Slashdot Mirror
India's Ethical Hackers Rewarded Abroad, Ignored at Home (yahoo.com)
An anonymous reader shares an article: Kanishk Sajnani did not receive so much as a thank you from a major Indian airline when he contacted them with alarming news -- he had hacked their website and could book flights anywhere in the world for free. It was a familiar tale for India's army of "ethical hackers," who earn millions protecting foreign corporations and global tech giants from cyber attacks but are largely ignored at home, their skills and altruism misunderstood or distrusted. India produces more ethical hackers -- those who break into computer networks to expose, rather than exploit, weaknesses -- than anywhere else in the world. The latest data from BugCrowd, a global hacking network, showed Indians raked in the most "bug bounties" -- rewards for red-flagging security loopholes. Facebook, which has long tapped hacker talent, paid more to Indian researchers in the first half of 2016 than any other researchers. Indians outnumbered all other bug hunters on HackerOne, another registry of around 100,000 hackers. One anonymous Indian hacker -- "Geekboy" -- has found more than 700 vulnerabilities for companies like Yahoo, Uber and Rockstar Games. Most are young "techies" -- software engineers swelling the ranks of India's $154-billion IT outsourcing sector whose skill set makes them uniquely gifted at cracking cyber systems.
An "ethical hacker" will only break in if given permission, either directly or via a bug-bounty program. Anybody hacking without a mandate is either grey-hat (if they do inform the target and do not try to extort them) or outright black-hat. That companies do not react friendly to people hacking them _without_ a mandate is not a surprise, as that happens to be a criminal act.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Isn't this basically "writing a mini-van?" ( http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-11-13 )
I mean, come on, they write the buggy code, so they know where the exploits
are - seems like a win-win scenario that they've built for themselves. Kudos.
CAP === 'queuing'
This is puzzling. One day we are told 95% of indian engineers cannot code, and the other day India has huge number of highly skilled hackers.
There is no unique gift to becoming a cracker (these aren't "hackers"). It is just a willingness to perpetuate destructive behavior. It is very easy to crack software and systems, I use to do it all the time. It is much harder to create.
If they were rewarded, they would end up with jobs. If they had jobs, they would not have enough time to do all of that hacking.
Their are only two ways you get hackers of this high quality:
1) They are not rewarded.
2) Their motivations outweigh their greed. Talking about religious extremism quality motivation.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
This is puzzling. One day we are told 95% of indian engineers cannot code, and the other day India has huge number of highly skilled hackers.
There is a Supreme Court Case where the court said traffic stops must be dangerous because a large number of police officers are injured every year while performing traffic stops. But the logic is bad. Without knowing how many total traffic stops there are you cannot really look at the risk of performing one.
Similarly, even if 95% of engineers cannot code, they can still have more good engineers if there are enough of them--or can have more decent engineers working on this particular set of problems.
It's also worth pointing out that (1) there are a lot of great Indian engineers who are not in India, (2) the 95% number you are pointing to was done by a company with an incentive to skew it one way, and (3) the people finding the bugs may not be a great match for the ideal job candidate but still have basic hacking skills.
Real lawyers write in C++
You're still talking criminal on a leash, no matter the brand of the perfume and the make-up you're adding.
That is not what "hacking" once was about, to the point that adding "ethical" to it makes no sense at all. Even the hats mean that you (in)security types have hopelessly confuddled everyone including yourself, with the result that "hacker", "ethical" or otherwise, means exactly nothing these days. And it shows.
S'kiddies, the lot of you.
And yes, your stolen terminology, now entirely empty, is quite related to your collective complete and utter failure to secure anything these last few decades. Your are the Emperor's new clothiers, it's the only explanation that actually makes any sense. So don't go complaining these cheap imitations from India aren't the real thing. They're about as functional and effective as everyone else in the industry, complete with getting the important bits hopelessly wrong.
>Didn't they launch some rocket to Mars at a much lesser cost as compared to the US recently?
They just barely got a small, proof-of-concept probe - and at that, it never got the desired orbit.
NASA, in around the same time frame, got a much larger, far far more complex research package in the proper orbit.
Good on India for pulling it off, but they were doing something vastly different than NASA.
TL;DR: apples & oranges
Stupid, potentially sensitive question: How many of the vulnerabilities, do you think (if it can be ascertained) came from companies who outsourced their work to India-based companies?
If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot