Slashdot Mirror


Chelsea Manning Set To Be Released From Prison, 28 Years Early (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning is set to walk out of prison Wednesday -- but she won't be entirely free. Manning's 35-year sentence for leaking an enormous trove of military intelligence records was commuted by President Barack Obama in January. But Manning is still appealing her conviction in a case that could take years, and the government has yet to respond to the appeal. And all the while, Private First Class Manning, 29, will remain an active duty soldier in the U.S. Army. She won't be paid a salary, and it's highly unlikely that she will be called to serve. But being placed on voluntary excess leave rather than discharged, says one of her attorneys, makes her vulnerable to new military punishment or charges if she steps out of line. Such an offense could be anything from getting into a fistfight to revealing previously unreleased classified information. Manning could even get into trouble with the military for speaking and writing. The Army private then known as Bradley Manning was just 22-year-old when she leaked nearly 750,000 military files and cables to WikiLeaks. Manning was court-martialed and sentenced in 2013 to 35 years in prison, with opportunity for parole after seven years served. n a statement given to the TODAY show the day after sentencing, Manning came out as a transgender woman. Last Tuesday, in Manning's first official statement about her plans after prison, she said, "I can see a future for myself as Chelsea."

7 of 542 comments (clear)

  1. She did the right thing by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Manning discovered widespread corruption, deeply unethical behavior and absolutely unacceptable conduct, and she decided to let fundamental human rights and dignity overrule artificial power structures, so she exposed the lies, and of course the liars punished her.

    It must have taken immense bravery, and we should admire her, not attack her.

    --
    Eat the rich.
    1. Re:She did the right thing by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Informative

      No she didn't. Wikileaks did. She just dumped a whole load of files on them with no way of knowing if there was anything that exposed criminal actions, or how responsible wikileaks would be.

      There was no deeply unethical behaviour 99% of what was given to wikileaks.

  2. Re: Yay! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Helping to expose corruption, deeply unethical behavior and widespread human rights violations.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  3. Re:Freak show by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't be ridiculous. Trump isn't suicidal.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Re:Freak show by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you seen his diet?

    --
    Eat the rich.
  5. Re: Yay! by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was no sing of any transgender tendencies before.

    Someone clearly wasn't paying attention.

    (1:11:54 PM) bradass87: and... its important that it gets out... i feel, for some bizarre reason
    (1:12:02 PM) bradass87: it might actually change something
    (1:13:10 PM) bradass87: i just... dont wish to be a part of it... at least not now... im not ready... i wouldn't mind going to prison for the rest of my life, or being executed so much, if it wasn't for the possibility of having pictures of me... plastered all over the world press... as boy...
    (1:14:11 PM) bradass87: i've totally lost my mind... i make no sense... the CPU is not made for this motherboard...
    (1:14:42 PM) bradass87: s/as boy/as a boy
    (1:30:32 PM) bradass87: >sigh<
    (1:31:40 PM) bradass87: i just wanted enough time to figure myself out... to be myself... and be running around all the time, trying to meet someone else's expectations
    (1:32:01 PM) bradass87: *and not be
    (1:33:03 PM) bradass87: im just kind of drifting now...
    (1:34:11 PM) bradass87: waiting to redeploy to the US, be discharged... and figure out how on earth im going to transition
    (1:34:45 PM) bradass87: all while witnessing the world freak out as its most intimate secrets are revealed
    (1:35:06 PM) bradass87: its such an awkward place to be in, emotionally and psychologically

    --
    FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
  6. Re: Yay! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What exactly is the mumbo-jumbo you're trying to express here?

    None. Your Mumbo jumbo masquerading as simple logic is still mumbo jumbo.

    If you are XY you're male...if XX you're female.

    These are the rules of biology:
    1. If you think it's simple, you're wrong
    2. If you think it's complicated, you're still wrong.
    3. If you think it's ludicrously messy and complicated, you're wrong, but getting there.

    Since you are making pseudo biological arguments, I shall respond with biological arguments.

    Go Google "androgen insensitivity syndrome".

    I'll wait.

    OK now you've read it, do you believe that someone work XY chromosomes, but entirely female anatomy since birth is male or female? And why do you choose the choice you made?

    Follow up questions: what is your definition of gender that actually matches biology I a way that's neither circular nor unique to humans?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.