Slashdot Mirror


Our Obsession With Trailers Is Making Movies Worse (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: Our increasing obsession with trailers is changing how we watch movies. We're becoming audiences afraid of surprise, audiences that would rather watch movies we're certain we'll like than risk watching films that surprise us into love. In some cases, this fixation is even lowering the quality of movies themselves by encouraging bad filmmaking habits. The most extreme example happened when Warner Bros released such a successful trailer for 'Suicide Squad' it brought on the company that cut it to edit the whole film -- dropping the director's original cut altogether. [...] Thanks to trailers' easy accessibility on YouTube and those shot-by-shot breakdowns that quickly appear online once trailers drop, anyone interested in a given flick can pore over all the available footage for hours -- even if that leads to major spoilers for them and everyone they share it with.

13 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Why should we be different to studios? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A studio is afraid to try something new because a movie costs millions, often hundreds of millions, to make. So they are afraid to try something out of the ordinary and instead rehash the same stuff that once managed to get people into the cinemas, we get reboot after reboot, relaunch after relaunch.

    And going to see a movie costs between 10 and 20 bucks a person. So we're afraid to try something that we don't know anything about, fearing that we're going to waste 20 bucks on something we are not going to enjoy.

    It's a matter of money. People don't want to waste it on something that's not going to perform the way they would like it to.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Why should we be different to studios? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big explosions and tits.

      Come to think of it, why not simply name a movie that way? No trailer needed.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why should we be different to studios? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It sounds more like the working title of a Michael Bay movie.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Why should we be different to studios? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Big explosions and tits.

      Come to think of it, why not simply name a movie that way? No trailer needed.

      And that will put us one step closer to the movie "Ass" being made and winning 8 Oscars. Sadly, instead of 500 years, it'll probably be in less than 50 years.

  2. I avoid trailers, if possible by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They tend to give away too much, or, in a bad movie, show the only things worth watching. If I'm going to get suckered in to see it, I might as well save those five good jokes.

    It really helped when I cut cable, because I barely see any these days, other than previews before other movies.

  3. I don't know of anyone that watches them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you since they so often contain spoilers? What kind of idiot wants to ruin a movie just to find out something a little earlier?

    1. Re:I don't know of anyone that watches them by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take your average movie. Say, anything Michael Bay did lately.

      Now spoiler it in any meaningful way. I dare you.

      Nearly all mass appeal movies of today are so formulaic and predictable that "spoiler" doesn't really describe the problem. The problem is more that it's "seen one, seen 'em all".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. NOPE! by ichthus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're not the ones making the trailers, and we're not the ones making the crappy movies. Not our fault.

    We're fine with suspense and surprise. And, I'm pretty sure we're just fine with... *read slowly* GOOOD MOOOOVIES. So, make them good.

    --
    sig: sauer
  5. Worst trailer ever? The Matrix by LiquidMind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The trailer showed Neo stopping bullets with his mind. In the trailer.

    That was supposed to be the shock and awe moment that tied it all together.

    There should be a new category.... Spoiler Trailer.

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  6. The worse part of a trailer... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes the trailer is better than the movie.

  7. You have more options today by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the 1970s, you either paid for a movie ticket to see a movie, or waited 3-5 years for it to show up on TV at an indeterminate time, with commercials interspersed, and with unknown editing.

    Today, if you don't pay for a ticket, you can catch it on pay per view in a couple months, or rent it on Blu-ray/DVD/streaming, or watch it on a pay movie channel, or stream it from a service you already pay for like Netflix, or wait a couple years for it to show up on TV, or pirate it.

    In the face all that new competition, the logical thing to do is to lower movie ticket prices to make the theater experience more attractive. Instead, studios and theaters have done the opposite and raised ticket prices. I don't mind seeing the occasional bad movie on Netflix or Amazon Prime, or HBO because I'm already paying for those services. The only thing I lose is 90-120 minutes of my time (and that's only if I choose not to stop watching before the movie finishes). With a theater ticket I lose my money as well as my time. So I don't think it's at all surprising that people are holding theater movies to a higher standard than in the past. The studios need adapt to how technology has changed in the last 50 years - lower ticket prices, or improve the ratio of good to bad movies.

  8. Re:Garbage by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could be worse. They could all be Hallmark movies.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  9. Re:Absolutely agree by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the money matters a bit but the hugest investment is time.

    This why I prefer Netflix. If five minutes into a movie, it is obvious that it sucks, I can just switch to another. In the theater, that is much harder to do, especially if I am with other people.