Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft, Accenture Team Up On Blockchain-based Digital ID Network (reuters.com)

Accenture and Microsoft are teaming up to build a digital ID network using blockchain technology, as part of a United Nations-supported project to provide legal identification to 1.1 billion people worldwide with no official documents. From a report: The companies unveiled a prototype of the network on Monday at the UN headquarters in New York during the second summit of ID2020, a public-private consortium promoting the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goal of providing legal identity for everyone on the planet. The project aims to help individuals such as refugees prove who they are in order to gain access to basic services such as education and healthcare. Blockchain, first developed as a public ledger of all transactions in the digital currency bitcoin, is increasingly being used to securely track data in other fields.

53 comments

  1. About time by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for this tech to get into the ID biz

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see this possibly being misused by anybody!!

      Seig Heil!

    2. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it. So they mention bitcoin once in the article but do not mention Ethereum even once, although that is what this technology is based on...

    3. Re:About time by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me if I don't get in line to get one of these world wide ID's.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. good business, just ask IBM by citizenr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IBM was in this business in the 1930s in Europe.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    1. Re:good business, just ask IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall they used it somewhere in Central Europe? Something about a fledging new prime-minister needing to keep tabs on some less than upstanding citizens? What would we do if it wasn't for babysit- I mean strong leadership in the face of uncertainty???

    2. Re:good business, just ask IBM by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Proving you are who you say you are isn't the same as being tracked and registered.

  3. What's next? by Train0987 · · Score: 2

    Now everyone can have their unique ID tattooed on their wrists to make it more convenient.

    1. Re:What's next? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It will be your identification pony once Vermin gets the presidency.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:What's next? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      As long as it's not done via voice recognition, otherwise I'm Not Sure.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:What's next? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Odd numbers please come with me. You're smelly.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:What's next? by HatofPig · · Score: 1

      Human #0000000667 knows what number he really is. He also knows his apartment really isn't on the 14th floor.

      --
      Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
  4. What can possibly go wrong? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    Previous article https://politics.slashdot.org/... about almost 200,000,000 US voters' info leaking. Next it's going to go global. Bad idea.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:What can possibly go wrong? by snookiex · · Score: 1

      BS. They are completely different matters. Everyone knows that Blockchain is the closest thing to the second coming of the Messiah, it just can't fail.

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  5. good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who doesn't want to be trailed from birth? It's a basic human right, certainly! /s

  6. Well, that'll go well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because any project Big Time Consulting gets involved in always comes in under budget, on time and functions perfectly.

  7. Deer God by NettiWelho · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why on earth would you buy _anything_ at all from accidenture? I mean microsoft royally sucks but atleast their products work to a degree, usually.

    With accidenture you might as well be shoveling money to a furnace.

    1. Re:Deer God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We've hired them for about three dozen projects I know about. I think only one ever delivered a product. Some of the projects were as simple as making our shopping cart on Drupal responsive. We finally hired a local high school student who did it in 1/4 of the time that it took the five Accenture employees six months to fail at.

      I don't understand why people trust Microsoft, but I really don't understand why in the hell anyone would ever trust Accenture.

    2. Re:Deer God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you ever been blown by an Accenture marketer? Until you have, you can't know.

    3. Re:Deer God by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Typically the people buying are not doing it with their own money.

      https://buyandsell.gc.ca/procu...

  8. Okay, is anyone nervous about this? by evolutionary · · Score: 2

    Okay, we have two companies working together who do not exactly have the more trustworthy reputation.

    On one side, we have Microsoft, mass data collector who from Windows 8 started force feeding ads, private data extraction (see list here : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...), also force feeding updates, lying about the nature of a number of their updates (categorized "critical" which includes a new ad server?!?) and their trying to force feed upgrades from Windows 7 (now trusting updates to windows 7 is also an issue).

    On the other side we have Accenture. Does anyone remember that this is the new name for Author Anderson, who had a scandal with fudging financial records of a number of major corporations (https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1023409436545200).

    And THESE people are creating legal verification records? Also remember Accenture does a LOT of IT recruiting now. Anybody see a new data fudge coming? A new name and hair dye may change the appearance of a tiger, but it doesn't change it's stripes or it's nature.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Okay, is anyone nervous about this? by Terwin · · Score: 2

      Accenture was previously known as Author Anderson Consulting, which was a distinct organization from Author Anderson Financial Services(the one with the notorious problem).
      Accenture changed their name because the old one was contaminated by association, not because they specifically did anything wrong.

      And Accenture has been doing lots of tech hiring for at least a dozen years now. (the culture is very big on 'up or out').

      No comment on how effective their products are however(they are quite happy to hire 270 women to produce a baby in 1 day if that is what the client wants).

      Source: Worked for Accenture from 2004-2007(shortly after the name change)

    2. Re:Okay, is anyone nervous about this? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Is that in any way related to the Arthur Anderson family of companies?

  9. Six hundred, three score, and six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
    18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    1. Re:Six hundred, three score, and six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wink of his eye and a twist of his head
      Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.
      He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,
      And filled all the stockings; then turned with a jerk,
      And laying his finger aside of his nose
      And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose.

    2. Re:Six hundred, three score, and six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for starting the week with a touch of sanity.
      I really appreciate it.

    3. Re:Six hundred, three score, and six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better poetry, too.

  10. Complete lack of trust. by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't think of two companies I'd trust less.

    So this is truly a test: Can strong enough cryptography overcome complete lack of confidence in counterparties.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Complete lack of trust. by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      of course.

      Math is math. I don't know this particular project but what the "blockchain" would allow you to do is to create a history for those people who need it.

      The key point of worry is control of the passphrase. Say I make an unbreakable passphrase = "Bernie and Donald sitting in a tree k i s s i n g. First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes Hillary in a baby carriage."

      What happens if I forget it?
      What happens if I give it to somebody else (stupidity, blackmail, whatever)
      What happens when I die or comatose?

      The alternative is that microsoft / accenture / the govt has control over the passphrase -- is that anything different than what we have now in the US, Europe, Japan and elsewhere?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:Complete lack of trust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. they (.gov /Intel community) can obtain passphrase through backdoor and pretend to be anyone;
      2. change backdoored passphrase and make a person into an un-person -i.e. change the parameters of identity files, tamper or replace even bio-metric files.

      The second prospect is scarier!

    3. Re:Complete lack of trust. by vipw · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Why are passphrases relevant to this discussion?

    4. Re:Complete lack of trust. by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Because if you store hashed information on the blockchain you need to be able to retrieve it. Then the question becomes "who has retrieval access?"

      If you have access to this information then you need a pass phrase. But what if you forget your pass phrase or die or are in a coma?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  11. Double-edged sword by tgrigsby · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    "Without an identity you can't access education, financial services, healthcare, you name it. You are disenfranchised and marginalized from society," David Treat, a managing director in Accenture's financial services practice, said in an interview.

    And with one, you can't "start a new life." You can't leave the mistakes of youth behind. You can't hide from crazed ex's. You can't slough off whatever it is that has made your life untenable or even hazardous in order to begin again.

    Or maybe you can, if you have enough money... I wonder what the "New Life" service will look like and if it will come with different levels?

    Bronze = new ID going forward, but your old ID is still connected to you, and your new ID references your old ID.
    Silver = new ID, your old ID can no longer be used to retrieve current information about you, but your new ID can references your old ID
    Gold = new ID, and there is no connection between the new and old IDs.
    Platinum = new ID with a fake history, old ID shows you died, and you get to select your fake death and fake new history from a menu.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    1. Re:Double-edged sword by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

      "select your fake death and fake new history from a menu."

      Cookie-cutter is how it's obvious...

    2. Re:Double-edged sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      "Without an identity you can't access education, financial services, healthcare, you name it. You are disenfranchised and marginalized from society," David Treat, a managing director in Accenture's financial services practice, said in an interview.

      You could, of course, make all that shit not need all that wonderful all-singing all-dancing "digital identity"... or any formal token of being part of the man and his system at all. But that would be sensible. It'd be cheap and not depend on shoddy software makers and shoddier making-good-money-off-prolonging-the-problem consultants.

  12. NETWORK OUTAGE = CHAOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The weakest of links my children.
    Plan for it now.

  13. Accenture by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

    Accenture is the "New Jersey" of tech companies. This will never come to fruition.

  14. freedom in the 21st century by crafoo · · Score: 1

    Anyone who is not immediately repelled and horrified by this concept is not, and has never been free.

    If a free person is not breaking any law then they are free to complete any transaction they would like without providing documentation or proof to a third party, including the government. Any excuse presented to curtail your freedom is just that, a transparent excuse to put you in chains. War on terror, drugs, think of the children, etc. Part of the cost of living in a free society is understanding everyone's freedoms come at a cost. But it is worth the price.

    1. Re:freedom in the 21st century by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      There are hundreds of applications where a publicly viewable transaction history is a good thing, even for freedom loving individuals.

  15. Comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the bleeding edge of technology will be used to "legally identify" a huge bunch of downtrodden miserables (hint: Victor Hugo's novel). Exactly the kind of humans who have little education, scant resources, live where even potable water is scarce, and certainly do not have a stellar Internet connection via the latest in computing gear.

    Yeah, certainly smells like a guinea pig testbench for a modernized automatic version of Auschwitz-flavor crowd control.

  16. As if... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Yea, as if ledgers can't be forged in a democratic-based blockchain.

    Fuck right off you scam-sniffing fucks.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. Anyone Ever Have a Good Experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever had a good experience with Accenture? Asking for a friend.

  18. Who defines 'legal' ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is 'legal identification' and who defines it? What makes it legal or illegal? If I identify myself as...myself, because I am myself, who can tell me that I indeed am not myself? And would identifying myself without an accompanying legal document (papers, please?) be illegal? And if so, could I go to jail for illegally stating that I am who I am? Is this really what Microsoft is supposed to do? Or should do? Or should be ABLE to do?

  19. Microsoft _and_ Accenture? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    So, over budget, behind schedule and full of bugs? They just need to add Oracle to the mix to get the trifecta of bad businesses! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re: Microsoft _and_ Accenture? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Also insecure as hell, add Oracle and both the UN and Accenture will be on the verge of insolvency at the end of the journey. Without Oracle, they'll just get fucked over and never grow further as a company.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  20. Abandon ship! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You can bet MS only wants to get this fast money before it collapses.

    Get out while you still can.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  21. irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people don't need government ids, but capitalist firms want to make money from this stupid move

  22. that's how it begins ... by swell · · Score: 1

    "The project aims to help individuals such as refugees"

    Do we all remember the old poem? "They came for the Wookies, but I wasn't a Wookie so I didn't speak up..."
    So here they claim to 'help' the poorest, the disenfranchised and desperate. How can we criticize that? But where does it stop? Other minorities, other classes of poor and ignorant will be added to the list. Then union members and unemployed Uber drivers. I'll tell you where it stops--at the 1%.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  23. Don't build tech for the evil UN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The goal is one world government. This scheme to tag people (and inevitably control them) is just sickening.

  24. I'm calling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft merges with Wal Mart in the late 2020s to try to form a counter force to the Amazon economic empire.

  25. Why limit these things? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    "The project aims to help individuals such as refugees prove who they are in order to gain access to basic services such as education and healthcare."

    Why limit these things to people who prove who they are instead of just letting everyone at all have access?

  26. *cheers* by kelanos · · Score: 1

    Tagging the cattle, how noble

  27. Not going to be decentralized. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    I will be VERY surprised if this is a decentralized solution with irreversible transactions, etc. Most likely it's just a bunch of buzzwords for a new centralized database that can be edited at whim by whoever happens to be deemed an authority.