Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases Chrome 59 (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Google has launched Chrome 59 for Windows, Mac, and Linux. Among the additions are native notifications on macOS, settings being revamped to follow Material Design, the Image Capture API, Headless Chrome, and more service worker improvements. You can update to the latest version now using the browser's built-in silent updater or download it directly from google.com/chrome.

72 comments

  1. Chrome 59? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    I'm a bit surprised they're not already at version 590.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Chrome 59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      v590 would make it seem like Chrome should be so much better

    2. Re:Chrome 59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Meaningless version numbers are so 2005.

  2. Tomorrow's headline by TWX · · Score: 1

    For Wednesday June 7th, 2017: "Google Releases Chrome 60".

    For sometime this weekend: "Google Releases Chrome 61"

    For next week: "Google Releases Chrome 62"

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  3. Chrome is an amazing piece of software by grungeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have been developing a web application for the last two years and I have become more familiar with Chrome than I ever had intended. There has been frustration from time to time (lots of crashes in a "stable" version last summer, a change in performance profiling that made life difficult for a while), but all in all I must say that Chrome is an amazing piece of software. I have not seen a crash in a while (and we are doing some wild stuff, believe me) and with every new release Javascript on Chrome just feels a little bit faster. Before I get too sentimental I just want to say "Thank You" to rhe Chrome and Chromium team.

    And I really hope and pray that in one of the next releases we will see SVG Font support. That would be awesome.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! And they call me a troll! Was it because I got first post?

    2. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by hduff · · Score: 1

      Please don't hold back.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    3. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Wow! And they call me a troll! Was it because I got first post?

      Nope. It is because it is how many of us feel.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by grungeman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the kind words. We will make sure to let you know when our app goes online.

      --

      Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    5. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He speaks for a lot of us.

    6. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome really is an impressive bit of software. There's a reason that developers pretty much exclusively target it on the desktop.

      In my experience the Chromium team has been responsive in resolving issues with chrome enterprise (The version you can distribute as an .msi and can have it's settings managed/changed/locked with group policies)

      It's also pretty impressive to see my settings, extensions, bookmarks etc all roam between windows, linux, and a Chromebook. All the stuff I use just follows me without a hitch.

    7. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by sexconker · · Score: 1

      He speaks for me.

    8. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Wow, 1MB? Not a whole 1MB! That is more than AC has total memory.

    9. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's funny how opinions differ; I really really really hate chrome. They keep making things harder and harder to do in the UI because they keep dumbing it down.

      I just tried to look up security certificate info for a site and have just discovered you can't any more. You used to be able to click on the padlock to access it!

      The worst thing is I feel I am forced to use it because so many sites seem to use Chrome-specific site code.

      It's like the Netscape vs IE wars all over again, except Google is winning.

      RIP AnyBrowser.org

      It's depressing that Opera 12 still has the best and most customizable interface of any browser ever made and we're only going down hill from there. You can't even rebind keyboard shortcuts or have free rein to customize a browser toolbar now FFS!

    10. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      I just tried to look up security certificate info for a site and have just discovered you can't any more. You used to be able to click on the padlock to access it!

      Average Jane and Joe User don't care about a sites certificate and the trust chain. Nor do they care about the settings in it's place. I am surprised that Google even has those. I often feel that the only reason Google has not updated it's UI to a Fisher Price UI is because they still want cred in edgy category.

    11. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Timmy! Are you browsing the web on your digital watch again?

    12. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well, the sarcasm was perfectly justified and appropriate and it triggered somebody. The story is an advertisement. Now, if they offered a Netscape theme, that would be news.

    13. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Done that and I would have to agree with you. You get a completely different perspective on Chrome when you are doing an app.

      The danger, however, is losing the perspective that Joe Sixpack gets of Chrome and there are a few pretty big issues that need to be addressed.

    14. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      And I really hope and pray that in one of the next releases we will see SVG Font support. That would be awesome.

      Extremely unlikely. They had SVG font support at one point. They deliberately removed it, way back when they were still with WebKit.

    15. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just tried to look up security certificate info for a site and have just discovered you can't any more.

      It's now in the security tab of the developers tools for some reason. I don't get it why the link was removed from that padlock popup, the single place where it made sense to put it. It's just one single link. Checking the domain and company name of the certificate was the only thing an average user could have done to actually improve their security and they made it harder.

    16. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still view the certificate, you just have to use the developer tools now...

      F12 -> Security... Tells you everything you need to know!

    17. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by tepples · · Score: 1

      Old SVG font support (where the wrapper was actually SVG) was found to have security issues that browser developers couldn't figure out how to fix. New SVG font support is SVG glyphs in OpenType, which is a different wrapper format that somehow changes things.

    18. Re:Chrome is an amazing piece of software by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Old SVG font support (where the wrapper was actually SVG) was found to have security issues that browser developers couldn't figure out how to fix. New SVG font support is SVG glyphs in OpenType, which is a different wrapper format that somehow changes things.

      Just a smaller subset, which is also what makes it more complicated to implement as they can't just send it to the SVG interpreter without introducing the same security issues.

      Though note the "security issues" here are just code for rarely used and poorly maintained code. I tried fixing a few bugs there and clean it up in WebKit, but it was too late and it was deleted anyway, and to be honest, even after investing time in it. That might not have been a wrong decision. Just which they did the same with the rest of the SVG code, or finally invested people in cleaning it up.

  4. I hope they rectified the random startup hangs by tomxor · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else been experiencing the random hangs on v58 on startup, multiple linux machines with very different hardware i have with v58 do this.

    1. Re:I hope they rectified the random startup hangs by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      Yup. Happens to us on Windows 7, 32 and 64 bit. Different hardware, different generations of machine images, etc. It's still a problem in 60 (the Canary track) so no, they haven't fixed it yet.

  5. Chrome 59? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1
  6. Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by eril · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the projects I work on is creating bots used to buy things like tickets (on Ticketmaster, Live Nation, etc...), or shoes (yeah, that's a thing...rich kids with too much time on their hands). The thing is, though, that these sites have very sophisticated methods of identifying bots; most of the time, if I navigate the checkout process with a bot, I get hit with a CAPTCHA, but if I navigate the site with a regular, mainstream browser, there's no CAPTCHA. So by offering headless operation, one could just programmatically drive Chrome and avoid having to deal with a CAPTCHA.

    1. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by aicrules · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More power to you for making a buck on this type of thing, but I am betting you get a lot of hate messages about this.

    2. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a HOWTO.

      I use wkhtmltopdf in one of my apps, but pagination doesn't work well (at least with the way I have it set up). I wonder if Chrome would do a better job.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re: Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a piece of shit!

    4. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking die

    5. Re: Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by eril · · Score: 1

      What's wrong, did you miss out on some Hannah Montana tickets because the bots got to them faster? Poor baby. *pats AC on the head*

    6. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by eril · · Score: 1

      Why, because you weren't able to get a pair of Yeezys from Adidas? My heart bleeds for you. #firstWorldProblems

    7. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Because his bots cause scalping of things like concert tickets, making the price to see a popular act live go up and out of reach of some fans.

    8. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has offered a headless WebBrowser component since Internet Explorer 4. Headless Chrome doesn't really give bot-makers a tool that has never existed before, just a bit of competition.

    9. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Your Horoscope for today, June 6, 2017:
      Procyon - the dipstick
      Are you ready for a fresh start on a project that once spanked you Procyon? You should be because Taurus the Bull is in Uranus. I sense your inherent level of batshittastic inspiration is peaking. You might find yourself in the mood to color-code your STD medications. And don't be afraid to wave fake plastic handguns at police officers -- you are invincible today!

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    10. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you build a bot as a Chrome extension? What's headless got to do with it?

    11. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #firstWorldProblems

      Actually, the First World's problem at the moment is that we are being flooded by subhumans and we aren't putting a stop to it.

    12. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can probably do better. wkhtmltopdf is using a very old version of Chrome.

      If you use a version of Electron you'll get a more recent version of Chrome. Electroshot is a good choice https://github.com/mixu/electroshot

      However once the headless Chrome is well tested it will probably kill off Electroshot etc.,

    13. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by eril · · Score: 1

      So the "problem" is that some people are unable to afford some luxury items? Maybe we should get pissed at Rolex for pricing their watches too expensively. The free market sets the price for these tickets; artists purposely underprice them, because they want to fill the venue (otherwise, their egos get hurt)...because of that deficiency in pricing (caused by the egos and vanity of performers), scalpers buy the tickets and sell them for their *real* value (e.g. whatever people are willing to pay).

      Before you bitch and moan about that being a bad thing - consider the fact that it cuts both ways. Madonna, for example, did a European tour some years back, and she priced her tickets too high, and she was performing before half filled venues. Nevertheless, she did fine, because scalpers bought up a lot of her tickets, anyway, hoping to resell them...only nobody wanted to buy them (even if they resold them at face value). So brokers ate the cost of that venture.

    14. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by eril · · Score: 1

      Trump supporters?

    15. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a Chrome extension, then you only have that one instance of Chrome running. Bot makers generally want to run and coordinate a large number of bots, which is not feasible if you're doing it through an extension that has to be run through a GUI.

    16. Re:Headless Chrome is a pretty big deal by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      I use wkhtmltopdf in one of my apps, but pagination doesn't work well (at least with the way I have it set up). I wonder if Chrome would do a better job.

      wkhtmltopdf is a pile of garbage that works for basic pages, at the cost of a significant footprint and high cpu. bugs have been around since ages (like some css crashing the soft) that seemingly nobody cares about. and the soft is maintained, but check out the forums to see how nice the developer is.
      tl;dr Chrome can only do better.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  7. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about a slow newsday. "New Chrome release 59 causes laptops to explode, death toll at 30 so far" is news. This is just another incremental release announcement.

    1. Re:This is news? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Google pays slashdot a fixed monthly fee to present 15 ads dressed up as legit articles each month. The monthly cycle rolls over on the 10th of each calendar month, whether Google has used their full 15 or not. So in the few days leading up to the 10th, they are in "use it or lose it" mode, which means you may see some 3rd and 4th tier products/initiatives touted here.

  8. No Chrome all rust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rust does NOT support local computer file viewing; Rust does not support playback of website /embed/ *.mid; Rust does not support anonymous UTUBE. Get the chemistry? All Rust ... no Chrome.

  9. New version of spyware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go fuck yourself, Google.

  10. Gyara 59 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Google should rename their browser "Gyara" so I can use this joke on my favorite song from a video game ever.

    https://youtu.be/WYbHYoHYcto

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. Pretty bad idea by swb · · Score: 1

    So now malware can simply use an existing install of Chrome and totally mimic an end user in a way that makes it appear they were actually performing some actions.

    Now we'll end up with banks or stores refusing to cover theft losses because they will say it passed all of their tests to insure a real user was using the system, so the customer must be lying about their claim of theft.

    And of course it will make it much more annoying to use web sites which will have to work all the harder to ensure a kind of Turing test every time you visit a site to make sure you're not some scripted browser.

  12. slashdot is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot is officially dead.

    1. Re:slashdot is dead by eril · · Score: 1

      Netcraft confirms it?

    2. Re:slashdot is dead by A10Mechanic · · Score: 1

      But I don't want to go on the cart!

  13. About that headless thing.. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is unrelated, but they finally fixed the bug I had on Fedora 25 / XFCE whereby attempting to open a link from outside chrome (such as from an email client) would kill chrome if it (chrome) wasn't on the visible workspace. I lost count of how many times I lost all my open tabs because of this annoying bug.

  14. Chrome needs to do something for the XP hold outs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you look at market share statistics, there's a large pool of Chrome 49 users, which is the last version to support XP. It should either release a new version or help users upgrade. Windows XP is three years out of date now, and no one knows how to deal with it. Chrome is the new IE in terms of market share, so it needs to take responsibility as Mozilla can't do it as they are too busy playing about with their web extensions to listen to its users.

  15. *sigh* by sootman · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the next big fad to come along in software so developers will put their energy into something else and quit putting notifications into everything.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  16. Big Deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still running version 1.0. Should I upgrade? are there any new features I should know about?

  17. Acid Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New hotness breaks acid2 and 3

  18. Headless Chrome? by bjwest · · Score: 1

    What good is a web browser without a monitor?

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
    1. Re:Headless Chrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for browser testing in web development or for better bot/crawler or for web page capture

  19. Its become the IE of current day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google Chrome is probably the only browser besides Internet Explorer that has managed to dominate the browsers. The troubling thing is the potential for Chrome to take advantage of the control.

  20. Veiling bij afslag by tepples · · Score: 1

    artists purposely underprice them, because they want to fill the venue (otherwise, their egos get hurt)

    Why not Dutch-auction the seats, setting the price high to start with and then running a clearance later on for those seats that haven't sold?

    1. Re:Veiling bij afslag by eril · · Score: 1

      artists purposely underprice them, because they want to fill the venue (otherwise, their egos get hurt)

      Why not Dutch-auction the seats, setting the price high to start with and then running a clearance later on for those seats that haven't sold?

      Yes, that's definitely a possibility, and it's actually something that happens every once in a while, but it's pretty rare. The problem is one of perception / publicity. Basically, the artists have been underpricing their tickets for so long that the fans have come to expect it (forcing artists to make their money through other means, like merchandising, or concessions, etc...), and if an artist doesn't price their tickets in the friendliest possible way, the fans may become angry and start hating on the artist.

      Nowadays, most big acts no longer directly control the ticket sales for their own performances; instead, they have a management company (like Live Nation) that offers full service marketing, promotion, and gig management - that means that they (and not the artist) set up things like ticket pricing and merchandise sales at the venue.

    2. Re:Veiling bij afslag by eril · · Score: 1

      In the past, it used to be that live performance is where bands made their money, and radio was just an advertising medium - artists would actually pay radio stations to play their albums to boost their popularity and increase ticket sales. Nowadays, it's completely reversed. It would be considered unethical for a band to pay a radio station to play their albums...radio play is how they make their money , actually, and concerts are essentially a marketing cost intended to drum up the band's popularity (note: royalties are paid by the radio stations to the song writers...which may not always be the same as the band / performer).

  21. A MIDI polyfill exists by tepples · · Score: 1

    Calling a browser by the name of a systems programming language sponsored by a competing browser engine developer is confusing.

    does NOT support local computer file viewing

    Though Chrome for Android does not, Chrome for desktop can still view HTML files. I just updated Chrome on my work PC to version 59, relaunched, and opened an HTML file. The one drawback is that each pathname (directory plus filename) is considered a separate origin for the purpose of the same origin policy, and there is no way for a file to issue the equivalent of an Access-Control-Allow-Origin header. The workaround is to install Python on the same PC and do python3 -m http.server.

    does not support playback of website /embed/ *.mid

    It supports Web Audio API with which a JavaScript programmer could build a parser and soft synthesizer for Standard MIDI File, NSF, MOD, or what have you. (A JavaScript implementation of a missing browser feature is called a "polyfill".)

    does not support anonymous UTUBE

    I just updated Chrome on my work PC to version 59, relaunched, opened an Incognito window, and accessed Universal Tube and Rollform Equipment Corporation. Did you misspell the site name?