'Science Must Clean Up Its Act' (scientificamerican.com)

Our science community still struggles with diversity, equity, and inclusion issues, including systemic bias, harassment, and discrimination among other things, writes Heather Metcalf, mathematician, computer scientist, social scientist, and also the director of research for the Association for Women in Science. From her piece, in which she has shared both personal anecdotes and general examples, for the Scientific American: [...] Take the recent March for Science. Nearly two weeks ago, scientists and science supporters gathered in Washington, D.C, and around the globe to stand up for "robustly funded and publicly communicated science as a pillar of human freedom and prosperity" and put forth a vision of science that "serves the interests of all humans, not just those in power." However, in its attempts to remain apolitical and objective, the march focused primarily on funding and communication aspects of its mission while losing sight of the need for a science that addresses human freedom and prosperity for all, not just the privileged. [...] In the early days of its organizing, the march offered up a strong statement of solidarity acknowledging the complacency with which the scientific community as a whole has handled issues that primarily impact marginalized communities: "many issues about which scientists as a group have largely remained silent -- attacks on black and brown lives, oil pipelines through indigenous lands, sexual harassment and assault, ADA access in our communities, immigration policy, lack of clean water in several cities across the country, poverty wages, LGBTQIA rights, and mass shootings are scientific issues. Science has historically -- and generally continues to support discrimination. In order to move forward as a scientific community, we must address and actively work to unlearn our problematic past and present, to make science available to everyone." This messaging was removed and replaced after much pushback, largely from white men, about the need to remain apolitical and objective. These debates resulted in many women, people of color, people with disabilities, LGBTQ+ scientists, and their allies feeling ostracized and even receiving disrespectful and hateful messages about their place in science generally and in M4S specifically. Rather than standing up for a science that is available to everyone, these conversations and the march itself merely served represent an exclusionary science by reinforcing longstanding, divisive norms within the scientific community, all in the name of objectivity..

Comments

Re:What does this have to do with science?

[meta-monkey]

The problem is the author's choice of issues that are included in "science" are concerns for left-wing politics with the desired left-wing outcomes predetermined.

"The issues that are really important to science are protecting gun rights, lowering tax burdens and protecting religious liberty. What do you mean I'm just co-opting 'science' for my right-wing political beliefs? I didn't say anything about 'the right' you're just inserting terms!"

Science is (was) just a method of learning which things we can prove are false via experiment and repeated observation. It is no longer. It is no longer a system of determining what is false, it is a system of advocating for desired political outcomes.

Science is dead. And it's been dead for a long time, and social scientists have been masquerading in its in corpse. Finally the carcass has rotted so badly the stench has become unignorable.