Slashdot Mirror


Switzerland Votes To Abandon Nuclear Power In Favor of Renewables (bbc.com)

Slashdot reader bsolar writes: Swiss voters approved a new energy strategy proposed by the government. Under this new policy no new nuclear power plant will be built and the five existing nuclear power plants will continue operating and will be shut down at the end of their operating life (expected to last about 20-30 years). The plan is to offset the missing nuclear energy production by renewables and lower energy consumption.
Though one-third of the country's power comes from nuclear energy, the BBC reports that more than 58% of the voters "backed the move towards greener power sources." One Swiss news site notes that "regions where the country's five nuclear reactors are situated rejected the reform with clear majorities."

6 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. Re:dumb move by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

    didnt realise the swiss were stupid.

    Yeah, letting people vote is always a bad idea. Democracy is for dummies.

    They should be busy bringing back coal, like the more advanced nations are doing.

    --
    No sig today...
  2. Re:They can vote all they like by mentil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to worry, 20-30 years from now we'll finally have Fusion power. And Half Life 3!
    Well, one of the two at least.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  3. Re:dumb move by butzwonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's right, and let me quote the President of the United States of America in further support of nuclear:

    Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

    Wise words, from the president of the most advanced nation on earth! We need nuclear!

  4. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As a rule, renewables don't either.

  5. Re:dumb move by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reading that broke the part of my brain that deals with language comprehension.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  6. Re:Less nuclear means more coal by Lodlaiden · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess it's a good thing German is not at high risk for a tsunami any time soon.

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei