ISPs Could Take Down Large Parts of Bitcoin Ecosystem If They Wanted To (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A rogue ISP could take down large parts of the Bitcoin ecosystem, according to new research that will be presented in two weeks at the 38th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy in San Jose, USA. According to the researchers, there are two types of attack scenarios that could be leveraged via BGP hijacks to cripple the Bitcoin ecosystem: hijacking mining proceeds, causing double-spending errors, and delaying transactions. These two (partition and delay) attacks are possible because most of the entire Bitcoin ecosystem isn't as decentralized as most people think, and it still runs on a small number of ISPs. For example, 13 ISPs host 30% of the entire Bitcoin network, 39 ISPs host 50% of the whole Bitcoin mining power, and 3 ISPs handle 60% of all Bitcoin traffic. Currently, researchers found that around 100 Bitcoin nodes are the victims of BGP hijacks each month.

Comments

Slashdot ads again

[MrKaos]

When a new story comes up, I have to look at a floating div ad covering a third of the page until I reload it.

This is not one of the things that made /. interesting, when I have to look at a new ad everytime I edit a comment I am going to post.

I know I could use adblocker. I don't understand why /. can't find revenue mode so that this sort of thing isn't needed? I don't know if it is just me, however I am increasingly getting a sense lately that the conversations here are being directed away from the stuff that really matters for commercial purposes.

The reason why I think this is because /. appears as a meta-site, if that makes sense, where ideas are torn to pieces and put back together by the combined reality of the people that post here to promulgate across the net.

I'm not sure if the people who run /. understand this and just see a cash cow, or maybe they do, and they are refining control over the meta-conversation so that censorship's role here is to guide the conversations away from the subjects that need to be meta-examined. Apart from anonymous trolls abusing the responsibilities of free protected speech they get here and promoting self-censorship to avoid mod trolls, I get a real sense that the conversation here is loosing it's teeth that made it interesting. Lately https://soylentnews.org/ has been getting a lot better and lately has been ahead of /. on many subjects.

I'm not ungrateful for them financing and making sure /. is available, I am trying to ascertain if commercializing the /. community in an effort to sustain it is destroying it. I'd really like to get an idea of who is on the board and where the money is coming from.

Maybe this needs to be an ask /.