Slashdot Mirror


As AI Explodes, Investors Pour Big Bucks Into Startups (siliconangle.com)

Investment in AI startups is on a tear as venture capitalists and corporate investors scramble to stake out a leadership position in what could be the driving trend in technology for decades to come. From a report: The financial interest in AI, machine learning and related technologies is hardly new. CB Insights has tracked some $18.4 billion invested in 2,541 AI-related startups since 2012. But the trend is only accelerating. In the latest MoneyTree report from PricewaterhouseCoopers and CB Insights, which showed otherwise mostly stagnant startup funding, AI and machine learning companies shined, reaching an eight-quarter high of $820 million invested in 90 companies. A flurry of significant investments in a number of AI-related companies this past week underscored the point. On Wednesday alone, for instance, AI-powered analytics software provider CognitiveScale raised a $15 million round, voice AI startup Snips raised $13 million and, to top it off, machine learning consultancy Element AI got an unusually large $102 million early-stage investment just eight months after the company was launched. Then on Thursday and Friday, two other AI-powered companies, Conviva and Codota, announced fundings too.

15 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. AI is not "exploding" by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, there is nothing besides weak AI (i.e. the "AI" with no "I", better called "automation"). Second, it is not "exploding". There have been no fundamental breakthroughs for quite a while. There have been gradual speed-improvements, but they are, well, gradual. The only thing that has been "exploding" is the hype about AI, i.e. this is nothing but a bubble of hot air.

    Of course some people will get rich from this, but there will be no fundamentally new products or services from this anytime soon.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:AI is not "exploding" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The exploding AI is the replacement for the blue screen of death.

    2. Re:AI is not "exploding" by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There have been gradual speed-improvements, but they are, well, gradual.

      Even with gradual speed improvements, you may reach a speed that represents a tipping point, where these processes go from taking an unacceptably long amount of time to taking an acceptably long amount of time.

      When you hit a tipping point like that, usage and adoption might expand dramatically (even if not "explosively), regardless of whether there's been real innovation.

    3. Re:AI is not "exploding" by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Quite right, and it's gratifying to see that for once I'm not the first person to say what you're saying. What is 'exploding' is all the media hype, making technologically uninformed people think what they're erroneously calling 'artificial intelligence' is much much more than it actually is.

    4. Re:AI is not "exploding" by ranton · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I seem to recall quite a hype bubble about 3D printing. We were all going to drive 3D printed cars, printed right into the garage of our 3D printed houses.

      Um, we have 3D printed cars and 3D printed houses. Considering 3D printing hype arguably started in earnest in 2014 we are a decade or two away from being able to tell if it was all just hype. The 3D printing industry is still growing today and showing no signs of stopping.

      Then it was private space. We were going to colonize the Galaxy because "the species", and technology always gets better.

      I have not heard anything about companies such as SpaceX or Virgin Galactic pulling back on their commercial space travel ambitions.

      Overall you seem to be just complaining about new technologies and industries with nothing to back it up.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  2. Uh-huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too bad 'AI' is just a fancy term for computing. :P This isn't any different than health startups or VR a few years ago, the rate at which VCs throw good money after bad chasing fads is insanity. in another few years it'll be something else, and AI will have been dropped like a hot rock by most of them. It's a new form of day trading: get in, profit off of the hype, get out. Though it lines their pockets nicely, it does nothing to help anyone or progress anything in a meaningful way, and it artificially inflates expectations. It could easily take the economy out again, eventually. The SEC is fast asleep.

  3. Another AI Winter by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could this be the foreshadowing of another AI Winter? I remember the AI Winter of the late 1980's and early 1990's. At that time, the hype was about some of the truly amazing things that could be done in Prolog like languages. Pattern matching. Deductive reasoning. Theorem provers. Computer Algebra Systems (CAS). And especially Expert Systems.

    The expectations got totally out of control. Wow! A knowledge expert could write a set of rules so that an expert system could predict who is a bad credit risk! Etc. Of course, modern statistical approaches might be much better at that. But I use it as an example of having too great of expectations.

    Like today, these modern statistical classifiers are amazing! But one day one of those statistical classifiers will mis-classify a pedestrian in front of a vehicle. Another possible way there could be wrong expectations is that both human beings and also managers might expect these systems to have some kind of insight or creativity. Or possibly deductive reasoning power (like the classic AI systems actually had, to a degree).

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  4. AI is a big threat to index funds and indexers. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    Index fund idea is based on the wisdom of crowds. The mean value of a large number of independent predictions will be more correct than most of the individual predictions. The key is "independent". But with high frequency trades and very fast analysis independent AI systems might "sense" the phase differences and slowly synch themselves over time.

    At present active investors can't game index investors easily. The orders from traders for index funds get swamped out lost among the orders from actively managed fund traders. But with AI systems, it might learn to place a large buy order in a relatively thinly traded component of a large index, a few microseconds before selling a large lot of the index itself. How much to buy, how early to buy, what to buy, when to sell etc are not calculated deterministically by human traders. But AI might find the pattern and learn it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:AI is a big threat to index funds and indexers. by Junta · · Score: 2

      a few microseconds before selling a large lot of the index itself.

      I've long thought this needs to be squashed. Sub-second trading granularity just isn't adding anything meaningful, but it causes crazy distorted and unfair trading practices. Something like shuffling transactions over a larger timescale that is more fair.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  5. Re:Glug glug blub pop by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    A bubble is when your mother gives you stock tips for the latest technology startups. That's a good sign to get out of the market while fools are still rushing in.

  6. AI ways to separate investors from their money by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    Seems to be the best application of AI yet.

  7. Translation by kelanos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please fund our bubble

  8. AI Bubble by Zorro · · Score: 2

    Same as Social Media Bubble.

  9. Re:You graybeards are always missing it! by ranton · · Score: 2

    (Oh, but the way: You, too, are just an automation; at some point, automation becomes so complex that it is indistinguishable from "sentience".)

    You can spread your religion-surrogate crap somewhere else please. There is no scientific basis to your claim.

    You appear to have it backwards. Nearly all if not all of our scientific knowledge points to humans being an automation just like any other robot, although much more complex and with fundamentally different hardware. Religion or religion-surrogates are the only source of belief to the contrary.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  10. Smart by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 2

    My AI is telling me that I should invest BIG bucks into AI startups.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.