Slashdot Mirror


Opera Rethinks What a Browser In 2017 Should Do: Adds Quick Access To WhatsApp, Telegram, Messenger in v45 (theverge.com)

Opera says it has been working on a complete redesign of its desktop browser for a few months. Codenamed "Reborn", the new version of the browser focuses on one feature that it thinks many people desire in 2017: a way to stay connected with friends and be able to swiftly share things. The Verge adds: The latest addition is a messaging sidebar built directly into the browser interface. From the sidebar, users can log into their WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Telegram accounts, and chat with friends and family without ever leaving Opera itself. [...] But as with previous updates, there's a lingering feeling that this new feature is a little bit too superficial. While it is nice to have access to chat apps in the browser window, their inclusion makes for a crowded interface.

99 comments

  1. Goodbye Opera by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goodbye Opera, nice knowing you. I want a browser to browse websites, that's all

    1. Re:Goodbye Opera by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they're trying to differentiate themselves. I agree, not for me, I don't use any of those social media apps and have no desire to integrate my browser with them.

      The problem for them is, their market share is tiny compared to Chrome. They need to do something different to stand out or people will, for the most part, use Chrome.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it succeeds there, it's only a matter of time until it comes to all browsers.

      It is very easy to imagine people liking it a lot and expecting it in all browsers.

    3. Re:Goodbye Opera by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Integrating specific sites or apps into the browser is always a bad, short-sighted idea. They come and go so quickly, and even among your user base only a fraction will actually use those sites at all regularly.

      Anyway, doesn't Opera support extensions? Why not just use those, why bake in bloat that many people won't use?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a point though. I have 3 pinned tabs with web versions of messengers because of the sorry state of desktop clients. If they allowed adding any page like that it could be a killer feature for some people.

    5. Re:Goodbye Opera by uulbri · · Score: 0

      A non-open source browser ?? Why not using TrackMeOS aka winple then...

    6. Re:Goodbye Opera by samwichse · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not really Opera anymore anyway.

      They sold off Opera to another company that is just running a Chrome skin. It doesn't seem to offer much extra reason to use it over Chrome.

      Vivaldi is where the Opera people went. If you liked Opera 12.x, you'll like Vivialdi well enough. Still not quite back where the old Opera was, but getting close. And with a rendering engine that doesn't choke on 50% of modern websites.

    7. Re: Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your post is, technically, accurate, it is not really representative.

      Opera swapped their code base, quite a while ago. They use Chromium as the underlying code but it is hardly a reskin, as you out it.

      Opera was just recently sold to the company in China. That was sometime in the past six months. They did the code swap way back around v. 15.

    8. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like browser developers have no clue that the reason chrome quickly overtook the other browsers was essentially the same reason google overtook search engines:

      Simple
      Easy to Use
      Fast

      Cramming bullshit in the browser and not in extensions is a fail move. You make the browser start up just a little slower for everyone for that 1% who wants a chat app built into their browser.

    9. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing their browser to be a Chrome skin sure differentiated them.

    10. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Which is why all us die-hard Original Opera fans keep begging them to revisit their old codebase!

      The old Opera browser was lightyears ahead of its time; Nearly every small convenience feature in modern browsers was copied from Opera - Tabs, Paste and Go, Dragonfly to name three!

      And even now it is FAR more customizable than any other browser - You can customize the whole UI, the menus (even the context menus!), the shortcut keys, the mouse gestures and even program your own buttons with JavaScriptlets!

      The Chrome-based version doesn't even come close, and doesn't really do anything you can't do with Chrome, so there is no real reason to use new Opera over Chrome or one of the other million Chrome forks.

      Opera was the *only* browser for power users, whereas all modern browsers are so dumbed-down you have to do everything their way or no way. Remember the big announcement from that the backspace key would no longer go Back like that was something to be proud of? Well I didn't need to recompile the entire Opera codebase to get that 'feature' because I could change the key bindings my self!

      C'mon Opera! Bring back the old codebase! Or at least Opensource it!!

    11. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too.

    12. Re:Goodbye Opera by Jappus · · Score: 2

      If you want a fully customizable UI, you can always switch to Vivaldi.

      https://vivaldi.com/

      It is led by Opera's former CEO Jon von Tetzchner, has a UI that can be fully customized via JavaScript and can be extended via regular Chrome Extensions if that is not enough.

      And as for site-compatibility, since its rendering Engine is Chrome's Blink engine, you will not find much problems there.

      Reading your post makes me think you're exactly the user that they make their product for. :)

    13. Re:Goodbye Opera by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I never used that crap, I will drop Opera without regret. I am actually in love with Puffin browser for Android, too bad it is not yet available for Windows.

    14. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one advantage Opera has over Vivaldi, and the one reason I haven't uninstalled Opera yet, is the VPN.

    15. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice. They never cared about you in the first place, though.

    16. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.
      These should be extensions in their (basically dead) extension store.

      When Mozilla did the same shit by forcing in features nobody wanted, everyone left.
      Now look where they are.

    17. Re:Goodbye Opera by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Shit that is so 1990s. People don't browse like that any more.

      No I'm not being facetious. I'm just observing that someone under the age of 30 is very likely to have 2 tabs permanently open in their browser: WhatsApp and Facebook, for the exact reasons listed.

    18. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Nailed it !

    19. Re:Goodbye Opera by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      Glad to see all my fellow Presto Opera lovers are already here mentioning Vivaldi before I got a chance to :)

    20. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My employer provides IE, and doesn't allow chrome or firefox in their machines. Opera installs just fine, so I've been using it for about a year now. I found nothing but seamless usage. The change today was pretty dramatic, I'll be interested to see how the changes affect me over time.

    21. Re: Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open the source. Watch the market share soar.

    22. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vivaldi is not fully customisable. You can't even move around the buttons on the address bar, extension buttons or the Vivaldi main menu button. In order to remove the useless "home" button that nobody uses, I had to hack files.

      The download sidebar is crap too. It doesn't show the download speed. I had to install an extension ("Download Manager" if you're curious) to have proper download information.

      Another thing that is super obnoxious about Vivaldi is that there is no way to have the address bar do typing prediction using only the history and not bookmarks. It's either all on or all off.

    23. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use vivaldi and I have FB as a web panel for chatting. Until it is possible to share notes over all my devices (especially mobile and desktop) I'm also using "google keep" as a web panel :)

    24. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      used chrome engine, this is neglect RAM, and no support old true win xp

    25. Re:Goodbye Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for vrn "ip proxy" , used presto, a service for ip input proxy,present

  2. Sharing fake news faster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now. All those fake news articles being shared faster and the creators of those news stories getting richer!

  3. welp that's it then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God help us.

  4. Wasn't his purchased by a Chinese company by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do I feel like whomever purchase opera in China is looking to install data collectors (aka Trojans) much like MS has done with Windows 10.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Wasn't his purchased by a Chinese company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody wants in on the action. Google, Microsoft, Opera, every maker of consumer electronics, automobile makers, everybody.

      Only a few people care, so they succeed.

  5. Just like Firefox by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

    In other words, add a metric shitload of things that the user does not want anyway. Just like Firefox.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Just like Firefox by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that anymore. The more I look around the more I see browsers with lots of tabs, but two familiar ones on every screen: WhatsApp and Facebook. For no other reason than messages and it being a shitload easier to type on a computer than on a phone.

    2. Re:Just like Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, add a metric shitload of things that the user does not want anyway. Just like Firefox.

      Well, that's what you get with "free" software. The users don't want to pay for the software, so the software vendor makes money selling user data.

  6. Telegram? Great choice! by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    Telegram is the only popular messaging app, and it's pretty awesome. I highly recommend it. It's similar to Whatsapp, except it doesn't belong to Fuckerberg.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  7. Only apps can app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appy Appera knows that only apps can app apps, so they apped apps with their appy app app while apping other apps!

    Apps!

  8. What a browser should do in 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Two DOMs. The one that the scripts see, and the one that the user sees. Tricky (i.e. fun to experiment on and develop) rules for propagating changes and events from one to the other. The goal: serve the user, all other considerations extremely, rapidly, distantly secondary.

    That these people think that instant messaging (especially proprietary instant messages) is important or even of non-negative value in a browser, is hilariously out-of-touch.

    1. Re:What a browser should do in 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like opera 5.5 with icq support?

  9. More NSA and CIA friendly than ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It probably censors opposing opinions for you too

  10. Owned and Operated By The by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Chinese. You know my stance. It's like this. (Witness Bruce Lee stance here)

    Now. If those reds can win me an election, then we can talk. Until then, not just no, but hell no!

    1. Re:Owned and Operated By The by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stance seems kind of wide to me.

  11. I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People haven't figured out that social media like facebook, whatsap, etc., are all eroding the fabric of our social and political systems and being used to make authoritarian take-over easier.

    Dump all social media!

  12. Memory Usage by Oxygen99 · · Score: 1

    Just having a browser that doesn't take nearly a gig of RAM for a few tabs would be nice.

    --
    I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
    1. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding - right now on Chrome I have one tab open on Slashdot only, and it's using 300 MB. Ridiculous.

    2. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe one day you'll learn how memory and memory management works in a modern OS.

    3. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My machine has 64GB of RAM and I'll be damned if any program tries to use it!

    4. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody is complaining about "how memory and memory management works in a modern OS". Just the fact that browsers are memory hogs. That is a property of the browser, not the operating system.

    5. Re:Memory Usage by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try this:

      1. Install Firefox (desktop).
      2. Open Firefox and run a Slashdot browsing session.
      3. Look at Firefox's memory use.
      4. In about:config, set privacy.trackingprotection.enabled to true. This enables Firefox's built-in tracking blocker. In practice, it behaves as an ad blocker because most sites neglect to replace tracking-based elements that fail to load with ads that don't track the user.
      5. Restart Firefox and run a comparable Slashdot browsing session.
      6. Look at Firefox's memory use. See how much memory was wasted on tracking the user.

    6. Re:Memory Usage by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's ridiculous, but is it important?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just did this. I didn't know about this. Holy crap. Went from 200K on the main process down to 66K.
      Definitive remembering that setting.
      Thanks for that.

    8. Re:Memory Usage by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Looks like you can do that in your regular preferences, in the privacy section.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:Memory Usage by tepples · · Score: 2

      The checkbox in Preferences > Privacy applies only to Private Browsing windows. The about:config setting applies to "normal" windows as well.

    10. Re:Memory Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      178 mb, my opera presto

  13. Go back to Presto and restore XP support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wants to add features, add features people want.Nobody wants a Chrome clone.

  14. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Opera can combine Messenger, Skype, Discord etc into one neat interface, I'm in!

    If they're just providing plugin-style clones of the web interfaces, meh. Lot of work for little gain: bookmarks/pinned tabs already work for that.

  15. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Aren't we all supposed to be complaining about what Firefox is REMOVING these days? Sigh. I can never keep up with this silly hivemind.

    1. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...Aren't we all supposed to be complaining about what Firefox is REMOVING these days? Sigh. I can never keep up with this silly hivemind.

      It's easy!
      Anything they do is bad. Even if they do a thing we were mad they didn't do before!

    2. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, ok, I think I get it now. Mention Firefox and Mozilla as frequently as possible, and as negatively as possible, and mod up anyone else who does, and label anyone who doesn't a fanboy or shill. I've been in a highschool before, I think I can handle that.

  16. Re:Telegram? Great choice! by fnj · · Score: 1

    What the hell is wrong than Pidgin? How is this piece of dung better than Pidgin?

  17. There was a browser years ago that did this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago, a browser called RockMelt did this, and it did it well. It was based on Firefox, but had a lot of integration with Facebook and Twitter. Yahoo bought it and shut it down however.

  18. Re:Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever tried to get a random non-technical person to use Pidgin?

    Have you ever tried to get them to install OTR?

    Then you'll know what's wrong with it.

  19. Opera Coast by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Opera has had another browser format all along. On smartphone it's called Opera Coast. It's my favorite browser on the smart phone because it gets out of your way, and it also compresses the web pages when the pipe is slow. While I use Chrome or Safari or Firefox on desktops, the COast browser is truly optimized for the smart phone usage patterns, maximizing screen real estate, quick access to web sites, and reduced download times.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Re:Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about using Conversations with Jabber?
    Telegram is the same "central server" crap that collects metadata up the wazoo.
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.siacs.conversations
    also available on F-Droid ..
    That way you can log in from your desktop or mobile at the same time (without having to have your mobile with you)
    Also with OMEMO it is also secure regarding end-to-end encryption. (with the added benefit of there being no central point where communication metadata can be collected.

  21. Phantom of the Opera... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I could never get used to Opera. Of course, the last time I looked at Opera was back in the WinXP days. Loading it up with apps won't change my mind.

  22. A good adBlock by vyvepe · · Score: 1

    A good browser should have especially a good advertisement blocking.
    And some other things like something for blocking scripts (like uMatrix) and something for tracking certificates for selected (e.g. banking) websites.

  23. Trendy by thegreatbob · · Score: 2

    Who started the trend of making web browsers more than just a web browser by default? If someone has a time machine, we should probably take a quick jump back and deal with that.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re: Trendy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that may actually have been Opera. ISTR that they integrated email with their browser, way back when you still had to pay to use it. The email functionality has long since been removed, but they now have an integrated VPN, a data compression function that also is like a VPN - called Turbo or something, and now this.

    2. Re:Trendy by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Who started the trend of making web browsers more than just a web browser by default?

      I don't know. Netscape maybe? It's still around, but it doesn't get much press these days. But if stability is what you're after, look no further.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  24. Chat Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leading technology company changes world disruptively with new walled-garden chat app, and/or a hotlink to an existing chat app.

  25. Confused.. by sqorbit · · Score: 2

    So by adding social media apps to their browser you would expect that they'd be targeting a younger crowd that is more involved in using such services. This might be me sounding old, but those that are younger that they would be targeting would also be less likely to download a browser other than what's on their phones already. A desktop version of this browser would totally miss the mark. What type of user would actually be interested in this?

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  26. Re:Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with PIDGIN?! How about libpurple backend that saves passwords in plaintext BY DESIGN with no option to change that?

  27. Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support by tepples · · Score: 1

    Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support. If your computer runs an operating system that no longer receives security updates, it's likely to get infected with a key logger. And if it does, no web browser can make your connection secure.

    1. Re: Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're retarded. Stop speaking. They, obviously, mean restore the ability to install (current) Opera on an XP-based system. Stop trying to be clever, you're not.

    2. Re: Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support by tepples · · Score: 1

      What's the point of running a web browser, which is a program specifically designed to communicate over the Internet, on a deliberately unpatched PC?

    3. Re: Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to. Don't be intentionally obtuse. It is unbecoming and doesn't make you appear intelligent.

      Or, if you want to play your usual bullshit game, maybe they can't afford a new PC and Linux doesn't work properly with their hardware? Which, funnily enough, would be the argument you'd make in any other situation.

      In other words, your idiocy is played out. Stop talking.

    4. Re: Only Microsoft can restore Windows XP support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unpatched?
      WinXP is still getting patched right now.
      It's just got a different name.
      WinPoS Ready.

      Same applies to every other Windows, there is some hyper-slim version for low-resource machines.
      Usually called Embedded.

  28. Better Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Source Presto.

    I think I would spontaneously orgasm if I learned that Opera 12 was Open Sourced.

    1. Re:Better Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piracy source opera presto on githab

  29. Net Neutrality For Browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we need another discussion to get Net Neutrality for Browsers? (and possibly mobile phones?)

  30. Pretty soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they'll add a text editor and a newsgroup reader and rename itself to emacs.

    1. Re: Pretty soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha visit opera://news in opera

  31. Re:Telegram? Popular? by guyniraxn · · Score: 2

    What is Telegram? I've honestly never heard of it and I have about 5 messaging apps on my phone right now. Not sure how popular it could be.

  32. commentsubject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >"Reborn" focuses on being able to swiftly share things
    I'd thought no one took this share crap seriously, but I suppose there's usually a bar of it right on this page, if your browser's the one wielding you.

    It's about two inches from that other feature. You know the one. "Helping inform you about products and offers you may be interested in".

    Television is reality drivel and the internet is "social networks". I'd remark about politics soon becoming pander-to-normals (as if they weren't) but in the US that'd be an upgrade. We're doing a lot worse than personalities who appeal to simple minds.

  33. Do note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The browser makers, the "standardisers", and the webmonkeys (even if only in the role of useful idiots) have been conspiring to reduce the longevity of webbrowsers and websites alike, through the "living standard" nonsense.

    That also means that you end up "upgrading" so often that opera has plenty of time to drop myspace and add instagram, or whoever is deemed to be down-and-out and up-and-coming next week. In some sense it's just deserts for the likes of google trying to own the space, though in another it's ceding power to teh zuck so I hope for them that opera at least gets paid for that "integration" gimmick.

    But anyhow, we've long had "browser toolbars" and a very special kind of luser that lets them be installed, even likes to install them, sometimes to the point of taking over half the screen space (on your handy dandy widescreen). Apparently that's a juicy enough demographic that opera thinks it'll let them carve out a decent-sized niche.

    Me, I liked opera before they switched engines, as they used to be a somewhat better browser, but once they switched I decided they'd gotten stupid and left them to stew in it. This move of theirs isn't disappointing in that sense. I can see the logic, if not whether there's actual sense in it. Time will tell.

  34. Sold! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    They added WhatsApp, Telegram, and Messenger? Sold!

    No, not really. Are those REALLY what people want in 2017???

  35. There is but one true browser by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    It has been stable in function and in form for about 20 years.

    Three guesses which one...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:There is but one true browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links?
      Lynx?
      Emacs?

    2. Re:There is but one true browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lynx?

    3. Re:There is but one true browser by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      There are but two true browsers....

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:There is but one true browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seamonkey...

      No wait, it's only been the same for about 15 years.

  36. Re: Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about living in the 21st Century and getting over the fact that nobody gives a millifuck?

  37. Not suspicious at all... by hackel · · Score: 1

    Yes, just hand over the credentials to all of your social media accounts to this innocent Chinese company. What could go wrong??

  38. Next up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote for a BonziBUDDY sidebar!

  39. Re: Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go cry to Alexa about your ED.

    (captcha: micron)

  40. VERY funny (on "ChOpera") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject (it's what I call Chinese/Chrome Opera) but I like your "phantom of the opera" (good play on words)!

    * I use Opera 12.18 64-bit here - last of the "PRESTO" engine & "last of the V-8 Police interceptors" as far as I'm concerned...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Going to steal that one from you IF that's ok - I like it (I'll credit you when I use it, lol)... apk

  41. Re:Telegram? Great choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >...is the only popular...

    Saying the only popular ANYTHING is suspicious as hell. Shill much? Or just still living at home...

    That you write such a 'fact' is an announcement of your ignorance & small-world, tight knot fanboi culture you've yet to grow out of.

  42. Standard Bearer by dugrrr · · Score: 1

    At one time, Opera lead the way on web standards compliance.

    Less compliant browsers like IE seemed to have websites catering to their flaws.

    Then, somewhere along the way, it seems that browser development started wagging the dog (and driving standard development all the more).

    I was an early Opera adopter... then I floundered for a bit until Vivaldi came out (Thank you Jon!)

    The current Opera's VPN does interest me... but yada-yada chinese trojans

  43. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love Opera since they moved to Webkit and it's the only browser I use nowadays. It is noticeably faster and less memory hungry than Chrome and Safari and way way faster than current stable versions of Firefox. For example, Opera easily handles large pgBadger reports that make Chrome, Safari and especially Firefox grind to a halt for minutes on the same computer.

    I don't care about gimmick features like these, but if they make Opera money so they can keep on developing it, I'm all for it, as long as they can be disabled.

  44. Just an update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/500-512/

    Instant Messaging
    IM: optimization of message search contact addition (manual)
    IM: window handling enhancements
    IM: other Minor additions and optimizations