Auto Makers Threatened By Both Tech Company Autos And Ridesharing (caranddriver.com)
An anonymous reader quotes Car and Driver:
For automakers, the first bit of bad news is that people seem quite receptive to buying a vehicle from a tech brand such as Apple or Google, according to Capgemini's 17th Cars Online report, which surveyed some 8000 consumers in eight countries... Consumer interest in buying cars from tech brands has grown from 49 percent in its 2015 study to 57 percent in the latest report... There is also the growing popularity of ride-sharing services offered by the likes of Uber and Lyft. Fewer people will feel the need to have their own car if it's easy and inexpensive to order up a cab on their smartphones. Capgemini's survey found that 34 percent of car buyers see ride sharing and related services as a genuine alternative to owning a vehicle.
Their clout is so high, it is not being talked about as much as the pension obligations of the big three, or the clout of labor unions over the manufacturers. If the cars made by tech alliance by passes the NADA, it would be a boon to the consumers.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
I think key problem is that automakers forgot that they are in the hardware business.
GM is a hardware company. Tesla is a software company. Tesla is worth 100 times as much per unit of revenue.
Automakers know they are in the hardware business. They also know they need to get into the software business in a really big way.
There just isn't enough metal to go around.
The earth's crust contains about 2.5e18 tons of aluminum and 1.25e18 tons of iron.
There are roughly 7 billion humans, so there is enough for each person to have 2.8 billion tons of aluminum and 1.8 billion tons of iron.