Slashdot Mirror


Did The UK Police Hire Foreigners To Hack Hundreds of Activists? (bbc.co.uk)

Big Hairy Ian shared this story from the BBC: Undercover counter-extremism officers used hackers in India to access the emails of journalists and environmental activists, it has been claimed... The Independent Police Complaints Commission said it had received an anonymous letter, which alleged covert officers from the Metropolitan Police's National Domestic Extremism and Disorder Intelligence Unit contacted Indian police officers for help to enlist hackers. The letter alleges the hackers accessed the email accounts of hundreds of people, including members of political and environmental pressure groups and journalists.
"The letter said the monitoring included the 'email accounts of radical journalists who reported on activist protests (as well as sympathetic photographers) including at least two employed by the Guardian newspaper,'" the Guardian reports, adding that the letter provided the names of 10 campaigners -- and the passwords for their accounts.

12 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh my, there has to be an Indian Outsourcing joke here someplace. But seriously, without the letter to the Guardian, if this was discovered "Metropolitan Police's National Domestic Extremism and Disorder Intelligence Unit" would probably put forth some "plausible deniability" story - "It wasn't us! Must have been those pesky Russians again..."

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re: Better ROI *and* plausible deniability! by dougdonovan · · Score: 2

      i doubt any law enforcement agency globally has the intelligence to know how to hire a legit hacker.

  2. It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Informative

    This sort of "outsourcing" of illegal information gathering activities has been going on for years. GCHQ has the NSA spying on the Brits. GCHQ spies on the Yankees. The Cannucks are spying on the Aussies and the Aussies are spying on the Cannucks. Meanwhile the Kiwis are all pissed because no one gives a shit about what goes on in New Zealand.

    For a country like America who gave the crown a fat middle finger, the level of coziness today should unnerve everyone.

    1. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You didn't give the crown a middle finger though. The French gave the British Crown the middle finger and the colonists were merely along for the ride. Most of them (2/3rds by all accounts) either supported the crown or didn't care who won.
      You don't even know your own history.

    2. Re:It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Within the UK it gets even more interesting.
      When the UK was collecting on all calls within Ireland and between Ireland and the rest of the world the UK needed to keep such collection secret from the press, lawyers, any court setting, human rights groups, UK police who enjoyed talking with the media, UK police with contacts in Ireland.
      So only the UK mil, GCHQ and Royal Ulster Constabulary Special Branch would often see the results of collection. No other parts of the UK gov could be trusted with raw product and the results of collect it all.
      Irish funding and support had to also be tracked in the USA by the UK, and had to avoid all questions by the USA.
      Later meetings saw the use of Forward Intelligence Team https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Other issues show the need to control unions in the UK "Police ‘covered up’ links with union blacklisting" (8 Nov 2014)
      https://www.theguardian.com/uk...
      The use of different groups by the sections of the UK police and UK gov offers a way of ensuring police officials, the media, lawyers never pay for or get told of such methods.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: It's only illegal if your countrymen do it. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It depends on exactly which sources you trust. There's reasonable evidence that more than 1/3 supported the US revolution, at least passively, and about 1/3 supported staying with Britain. The exact proportions depend on how you figure support and which colonies you are looking at. Also when. The US revolutionaries were clearly losing until the French supported the revolution. If your viewpoint is from Europe, then that was the French giving Britain the finger, but if your viewpoint is from the US they were only a supporting actor. Both views are valid. And if you asked people after the war was over, most people supported the revolutionaries...except when the economy was really in the dumps.

      Few people were either committed revolutionaries or committed loyalists. The committed revolutionaries were generally much more committed than were the crown loyalists.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  3. They're following the lead by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, basically, the UK is following the lead of the USS... I mean the USA... in having an agency illegally monitor internal political dissenters?

  4. "Holy shit!" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    ..."Jesus fuck!" and "Motherfucker!" are among things I said out loud while reading the summary. Why can't intelligence and law enforcement resist becoming the Stasi? Why do they always target innocent protesters for illegal surveillance?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:"Holy shit!" by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      The costs to an economy and people's standard of living is huge with high taxation.

      Low taxes have high costs. You pay far, far more for health care and education in the United States compared to other countries, with worse results. Yeah, it's great that Elitist U gave you a marginally better engineering degree than some shmoe who went to a Romanian community college - but the Romanian didn't gradate with five figures of student debt.

      Capitalism is not used virtuously, it is used to control the majority by the minority.

      Fixed that, too.

      Look, all this Libertarian angst is just frustration that the rich actually have to pay back a pittance of the total that they exploit from the land, from consumers, from workers. I know you'd all like to go back to the Libertarian Golden Age of the 19th century, where the .01% would pay workers starvation wages to work in coal mines - and then get all that money back by paying the workers in company scrip that could only be used in company stores.

      I'll let you in on a little secret: high taxation rates (on the wealthy) is labor camp insurance for bourgeoisie elitists such as yourself. If you're lucky. Guillotine insurance if you're not. Abuse the proles too much with your boot heel on the back of their necks, and sooner or later they're going to get fed up with your capitalist nazi bullshit and come for your head. So STFU, get over your elitist sense of entitlement, and pay your goddamn taxes.

  5. Re:What??? by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The NSA can only be used by the American government for political spying, the British conservatives can not use the NSA or 5 eyes collectively for politically based spying. Basically this is just conservative politics law enforcers using their power for political purposes. The real warning, how far will they go to target the most effective political campaigners, a murderous arrest, they had to be safe, targeted law enforcements attacks against the whole family of the targeted political campaigner, fabrication of false evidence (reinforcement chairs become caltrops, empty bottles and a can of lawn mower fuel become a molotov cocktail fabrication facility, water recycling becomes biological weapons production), repeatedly violently targeting the specific individuals at protests, ensuring the unemployability for security reasons including their entire family.

    It is crap to defend criminal politically based behaviour by law enforcers because that does lead to assassination by law enforcers during false arrests, that is exactly where politically based law enforcement spying leads. A sure sign of an extremely corrupt government.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Old since March 2017 by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 2

    The whistleblower wrote his/her letter in march 2017 already. Look at the articles of The Grauniad in the related articles bar towards the end. You can guess how much information will have not been shredded in between.

    The cops break the law individually and as an organization, and get away with it because the law is set up so that the cops may break it at will.

  7. Re:Can't be in light of a recent story by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    That's why we have operational research for inventory optimization! No need for these ridiculous lead times if you're a responsible hospital manager.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20