Slashdot Mirror
More Than 20 Employees Fired at Uber in Sexual Harassment Investigation (cnbc.com)
More than 20 employees have been fired from Uber as part of an ongoing sexual harassment investigation, according to Bloomberg. From a report: In an explosive blog post earlier this year, former Uber engineer Susan Fowler alleged the company failed to act on sexual harassment and gender discrimination complaints. CEO Travis Kalanick called for an urgent investigation into the claims, led by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. That investigation, with Holder at the helm, has given its own recommendations to Uber's board, according to Bloomberg. But Uber's 12,000 employees have been given an assessment of a separate investigation, led by an attorney in at Perkins Coie LLP, according to Bloomberg, who cite an anonymous source. Perkins Coie examined 215 claims, Bloomberg said.
Check this out and tell me the harassment doesn't start with the CEO
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
And apparently for men with poor impulse control.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
How come they all wear the same uniform of a muslim-style beard and Shawshank Redemption warden-style glassess?
They all look exactly alike but they don't like "mainstream" people.
Irony deficiency for sure.
Rarely have I hated a company as much as I hate Uber....
Ignoring and violating local regulations
Violating labor laws
"Greyball" tracking
Interference in local politics
Toxic culture
What did I miss?
That's about right in my experience. 90% whiners, 10% actual issues.
They should have disciplined the whiners too.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
We at Uber have all been very disturbed by these allegations that our corporate culture has created an environment in which women feel unsafe and harassed. After a very thorough investigation, and in order to make sure situations like this never happen again, we have taken the step to fire all those involved in reporting this harassment. We want our employees to feel safe knowing we have a zero tolerance policy regarding reports of sexual harassment.
Management sets the pace. I'be worked for great management teams that allow room for a bit of fun but aren't afraid to fire shovenist jerks, and I've worked for managers who were shovenist jerks. The team behavior was makibly different on these teams because of the expectation. I'm a guy so I can't speak to how it looked or felt to the women in both situations but I can imagine which one they liked better.
Fire the leadership and hire respectful professionals.
How did you arrive at those numbers? Was it just based on the statements of "more than 20 employees" and "examined 215 claims"?
If that is the case why are you assuming that the 215 claims were against 215 different employees?
The article doesn't seem to say, and i certainly don't know it for a fact myself, but i would suspect that many of the people who committed harassment serious enough to get fired probably harassed more than one person, and thus were the focus of more than one claim.
This Space Intentionally Left Blank
How does having a partisan hack former AG help your image? Did Holder actually bring some kind of investigative experience to this?
I mean he couldn't see his way clear to investigate a bunch of things he should have while he held office.
I'm not trolling, and I'm not disregarding the important issue of sexual harassment (which is horrible) and the behavior of Uber's CEO.
However, the almost universal disparaging of Uber here (and elsewhere) when they are mentioned -- even in this case, when Uber took some proactive measure to reduce a problem prevalent in many Silicon Valley ventures -- compels me to state the obvious: that Uber has saved thousands of lives (from reducing drunk driving), and has saved countless hours (from transportation inefficiencies in various circumstances).
There were many times when Uber has been a miracle.
Again, I hope this comment is not interpreted as apologizing for the several significant flaws within the company. I am glad there is significant pressure on the company to become a more ethical enterprise. However, I hope the public focuses on trying to reform and improve the company, instead of destroying it.
Who are likely still working there for the moment, having used this as an excuse to purge the undesirables.
In a company full of dudebros there was a problem with how they treated women? nooooooooo, do tell!
Now maybe they can get to the business of stopping the abuses of the drivers? (playing games with payments, hiding exactly how much they take out of the fare, telling passengers one price and telling the drivers something else, driving fares down for no good reason, etc, etc)
Years ago I worked with some poor bastard who got blamed for harassment. The woman had a real chip on her shoulder because she called in on a Saturday to fix her code.
And her complaint involved something so innocuous that the guy said that even the women in the human resources department thought it was stupid.
BUT - HE has to take sensitivity training classes during work hours and stay late and come in on every weekend to get his stuff done.
Her? She ended up quitting anyway for some reason.
And there's more. This was my second time witnessing these types of things so I became Mr. Professional on my next job. (There was a massive layoff at the previous one.) I talked nothing but work on the job and I never went out with the gang for happy hour or any other after work things. And I didn't gossip or anything - someone quits and asked about it, "I don't know was always my answer (I got burned on that one too). You never know who is hypersensitive or who they'll tell what you said.
During my review, I was told to "relax" and "have fun". "We're a family after all!"
"Family? Really? So I can quit and I'd be welcome back at anytime?" Using the word 'quit' wasn't a good idea and my "family" let my ass go and I'm not welcome anymore.
STFU, do your job and remember, when it really comes down to it, work friends are never your friends or family.
Uh, the men with poor impulse control are the ones still working. Fully capable of meeting their harassment quotas. It is the men with good impulse control and politeness who are unable to meet their quotas.
Will deep learnin' algorithms work even if ya' ain't got much data?
I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
Or was is twenty recently hired worker bees?
Shouldn't they wait until results happen, accusers are met, and so forth? Or do they not want to even make up a kangaroo court?
attorney in at Perkins Coie LLP
IIRC, that's the same firm connected to former Reddit CEO Ellen Pao.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
ntr
Waiting for the leak...
Just yesterday, 5 killed in a workplace shooting by a disgruntled ex-employee fire last month.
I wonder if Uber will experience something similar or worse. I mean, Uber let go 20+ and the other company just let go one person, so the probability should be higher.
Yee-haw, Uber's having themselves a good old fashioned witch hunt! The big money femini$ts are going to make damn sure the work environment there is VERY hostile for straight men. Remember, next time your commute is delayed by yet another suicide on the Caltrain tracks - thank feminism!
Whatcha wanna bet that 100% of the witches found & fired, for the horrible crime of acting like healthy human beings, were working class "nice guy" engineersâ and paper pushers? And 0% were gropey douchebag management types who went to the right schools and go to the right cocktail parties in Palo Alto.
Workers have no rights. Accusation is guilt.
Or do they not want to even make up a kangaroo court?
Since the employees were not hanged, drawn and quartered, just fired, “kangaroo court” is not hardly applicable. From what I have heard, in USA firing doesn't need a reason. If during the investigation they found things that would normally warrant dismissal of employee without “a court”, then why shouldn't they do that in this case?
However, if the Uber publishes the list of employees they fired exactly because of harassment claims, then those employees could have a case of slander.
Yeah, cause the other company was the only one to fire someone in the past 10 years
It's a start. Let's hope the firings continue until the entire horrible company goes out of business.
So you know the standards of process I'm talking about. Good. I disagree with your disagreement of my use of terminology, and double down on my previous.
It's my opinion that people shouldn't be fired on the basis of complaint alone, because this amplifies the damage that a serial false accuser would do -- both to the company and the employee. In practice investigations happen to the standard of covering the company's ass in court, from both the accuser's and the accusee's directions. This, while shooting quite low, means at the minimum that "guilt upon accusation" would land the employee in court; and it's well that it should, since there are e.g. ways by which an employee can be given a small bonus in return for having someone fired using such an accusation.
But, like, maybe all pregnant women are actually serial workplace rapists in the US. I wouldn't know, and couldn't tell.