Slashdot Mirror


A New Report Finds No Evidence That People Will Work Less Under a Universal Basic Income (theoutline.com)

Economists Djavad Salehi-Isfahani and Mohammad H. Mostafavi-Dehzooeifrom for the Economic Research Forum have released a new report on the results of a basic income scheme launched in Iran in 2011. "In 2011, in response to heavy cuts to oil and gas subsidies, Iran implemented a program that guaranteed citizens cash payments of 29 percent of the nation's median income, which amounts to about $1.50 every day (about $16,000 per year in the U.S.)," reports The Outline. Here are the key findings: The report found no evidence for the idea that people will work less under a universal income, and found that in some cases, like in the service industry, people worked more, expanding their businesses or pursuing more satisfying lines of work. The researchers did find that young people -- specifically people in their twenties -- worked less, but noted that Iran never had a high level of employment among young people, and that they were likely enrolling in school with the added income. The evidence presented in the paper is compelling, but the anecdotal belief that handing people money will make them lazy is hard to shake. "The findings in this paper do not settle this question," the report's authors point out. "What we have accomplished is at the very least to shift the burden of proof on this issue to those who claim cash transfer [sic] make poor people lazy, and to show the need for better data and more research."

6 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. Re:And the report also provides no evidence of by borcharc · · Score: 3, Informative

    it's basically 4 trillion dollars so they would have to double the federal budget to pay for this. Bare minimum, everyone's tax rate doubles. This is based on total outlays vs total income. Remember that FICA is just another source of income for the feds, an effective ~15% tax before any income tax is considered. Then there is all the excise, corporate, etc taxes. It's easy to say they can get the money, but there are not enough rich people to just stick with the bill. It will land on the middle class like every other tax increase does and we will be stuck with a standard of living much closer to those on universal basic income.

  2. Re:What would stop employers from lowering... by borcharc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rich are fine and the middle class gets their standard of living dragged far closer to those on UBI. It is a fact that the rich can not pay the bills, they are too large. The middle class will be the ones who pay for this.

  3. Re: Strawman Much? by PoopJuggler · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not pissed about it. Only wankers get pissed about helping out the needy. It's an investment in the future of this country, and it benefits everyone. Less problems, less crime, less strain on medical services, more productivity. Yeah, maybe you can't afford that new big screen TV because of it. Boohoo.

  4. Re:What would stop employers from lowering... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Informative

    The drastic reduction in desperate workers gives employers less leverage.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  5. Re:I'd find a job... by Immerman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think you're thinking of welfare. You still get your full UBI regardless of how much money you make, dramatically increasing the incentives to work.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  6. Re:I'd find a job... by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    *Whoosh*

    They're not talking about "incentives from employers". They're talking about the personal incentive ("incentive (n): something that incites or tends to incite to action or greater effort, as a reward offered for increased productivity.") to work. Aka, under most welfare systems, there's a "welfare cliff" where if a person works more, their income actually drops as they lose their benefits - and thus there's a disincentive to work past that cliff. Under UBI, there is no such cliff - the more you work, the more you earn.

    It's a serious issue. A lot of people who are on benefits for various physical or mental disabilities have "marginal" ability to work. Many want to work, but are afraid that if they take on a job, lose their benefits, and then it ultimately turns out that their condition prevents them from fulfilling the job requirements (a very real risk), that they'll be screwed. It keeps a lot of people who might actually be able to work out of the job marketplace for no good reason.

    --
    We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.