Open Source SQL Database CockroachDB Hits 1.0 (infoworld.com)
An anonymous reader quotes InfoWorld:
CockroachDB, an open source, fault-tolerant SQL database with horizontal scaling and strong consistency across nodes -- and a name few people will likely forget -- is now officially available. Cockroach Labs, the company behind its development, touts CockroachDB as a "cloud native" database solution -- a system engineered to run as a distributed resource. Version 1.0 is available in both basic and for-pay editions, and both boast features that will appeal to enterprises.
The company is rolling the dice with its handling of the enterprise edition by also making those components open source and trusting that enterprises will pay for what they use in production.
The company is rolling the dice with its handling of the enterprise edition by also making those components open source and trusting that enterprises will pay for what they use in production.
Especially in these times.
This one will still work when all the other SQL-Databases have died a nuclear death.
From their FAQ (emphasis mine):
It may be a really cool software package, but, I gather, if you allowed for only a "small subset" of SQL to be supported, you could have MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and Sybase as "fault tolerant" and with "strong consistency".
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
No, not according to the the FAQ, which says (emphasis mine):
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
Cockroaches check in... but they don't check out!
Now with full support for ANSI SQL...
What's the target platform?
Does CockroachDB work with RAID?
Cue Oracle buing then shutting down the company in 3... 2... That was probably the whole cockroachy business plan anyway
... because the men in suits who sign the cheques are really not going to go a bundle over something called Cockroach. No doubt it sounded amusing after a few beers on a friday night, but I'm struggling to think of any current IT products with a worse name.
Hey, now you can have that same thing in a "next gen" (or "3.0" or whatever term you like) software package, free from all that "legacy" code, well-tested over decades. I'm sure it makes sense if you grew up with MySQL and PHP and thought those were really good bits of software.
Me, I think I'm going to take their name at face value and break out the professional grade pest poisons.
What happens when I make a formal commitment to Satan?
Wrong SATAN, Santa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_Administrator_Tool_for_Analyzing_Networks
Development tools are probably the most important factor in wide adoption.
"Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
"Satan comes to us on his own. Many times, we can feel him. He comes to guide us "
Shut up, Steve Bannon!
The traditional open source model is "software is free. pay for support."
For a big company, this can make sense. They can measure the benefit of support. They're into outsourcing things. But if the company becomes kinda-big, and it's a decent place to work, they can just support the software themselves. Canonical and RedHat are effectively in competition with "let's bring this stuff back in house." If their timelines are too long, or they say "no" too often, or the quality of their work is poor, it will not make sense.
That would be economically elegant if "support" were the only work that had to get done, but obviously it isn't.
For a small company, does it make sense? I feel like they'd pay their small fee, and in return get a bank of tier 1 techs that say "no" to everything or help you read the manual. All of the small companies I've worked for have not paid for support. I suspect this is because it's like a tax to them; they can't measure its effect.
But the other poster is right. None of this matters. The only small database that can ever slowly grow useful is one that's fully open source because otherwise Oracle will destroy it. That's true so far: the only things left standing are suddenly-offered big databases that pull you into a walled ecosystem (SQL Server, DynamoDB, and Google's (Datastore, Cloud Bigtable, and Cloud Spanner)).
Satan, that is our political leaders who wage war for geo-political reasons and out of financial self-interest, like shares in weapons factories.
Satan, that is the leaders and owners of the military-industrial complex that lobby and pay the people in governments to start wars, so their weapons can be sold and used.
Satan, that is the bankers who want to take away our cash and financial freedom, and want to destroy any non-western bank in order to establish their own and get all countries under their control. Oh, and charge negative interest of course once we are 'cash less'.
There is absolutely no reason to look into the sky or soil, looking for a satan--or god for that matter--somewere outside of this world.
Satan is here, where most of us don't see him because most people don't see hell from the satans.
"Trump!!", the new Godwin.
Couldn't they have found a better name? Maybe PukeDB? FatalCancerDB? FootSmellDB? PottyTrainingDB?
From the article: "CockroachDB may sound like a joke project..."
I spun up 4 vm's on my LAN and tried to get it to work reliably but it seems a lot of how this database maintains cohesion and consistency depends on ensuring your servers have highly accurate times. It works and it's a great database for 'free' but it's not a non-trivial setup either. Anyone else have setup problems and maintaining the cluster due to time issues? https://jasoncoltrin.com/2017/...
Namaste
So, what are you going to run our website on?
We decided on "CockroachDB" greatest thing since sliced...
Sorry, uhm, sad to say we decided to go with your, well, competitor
The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
What genius came up with the name? It's so bad it must have been from some loser who attended Trump University.
"trusting that enterprises will pay for what they use in production."
good luck with that...
When your database server goes south on you, there will be a swarm of cockroaches scuttling around to make the experience just that extra bit special.
Yeah, CockroachDb. You'll know that when the sh*t goes down, there will still be cockroaches running in, on and under your servers.
I would rely on a more established solution like Microsoft or Oracle. Personally I’d rather not be on the bleeding edge of technology, especially if it blows up in my face. If that occurs , I’m sure it would cost more to potentially recover data, than it would have to just purchase something that was a little more battle seasoned.
To paraphrase a quote from the Dewey Cox movie, "I do believe in you. I just know you're going to fail".