Slashdot Mirror


10 Percent of Harvard's Popular 'Introduction To Computer Science' Class Accused of Cheating (thecrimson.com)

theodp writes: The Harvard Crimson reports that more than 60 of the 636 students enrolled in last fall's CS50: "Introduction to Computer Science I" course appeared before the College's Honor Council in a wave of academic dishonesty cases that has stretched the Council to its limits over the past few months. Former students and course staff, though, said course policy was unclear about what constituted cheating, creating the potential for unintentional violations. Consistently, one of the most popular courses at Harvard, CS50 is known for an unconventional atmosphere, complete with flashy promotional videos and corporate-sponsored events.

131 comments

  1. And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ....being unclear what the definition of be word "is" is.... ....being unaware that running a private email server for govt business is wrong... ....being unable to recall basic information about their activities when subpoenaed... ....thinking that finding a way to bypass the clear interest of congress is a neat idea...

    1. Re:And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save some ellipses for everyone else.

    2. Re:And their future holds... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2

      Well, yes? Institutes like this are places than where the wealthy launder privilege into credentials. Anyone who thinks otherwise has bought into the propaganda. Get a good look at your elected representatives; in a few decades we'll be arguing over which one cheated the least.

    3. Re:And their future holds... by ToTheStars · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry... Ellipses are a...renewable resource...

    4. Re: And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      No.

    5. Re:And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry...

      Ellipses are a...renewable resource...

      I couldn't help but read that in William Shatner's voice.

    6. Re:And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, 10% are a little computer savvy, while the other 90% are useless dweebs?

    7. Re:And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It's punctuation Jim, but not as we know it...

    8. Re: And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh you talk pretty.

    9. Re: And their future holds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know. Nothing has changed. And wouldn't we need to look at the next representatives 10 years from now, implying these graduates are the new elected officials. Lol. It sounds like what you wrote makes sense but it absolutely does not.

      Maybe we should remember this post for 10 years and see that we discuss which of these graduates as elected officials cheats the least.

      But they will learn how to cheat and lie much better by the time they graduate. Like Pocahontas.

  2. well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    learning how to cheat was just part of the curriculum.

    1. Re:well.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      It's CS, not an MBA.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:well.. by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      But that social network movie tho

    3. Re:well.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yebbut that was fiction like.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information wants to be free. I do not see a problem. If everyone has access to all information, the concept of cheating does not exist.

    5. Re:well.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      It's CS, not an MBA.

      I work in CS, and I grab code from Stackoverflow everyday and copy-paste it into my own work. I also regularly get other people's code from our internal git repository as well as Github. I very rarely write anything 100% in my own. I get paid for getting stuff done, not for originality.

      When I was in college, I worked on projects with classmates, and we shared code and ideas all the time. There was no auto-cheat-detectors back then, but I wonder if today that is considered "cheating". We certainly didn't see it that way. We collaborated to learn from each other, not to avoid learning.

    6. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college, I worked on projects with classmates, and we shared code and ideas all the time. There was no auto-cheat-detectors back then, but I wonder if today that is considered "cheating". We certainly didn't see it that way. We collaborated to learn from each other, not to avoid learning.

      A lot of the professors I had in college, and similar for ones I worked with later, have an explicit policy that you are allowed to work with other students on homework, but must write up your own answer to show some evidence that you're not simply copying the answer from someone. It is pretty obvious a students has some understanding of the problem and solution when they have differing numbers of steps in a proof due to different amounts of detail in places or abbreviations in others. Even when the math is the same, they get the benefit of the doubt when wording varies for explanations, as people lazy/desperate enough to cheat without at least attempting the problem on their own will copy an answer verbatim.

      However, I did have one math professor who blew a gasket when he got student's submissions for one assignment, in a small class where we all worked together on a very difficult question. The answers were far from verbatim copies of the same proof, but we all made the same minor mistake, and he said it was cheating to work together on homework. Eventually the dean got involved, and he told the prof that the point of attending a university is not just lectures with graded assessments, but to have an environment that makes learning more efficient, including working with peers. The dean said the prof could make assignments solo work only by explicitly saying so (that university had a lot exams in take home formats) but heavily discouraged it for weekly assignments. Surprisingly, the professor didn't just forbid group work, but instead had the students take turns defending or presenting parts of their answers in class. This worked well for everyone, as the prof could easily be satisfied that the students understood what they were doing, and the students got a lot more interactive help and learning instead of just sitting in an old fashioned lecture.

    7. Re: well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no, it's not CS. If you're taking a CS Major or Minor this class doesn't count for anything.
      The first actual CS course will be 100 or higher. This is just there so the Women's Studies majors and Football players can grab an easy Science and Technology credit.
      And they still have to cheat to pass a class where being able to press the power button gets you an A.

    8. Re: well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they still have to cheat to pass a class where being able to press the power button gets you an A.

      The course requires you to program in C, JavaScript and PHP, while also learning SQL. That is a lot more than an easy elective A for most non-STEM people.

    9. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employers will expect you to be able to read up technical specifications and write original code when needed, but at the same time, expect you to immediately ask for help if something isn't working as expected.

    10. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I search for copyright violations during code reviews at my work and one of the things I check is stackoverflow. And unfortunately people have been removed from projects because I had to report them. There are auto-cheat detectors as well, that mainly hunts for GPL code. (Black Duck is one example)

      If I pay you to do a job, then you better fucking do it yourself. If I wanted copy pasta I would have hired someone way cheaper than an engineer to do that.

    11. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college, I worked on projects with classmates, and we shared code and ideas all the time. There was no auto-cheat-detectors back then, but I wonder if today that is considered "cheating". We certainly didn't see it that way. We collaborated to learn from each other, not to avoid learning.

      If the instructor was not informed beforehand and did not approve of the code sharing, it likely would get you a lecture from the instructor and possibly much worse outcome if the instructor sent the formal complaint to the academic dean.

    12. Re: well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about his school - ITT. Hehe

    13. Re: well.. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Don't be obtuse; it's Harvard.

    14. Re:well.. by Jerry · · Score: 2

      @ShanghaiBill
      Exactly.
      Show me someone who has written an original sorting algorithm in the last 20 years, or made non-trivial improvements on a double linked btree list.

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  3. What do you mean expelled? by paiute · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Come on. Zuckerberg copied - and he's a billionaire now.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:What do you mean expelled? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      . . . but if 10% got caught at cheating, that implies that 90% got away with cheating!

      So it's still a great achievement, after all!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  4. Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course they won't though, Harvard is already trying to redefine cheating to sweep this under the rug.

    This begs the question, if people there need to cheat at an intro computer class, how many of them are cheating for actually difficult classes? 20%? 50%?

    If Harvard wants to truly save face, they'll expel these losers. But they won't.

    1. Re:Expel them all by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      This begs the question ...

      No, it raises the question. Begging the question means something completely different. If you went to Harvard, you would know this.

      ... if people there need to cheat at an intro computer class, how many of them are cheating for actually difficult classes?

      When I was a student, I made money coding assignments for other students. Cheating is way more common in intro courses. By the time students reach upper levels, they either know how to do the work, or they have already switched to an easier major.

    2. Re:Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read that AC's post "This begs the question ...", I literally shit my pants.

    3. Re:Expel them all by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the phrase "beg the question" is a very poor transliteration of the latin original, and is not intuitive of its own meaning at all.

      I say we redefine "beg the question" to mean what it seems to mean, and use a more appropriate term for what is essentially circular reasoning.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Expel them all by darthsilun · · Score: 2

      This begs the question ...

      No, it raises the question. Begging the question means something completely different. If you went to Harvard, you would know this.

      I bet you're one of those people who complain every time someone uses "decimate" to mean something other than kill one in ten.

    5. Re: Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CS50 is not an intro course, it's an elective for non CS majors. Any actual class starts at 100 or higher, less than 100 means it's either a bonehead course or just there for other majors to get an easy elective credit.

    6. Re:Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read that AC's post "This begs the question ...", I literally shit my pants.

      Woah, you have pants? I'm so jealous.

    7. Re:Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "to mean what it seems to mean" - The Humpty Dumpty principle : "A word means exactly what I want it to mean. No more and no less".

    8. Re:Expel them all by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No it begs the question. Your own link describes the modern usage at the bottom. Get with the times.I mean I know some people are old fashioned, but seriously man get with the times. That was 400 years ago.

    9. Re:Expel them all by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No, it raises the question.

      For all intensive purposes, it now means begging the question, irregardless of what it used to be. I could care less, and you should too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Expel them all by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Unironically kys cuck flambeaux doink ummmm help I'm running out of stuff the yung peeps say. Don't be a square, hipster!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could care less

      So you do care, after all?

    12. Re:Expel them all by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I care about the massive whooshing sound.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Expel them all by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I'm going to need some intensive care after reading that post. :)

    14. Re: Expel them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooooooosh whooosh whooooosh

  5. Collaboration by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see how a course that encourages collaboration between peers can then turn them in for cheating when they come up with the same answer. You can't collaborate without often coming to the same result using the same methods.

    While coding, in its purest form, is a creative act the same is not so of most 'coding 101' problems. They are often rote mechanical pieces, intended to highlight a particular software concept, with little room for creativity (especially if, like any sane student, you're trying for the simplest and shortest solution).

    Unless they are monitoring the entire typing history for students, and they only brought students up on charges where their submission was created with a single keystroke (Ctrl+V), I don't see how this is a fair system.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collaboration: "Hey, how do I exit this for loop again, break or continue"?

      Not collaboration: "Hey, send me the code when you're done, thanks."

      If you think 60 people all sat around a computer together and put in equal work, you're a fucking moron.

    2. Re:Collaboration by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a course that encourages collaboration between peers can then turn them in for cheating when they come up with the same answer.

      My Introduction to Java class had a similar situation. Each student was to write their own code file after collaborating with each other. A pair of students turned in identical code files but one file used the x variable and the other file used the y variable. That got a good laugh out of the class. The students got warnings after class to submit their own code files in future assignments.

    3. Re:Collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While coding, in its purest form, is a creative act the same is not so of most 'coding 101' problems. They are often rote mechanical pieces, intended to highlight a particular software concept, with little room for creativity (especially if, like any sane student, you're trying for the simplest and shortest solution).

      Exactly. Unless you're fucking up, the logic will be the same.

      And unless the college is fucking up, chances are, the variable names will be the same in both name and style. (If you're alternating caps randomly like a twelve year old girl, you are bad at programming. If you're naming an incremental counter lolCounter instead of i, you are bad at programming.)

      Meh, maybe they're parsing comments. Even then, I hope somebody's teaching these kids how to write concise comments instead of novels.

    4. Re:Collaboration by Calydor · · Score: 0

      If you think the 60 people were all in the same work group, you are the fucking moron. Article doesn't say if these are twenty groups of three people each.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Collaboration by StoutFiles · · Score: 0

      Article says they're more than 60 people, and the guy you responded too never said he/she thought 60 people all worked together. Your confusion about both of these facts confirms you're the fucking moron of this thread. Also, a post signature? Oh grandpa, you're adorable.

    6. Re:Collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, back off of lolcounter that is a good one

    7. Re:Collaboration by RedMage · · Score: 2

      There is a definite conflict between what the course encouraged and what the Harvard academic policy discourages when it comes to collaborative classwork. I ran into it headfirst at the last time a Harvard cheating scandal happened - and I was in THAT class, so had firsthand knowledge. I know people in CS50, so have some real knowledge here too - it will be interesting how/if it is resolved. The panel that does the academic honesty reviews is not something you want to face - it has some real bite, and students do get expelled.
       

      --
      }#q NO CARRIER
    8. Re:Collaboration by dwpro · · Score: 1

      This is an into to CS course, so these people aren't experts. As such, you'd expect a wide variety of solutions to come up with the same answer. There are many ways to skin the programming cat anyway (especially given some of the attempts will be wrong).

      Also, if you multiple counters, what do you use? j? i2? Why not just name the counter what it represents to begin with so I don't have to look as hard to figure out what you screwed up when you confused your counters.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    9. Re:Collaboration by HiThere · · Score: 2

      FWIW I tend to name my counters i, j, k. After that I start to get creative. I trace that naming pattern back to Fortran IV, where that was the recommended pattern, and names could only be six letters long, but it's become a tradition in multiple languages since then. I could find examples in C and Java texts.

      The thing is, for a short piece of code a long name is a waste of time. If something's less than around 20 lines long, a fancy name is a waste unless it's doing something external to those 20 lines. (Yay! Block Structures!).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Collaboration by dwye · · Score: 2

      When I took CS101 the rule was that you could NOT use i, j, k, etc as index variable names. I therefore used indx, jndx, kndx, etc. Got past the graders.

      If it is something like input line number, that is different, but for most problems it is just an arbitrary subarray index, and more work naming it than using it.

  6. In my day by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consistently, one of the most popular courses at Harvard

    In my day you wouldn't get into Harvard if you used commas like that.

    Not even to look around.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:In my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah apparently at Harvard they don't even end sentences in prepositions.

    2. Re:In my day by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's the kind of thing up with which I will not put.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:In my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lolly pop!

    4. Re:In my day by epine · · Score: 2

      Your day must have been a good while back.

      Consistently, one of the most popular courses at Harvard, CS50 is known for an unconventional atmosphere,

      Should be:

      Consistently, one of the most popular courses at Harvard, CS50, is known for an unconventional atmosphere,

      The comma after "consistently" is less obvious.

      Steven Pinker — 1994

      It is simply not true that an English adverb must indicate the manner in which the actor performs the action.

      Adverbs come in two kinds: "verb phrase" adverbs such as "carefully," which do refer to the actor, and "sentence" adverbs such as "frankly," which indicate the attitude of the speaker toward the content of the sentence.

      Other examples of sentence adverbs are "accordingly," "basically," "confidentially," "happily," "mercifully," "roughly," "supposedly" and "understandably." Many (such as "happily") come from verb phrase adverbs, and they are virtually never ambiguous in context.

      The use of "hopefully" as a sentence adverb, which has been around for at least sixty years, is a perfectly sensible example.

      Perhaps the author of this story item regards it as consistent that a popular course among Harvard undergraduates is known for having an unconventional atmosphere.

      No?

      Okay, I admit defeat.

    5. Re:In my day by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps he thinks Consistently is it's^H its name.

      David, one of the fattest gits to waddle the streets of Wigan, ...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:In my day by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      What would Harvard know. They don't even have a comma named after them.

      Sincerely,
      Oxford.

  7. I took the class online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cheating is partly an indication of just how popular that course has become. (15% of the entire campus was taking the class by 2014, and it became so popular that they actually started teaching the same class at Yale.)

    But I just want to say that I took it online back in 2015, and it really is a good class. They start with C, then move on to PHP, SQL, and JavaScript -- all in 10 weeks. I learned a lot, and it gave me a lot of confidence that I could actually learn any language. The course's slogan is "challenging, but definitely doable," and I think that challenge is what makes it such a good course.

    1. Re:I took the class online by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      You throw that 15% around like it was a big number.
      The entire undergrad enrollment at Harvard is about 6700[1]. If most of those who take CS50 take it in their freshman/first year, that 15% is only about 100 people in any given semester or term.
      I dare say you could take any intro CS course at a school like University of Michigan, or UC Berkeley, and sit in an auditorium filled with over 100 people. And that'd be for just one of several of those classes.

      And no, I'm not defending Harvard, or cheating.

      [1] http://www.harvard.edu/about-h...

    2. Re:I took the class online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15% of 6,700 is 1,005 not 100.

    3. Re:I took the class online by lucm · · Score: 1

      The cheating is partly an indication of just how popular that course has become.

      So what you're implying is that "normal people" cheat more than CS students?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:I took the class online by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, argue with actual math.

      Wait. I support that.

      NVM.

    5. Re: I took the class online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6700 for all four years of undergrad.
      Then, there are two semesters per year.
      Then, 15% takes the course during their Freshman year.
      So, one class during one semester of Freshman year would be... how many students?
      (hint: like the OP said, a bit over 100)

    6. Re:I took the class online by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So what you're implying is that "normal people" cheat more than CS students?

      People are more likely to cheat if they take a course they are not prepared for, and get in over their head. So, yes, in a CS course non-CS people are more likely to cheat. Likewise, in an English course, CS students are more likely to cheat than English majors.

    7. Re: I took the class online by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      Thank you. At least someone has a brain.

    8. Re:I took the class online by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      This is why you didn't go to Harvard
      (Neither did I, but I can do math.)

    9. Re:I took the class online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15% is a large number for a CS course. You're also right that a 100 person course is not large, but that is an unrelated tangent. The whole point was not that the classroom had a large number of people in it, but that a large portion of the student body took this course.

      I went to a technical university that required calculus and physics for all majors, so these courses were taken by 100% of the student body, which is pretty significant regardless of there being physics and calculus courses at state universities that dwarf the entire said student body.

  8. DIY by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I taught myself to program on a Commodore VIC-20 reading magazines. No internet. No BBSes. I slept through my CS101 class and aced it.

    In this day and age, if you need to cheat in Intro to CS, you probably shouldn't be in CS.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:DIY by crgrace · · Score: 1

      Same here, I learned LOGO on a VIC-20 as my introduction to computers, then aced Pascal (ECS30) when I got to college.

      It's a different time, that's for sure. Back when we were in college most students didn't know how to program when they started, that's why I was (and you were too) able to crush the first classes. Now the level of competition is much, much higher.

    2. Re:DIY by timholman · · Score: 2

      In this day and age, if you need to cheat in Intro to CS, you probably shouldn't be in CS.

      You don't understand the mentality. CS graduates are getting six figure offers right out of school. The students majoring in CS want that money. It doesn't matter if they hate CS. It doesn't matter if they have no talent for programming. It doesn't matter if they've flunked the "Intro to Programming" course three times in a row. It doesn't matter if they get caught cheating.

      All that matters is that starting salary, and no matter what, they're going to get that CS degree. Employers need to brace themselves, because they're going to be seeing a great many CS graduates coming out of prestigious colleges over the next few years who won't be able to program "Hello World" if their lives depended on it.

    3. Re:DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This all happened before.

      In 1997/98 during full internet bubble swing..all our "Intro to CS" courses ballooned from 30 person classes to huge halls with 300+ students, like you would normally see with any 100 level course that was required for every major in the university.

      In the labs, people couldn't code the 5 minute pop quiz on how to create a main() in Java that could parse three command arguments without looking in their books.

      I was an older student, having already been working as a programmer for a good while but returning to get academic credentials.

      I could spot the people who wouldn't be working in software engineering in 3 years a mile away, let alone the ones who wouldn't even be in comp sci II next semester. It was the same nonsense where you had everyone trying to make 100k out of college because of nonsense silicon valley hype.

    4. Re:DIY by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Itro to computer science is default for nearly every single course in university, cheating is the norm and to be expected (arts students who see computer as magic box). To be fair it is a first year course and every one who has actually been to university and experienced the difference between parking in the first half of the school year and in the second half of the school year, should appreciate why. A lot of those absent in the second half are often caught cheating in the first half, not expelled simply leave when they can not handle the work.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:DIY by RedMage · · Score: 1

      Yeah me too - but I know someone in this class, and I've looked over the material. It's the real deal here, no way someone with no CS background could pass this course from a cold start. I'm not surprised at cheating here, but there are some facts that haven't come out here (disclaimer, I'm a Harvard CS grad). First of all there's a grey area in this class on what was allowed - collaboration was encouraged but each student had to submit their own work. This leads to some ambiguity. Also the Harvard academic honesty policy is very discouraging of collaborative works - it's very each to cross the line. Outright blatant cheating does occur, and Harvard is very strict and DOES expel students over it (contrary to another comment here.) Here it's not quite so cut-and-dry I think.
      C

      --
      }#q NO CARRIER
    6. Re:DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's repulsive to me is that I actually enjoy CS, and while I've been admitted to both UCLA (to study Mathematics), and UCSD (to study Computer Science), I'm choosing UCLA for Math simply because I don't want to spend 2 years fighting for chairs in lecture halls with the people who are chasing the 6 figure salaries.

      I expect that once the former group of students graduates into the job market, the demand for Math majors is going to go up while the CS degree will need to be supplemented by either an impressive Hackerrank score/github profile, a M.S. or PhD, or a really impressive whiteboard interview.

    7. Re:DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I learned LOGO on a VIC-20 as my introduction to computers, then aced Pascal (ECS30) when I got to college.

      It's a different time, that's for sure. Back when we were in college most students didn't know how to program when they started, that's why I was (and you were too) able to crush the first classes. Now the level of competition is much, much higher.

      People building websites and mobile applications using pointy-clicky websites does not make them programmers. Developing an Asterioid-type game written in JavaScript would at least be a step closer to the days when we learned to programme, teaching ourselves for the most part, on Commodore, Apple, and Timex personal computers before MS-DOS/PC-DOS. If not for my Commodore VIC-20, bought with money earned delivering a daily newspaper, I wonder whether I would have developed any interest in computer programming at all.

    8. Re:DIY by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      Good choice! Always get math degrees, undergrad and grad. It's much harder to get a top-notch math education outside of school. You're going to have to get permission from the profs to take CS classes in the engineering school at UCLA, but do it too!

    9. Re:DIY by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      My first computer was a TI 99/4A my parents got me for Christmas in 1983. I was one of three or four self-taught programmers my first year of college, the other couple hundred had heard it would be a good career. Many of them had never touched a computer before and were not particularly interested in learning about them beyond what it would take to get a piece of paper. Some of them simply had no aptitude for it whatsoever. I don't know how much cheating was going on, but I know at least one guy got caught at it. Presumably the others were better about getting caught. So yeah, that's been going on for a while, and I agree that if they need to cheat, they shouldn't be in CS. But that won't stop them.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:DIY by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      This isn't something new. I remember talking with a guy that was graduating that year with a degree in CS from Ga Tech back in the early 80s. The guy said he hated programming and didn't know what he was going to do after graduation. Blew my mind that someone would dislike a subject and go through years of study to get a degree in that subject and then possibly decades of work in that area.

  9. The other 90% didn't have to cheat by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They are guaranteed an A no matter what they do.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:The other 90% didn't have to cheat by RedMage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, don't speak about what you know nothing of. This class is actually pretty tough - not a walk in the park by any means, and someone without some CS knowledge would struggle. I have a Harvard CS degree, and it's not a joke, and don't even get me going on how hard the courses are, because they are very rigorous. I earned my degree, and I think everyone who makes it out of that program has too.
      C

      --
      }#q NO CARRIER
    2. Re:The other 90% didn't have to cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't speak about what you know nothing of. This class is actually pretty tough - not a walk in the park by any means, and someone without some CS knowledge would struggle. I have a Harvard CS degree, and it's not a joke, and don't even get me going on how hard the courses are, because they are very rigorous. I earned my degree, and I think everyone who makes it out of that program has too.
      C

      If the students have to struggle, perhaps it is an indication that the instructor is not teaching very well. There are always a few who will fail as it should be each semester. However, in my opinion, an instructor capable of teaching should enable 99% of the students to pass if only barely. A truly competent instructor should teach such that 80-90% of the students can pass with at least a 'B' in the course; the students actually learned and were inspired to learn by the instructor.

    3. Re:The other 90% didn't have to cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't speak about what you know nothing of. This class is actually pretty tough - not a walk in the park by any means, and someone without some CS knowledge would struggle. I have a Harvard CS degree, and it's not a joke, and don't even get me going on how hard the courses are, because they are very rigorous. I earned my degree, and I think everyone who makes it out of that program has too.
      C

      Very fair point. I think part of grade inflation is that a degree like a modern C.S. degree is hard. Getting through at all is worth at least Bs. Many people drop out, meaning just adjusting the curve every time that happens and pretty soon you're failing adequate students (like jack welsh trying to cut 10% of a company after the bloat is gone, just cutting muscle at that point).

    4. Re: The other 90% didn't have to cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the students don't struggle, then the class is probably too easy and could be covering more material. The difference between a good and bad instructor isn't whether the class is easy, but how much they maximize what you learn. Some of the best course and instructors I've had were extremely difficult, but we covered a lot of material and the professors made sure you learned it thoroughly.

    5. Re: The other 90% didn't have to cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad instructors teach knowledge, good instructors teach you how to think. If you're struggling to understand the concepts, you probably shouldn't be doing it.

      Recent psychology is showing that a person's ability to reason is inversely related to their knowledge, beyond a certain amount of knowledge, which is typically reached in their late 20s. If you're working in an industry that requires strong reasoning skills, hording knowledge is setting yourself up to fail. People who learn how to quickly forget new knowledge have much better reasoning skills in later life and much lower risk of mental illnesses. Too much of a good thing can be bad.

      What you want is enough reasoning skills to be able to teach yourself just long enough to accomplish what you need, then quickly forget. Part of this is attributed to an issue that when you have too much knowledge, memories are constantly being triggered, which consumes your working memory. Remembering stuff eats lots of working memory. In order to learn, you need to have free working memory. Too much knowledge makes it difficult to nearly impossible to learn.

      When people purposely forget, they allow themselves to continuously learn, even relearning what they may have forgotten. But by constantly learning, they exercise their ability to learn, allowing them to quickly learn new ideas. While people with lots of knowledge get worse at learning.

  10. What's the news here? by chrism238 · · Score: 1

    What's the news here - that only 10% cheated, or that they were accused of it?

    1. Re:What's the news here? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      They got caught for leaving behind naughty bits. No excuse for sloppy work.

    2. Re:What's the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't get this either. 10% cheating seems _low_ to me for any university. 30% is typical.
      I've seen administration turn a blind eye all the time in the face of proof, because they want tuition money and don't give a fuck about anything else.
      They occasionally publicly announce that they have a zero tolerance policy for cheaters or some such bullshit, but it's just to appease people like certification bodies and is nonsense.

  11. That is, sadly, pretty low by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Informative

    In going through Engineering Calculus and Engineering Physics, it became fairly obvious that some of the students were collaborating in team homework sessions, and labs, borrowing text and illustrations from each other. Apparently this is considered normal nowadays.

    I'm not saying that working in a group and "hey I'm stuck on 5, this is what I get, what did I do wrong" kind of thing, but more of a "from our twenty people, two each work on 1,11,21,31 and so on, and if we agree, pool the answers and randomize the text you write it down with" and a "here are the six sections of the lab, you four redo this graphic differently for each team and write down this text in a different order" kind of thing.

    Sad.

    The easy way to tell was many of them would skip the class sections.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:That is, sadly, pretty low by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      They check homework in college classes?

      When I was in college, homework was not checked. If you didn't do it, you would fail the exams and everybody knew it.

      Checking homework is high school, sophomore and younger.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:That is, sadly, pretty low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20+ years ago most of my college classes had homework as 10-25% of the grade.
      I usually had the highest test average in the class, but I gave up a ton of GPA by not turning in homework assignments.

      p.s. You sound like one of the 4.0 guys that was pissed at me for wrecking the curve, since that forced you to have to study longer while I just played games. :-)

    3. Re:That is, sadly, pretty low by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      They check homework in college classes?

      Came here to say that too. I often collaborated on the work. We sort of naturally split off into groups of 3 or 4. Sometimes spend hours with heated arguments back and forth. Then of course on those problems (i.e. the difficult ones) we'd turn up to the tutorials with identical working. Those questions would then usually get the majority of the attention, because what's the point in going over the ones everyone found easy?

      The sessions made absolutely zero contribution to your final mark. About the only reason for cheating is if one had a bit of a, ahem, "busy" week and wanted to save face. Having been on the other side of the table, it's usually easy to spot, especially as students with hangovers always have a certain look. If it started to happen often it would be cause for concern, but it never did for me.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:That is, sadly, pretty low by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sorry you went to such a shitty school. Most colleges treat students like adults.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:That is, sadly, pretty low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly you're right. In my days as a TA, I personally witnessed 25% in one class.

  12. Only 10% cheating is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If only 10% were caught cheating, that's actually pretty damn good by international standards.

    Upwards of 90% of H-1B's from India either outright purchased their diploma, or cheated to pass.

    Source: My H-1B co-worker who was very honest in explaining to me why there are so many Indian programmers. He's pissed off because he actually worked for his diploma.

  13. Re:What else would you expect by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Trump went to Harvard?

  14. Re:What else would you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the college where the President who signed the worst healthcare law in the history of the United States, which we're still cleaning up after?

    From the college where what?

    Are you another one of those loopy conservatards foaming at the mouth so much that you can't think straight to finish your sentences?

    Are you trying to say where Obama went to get his law degree? Do we need to bring up Twitler and Wharton? I think we do. I think I just did.

    After 50+ years of promises from both Republicans and Democrats to "fix" health care for everyone, and getting nothing in all that time. one could be tempted to say it's the only healthcare law in the history of the United States. I dunno about good or bad, but for 20M people it's more than many of them had to choose from a few years ago. I dare say for most of them, it's good – or better than nothing.

    You and your Conservatard friends at Breitbart and Infowars, and Kellyann Clownway's School of Alternative Facts are welcome to clean up this so-called "mess". Just make sure you keep all the promises* your guy Twitler made. He made them, you love him, they gotta be good, amirite? Anything less would be the work of a loser. And hey, BTW, today he praised Australia's PM for having better a healthcare system than we do. I thought you'd like to know. No doubt your guy thinks we should copy them. You don't think he wants us to be second place (((losers))) behind (((Australia))) do you?

    Oh. And fix it without giving the 1% even more tax cuts in the process, okay?

    * http://www.politico.com/story/...
    1) insurance for everyone
    2) no cuts to medicaid
    3) no one loses coverage
    4) a lot less expensive for everyone
    5) get rid of artificial lines
    6) everyone gets taken care of

  15. "Unclear" policy? by timholman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... course policy was unclear about what constituted cheating ...

    I've heard that argument before. The student caught copying someone else's work first denies, then pleads, then goes into "lawyer" mode, trying to argue that what he or she did wasn't really cheating because the syllabus was either badly worded, or didn't specifically say not to do it.

    I recently had a situation where a student taking a lab course did not attend several labs, and then tried to turn in lab reports and have the TA grade them. This student was shocked ... shocked ... when told that this was academic misconduct. After all, the syllabus said that data could be shared between lab partners, and the person he got the data from was his partner from one of the few labs he did attend. Furthermore, he argued that the syllabus did not specifically say that lab reports would not be accepted for labs that the student did not attend. I kid you not.

    Anyone smart enough to get into Harvard knows exactly when the line between collaboration and plagiarism is being crossed. Unfortunately, some of them also have learned that denial, pleading, "lawyering", and then threats of legal action by their parents are quite often sufficient to avoid the consequences of their actions.

    1. Re:"Unclear" policy? by Bangback · · Score: 2

      Computer programming is a little different....

      CS50 has always been fast and loose. I can remember showing weaker students my code and letting them copy a few lines or the answers to early problems. And vice versa. Many times TAs were in the labs shoulder to shoulder with us helping us with problem sets. Collaboration was always encouraged as long as you came up with some original ideas for harder problems and you weren't blatantly ripping off other people. Intro to CS is designed to get to pretty challenging material quick. You can't get to the fun stuff if everyone has to solve every easy and medium problem from scratch. Back in the dot-com days, passing CS50/51 with a good grade was sufficient to get a professional programming job, regardless of major. Those who didn't go to Harvard may not realize that getting easy problems 100% right is not culturally respected in the sciences there -- most exams are solely problems that range from hard to extremely hard and a 50 or 60 is an A-.

      Plagiarism is a tough standard to apply to computer science at the intro level, similar to plagiarism in algebra. I completely understand and respect the Be Reasonable concept -- that's how we rolled (I took CS50 at roughly the same time as the current professor). I saw stuff that went over the line as well (printouts fished out of bins or stolen from printers, cut and paste specials) I like the Be Reasonable concept, but it has clearly reached its limit if this many students are getting dragged into investigations.

    2. Re:"Unclear" policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are wrong.

      the kid is right.

      seriously.

    3. Re:"Unclear" policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plagiarism is a tough standard to apply to computer science at the intro level, similar to plagiarism in algebra. I completely understand and respect the Be Reasonable concept -- that's how we rolled (I took CS50 at roughly the same time as the current professor). I saw stuff that went over the line as well (printouts fished out of bins or stolen from printers, cut and paste specials)

      I like the Be Reasonable concept, but it has clearly reached its limit if this many students are getting dragged into investigations.

      Well, the problem is that in current times you could use any resource like stack overflow to satisfy your cheating needs. Those who simple copy off of others are dregs that shouldn't be allowed to graduate. If you can't pass CS50 with the aid of stack overflow, then you can't program well. It does not matter that the Harvard course is poor; stack overflow should make up for that if the student is a bright learner ;-p

    4. Re:"Unclear" policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG say it's not so.

      You mean some guy *gasp* missed a lab and had his partner collect the data?
      You mean just like at least 90% of all students do at least once?
      Wow. You should be a hard-ass and make an example of him.

    5. Re: "Unclear" policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. CS50 is for pansies who don't have any business coding.
      I smoked a fat joint 10 minutes before the final, completed it in 20 minutes, and got a perfect score. I was hitting a bong in my dorm room while most of the class was barely halfway done.

    6. Re:"Unclear" policy? by rknop · · Score: 2

      I've heard that argument before. The student caught copying someone else's work first denies, then pleads, then goes into "lawyer" mode, trying to argue that what he or she did wasn't really cheating because the syllabus was either badly worded, or didn't specifically say not to do it.

      "Nowhere in your syllabus did it say we couldn't make up our data."

      Actual quote from a student in my astronomy lab class, after he got past the denial (I didn't cheat!) and pleading (I took some of the data, I thought it was OK to use our knowledge to fill in the other points) stages.

      (The attempt to kiss ass with the "use our knowledge" was pathetic. Mostly because the cheating was done so poorly that it was clear that he didn't have any actual knowledge.)

    7. Re:"Unclear" policy? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      The dirty little secret is that Universities want a lot of students to pass. Thus a lot of cheating is ignored, and the point where someone is going too far is not consistent.
      I had a lot of students cheat in my lab classes some years back but was told to put up with it since it had been changed to be only a tiny fraction of the assessment.

    8. Re:"Unclear" policy? by timholman · · Score: 2

      "Nowhere in your syllabus did it say we couldn't make up our data."

      That is one I have yet to see, but thanks to your anecdote, I am going to add this to the list of unacceptable actions in my lab syllabus.

      Before this semester, it never occurred to me that I would need to put "Turning in a lab report for a lab you did not attend will result in an automatic grade of zero" into my syllabus, either.

    9. Re: "Unclear" policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, sure boss.

  16. If you can't code, you're a sitting duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we letting the retarded Cuckerbergs of the world run the show? We can code helixes around them. Any fool can take down Silicon Valley but nobody tries.

  17. Re: What else would you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was unemployed 4 months last year. Could not afford healthcare. This tax season thank to Obama, I have to pay a 2k penalty because I was uninsured pastvthe threshold.

    This is good? Penalize me because I can't afford it?

    Yeah, I had company PPO blue cross always at 600 a month.

    Have you seen the shit they offer from the state or fed? I can't see my doctors with it.

    I didn't care before and thought it was a great idea. Because I didn't use it. I did not know.

    I know now. That faster we dispose of penalties for the poor and shot plans, the better.

      I know for a fact all of you that I think Obama care is good has absolutely never had to rely on it and has never been in the situation where you needed to make the decision or get stuck with a very expensive penalty when you need money the most

      All very naÃve I can only hope you get put in that situation so you can finally learned like I did

  18. So did Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did Gates
    So did Allen
    So did Ballmer
    etc.

    Great artists steal (just not from me).

  19. Ah, Harvard! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The school where larval politicians go to pupate.

  20. Not the first big cheating incident at Harvard by ToTheStars · · Score: 2

    This is also the august institution where, in 2012, nearly half of students taking 1310 "Introduction to Congress" (~125 students out of 279 in all) were investigated for cheating on the take-home final exam. (The jokes practically write themselves.) "Somewhat more than half" were forced to withdraw.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  21. 80% of CS Students Don't Get Caught Cheating by ranton · · Score: 1

    Considering how many students are actually cheating in college now a days, this goes to show Harvard mostly only admits students smart enough to not get caught.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  22. It's an intro class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an intro class that looks like it's marketed a fun class where you get to hang out with everyone and go to parties... 10% are the ones that have no real interest in the subject matter and are just there because they saw the youtube video of everyone dancing. How is this news? You'll see that in any intro class.

  23. Re: What else would you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only hope you get put in that situation so you can finally learned like I did

    What a nice guy you are.

    I've been down and out. One "friend" fucked me over for job during the 2001-2002 recession. Even so I didn't wish his dog would die, or that he'd get cancer, or shit like that. (Although I did stop having anything to do with him.)

    I bought insurance out of pocket. It wasn't required at the time. I had to dig deep, and it hurt. And I didn't get the subsidies like you can get now.

    AFAIK you could have had substantial subsidies. Maybe even free. But it's easier, I guess, to piss and moan about it and blame Obama.

    You conservatards are all about being rugged individualists, you don't need help, you don't want hand-outs. But when you fall on hard times we discover you haven't saved, you haven't planned or prepared, and then it's those damn libtards fault. Those guys who saved for a rainy day and wanted a safety net for everyone. Yeah, it's their fault, and you don't want to pay for someone else's safety net. Except you're the one up on the wire without a net.

    Yeah, karma is a bitch. A real mean bitch.

  24. you got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coding IS cheating.

    cheating time for the most part

  25. Not sure what might be the cheating about by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    After seeing the video with so many smiling faces basically doing cool-looking anything, I cannot even imagine how anyone could cheat. Some of the students didn't accept the terms of the cool site from where they downloaded the cool videos submitted to their assignments? Were some of the smiles in the evaluation provoked by beyond-acceptable amounts of alcohol/drugs? Or perhaps some of them cheated in the tough cool-and-serious-looking-while-holding-a-laptop part by taking forbidden yoga lessons? Poor students! Their daddies might reduce their monthly allowance by over $5000! They might even have to be in the university for another whole semester before the company they want hire them to do the "work" they feel like doing!

    Note that I am not anti- rich, spoiled, living-in-a-bubble, etc. people for as long as they accept themselves and don’t unfairly affect others. But what I saw in that video was too much! How can anyone think that all this is appealing and/or related to college-computer-anything at all?

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  26. Caught red handed in intro to CS for non-CS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, did not come up with that bubble sort on your own!

  27. Re:What else would you expect by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Harvard is for the plebs, Trump went to Wharton.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  28. What, no comparision to India? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few months back, Slashdot was united in their agreement that a similar incident of cheating that was exposed in some Indian school was confirmation that Indian education is of low value, Indian degrees meaningless, and Indian programmers lack basic understanding of CS fundamentals.

    Interesting to note that the arc of discussion in this case is completely different.

    What, we are not willing to consider the possibility that this indicates that a significant % of `US programmers' may lack an understanding of CS fundamentals, which may be the reason why US multinationals like H1Bs?

    1. Re:What, no comparision to India? by dwye · · Score: 1

      You must have responded too soon; by the time that I am replying, almost no one is taking the cheaters' side.

      Of course, going to Harvard for CS is like going to MIT for pre-law or French Lit.

      Finally, someone above claimed that CS50 at Harvard is only for non-programmers, and so has nothing to do with whether US programmers are better than H1B hires or not.

  29. Re: What else would you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Savings? This is exactly what I'm talking about. You know who has savings? Not the poor. Not the down and out. These are mutually exclusive.

    You say you don't wish it from one side of your mouth and talk shit from the other.

    You wrote exactly what I wrote, including blaming the other guy.

    Guess what. You have savings. You have a job. Or you would understand savings goes first during hard times. And no. There are income limits to all these subsidies you didn't list. I looked. There are tax breaks I didn't qualify for. Life changed that didn't qualify.

    I'm not some child like you. I had almost 200 grand cash savings for a house down payment. I had a car accident. Then 2 years later my neck got worse and worse. I was intermittently working as a contractor. I was going on unemployment or disability (I'm gonna try).

    This slowly drained my savings. After 4 years, I had to get a surgery. Being an intermittent contractor, the insurances coverage was spotty. But even before I didn't seem bad enough to get surgery. Even though I had terrible arm pain and throwing up from sitting at the computer programming just 3 hours.

    I know I'm your better. Ill tell my story you stupid child.

    That's how these things go. You don't wake up one morning without cash. These situations take time over years. You are so stupid.

    So the savings which you say I didn't have was gone. It lasted 6 years, supplementing for my lost work. No one will keep a part time programmer that is having health issues full time. Its the perfect storm.

    Yes, the tax penalty from Obama care was the least of the expenses. But it was a kick you while you are down regulation.

    People that can afford healthcare long term (this is long term in the adult world, not your short term fantasy scenario), will have it. Insurance as an insurance mechanism.

    But many many people can not afford it. And it is absolutely not free. That was the lie. If it was why are there fees. And why are there enforcement penalties.

    Obama care is a 'make everyone pay for medical coverage' regulation. So it looks like it it national healthcare. But its not.

    We could pass a law with the exact same rules for internet. Make people buy internet. Then we have national internet coverage.

    But it does not change anything. The people that can't afford it still can not. They are the people who have to pay the penalties. They are they people getting kids vied when they are down.

    And by the way, its so obvious you never looked into the networks of doctors. Even if I had paid, I could not see all my PPO network doctors.

    You are pretty stupid or a niave child. Or both. Its very clear.

    But thanks for your armchair analysis of my situation with no facts. I know I had much much more than you. If you were at that level, you would know not to talk simplistic trash of 'not prepared so you deserve it'. Silly child's mind.

  30. Everybody cheats at college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the opportunity, everyone will cheat. College is nothing more than a 4 year long beer party of booze and sex.

  31. Only 10 percent? by plopez · · Score: 1

    That's a pretty low number for an Ivy league school.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  32. Only 10% is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to the University of Buffalo in NY (and I will use their name) and as an Electrical Engineer *I* got in trouble when I filed an ethics complaint when graduate students were cheating on a midterm when the only TA walked out, and the department (who all knew it happened) didn't do anything. Worse than 10%, more than HALF of our class was cheating in a digital logic class, and of course they weren't punished. This wasn't like "build an adder using transistors" it was "find a logic circuit for this three-input 1-output truth table" after we learned techniques for it. Labs were the same thing, students copying labs or just lying about values. When the TAs find the students do copy labs, they just shrug it off and give them -10. Note: minus 10 could also happen because you failed to record a value from a q-point. Worst was last week someone flat-out submitted an assignment that wasn't theirs, AND DIDN'T EVEN HAVE THEIR NAME ON IT AND GOT A 92. Higher education is more corrupt than politics.

  33. Re:What else would you expect by Jerry · · Score: 1

    In the second week of my freshman year, 1960, I had an emergency appendicitis operation. The TOTAL bill (doctor, hospital and medicine) was $750.50, and BlueCross & BlueShield paid it all. The premiums were paid by the company where I had worked. The insurance companies competed to get the company's business.

    Then Nixon listened to Halderman about Kaiser's HMO's and got government into healthcare, to "save the people money". Costs have been rising and coverage falling every since. The insurance companies stopped competing and started colluding on price. They also stopped using standard mortality tables and began dividing the population up into groups based on age and previous health.

      Today an appendectomy will cost about $10K and the patient would pay anywhere between $100 copay to 50% of the total cost. Obamacare has pretty much set the premiums for a family of four living on $48K/yr at $1,200/mo or $14K/yr. The ACA amounts to a tax on employment. It penalizes those who work and funds those who become dependent on the government. Backdoor socialism, which was its main goal. The ACA will cost $2 TRILLION dollars over the next ten years. For that money we could have put a free clinic in every town in America.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  34. Re: What else would you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had a car accident, lost your awesome well paid job and had to blow away your savings because health care where you are is stupidly expensive. Then it's Obama's fault for trying to fix a broken system.

    You got what you deserved jackass.

  35. How many were non-white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just can't imagine...
    https://news.slashdot.org/story/17/04/20/128224/95-engineers-in-india-unfit-for-software-development-jobs-report
    http://www.gadgetsnow.com/jobs/95-engineers-in-india-unfit-for-software-development-jobs-claims-report/articleshow/58278224.cms