Slashdot Mirror


IT Crash Causes British Airways To Cancel All Flights (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CNBC: British Airways canceled all flights from London's Heathrow and Gatwick airports on Saturday as a global IT failure upended the travel plans of tens of thousands of people on a busy U.K. holiday weekend. The airline said it was suffering a "major IT systems failure" around the world. Chief executive Alex Cruz said "we believe the root cause was a power-supply issue and we have no evidence of any cyberattack." He said the crash had affected "all of our check-in and operational systems." BA operates hundreds of flights from the two London airports on a typical day -- and both are major hubs for worldwide travel. Several hours after problems began cropping up Saturday morning, BA suspended flights up to 6 p.m. because the two airports had become severely congested. The airline later scrapped flights from Heathrow and Gatwick for the rest of the day.

184 comments

  1. a power supply failure?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So a power supply failure can bring down all operations on a global scale. Good to know that BA had outsourced part of their IT staff to India!!!

    1. Re:a power supply failure?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      BA is awaiting a call from an Indian claiming to be from Microsoft saying they have a faulty PC and it sending out signals to Microsoft and getting to look at the event log. This alerted BA to pay the individual $150 dollars to fix their PC by download TeamViewer

    2. Re:a power supply failure?? by dbIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      So a power supply failure can bring down all operations on a global scale. Good to know that BA had outsourced part of their IT staff to India!!!

      As another poster quoted "BA in 2016 made hundreds of dedicated and loyal IT staff redundant and outsourced the work to India".

    3. Re: a power supply failure?? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      outsourced to india...the majority of "them" live here in the U.S selling tech positions. more excedrin pm / crown please.

    4. Re:a power supply failure?? by robinsc · · Score: 1

      Except the power supplies sit in a DC somewhere in the UK where local Uk residents felt they did not need to do any kind of periodic maintenance ?
      No use blaming the folks in India for this one. Perhaps its time to move the datacenters to India - oh I forgot UK laws won't allow that.

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
    5. Re:a power supply failure?? by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      "where local Uk residents felt they did not need to do any kind of periodic maintenance"

      It is equally possible that the 'UK residents' were sacked because management thought they were not needed because it seemed cheaper on the short term.

      As for moving the data centers to India, it is a bad idea for the heat alone, but there are also very good reasons why there are laws to that effect.

    6. Re:a power supply failure?? by robinsc · · Score: 1

      Not all of india is hot... probably you might have heard of the himalaya mountain range that sits around 60% in India ?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Himalayan_Region

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
    7. Re:a power supply failure?? by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      We are not just talking about heat.

      If we disregard the fact that the power supply story is absolute bullshit, did you have an actual place in mind that would have redundant fiber optic links and reliable power for a data center?

      Have you given any thought to network latency?

  2. Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I didn't realized that the British celebrated U.S. Memorial Day weekend.

    1. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I didn't realized that the British celebrated U.S. Memorial Day weekend.

      Ramadan starts today, and Monday is the Spring Bank Holiday, when many schools and businesses close.

    2. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ramadan starts today

      Maybe it's a good thing all the flights are grounded, then.

      ***MUSLIM EXPLODES***

    3. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is one of the holiest and most British of British holidays.

    4. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is actually "(Late) Spring bank holiday". The UK has depoliticized and dereligionized most of their holidays (notable exceptions are Christmas and Easter), so there is a bunch of "bank holidays" around the year that fall on Mondays (to provide extended weekends). This particular holiday seems to have replaced "Whit Monday" (day after Pentecost), which was a moveable Christian holiday. So, as you should expect, it is not related to the US Memorial Day.
      The equivalent to the US Memorial Day for the UK (and Commonwealth nations) is the "Remembrance day" on November 11th (end date of WWI), which is not a bank holiday (so you normally go to work that day, usually wearing a poppy).

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    5. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I didn't realized that the British celebrated U.S. Memorial Day weekend.

      Believe it or not, the world does not revolve around the US. Other countries celebrate holidays of their own that have nothing to do with the US. Some of them happen to fall on the same dates as the US happens to be celebrating something, others don't. Shocking, but true.

    6. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      full of holes, perhaps. craters, even.

    7. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, the world does not revolve around the US.

      But Trump is going to make Pax Americana great again!

    8. Re: Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by intertrode · · Score: 1

      That joke went right over your head.

    9. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "world does not revolve around the US"
      I am pretty sure the world actually does revolve around the US. The international language of business is English. The US dollar is the worlds number one reserve currency. A large part of the world lives comfortably under the security umbrella the US military provides. US dominates the world when it comes to entertainment. When is the last time Russian or Chinese produced a movie that became a global "blockbuster"? When is the last time you saw any large political protests in the US targeting any foreign leader? Look at all the protests taking around the world aimed at Trump. Same thing happened when Bush was President and I am sure you could step back through time and see many other examples. The world pays such close attention to US elections it's a wonder they haven't asked to vote. You certainly don't see any US reciprocal interest in foreign leaders. And it is not because Americans are stupid it's that they just don't care. So yeah I believe the world actually does revolve around the US.

    10. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The international language of business is English.

      Did you know that England isn't in the US?

    11. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When is the last time Russian or Chinese produced a movie that became a global "blockbuster"?

      How American movies would be blockbusters without Chinese funding and ticket sales?

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2017/03/04/how-china-has-taken-over-the-worldwide-box-office-in-2017/

      When is the last time you saw any large political protests in the US targeting any foreign leader?

      How about Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdogan?

      http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/turkey-demands-apology-beating-up-us-protesters

    12. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      " When is the last time Russian or Chinese produced a movie that became a global "blockbuster"?"

      The latest film to win 8 Oscars was Indian.

    13. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      The United States also has a military-based holiday on November 11th (Veterans Day). Unlike Memorial Day, many businesses/institutions don't take that day off either. Not sure if you know about it, but based on your description I'd say Veterans Day sounds more like Remembrance Day than Memorial Day - which these days is more known for hot dogs, parties, and retail "sales events" than cleaning up grave sites and remembering veterans' sacrifices.

    14. Re: Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of which should lead us to the natural observation, that the US was founded by the English.

    15. Re: Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, but you, guys, don't enjoy that responsibly.

    16. Re: Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whit Monday is next week (2 June). This was for Ascension, which was last Thursday. Many people took Friday off to have a long weekend.

      Posted from Catholic Luxembourg.

    18. Re:Busy U.K. Holiday Weekend... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's Ramadan, not Ram-a-dam.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MBA to board: I've got a great idea to cut costs! It will save millions!

    1. Re:outsourcing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And everyone else is doing it too!

    2. Re:outsourcing by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      Reality: they will write this off as having a bad day and continue with them getting their multi-million bonus at the end of the year. In other words, nothing will change.

    3. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far more likely they'll grant themselves even greater bonuses for the way they handle this totally unpredictable, someone else's fault, failure.

    4. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is a tiny, tiny hope the classification of "force majeure" will be ruled to not be appropriate for your IT breaking down and instead classified and gross negligence (which I would claim is the more honest classification, at least until more details are known).
      In that case the cost of this would skyrocket and there might be an actually impact.
      It is really ridiculous how nowadays whenever something goes wrong you can just say "oh, the computer did it" and nobody gets any blame.
      It is time that these "it's the computer" excuses gets treated the same way as someone saying "the dog ate it", because it really is the same thing.

    5. Re:outsourcing by plopez · · Score: 1

      Never admit failure, always claim the victory.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:outsourcing by plopez · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what they said, IT services are now provided globally by a range of suppliers and this is very common practice across all industries" see the Register for the qoute

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

      As my parents replied when I used that excuse as a child, "If everyone was jumping off a 100 ft cliff would you jump off too?"

      MBAs are herd animals

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were going to fly in a technician from New Deli with a new power supply to install, but oddly his flight was cancelled!

  4. Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somewhere, there is probably an IT guy who has been begging for the budget to upgrade some old machines, or move the services onto a cloud provider and was ignored.

    He's crying today, because this huge revenue loss could probably have been avoided with a small budget for newer hardware or more redundancy.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by nadaou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's crying today, because this huge revenue loss could probably have been avoided with a small budget for newer hardware or more redundancy.

      And despite that s/he knows who will take the blame for it.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    2. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      move the services onto a cloud provider

      "Cloud" service providers have no place in mission critical roles by virtue that the "Cloud" is a faster way of saying "abdicating responsibility". If you make millions of dollars a day on the back of your IT infrastructure, then the last thing you do is outsource the responsibility of said infrastructure to a 3rd party company which has different priorities than you do.

      Any IT manager making such a recommendation is a) lazy, b) useless and c) should be fired.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And his "I told you so"s will be quietly swept under the rug as the suits fit him up as a scapegoat.

    4. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only alternative is to spend vast amounts of money building your own redundant systems, which clearly BA were unwilling to do. Using cloud services makes perfect sense.

      Take Amazon's cloud services as an example. To get that kind of reliability, with systems distributed around the world for responsive operation an redundancy you are going to need a large number of geographically distributed services and a team to look after them. A team that is available 24/7 with response times in minutes.

      And you will still have the same local problems, like internet connection reliability, and the same development problems. You don't have to waste time and effort administering your own servers either, dealing with mundane stuff like HDD failures or managing 30 different datacentre operators.

      Unless your company is willing to put a massive amount of effort into that stuff for some reason, it's dumb to even try.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Somewhere, there is probably an IT guy who has been begging for the budget to upgrade some old machines, or move the services onto a cloud provider and was ignored.

      On the contrary, that IT guy was probably made redundant in 2016. As the BBC article notes:-

      The GMB union says this meltdown could have been avoided if BA had not made hundreds of IT staff redundant and outsourced their jobs to India at the end of last year.[..]

      "BA in 2016 made hundreds of dedicated and loyal IT staff redundant and outsourced the work to India... many viewed the company's actions as just plain greedy."

      Let's hope BA continues to reap as many "savings" from that outsourcing as they did today. :-)

      He's crying today.

      Going by the likely response of the laid-off employees to the predicament of BA, I guess he *would* have tears coming out of his eyes.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere, there is probably an IT guy who has been begging for the budget to upgrade some old machiness

      That guy was sacked by BA in 2016 when they outsourced their IT to India.

    7. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't blame the IT workers. I had the same thing happen where I work. The middle manager, trying to look good, cut necessary costs. One power blip in the grid, and everything was dead because we had undersized UPSs everywhere, and they couldn't handle the load. He said "inrush current" thousands of times, but never knew what it meant.

    8. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by umghhh · · Score: 1

      You realize of course that there are such things like private cloud as well as public clouds whose owners do as you please with regard to redundancy and reliability but possibly better. Choice is yours and usually cloud or not if things go wrong you always find a reason.

    9. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't blame the IT workers.

      Pretty sure I never did that.

      Any blame I'd put at the feet of whatever amoral rent-a-manager decided he could save a few pennies by ditching their established IT staff then contracting their jobs out to a third party company on the other side of the world.

      Let's face it, there *are* likely quite a few talented IT people from India- but as the Indians themselves have said, the good ones are probably working in other countries, or at least not for race-to-the-bottom contractors likely paying peanuts to staff with patchy educational skills. The contractor probably making a *very* nice profit on them- still appearing cheaper than the client's existing staff, while overselling their talent. (And I've no doubt that those employees are peons to whatever mediocre middle management the contractor has- and their circumstances in general- so it's questionable how much they're to blame personally).

      I've absolutely no doubt that the (apparent) ability to treat IT staff as a pure commodity is very appealing to such managers. At least until the shit hits the fan and it turns out that (surprise, surprise) it doesn't always work that way.

      Even if it was a power supply issue (and I'm pretty sceptical about that), it sounds like the resulting problems would still be a result of their penny-pinching sacking of the experienced staff most likely to know what they were doing (and be in a position to do it). It's sure as hell not their responsibility any more. And given how they were treated, they'd be perfectly entitled to feel schadenfreude at their former employer's travails.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere, there is probably an IT guy who has been begging for the budget to upgrade some old machines, or move the services onto a cloud provider and was ignored.

      He's crying today, because this huge revenue loss could probably have been avoided with a small budget for newer hardware or more redundancy.

      And he'll be fired as well...

    11. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that is so hilarious. Look at where many companies host their web sites and web store fronts. Yep, AWS, Azure, and others. They also don't write their own payment code - they use Braintree and others. Running your own infrastructure is so 1999.

    12. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume the individual in question is transsexual?

    13. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Somewhere, there is probably an IT guy who has been begging for the budget to upgrade some old machines, or move the services onto a cloud provider and was ignored.

      He's crying today, because this huge revenue loss could probably have been avoided with a small budget for newer hardware or more redundancy.

      No, he's crying because he's been fired. Management, of course, decided it was all his fault.

    14. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Look at where many companies host their web sites and web store fronts. Yep, AWS, Azure, and others.

      You can do that because web sites and web store fronts can't possibly kill people if they fail.

    15. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless your company is willing to put a massive amount of effort into that stuff for some reason, it's dumb to even try.

      IAG (the holding group of British Airways) have a market cap of 13 billion GBP or about 17 billion USD, guesstimating by fleet size BA is almost half of that. I'd understand if you were talking about a fly speck of a company but an 8 billion dollar company can damn well run their own infrastructure without a cloud provider with geographical distribution, 24/7 available teams and all that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    16. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Netflix has a $70B market cap and they run in AWS and have no intention whatsoever to go back to traditional data centers. Running them well is hard and hiring competent people to run them is even harder: Amazon, Google, Facebook and Microsoft hired a good chunk of the talent. Zinga tried AWS, found it expensive so went back to traditional Datacenter and cambe back running to Amazon.
      I have worked on several migrations to AWS and the dumb companies do it without changing their software architecture.

      Newsflash, AWS is expensive if you do not rewrite your code for auto scaling and Setup your QA/Dev environments to be 'on demand'. But as far as uptime is concerned, you cannot beat Amazon uptime if you have built multi-region deployments. If you use it like a traditional data center, well shit happens and Amazon machines die like any other. Their SLAs actually guarantee nothing about individual hosts.

    17. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Usually the problem is when they go in house they want their administrators to work for $15 an hour, and then when they can't find good ones and the systems fail, they throw their hands up and go back to paying way more for cloud services than proper admins would have cost in the first place.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stop it with the whole 'they should use cloud' nonsense.. First of all, most airlines are still on mainframes, and most of them get uptimes close to Amazon. From a mainframe. Can you believe it?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The only alternative is to spend vast amounts of money building your own redundant systems

      Unless it doesn't actually cost vast amounts of money and in the long run ends up cheaper than outsourcing to people who are (or should be) spending money on the same thing and charging you extra money on top.
      Beyond a certain point it gets cheaper to do things yourself instead of paying for someone else's profits.

    20. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I run two small datacenters and do so at ~17% the cost of AWS. If my bosses would actually approved the extra cost ~6%, I'd run them dually redundant to each other. But they won't so I can't. That is about a thirty percent increase to current costs, no way they approve they 600% increase to go to Amazon, much 1200% to do so redundantly. Plus the migration cost and risk.

      My unscheduled down time in the last seven years is about thirty hours total. Including major damage to the facility during a weather event.

    21. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and with that, this news article has gone from sad to hilarious!

    22. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Kormoran · · Score: 1

      Not so simple. In my small town there is a notorious firm, with business worldwide, running an in-house central DB for ALL its stores on a 486 server, because back in the days they signed a per-core contract with Oracle... 200.000 euro each CPU core. New hardware is all multicore, so they simply cannot afford a new server. And yes, it's ungodly slow. To the point that stores are reverting to fax ordering.

      That said, OK here we can have some dumbass around, but I would expect someone big like BA to perform much better than that....

    23. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by jowaju · · Score: 1

      That's a complete lie. You can still get a Celeron G440 or G460 single core with up to 32gb DDR3 memory from Newegg right now, not to mention the thousands of options on used dells out there. If they truly need a single core machine, they are out there. Someone is being lazy or deceitful if they say otherwise.

    24. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What concerns me though is that ion spite of that, Amazon went down due to a thunderstorm. And again due to fat fingering a re-configuration.

      I run my own servers. Admittedly on a much smaller scale, but Amazon has had 3 failures since the last one I had.

      I can see use cases for the cloud but it's not going to give you proper high availability.

    25. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I also call BS. You can also disable cores in a lot of architectures. The mongrel 486 would also have ISA/EISA/SCSI-2 disk systems. Try buying replacement drives for those.

    26. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Market cap is quite a useless figure to quote when talking about base spending for something that doesn't create dollars. BP's market cap was 7x that of IAG when it almost went completely under during the spill. Likewise many airlines have a huge market cap but are struggling financially to stay a float.

      A better metric to use would be cash flows, and BA is doing incredibly well for an airline in that regard adding 230mm GBP to their balance sheet last year. This free capital shows a company's ability to invest in things that don't produce value, though ideally you still want to invest in something that will increase profits with it.

    27. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      BA does have its own redundant infrastructure.

      Whatever they are saying, this was not a simple hardware failure. Most likely something like somebody fubarred their internal DNS or something.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    28. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      There is no cloud, there's just somebody else's computer.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    29. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a transportation company. They had two mainframes, one in the midlands and one in the north. Any app was primary on one and secondary on the other.

      It wasn't instant failover but had one gone down operations would have been up within an hour or two[1], not down for two days.

      I've worked at smaller companies that had a similar setup with unix boxen.

      [1] No, most of the delay was *not* while we loaded boxes of punch cards onto stagecoaches.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A big company is going to be big enough to gain from economies of scale.

      A smaller company not so much. You can't buy half a server, and a top notch machine doesn't require twice as many admins as one half the power. It makes more sense for them. It's a way of pooling resources, in a way.

      I'd say BA is big.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by robinsc · · Score: 1

      Amazon doesn't guarantee any SLAs so where does the minutes figure come from ?

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
    32. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      Hate to break this to you, but Amazon's cloud has been down more than the airline's systems have.

      At least one very large cloud provider doesn't even back up your data: The contract says they are not responsible for data loss.

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    33. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Here's a list of times AWS had outages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Compares well to how often BA has computer problems. Also note that in ever instance they fixed it within an hour, not a few days like BA is taking.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      The Wiki doesn't list the outage time, but at least one of them was way more than an hour.

      Also, the duration of the outage doesn't have to be really long to mess up an airline, because the recovery can take days.

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    35. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      In the days of a 486 there was no such thing as a "core", it would be a "per physical cpu" license if anything...
      And you could always create a VM on any modern hardware which only exposed a single core to the guest OS.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    36. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the executive who was ultimately responsible for precipitating the whole affair will still get their bonus for cutting costs.

    37. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      "I'm not blaming the IT workers" isn't true, when you follow it up with blaming the IT workers (contracted). The contracting doesn't mean sub-standard workers are used. It means the management is even more separated from those doing the work, so a contractor suggesting $100k in power upgrades, to be done by his outsource team is seen as a sales pitch, not a "do this or you lose $1B from a failed infrastructure". That's purely a management failure that's unrelated to contracting, location of the contractors, or the workers in any way. If management doesn't solicit and listen to workers' ideas, then the company will fail.

      And yes, you dd imply that the workers hold some of that responsibility. They don't.

      Even if it was a power supply issue (and I'm pretty sceptical about that), it sounds like the resulting problems would still be a result of their penny-pinching sacking of the experienced staff most likely to know what they were doing (and be in a position to do it). It's sure as hell not their responsibility any more.

      What I've seen on the news has indicated a "power supply" issue, as in the supply of power, not what computer guys would think of as a "power supply". A power failure of some kind caused the issue, according to all the accounts so far, and I've seen nothing that indicated there's any reason to doubt that account. One of the cardinal rules of publicly traded companies is: Don't say it in an official press release if it isn't true. Anything else opens you up to lots of liability. The word choice of "power supply" is irrelevant. "power issue" is what was meant. And there's no reason to even suspect that wasn't the cause.

      But, for a minimal cost, they could have replicated their infrastructure in another data center (certainly minimal compared to the loss they have on their hands now). If the problem were with a cloud provider, it seems likely others would have been affected, or someone would have started pointing fingers or leaks. So it would seem that they were hosting their own stuff somewhere. Did they build/select a place with sufficient power, and best practices power delivery? I'm guessing it'll come out that they either picked the lowest-cost host, or did it themselves with worst practices implementation. It has nothing to do with the workers, and everything to do with the "cut costs at all costs" mentality of the "penny wise, pound foolish" corporate practices.

      Bringing up outsourcing is a way of blaming the contractors, when that's likely irrelevant. Management is the sole point of responsibility, and we need not mention anything else as a distraction.

    38. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      "I'm not blaming the IT workers" isn't true, when you follow it up with blaming the IT workers (contracted).

      If you go back and pay attention to what I was *actually* saying- rather than viewing things through the prism of your own personal experience- you'll see that the only thing the contracted workers were "blamed" for was for being employed on the basis of cost rather than skill, and for being treated as a commodity.

      In other words, it's quite obvious that it was primarily management- both at the contractor and at BA- that were being blamed here. Well, at least I thought it was obvious.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    39. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netlifx is not really on AWS - they just deploy the important but not core-important stuff to AWS - which make sense because cloud/hosting providers have a role in the stack of most modern companies. The main reason why they can't be 100% on AWS is the costs of bandwidth, hardware, cooling and power is way cheaper if you run your own infrastructure. Since after employment and content rights - those costs might be a large burden on their budget and it makes perfect sense to minimize those fixed costs by running your own CDN.
      http://www.networkworld.com/article/3037428/cloud-computing/netflix-is-not-really-all-in-on-amazon-s-cloud.html

    40. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      the only thing the contracted workers were "blamed" for was for being employed on the basis of cost rather than skill,

      The implication is obviously that the skill was lower, or there'd be no need to mention it. They were picked on cost. Period. Mentioning skill weakens your claimed focus solely on management. Why bring up the skill of the workers if it's unrelated to the incident?

      The effect would have been the same if they had replaced the workers with young new-hires, cheap retirees, or any other group they intended to pay the minimum they could get away with and planned to ignore feedback from. The union has claimed that the firing of experienced workers made the outage worse, because the new people hadn't ever run up a DR failover to backup systems. BA claims that's not true (though is unclear on which part of the claim isn't true). I expect many will use this for their own political gain. But hopefully this will show people that IT is worth paying for. Like the NIH, struck by ransomware not long ago, for failing to keep computers patched, failure to block attacks in firewalls, and failure in blocking malware on endpoints. Any one of 10 different IT policies/capabilities at "best practices" and they'd not have gotten hit (or hit as hard).

    41. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Going from a custom solution with outsourced staff to a cloud based one is just going from one shitstorm to another, but with the added bonus of relinquishing all control over how it is managed.

      If they actually cared about their data they would keep redundant datacentres with competent local staff.

      Clearly they don't, so lots of luck to them.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    42. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention it could come out tomorrow that someone had bee cooking the books and Amazon is bankrupt and POOF your whole cloud is gone.
      If you want proper fail-safe you'd have to split your infrastructure across at least 2 cloud providers. Which seems feasible, but you'd probably have a huge amount of extra cost.

    43. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For many, if not most web stores (not selling completely generic things with heavy competition that people want to have RIGHT NOW), being down a day just means double the sales tomorrow.
      Downtime is about as close to 0 cost as in any business.
      An airline is in a VERY different business than a merchant. Hopefully everybody in any relevant position in BA knows that...

    44. Re: Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Netflix has a $70B market cap and they run in AWS and have no intention whatsoever to go back to traditional data centers. Running them well is hard and hiring competent people to run them is even harder: Amazon, Google, Facebook and Microsoft hired a good chunk of the talent. Zinga tried AWS, found it expensive so went back to traditional Datacneveral migrations to AWS and the dumb companies do it without chewing their software architecture.

      Newsflash, AWS is expensive if you do not rewrite your code for auto scaling and Setup your QA/Dev environments to be 'on demand'. But as far as uptime is concerned, you cannot beat Amazon uptime if you have built multi-region deployments. If you use it like a traditional data center, well shit happens and Amazon machines die like any other. Their SLAs actually guarantee nothing about individual hosts.

      That's horsecrap, and the "everyone else is wrong so use our new paradigm to overlook our problems" attitude is exactly what's wrong with it.

      If you're making consumer-level applications that don't need data integrity then it might be "good enough". If you need enterprise reliability, it's absolutely not "good enough" without a lot more engineering.

      There are plenty of competent datacenter operations folks, and running one is NOT rocket science, it just requires awareness of reliability engineering and infrastructure/operational experience. In exchange, you have actual control and actual responsibility for your mission-critical infrastructure.

      You know, just like how we used to do it.

    45. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by sjames · · Score: 1

      Quite true. Or, like megaupload, some other customer might attract unwanted attention that spills over on you.

      More fundamentally, if my IT is supporting a million a year in income, I will treat it as a vital part of 1 million in value. If I outsource it to the cloud for $1000/year, it will be treated as a vital part of 1 thousand in value. If you aren't your provider's biggest customer,. your infrastructure as implemented in the cloud will never be treated with the importance you might give it yourself. Most of us would at most represent a drop in the bucket to Amazon. That's not meant as a dig at Amazon, just a mathematical fact.

    46. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, stick with DOS.

    47. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So call Oracle and ask about tools to migrate from the old as dinosaur shit Oracle system to something modern like Mysql or Ms sql server and see what happens, things might get considerably cheaper real quick; Oracle isn't the only game in town anymore.

    48. Re:Somewhere, an IT guy is crying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, you might remember AWS suffered a major outage based on storage recently. https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/01/the-day-amazon-s3-storage-stood-still/

      The point is what immediate redundancy does an operation have in place to take a quick power outage. i.e. is there battery power in the rack, or data center to maintain operations until the generators that you hopefully have come on line. Do you have multiple redundant internet service providers (with battery backup) available to each data center? While moving to the "cloud" saves money for sure, you also lose control of operationalized redundancy.

      I doubt it will every see the light of day, but most of the outages come down to a financial/budget decision where decision makers decide to take a risk, and save money. Be it in staffing, redundancy, disaster recovery, or having real live tests for immediate and long term outage recovery.

  5. Other sources: IT outsourcing by sanf780 · · Score: 1
    It looks like BAE has recently replaced most of its IT workforce with south Asian contractors. It might or might not be related, as the official statement is power supply failure.

    Here you have the BBC report on the matter: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-400...

    1. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by gilgongo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It looks like BAE has recently replaced most of its IT workforce with south Asian contractors.

      OT: it's BA, not BAE. The latter is a different company concerned mainly with blowing up flying objects, along with people in them. Easy mistake to make though.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    2. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Power supply failure" does not take down a well-designed and well-maintained infrastructure. This is just a smokescreen to hide incompetence.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, OT since BA is having the problems and BA did the outsourcing.

      Although wasn't BAe involved in that 146 thing? Sure, people in them weren't absolutely safe, but I remember them holding together as mad ex-employees took them supersonic.

      Don't mention the bleed air thing, though

    4. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retard

    5. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by OdinOdin_ · · Score: 1

      I read it as "Power Supply" failure, as my thinking was something more than a single device was affected, due to power supply interruption.

    6. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by mjwx · · Score: 1

      It looks like BAE has recently replaced most of its IT workforce with south Asian contractors.

      OT: it's BA, not BAE. The latter is a different company concerned mainly with blowing up flying objects, along with people in them. Easy mistake to make though.

      Just to clarify the parents point, BA is British Airways, a commercial airline operating out of the United Kingdom. BAE Systems, formerly British Aerospace, is a defence contractor who primarily works for the UK Government and produces amongst other things, the Harrier jump jet, the UK's Eurofighter Typhoons, M2/M3 Bradleys (via an acquisition of United Defence), Astute class submarines and Type 45 destroyers.

      Despite BAE's impressive work it's the service in on BA flights that truly strikes fear into the hearts of our enemies.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It does not really matter. Something this critical done right is done in two geographically separate redundant data-centers with independent power sources (different power stations and power-lines) and enough independent local power to survive long enough for anything except a major catastrophe being fixed by the power people. I have seen several instances of this being done. What happened here seems to have been a minor incident that got major because of lack of redundancy and preparedness. A major incident would probably kill them in that state.

      Somebody in BA management fucked up pretty badly and as they likely will not be held accountable, they will continue to do so.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Other sources: IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Despite BAE's impressive work it's the service in on BA flights that truly strikes fear into the hearts of our enemies." Wish I had mod points.

  6. Idiots in charge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Mythical Man-Month was written in 1975. In a very detailed way, it described how common business-planning stategies fail when applied to information technology projects. But did anyone listen? We've known how to avoid these sorts of problems for over 40 years!

    1. Re:Idiots in charge! by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "We" (as in people that actually have a clue what they are doing) have indeed known that. But the decision-makers have no such understanding. While it is really tacky, I have had to explain catastrophe scenarios to customers that would have killed their company, and all that was needed was a failed software functionality update (which they wanted to do without a possibility to roll-back and no working plan for keeping business going any other way). The people making the decisions these days are bean-counters with zero understanding of risk-management or "visionaries" that have even less of an understanding about the reality of things. And, unfortunately, this often is aided by a corporate culture of "don't rock the boat" and people that warn of consequences get silenced.

      Expect more of these utterly pathetic failures.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Idiots in charge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. BA offshores IT
      2. UK has bank holiday weekend (3 days)
      3. Upgrade / new release cockup ==> systems down
      4. No plan B.

    3. Re:Idiots in charge! by dwywit · · Score: 2

      I think it got much worse when accountants started calling themselves "management consultants", as if expertise in managing finance somehow magically transferred to all aspects of management.

      Instead, the balance sheet became the be-all and end-all for decision-making.

      This is British Airways, one of the largest commercial airlines..... in the world /clarkson. They've had a pretty robust system for a long time. I find it hard to believe that there were sufficient failures of multiple systems to lose power.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    4. Re:Idiots in charge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's idiocy like this that will save our bacon when the aliens invade. Just take down the mothership and all of the drones will instantly power down too.

    5. Re:Idiots in charge! by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Thanks. So agree. I'm semi-retired now, but my last serious job was in a small, very competent investment bank. Any major change had to survive the change committee and have a detailed, well-documented roll-back plan. We usually did the doing in the middle of the night at the weekend when major markets were closed as well. Also, senior managers were somewhat tech-savvy and very supportive.

      This BA thing isn't the first one either: https://www.theguardian.com/mo... and probably won't be the last. Because the other thing that is going on is that senior people and consultants (accountants) have confused resilience (extra hardware etc. to deal with spikes and outages) with inefficiency (oh, that's too much stuff, you can do it with 'less').

      I still enjoy computing and computers but I'm frankly glad to be away from this sort of stupidity.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    6. Re:Idiots in charge! by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of sympathy with what you write. However, most large organizations these days do take disaster recover and business continuity somewhat seriously, and have budgets to ensure issues like this are supposed to be addressed.

      As others have opined, while some kind of power outage might have precipitated the problems, surely there must have been a cascading series of events that prevented the system from coming back online quickly. Of course, a power outage should not bring down critical servers in the first place: UPS combined with backup generators should keep critical infrastructure online. However, I have seen cases where backup generators were not regularly tested, and failed when really needed. Once servers crash, especially if it is at peak transaction times, you may be faced with time consuming database restarts, with lengthy logs that need to be processed. Even assuming there is a redundant secondary data center with database replication, it only takes a software glitch to prevent that from saving you (especially as such recovery scenarios are rarely sufficiently tested). I doubt we will ever get the complete story, but multiple infrastructure, software and human deficiencies probably combined to generate this fiasco.

  7. Backup plan.. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

    and the backup plan for when the IT systems fail is: water and food vouchers..

    --
    ---
    1. Re:Backup plan.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actual BA passenger here, currently in Austin TX, and was due to fly to LHR on today's direct flight at 6pm central time. Just to highlight how catastrophic the failure is:

        - Heard about the outage this morning, and looked online for more information, very little actual info available. I logged into BA with my flight booking, and the page indicated that the flight was still fine. The system also had my email address and made the statement "we will contact you if there are any problems".

        - Based on this I assumed the flight was OK.

        - Turned up at the airport and the BA check-in is closed. There was a large crowd of unhappy people, a haggard team of BA staff behind the counter, but no one was moving and nothing was happening. After 20 minutes I went and told the BA manager that he had better tell the crowd what is happening before things get out of hand. Eventually, he did redeem himself by doing a walk-through and chatting with people and handing out a letter explaining that the flight was canceled.

        - Not only was the flight canceled, but their systems were unable to do any rescheduling. They asked us to leave the airport, find a hotel, contact them tomorrow, and ultimately seek reimbursement for expenses.

        - Disappointed, I wandered down to American Airways (a One World partner, with whom I am saphire) and had a chat with their staff. As if by magic, they somehow pulled my booking from the BA system and put me on some AA flights free of charge. Amazing.

      Not sure how much of it is staff incompetence, or the system is just completely fucked, but this mess is going to take days to resolve...as for me, I'm off in a few minutes, best of luck to the other BA passengers caught up in this mess!

    2. Re:Backup plan.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A bunch of the American airline companies have supercomputers just to figure out how far they can overbook planes to squeeze profits, I would be very suprised if they didn't have redundant copies of the One World database. Their link to the BA side was probably down, which meant they couldn't sync but could still work off the most recent copy of flight bookings they had available.

      Caching like that makes sense when you're tying together a massive number of airlines and don't need to sync the data on a sub-second real-time basis. It also helps in situations like this where your partner cheaps out on their IT infrastructure and causes outages, while you stay fully online.

  8. Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by david.emery · · Score: 2

    It's my vague recollection that at least one other airline had a power-related IT outage within the last year or so.

    I would have thought "reliable power at scale" was a solved problem.

    1. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      There are no "power related" IT outages. There are some where the IT infrastructure could not handle one specific system going down, and that is not a technical issue, but something else which usually is called "gross negligence". The seeming technological root-causes are just transparent lies by misdirection that serve to obscure the fact that management caused this by incompetence, arrogance, greed and general stupidity.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re: Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by guruevi · · Score: 2

      I think last time it was a data center failure. This time it seems like a power supply issue. The real problem is lack of redundancy and planning.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are some where the IT infrastructure could not handle one specific system going down, and that is not a technical issue, but something else which usually is called "gross negligence".

      Technically, that's known as a single point of failure.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure

      The term "gross negligence" doesn't come into play until a lawsuit is filed. Since no one died and/or injured from this outage, a gross inconvenience doesn't rise to gross negligence.

    4. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by Kamien · · Score: 1

      No power related IT outages? What about this? http://www.bbc.com/news/techno...

    5. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Datacenters can suffer power disruptions. There are plenty of failure mechanisms between the user and the datacenter. Your post was fact free and just a rant.

    6. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      BA is not the only incompetent ones on this planet. The root cause is not the power-problem.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Funny. You are as arrogant as you are clueless. Probably words like "geo-redundancy" are too long for you. This is not your amateur home installation.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re: Is anyone tracking causes for Airline outages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they had no real backup plan.

      If you have a redundant system, and you expect the backups to work, then you need to switch to them from time to time.
      That means pulling the power plug on active systems and letting things sort themselves out.
      Kind of a scary thing to do on the system supporting your revenue, but even (or maybe especially) the manager should be able to do it.
      Hint to the clueless manager: If your IT guy says you have redundant servers, ask him to show them to you and pick one and ask him to pull the plug.
      If he gets really nervous, you may need another IT guy.

      So when was the last time the BA exec that did the outsourcing witnessed any redundancy testing in his IT department?
      If he doesn't have the knowledge to do that, he doesn't have the knowledge to pick the folks to run his IT.
      And so you get what they got.

  9. The major issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the outsourced IT guys from TCS in India need to fly to the UK to fix the 'power supply' issue but currently they are unable to book a flight on British Airways.....

    1. Re: The major issue is... by Solo-Malee · · Score: 1

      Mod up +1 funny :-)

      --
      "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
    2. Re:The major issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny, but the bigger issue is there anyone at Tata that was there the last time BA restarted their systems? At the bank I used to work at, we were replaced by contractors, and two years later when they restarted the zSystem, they found-out the hard way that no one knew what to do.

    3. Re:The major issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus they can not spare anyone from the US as they are all busy.

    4. Re:The major issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the ones that took United had to be hospitalised on arrival.

    5. Re:The major issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have used FedEx; they have boxes in all sizes. With their luck the replacement power supply would have been in a separate box.

  10. All LONDON flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please note that this is just flights out of Gatwick and Heathrow airports in London, not all BA flights. There will be knock-on effects elsewhere as those are both major hubs for BA, but many BA flights aren't effected.

    1. Re: All LONDON flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pish. Try reading the news. BA confirmed it as a global outage. Damn near every flight they have is affected. But let's not let facts get in the way, eh?

    2. Re:All LONDON flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "those are both major hubs for BA"

      This is an understatement. Due to the way airlines work, close to 99% of all BA flights will originate, or terminate, at either of those airports. Anything else is done through code sharing, and the actual plane will be a partner airline, not BA. There are some rare exceptions to this rule, but ultimately, this is global.

      The real question is: if I have purchased a set of flights, say from the UK to the US, then a series of US domestic flights with partner airlines (AA) with a return flight to the UK next week. Can I still make my domestic flight today with AA, even though it was booked with a BA flight number under code sharing?

  11. Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, it requires more than the myopic 3-month planning that most MBAs are capable of at maximum. It also requires a real understanding of risk management and staying away from all short-term optimization. Otherwise, you end up at "save a million, lose a billion", as this seems to be a fine example of.

    Claiming this was a "power supply issue" is just lying by misdirection. The root cause is lack of redundancy, lack of resilience and lack of effective business continuity management. All things that cost money and that do not generate profit _unless_ something like this happens. In a healthy infrastructure, one (or even several) power supplies blowing up will not kill your ability to do business.

    Events like that are almost universally due to gross mismanagement and should not only result in termination but also prosecution of the "leadership" that allowed this to happen by not being prepared.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yip, company I work for has a team of misfits running the production data center which consists of hundreds of hosts.

      They constantly have weird break downs and people screwing things up. Their mode of operation is if its not broken or onfire, ignore it until it does catch fire. What puzzles me is the network ops manager and their manager think this team is magic because they solve amazing problems all the time, when in reality its a giant mess waiting for the next thing to go bang in the night, this approach might of worked when it was a smaller start up, but its not that anymore, it's a subsidiary of a fortune 50 company with some big name customers around the world.

    2. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Of course, it requires more than the myopic 3-month planning that most MBAs are capable of at maximum. It also requires a real understanding of risk management and staying away from all short-term optimization. Otherwise, you end up at "save a million, lose a billion", as this seems to be a fine example of.

      Claiming this was a "power supply issue" is just lying by misdirection. The root cause is lack of redundancy, lack of resilience and lack of effective business continuity management. All things that cost money and that do not generate profit _unless_ something like this happens. In a healthy infrastructure, one (or even several) power supplies blowing up will not kill your ability to do business.

      Events like that are almost universally due to gross mismanagement and should not only result in termination but also prosecution of the "leadership" that allowed this to happen by not being prepared.

      That's only going to happen if you can teach the Mouth Breathing Assholes (that's what MBA stands for, right?) who are hedge fund, 'wealth management', and other institutional investor representatives who are the only shareholders who matter that all their wonderfully insightful financial questions during the quarterly shareholder call are completely pointless if no one is paying attention to the fundamentals of the business—and functioning information technology is rather obviously a fundamental of the business of British Airways (and everyone else).

      Good luck with that.

    3. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prosecution? What the fuck dude? Someone messed up, but messing up isn't a crime.

    4. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Their mode of operation is if its not broken or onfire, ignore it until it does catch fire. What puzzles me is the network ops manager and their manager think this team is magic because they solve amazing problems all the time, [...]

      The trick is to show up with a fire extinguisher and a replacement server just before the server halt and catches fire. If everyone did preventative maintenance and nothing catches on fire, management would start laying off techs.

    5. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT at The Ohio State University is grossly mismanaged and excessively spent on nothing, just like this.

    6. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The trick is to fail to do your job until shit's about to blow up. Or sometimes, after shit has blow up, so management thinks you're super critical."

      Yeah, that's real miracle work, creimer.

      I wish I worked at the same place as you - in about 2 months, I'd completely automate away your entire reason for existing.

    7. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      "The trick is to fail to do your job until shit's about to blow up. Or sometimes, after shit has blow up, so management thinks you're super critical."

      Yeah, that's real miracle work, creimer.

      No, that's a shitty way to run an IT department. The miracle work is cleaning up the operations to have it conform to enterprise standards so everyone and everything is an interchangeable cog.

      I wish I worked at the same place as you - in about 2 months, I'd completely automate away your entire reason for existing.

      Not sure why you want to automate a job that will disappear when the contract ends. As an IT support contractor, I'm here today and gone tomorrow.

    8. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by dbIII · · Score: 1

      They constantly have weird break downs and people screwing things up

      That's par for the course in IT especially with what appears to be very little QA testing before new releases and patches of various software. However the weird breakdowns and screwups are not supposed to impact on production. There is supposed to be some way to fall back before the users even notice. That does require some sort of budget or at least retention of machines replaced by relatively recent upgrades.
      Cut to the bone and those fuckups are in your face instead of something your IT folks swear about in back rooms.

    9. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you can't keep a job. No employer would want to keep paying for new chairs after you keep breaking them due to your excess weight. Your coworkers would also get tired of you stealing all of their lunches out of the office refrigerator every day. I strongly recommend that you take a break from your IT jobs and apply to go on the Biggest Loser.

    10. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the last place he worked at, he farted after lunch and this happened.

      https://youtu.be/_KuGizBjDXo?t...

    11. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the last place he worked at, he farted after lunch and this happened.

      Lame, lame, lame. This is better.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOS5gWzkXMA

    12. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you do have a sense of humor? So why do you have such thin skin? Then again, you claim to have abs at 350 pounds, so I guess you must have thin skin.

    13. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a pity that Technical Debt does not feature as part of the formal published accounts of these companies.
      If it appeared on the bottom line the bean counters would care more.

    14. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, you end up at "save a million, lose a billion", as this seems to be a fine example of.

      They are currently one of the most profitable airlines I'm sure they'll be fine.

      Claiming this was a "power supply issue" is just lying by misdirection

      No. Claiming it was a power supply issue is a mix of stating the initiating event without having done the root cause analysis + not confusing people in general technobabble that is of no interest to them. This is neither lying or misdirection, and the higher up the chain or the further out into the public these kinds of messages to the more they get simplified.

      The root cause is

      The root cause is something only a complete idiot who doesn't know anything about root cause of failure analysis would speculate about.

      power supplies blowing up

      Speculation

      Events like that are almost universally due to gross mismanagement

      Speculation

      should not only result in termination

      Part of root cause of failure analysis is identifying systematic causes of the failure. Blindly calling for the termination of people is stupid and won't resolve the cause of failure. What it will do is demoralise and just make a repeat event more likely.

      prosecution of the "leadership" that allowed this to happen by not being prepared.

      What for? Precious little snowflake got delayed on their flight, compensated for it, and still ended up with hurt feelings? That's prosecutable? Can we also prosecute you for the undue burden on people who read your last sentence? Maybe we should prosecute your dog too since we're throwing that word around meaninglessly.

      Stick to the armchair and stay away from incident management please.

    15. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I think your network ops manager might suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.

      Alternatively, he might just be the guilty party here and is trying to do his best to prevent anybody from noticing. I have seen that one in action before.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The trick is to show up with a fire extinguisher and a replacement server just before the server halt and catches fire.
        If everyone did preventative maintenance and nothing catches on fire, management would start laying off techs.

      Unfortunately, there is a lot of truth in that. A friend of mine had his company lay off almost all system administrators because the IT worked fine ("So what do we need them for?"). Of course, the company went bankrupt as a result of that about 2 years later. The amount of stupidity displayed in these actions is really staggering.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of things like "due diligence" and "due care"? Not doing them while being in charge _is_ a crime. People have been sent to prison for it.

      Messing up when your job is to make sure there is no messing up is a crime, unless you did everything reasonably possible and then were hit by really bad luck. That is obviously not the case here.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    18. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Stick to the armchair and stay away from incident management please.

      Funny. Our customers (whose beacons we have saved a few times) think differently. It is pretty clear who the amateur here is.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Funny. Our customers (whose beacons we have saved a few times) think differently.

      Ain't nothing like an unsubstantiated appeal to authority in an attempt to save a very weak argument demonstrating what little knowledge you had on the topic.

      It is pretty clear who the amateur here is.

      That we can agree on, though I'm not sure you're going to like the reason why.

    20. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever consider you may be shit at your specialty despite having a resume and credentials(or not)?

      It would make sense that a bootlicker like you would fit right in at TATA

    21. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Funny. Our customers (whose beacons we have saved a few times) think differently.

      Ain't nothing like an unsubstantiated appeal to authority in an attempt to save a very weak argument demonstrating what little knowledge you had on the topic.

      You mistake my purpose. I am not trying to convince you, your opinion is utterly worthless to me as you demonstrated that you have nothing worthwhile to contribute.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    22. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Only the reasons why you're wrong and shouldn't be part of RFCAs.

    23. Re: Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by __aadota8673 · · Score: 1

      I have been 350lb for the last 5 years. My uncle dated a 16 year old girl and ended up marrying her so he could work 16 hour days on a 250k tractor till he was 70 to save up a million - maybe more. That is the true measure of winning at life. To be a 350lb 70 year old who works all waking hours, while fucking some underage white trash on a luxury tractor. You think I'm upset by you? You lose at life asslips. I'm just trolling myself a funnel of free money so I can save up for an ass hat. I'm having fun - are you?

    24. Re:Pilling up technical debt is utterly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What for? Precious little snowflake got delayed on their flight, compensated for it,

      Their current plan is NO compensation for anyone, except costs for hotel etc.
      That also includes NO compensation for any hotels etc. you might have booked for your holiday or work trip, and certainly no compensation for any lost business.
      It is VERY relevant whether they had really, really bad luck and this was not possible to anticipate or prevent, or if they were incompetent or even grossly negligent. In the first case, current compensation is fine, in the latter case, the bill for them will increase a lot.

  12. Manual backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a software provider, you can be excused for computer failure taking down your entire business. However, if you do business in the physical world (like moving people through the air), you really ought to be prepared for computer failure. Staff should be trained to use paper and telephones to check passengers in. If the tower and airplanes are operational, the rest should be able to function.

    I am a programmer, and I know lots of other programmers and IT workers. With that knowledge, I would never trust my entire business to programmers and IT workers if I didn't have to.

    1. Re:Manual backups by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you're going to have people fallback on pen and paper, they need to be trained to use pen and paper. I worked at a restaurant when a power outage took down the ordering stations. The restaurant kept doing business until the power came back online an hour later, as sunlight through the large windows and emergency lighting illuminated the interior. The kitchen kept on cooking with gas-powered appliances and emergency lights. The wait staff struggled to calculate bills and make change with only one calculator in the entire building. Management added backup power to the ordering stations a week later.

    2. Re:Manual backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the Northeast blackout of 2003, my kid was working as a cook at Hooters. Hooters decided they wanted the restaurants staffed during the blackout so they would be ready to rock and roll when the power came back on. Everything was electronic, gas fired fryers with electronic ignition and thermostats, they couldn't even feed themselves!

  13. Re: Massive screwup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hush. The adults are having a grown up conversation.

  14. A fuse blew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their IT had to call to India to find out how to replace it.

  15. Penny wise pound foolish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Telling engineers "that's not in the budget" when we ask for some extra funding to build redundancy into a system costs money. I wish MBAs would learn that.

  16. "Cloud" is used to encourage cloudy thinking. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Quote: ... "Cloud" is a faster way of saying "abdicating responsibility."

    The word "cloud" is used by cloud providers to encourage cloudy thinking: Dilbert cartoon.

    This Dilbert cartoon shows where cloudy thinking is leading.

  17. Re: Massive screwup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you got a URL for that site?

  18. Maybe in bringing it back up they can... by h4x0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. find my fucking bag that they lost A WEEK AGO, the fucking fucks.

    *cough*

  19. Most like the "power-supply" to their data center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A live report I heard on the BBC reported that the power supply to the data center was interrupted by a lightning strike. Granted that's just one report but that makes a hell of a lot more sense than "a" power supply going out. Either backup power didn't cut in or the distribution system took the hit.

  20. Grossly incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is quite unbelievable for any professional organisation of the size of BA.
    It suggests that there is only a single site hosting all systems, and that there is no redundant or backup power supply for that site, or even worse, that they are depending on a single point of failure on a single site.
    This is utterly humiliating for whichever fool was in charge of resourcing and planning BA's IT infrastructure. I'd expect that individual, or whoever dictated this setup will shortly be joining the dole queue. I'd stake a bet that this person was yet another product of the MBA culture of utter ineptitude that seem to plague UK and American business, with the typical moronic cost focused short term mindset. Personally, I now refuse to work directly with these MBA types. There myopic obsession with quarterly profit, makes it impossible for any organisation infested with their incompetence to function effectively.

  21. Or maybe really not IT failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it just coincidence that ramadan starts today? Maybe BA didn't want any muzzies blowing up their aeroplanes to celebrate?

  22. Obligatory Bastard Operator from Hell by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    "No the server isn't down. You must be using it wrong, idiot." *unplugs coffee maker, plugs server back in*

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  23. Re: Massive screwup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. The Indians have it in for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When will people realize that the Indians are actively hostile to lots of groups/nations/people, including the Brits. Just because they pretend to speak English and work cheap they get to stand next to the important bits while management is on holiday. It's like the Japanese before Pearl Harbor. Their interests are not your interests.

    1. Re:The Indians have it in for them by golden_hands · · Score: 0

      Why is this this BS not modded troll ?

  25. Damn squirrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They cause more damage to infrastructures than anything else on the planet. Not a joke. They chew on wiring because people don't burry power lines.

  26. Either amature hour or a lie by Murdoch5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Massive world wide systems like this, should always have at least two entire working deployments, one kept in a down state and one kept up and working, that way if a problem happens, you just bring the second data center online and off you go.

    If a power supply issue could bring down your entire system, you didn't design it correctly, PERIOD! If your entire system hinges on a single power supply failure, you ALWAYS have a second one on an alternative supply, in fact, you'd have multiple supplies to each data center, from different providers, just to make sure power issues can't cause these types of issue.

    If the problem really comes down to a power supply, fire the IT department, fire the System Architects and start doing things properly.

    1. Re:Either amature hour or a lie by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Define "correctly". We can design and build things for any scenario. With unlimited money, and investors who don't care about a profitable business we can do ANYTHING. Blanket statements get you nowhere.

      Give us up-time numbers, design goals, costs of failure, associated profits. Will BA report on their balance sheet a loss larger than the cost of hardening their entire infrastructure? Tune in on the 31st December this year to see how little designing things "correctly" matters in the corporate report.

    2. Re:Either amature hour or a lie by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Correctly in IT / System Architecture, means you have enough redundancy in your design so as not to have single point or even double points of failure. If management doesn't want to spring for a properly designed network, after it's been laid out / designed on paper, then they can swallow the massive losses of having the entire stack go down. Although I would suspect that after this joke, they'll be more willing to do the job right the first time.

    3. Re:Either amature hour or a lie by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Although I would suspect that after this joke, they'll be more willing to do the job right the first time

      "THIS time it will be different!" - Something that has been said every time. I mean it's not like it's the first time airplanes were grounded due to IT issues. If they haven't taken it seriously in the past what makes you think it will change now?

  27. that is because your booking us in gds by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Airline system are usually split in various intercommuniticating system (be their own, or in case of gds external enormous firms). E.g. you have a crew system, a weight and balance system, a check in system, a baggage system, and a reservstoon system usually handled by a crs, like appolo, axsres, amadeus, galileo, infiny , etc... your booking was almost certainly saved in obe of those gds. And depending on the agreements among airline and interline set up, they can just pull each other booking (aka PNR passenger name record) and rebook onto their own flights.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:that is because your booking us in gds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, which doesn't excuse BA in any way, as their policy seems to be "sit and wait" rather than "go talk to these alternative airlines..."

      While I'm no expert, their current approach doesn't even make any sense, since they could say to AA (and others): "sorry for the extra workload, you can have all the money from the booking (as per standard arrangements) plus we'll pay you $500 for every passenger you take off our hands in the next 24 hours" ...and I guarantee they would **still** come out ahead on customer satisfaction and raw cost of sorting out the mess and reimbursing customers.

  28. Don't servers... by Chessucat · · Score: 1

    ...have hot swap-able power supply? Could Dell make a mission critical server that has two power supplies, both hot swap-able. That way when one goes south, the janitor can just pull the dead one and replace it with a good one.

    --
    "I'm a dirty white tomcat, enter my world..."
    1. Re:Don't servers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty standard already; enterprise servers have up to four hot swappable power supplies. You should see our cisco switches too!

      This power supply story sounds like bunk. I might believe an explanation like the power plant delivering power to the data center blew up or something, so the whole data center and the whole town is dark. Not likely unless they're running their servers in Zimbabwe with daisy chained car batteries. But then it begs the question: no backup data center? Can't imagine how catastrophic this is for them, surely investing in some redundancy and risk management planning would have been less expensive.

    2. Re:Don't servers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical servers have hot-swappable PSUs, yes. No doubt their server bank for this has them too. That's worthless, however, when the server room loses its power supply and doesn't have redundant generators or the like. Power Supply refers to more than just the physical PSU.

    3. Re:Don't servers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do, they also have firmware updates that can 'brick' the secondary power supply leaving it unusable...

  29. Slashdot - land of one liners by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Hence the second sentence starting with "Beyond a certain point".
    WTF is it with people not reading past one line here recently?

    1. Re:Slashdot - land of one liners by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If that's how you react when people agree with you you can just fuck off.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re: Slashdot - land of one liners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the sixth sentence starting with "I'd say BA is big"

    3. Re:Slashdot - land of one liners by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. It's a bit of a trend. Don't take it so personally.

  30. a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe someone plugged an iPad into the wrong outlet?

  31. Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians; by NewYork · · Score: 0

    Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians;

    Adaptec - Indian CEO Subramanian Sundaresh fired.
    AIG (signed outsourcing deal in 2007 in Europe with Accenture Indian frauds, collapsed in 2009)
    AirBus (Qantas plane plunged 650 feet injuring passengers when its computer system written by India disengaged the auto-pilot).
    Apple - R&D CLOSED in India in 2006.
    Apple - Foreign guest worker "Helen" Hung Ma caused the disastrous MobileMe product rollout.
    Australia's National Australia Bank (Outsourced jobs to India in 2007, nationwide ATM and account failure in late 2010).
    Bell Labs (Arun Netravalli took over, closed, turned into a shopping mall)
    Boeing Dreamliner ES software (written by HCL, banned by FAA)
    Bristol-Myers-Squibb (Trade Secrets and documents stolen in U.S. by Indian national guest worker)
    Caymas - Startup run by Indian CEO, French director of dev, Chinese tech lead. Closed after 5 years of sucking VC out of America.
    ComAir crew system run by 100% Indian IT workers caused the 12/25/05 U.S. airport shutdown when they used a short int instead of a long int
    Dell - call center (closed in India because Premji's conmen don't even know how to use telephones, let alone computers)
    Delta call centers (closed in India because Premji's conmen don't even know how to use telephones, let alone computers)
    Fannie Mae- Hired large numbers of Indians, had to be bailed out. Indian logic bomb creator found guilty.
    GM - Was booming in 2006, signed $300 million outsourcing deal with Wipro that same year, went bankrupt 3 years later
    HSBC ATMs (software taken over by Indians, failed in 2006)
    Intel Whitefield processor project (cancelled, Indian staff canned)
    Lehman (Spectramind software bought by Wipro, ruined, trashed by Indian programmers)
    Microsoft - Employs over 35,000 H-1Bs. Stock used to be $100. Today it's lucky to be over $25. Not to mention that Vista thing.
    Microsoft - Lian Yang, Microsoft-Contracted Engineer, Arrested in Smuggling Plot After Another FBI Sting in Portland in 2010
    MIT Media Lab Asia (canceled)
    PeopleSoft (Taken over by Indians in 2000, collapsed).
    Qantas - See AirBus above
    Quark (Alukah Kamar CEO, fired, lost 60% of its customers to Adobe because Indian-written QuarkExpress 6 was a failure)
    Rolls Royce (Sent aircraft engine work to India in 2006, engines delayed for Boeing 787, and failed on at least 2 Quantas planes in 2010, cost Rolls $500m).
    Skype ( Yarlagadda fired)
    State of Indiana $867 billion FAILED IBM project, IBM being sued
    State of Texas failed IBM project.
    Sun Micro (Taken over by Indian and Chinese workers in 2001, collapsed, has to be sold off to Oracle).
    United - call center (closed in India because Premji's conmen don't even know how to use telephones, let alone computers)
    Virgin Atlantic (software written in India caused cloud IT failure)
    Visium Asset Management - Sanjay Valvani Insider trading
    World Bank (Indian fraudsters BANNED for 3 years because they stole data).

    1. Re:Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians; by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      What a lovely piece of racist bullshit.

      Shame you don't have the room or time to make a list of the companies ruined by white Americans and the amounts of money involved. (Here's a hint: One of the culprits is currently sat in the White House)

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    2. Re:Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians; by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Why don't you make that list? Here's a hint: No country will give you any Visa when they know about your uncivilized Caste system https://www.washingtonpost.com...

  32. BA IT systems are completely messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently booked and flew BA from Bangalore to SFO with my family. The website to do the bookings and to make changes (meal preferences for e.g) was dog slow. On the forward journey they "couldn't" print boarding passes at Bangalore for our connecting American Airlines flight at Heathrow. We barely had enough time to make the connection.

    I don't know if outsourcing is to blame or they're just plain incompetent.

  33. Sigh, LIABILITY != DAMAGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gross negligence doesn't require someone dying. Gross negligence is flipping the bird to due care in handling your responsibilities. It's a term referring to liability, not damage.

    You can be grossly negligent and still have no damage incurred through your gross negligence.

    First you evaluate the liability. Then you evaluate the damage. Assuming the damage and liability are nonzero, then you settle.