Slashdot Mirror


FCC Won't Punish Stephen Colbert For Controversial Trump Insult (slashdot.org)

Earlier this month, the FCC said it would look into complaints made against The Late Show host Stephen Colbert over a homophobic joke he made about President Donald Trump. Well, it turns out the FCC is not going to levy a fine against the comedian for using the word "cock" on late-night network television, reports The Verge. From the report: "Consistent with standard operating procedure, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau has reviewed the complaints and the material that was the subject of these complaints," reads the FCC's statement, according to Variety. "The Bureau has concluded that there was nothing actionable under the FCC's rules." Helping Colbert's case was the fact that the broadcast, time delayed for incidents like these, bleeped out the questionable word and also blurred the host's mouth as he was saying it. The FCC has broad authority to regulate what can and cannot be broadcast based on legal precedent regarding obscenity laws. Yet looser rules apply during the hours of 10PM and 6AM ET, when Colbert's show airs. So it would appear that the ample self-censorship on behalf of CBS saved the program from a guilty verdict in this case.

4 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Not homophobic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're missing something very important. All the Putin/Trump homosexual jokes that have been going around for a long time (as well as Colbert's joke) are capitalizing on the fact that both Trump and Putin openly despise homosexuals, so calling them homosexual is in itself an insult, not because being homosexual is bad, but because they presumably can't stand the thought of being thought of as homosexual.

    I don't think this was in any way intended to insult homosexuals. The homophobic assholes crying to fire Colbert for his "homophobia" clearly don't have a clue as to what constitutes homophobia.

  2. Re:Shouldn't be punishable anyway by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    he just made a crude unfunny joke

    Actually, it wasn't intended to be that much of a joke. A little, sure, but the only source of humor was the shock value.

    His real point, and his reason for using such a surprisingly crude phrase, was a very serious one. He was making the point that in America one can say the nastiest things possible about the most powerful government officials without fear of consequences. His rant was about free speech, about how crucial it is and about how Trump has absolutely no respect for it... but in spite of Trump's lack of respect for the principle, the principle holds, and Trump's power can do nothing about it.

    When you understand the whole context, this FCC ruling is an important victory for all Americans, even those who found it offensive. Which, to be honest, included me, though I understood the point and appreciated the value of the point and the fact that the very offensiveness of the comment was what made the point forceful.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  3. Re:If you can't call a cunt like Trump a cock hols by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For Fucks Sake America... Here in England and other civilised countries we can say "cock" on daytime TV. In fact probably a repeat of Top Gear on Dave with James May saying "Oh Cock" right now.

    We can also see boobs.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  4. Re:Shouldn't be punishable anyway by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trump has made many attempts to silence speech he doesn't like, like kicking major news organizations out of the White House press corps, to name just one example among many. He undertstands that the system stops him from doing it, but he clearly sees that as a bug, not a feature. Watch the monologue, Colbert makes this point quite well.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.