Slashdot Mirror


Manchester Attack Could Lead To Internet Crackdown (independent.co.uk)

New submitter boundary writes: The UK government looks to be about to put the most egregious parts of the Investigative Powers Act into force "soon after the election" (which is in a couple of weeks) in the wake of the recent bombing in Manchester. "Technical Capability Orders" require tech companies to break their own security. I wonder who'll comply? The Independent reports: "Government will ask parliament to allow the use of those powers if Theresa May is re-elected, senior ministers told The Sun. 'We will do this as soon as we can after the election, as long as we get back in,' The Sun said it was told by a government minister. 'The level of threat clearly proves there is no more time to waste now. The social media companies have been laughing in our faces for too long.'"

9 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. They've definitely been laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But only because so many people are willing to give them all their personal information for free.

    1. Re:They've definitely been laughing by ewanm89 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, this isn't just that, this is "we want to access all encrypted information". We must have broken encryption because "terrorism". Basically Theresa May has fascist tendencies she wants to enforce. Unfortunately the other political parties are such a mess at the moment that well... yeah, the whole thing is not good.

  2. In other news... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Mainstream media are reporting today that the government was given credible warnings about the suspected bomber as many as five times over the past few years, from a variety of sources and via exactly the sorts of channels you're supposed to use if you're worried that someone might do something like this. None of these source appear to have relied on high-tech surveillance and intercepted communications. They were reportedly based on in-person observations, which tragically doesn't seem to have set off the right alarm bells soon enough.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re: In other news... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      especially if they look like criminals

      That's cool that you know what criminals look like, we could just pay you to go through photographs, and we'll just arrest or deport the ones with the bad faces.

    2. Re: In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You saying they shouldn't? The watch list is there for a reason. It's about time they start using it.

      I for one, cannot figure why anyone would allow foreigners with even the smallest criminal records, especially if they look like criminals, to stay in their countries at all.

      The foreigner who blew himself up at the concert was BORN in the UK. He was as British as Theresa May or Tony Blair.
      Amazing isn't it ? At what point is a foreigner not a foreigner anymore ? Careful with your answer otherwise we could classify all people living in the US (minus the native americans) as foreigners. Do we kick them out and give back the US to the native people we stole the lands from ?

    3. Re:In other news... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They get ten thousand similar reports a week. They can't possibly follow up on all of them.

      But they can possibly follow up on all filter hits from UK's teeny-tiny Internet traffic, right? ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Ahh... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Multiple warnings over several years, and the UK government never acted on them. So now, rather than admit they were incompetent or not funding their human agents enough, they're going to cut off free speech online? Congratulations Britain, you have the dubious honor of being the second country in the world to fall to terrorism.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  4. Re:The Mosque by ArylAkamov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because it isn't the 60s anymore?
    b-b-but they did it too is a pretty piss poor argument. It's completely irrelevant at this point, it doesn't matter who is doing it, it needs to stop.

  5. Clueless politicians strike again. by Going_Digital · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly they learnt nothing from the CIA exploits leak that cased the NHS to go into meltdown when black hats got hold of the code. They just don't have a clue, compelling legitimate companies to provide ways to break into their encryption just means that the terrorists will use other encryption techniques either developed themselves or from a company outside of the UK who doesn't care about UK laws. End result, law abiding citizens loose their privacy, terrorists continue with impunity.