Slashdot Mirror


FCC Suspends Net Neutrality Comments, As Chairman Pai Mocks 'Mean Tweets' (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader writes:Thursday the FCC stopped accepting comments as part of long-standing rules "to provide FCC decision-makers with a period of repose during which they can reflect on the upcoming items" before their May 18th meeting. Techdirt wondered if this time to reflect would mean less lobbying from FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, but on Friday Pai recorded a Jimmy Kimmel-style video mocking mean tweets, with responses Gizmodo called "appalling" and implying "that anyone who opposes his cash grab for corporations is a moron."

Meanwhile, Wednesday The Consumerist reported the FCC's sole Democrat "is deploying some scorched-earth Microsoft Word table-making to use FCC Chair Ajit Pai's own words against him." (In 2014 Pai wrote "A dispute this fundamental is not for us five, unelected individuals to decide... We should also engage computer scientists, technologists, and other technical experts to tell us how they see the Internet's infrastructure and consumers' online experience evolving.") But Pai seemed to be mostly sticking to friendlier audiences, appearing with conservative podcasters from the Taxpayer Protection Alliance, the AEI think tank and The Daily Beast.

The Verge reports the flood of fake comments opposing Net Neutrality may have used names and addresses from a breach of 1.4 billion personal information records from marketing company River City Media. Reached on Facebook Messenger, one woman whose named was used "said she hadn't submitted any comments, didn't live at that address anymore and didn't even know what net neutrality is, let alone oppose it."

Techdirt adds "If you do still feel the need to comment, the EFF is doing what the FCC itself should do and has set up its own page at DearFCC.org to hold any comments."

1 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Re:STOP BEING MEAN by zifn4b · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Chairman Pai knows what's best and you people need to stop being so mean to the Trump regime. He was elected by the largest margin in modern history and he's the CEO of the country, so if he doesn't want Net Neutrality, you shouldn't complain because he's got the best people around him.

    Has it ever occurred to you that Trump is attempting to negotiate with the plutocracy corruption that's been allowed to fester for the past 30 years? You can't really just stand up to them (U.S. Chamber of Commerce et al) and say "hey, we're taking all the things you've enjoyed since the 70's away and you're going to like it." These are very powerful and influential people in this country and it's hard to tell what they would do in the face of a populist president that did just that without throwing them any kind of bone.

    I'm not saying Trump is a model president but he's not pro-corporation. Why would any pro-corporation president shoot down free trade agreements, hamper outsourcing and H-1B visas and suggest we might want to put the Glass-Steagall act back in place to stop mega conglomerate banks? That's about as anti-corporation as you can get. That's fighting corruption in three significant areas: STEM, auto manufacturing and big banks. Let me tell you, the people who represent those industries, they are 600 lb gorillas that the last 30 years of presidents were too chicken to go toe to toe with.

    Trump is definitely not the poster child for morality but we needed someone to go toe to toe with this corruption and that's what he's doing. The Net Neutrality thing is one of the more least important bones to throw to the wolves. I don't think it's right and it will probably be challenged later and undone. This country is a plutocratic mess. It's not surprising it's going to be insane to attempt to clean up.

    --
    We'll make great pets