Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Home Blood Pressure Monitors Are Wrong 70 Percent of the Time, Says Study (arstechnica.com)

Posted by BeauHD on from the six-of-one-half-a-dozen-of-the-other dept.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: In a study out this week, about 70 percent of home blood-pressure devices tested were off by 5 mmHg or more. That's enough to throw off clinical decisions, such as stopping or starting medication. Nearly 30 percent were off by 10 mmHg or more, including many devices that had been validated by regulatory agencies. The findings, published in The American Journal of Hypertension, suggest that consumers should be cautious about picking out and using such devices -- and device manufacturers need to step up their game. Lead author Raj Padwal and his colleagues set out to test the accuracy of the devices themselves. Funded by the University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, they compared the home blood-pressure monitors of 85 patients with a gold-standard blood-pressure measurement technique. The patients' monitors varied by type, age, and validation-status. But they all used an automated oscillometric method, which measures oscillations in the brachial artery and uses an algorithm to calculate blood pressure. The gold-standard method was the old-school auscultatory method, which involves the arm-squeezing sphygmomanometer and a clinician listening for thumps with a stethoscope. Of the 85 home devices, 59 were inaccurate by 5 mmHg or more in either their systolic (the top number that's the maximum pressure of a heart beat) or diastolic (the bottom number that's the minimum between-beat pressure). That's 69 percent inaccurate. Of those, 25 (or 29 percent) were off by 10 mmHg or more. And six devices (seven percent) were off by 15 mmHg or more.

2 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. So which was the most accurate? by mveloso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't they give us the most accurate devices?

    They don't even put the data anywhere, so we can't even figure it out for ourselves.

    It's 2017 people.

  2. 5 mm Hg is not significant by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's less than 5% in a system that easily varies 20% in the course of an hour, and than vary nearly 50% in moments under stress. It's also easily affected by flexing the arm sitting in a different chair.