Slashdot Mirror


Investigation Demanded Over Fake FCC Comments Submitted By Dead People (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Fight for the Future has found another issue with the fake comments submitted to the FCC opposing net neutrality. "The campaign group says that some of the comments were posted using the names and details of dead people," according to the BBC. The exact same comment was also submitted more than 7,000 times using addresses in Colorado, where a reporter discovered that contacting the people at those addresses drew reactions which included "I have never seen this before in my life" and "No, I did not post this comment. In fact, I disagree with this comment." Fight for the Future also knocked on doors in Tampa, Florida, where the few people who answered "were shocked to hear that their name and address were publicly listed alongside a political message they did not necessarily understand or agree with." An alleged commenter in Montana told a reporter she didn't even know what net neutrality was.

14 people have already signed Fight for the Future's official complaint to the FCC, which calls for notification of all people affected, an investigation, and the immediate removal of all fake comments from the public docket. "Based on numerous media reports, nearly half a million Americans may have been impacted by whoever impersonated us," states the letter, "in a dishonest and deceitful campaign to manufacture false support for your plan to repeal net neutrality protections."

Fight for the Future says they've already verified "dozens" of instance of real people discovering a fake comment was submitted in their name -- and that in addition, more than 2,400 people have already used their site to contact their state Attorneys General demanding an investigation. They note the FCC has taken no steps to remove the fake comments from its docket, "risking the safety and privacy of potentially hundreds of thousands of people," while a campaign director at Fight for the Future added, "For the FCC's process to have any legitimacy, they simply cannot move forward until an investigation has been conducted."

5 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Weird behavior by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know what it is about network neutrality but every single time there is anything about it, it brings out the slashdot anon trolls en masse.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Weird behavior by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd say we should have as few rules as practical

      I agree. This is a very simplistic rule that is quite practical.

      we shouldn't enact real rules and police them with real internet police because of some imaginary scenarios involving google.com.

      Except it's a very real scenario: After Netflix pays Comcast, speeds improve 65%

      But the Net Neutrality side is too dogmatic, refusing to acknowledge anyone else's interests.

      Whose interests does it refuse to acknowledge? I don't understand how it could be for anything but extorting sites to fork over cash like comcast did to netflix.

      Declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you a "troll" because "what about my imaginary google.com scenario" isn't really a way to have a discussion.

      That's not what I'm doing at all. If you read the comments above my original, none of them are actually about net neutrality but rather political troll posts.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  2. Entire BUtterfield clan supports by UziBeatle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      THis is interesting coincidence::
    https://www.comcastroturf.com/
    enter Butterfield as search term
    End up at
    https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/searc...?

    With results of 17 Butterfield surnames all reporting
    exact same text . All submitted their FCC filing
    on exact same date. Huh.

    I"m sure there is nothing to see here so safe
    to assume FCC will just accept them all as legit.

    --
    Something between the lines jumps out and bites your arm off. Soltan Gris / London
  3. Re:Slashdot are missing the point by laughingskeptic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The bot-driven fake submissions are in support of ENDING Net Neutrality. This was not a false-flag operation. These posts likely came from the DCI Group ( https://www.dcigroup.com/ ) which was hired by the National Cable and Telecom Association via Broadband for America see: http://www.zdnet.com/article/a... and https://news.vice.com/article/... .

  4. Re: These are leftists demanding an investigation by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree, except for the part about Putin being thrown out. I was under the impression that the economic consequences of corruption he brings would doom Russia. Indeed I can see it has hurt them short and long-term, and his actions have also brought economic sanctions. However, he's somehow managed to trick Russian people with propaganda, enough to keep some level of popularity despite terrible economic conditions. Russian people, like my American back-country neighbors, blindly support the strongmen that abuse them.

    With the rising price of oil, some of that economic pain will ease. Now is the time I thought he'd have been ousted, but with the success of his propaganda machine in electing Trump, I'm wondering what evidence we have of Putin's impending demise?