Slashdot Mirror


Using Texts as Lures, Government Spyware Targets Mexican Journalists and Their Families (nytimes.com)

Mexico's most prominent human rights lawyers, journalists and anti-corruption activists have been targeted by advanced spyware sold to the Mexican government on the condition that it be used only to investigate criminals and terrorists, reports the New York Times. From the report: The targets include lawyers looking into the mass disappearance of 43 students (alternative source), a highly respected academic who helped write anti-corruption legislation, two of Mexico's most influential journalists and an American representing victims of sexual abuse by the police. The spying even swept up family members, including a teenage boy. Since 2011, at least three Mexican federal agencies have purchased about $80 million worth of spyware created by an Israeli cyberarms manufacturer. The software, known as Pegasus, infiltrates smartphones to monitor every detail of a person's cellular life -- calls, texts, email, contacts and calendars. It can even use the microphone and camera on phones for surveillance, turning a target's smartphone into a personal bug.

54 comments

  1. Mexicants by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

    Just as with the US government, the Mexicant government cannot be trusted... Even worse they actively help the cartels hunt down anybody that tries to expose the ties between the government and the cartels and the profit that both are making on the backs of the plebs.

    1. Re:Mexicants by tgrigsby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...advanced spyware sold to the Mexican government on the condition that it be used only to investigate criminals and terrorists...

      Obligatory "what could go wrong" post....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    2. Re:Mexicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as with the US government, the Mexicant government cannot be trusted...

      Oh, I think they're not MexiCANT. I think they're MexiCAN, as in CAN use this tool for investigating criminals on whomever they like, because reasons...

    3. Re:Mexicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to imply that the Mexican Government is not owned and controlled by the Cartels

    4. Re:Mexicants by r2rknot · · Score: 1

      Oddly, some folks want to provide more and more power to the state to protect them. Even more oddly, in the USA, it was not until the Federal Government began assuming all this extra authority that ebil corporation started taking every step they could to subvert the powerful governments we created.

      --
      "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."
    5. Re:Mexicants by green1 · · Score: 2

      The nice thing about such a condition is that it's very easy for any government to classify anyone they don't like in to one of those groups.

    6. Re:Mexicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drew, let me be the first gringo today to say you're a critically naive non-thinker if you really think there isn't similar corruption in your own "compassionate conservative" dominated government with the same stakes, torture and death.

    7. Re:Mexicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse? You aren't very familiar with the CIA, are you?

    8. Re:Mexicants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory "Why We Need THE WALL: A Rant"
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOOBlcOIcLs

      In short: Letting everyone in is a pressure release valve for the shitty corrupt politics of the Mexican government.

  2. Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can gauge the quality of a government by their inclination to equate people who criticise the regime with terrorists.

    Case in point: Turkey.

    It's disappointing to see this behaviour by the Mexican state.

    1. Re:Critic == Terrorist by sycodon · · Score: 2

      But not unexpected.

      Mexico is a Third World Nation in every sense of the phrase.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not unexpected.

      Mexico is a Third World Nation in every sense of the phrase.

      Can you back this up with facts? Have you visited Mexico? Or are you just the typical Trump supporter screaming "they took our jobs"

    3. Re:Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Case in point: Turkey.

      And for those that are not aware of how bad the situation in Turkey is: while having one percent of the world's population they are responsible for one third or
      more of the world's jailed journalists.

    4. Re:Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And doing that Mexico is doing the same all major countries in the world (including USA) is doing.
      Sometimes i think that 1st world nations only exports corruption, military coups, economic breakdowns and resource theft.
      And their influence is too big.

    5. Re:Critic == Terrorist by ladydi89 · · Score: 2

      I'm really surprised our president and the mexican president don't get along better.

      --
      Thou shalt not use tools thou does not understand, lest they rise up and smite thee
    6. Re: Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you just a typical elitist Hillary supporter who celebrates every time you here about more working class Americans left destitute after their jobs were offshored?

    7. Re:Critic == Terrorist by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      I have no hate for Mexico, but technically sycodon is correct. Mexico is not a member of NATO, nor are they a member of the Warsaw Pact. Therefor, according to the original definition, they are a "third world country".

    8. Re:Critic == Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep telling yourself that its all the 1st world's fault.
      It's not like corruption wouldn't exist in all of these 3rd world nations if the U.S. and Europe didn't exists. They've been corrupt since humans populated them and organized into political units.
      Face it. It's not a 1st world problem, its a human problem.

  3. Shitty corrupt government is shitty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm shocked!

  4. fuck your fat face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    eat fifteen dicks, shit them out, then eat the shit

    1. Re:fuck your fat face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      butthurt much?

  5. Like Grand Prize Winner only instead of high-price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    award, offer them a ladder to climb the TRUMP wall. $25 for the ladder. $25BILLION for the Wall. Left Overture!

  6. Wow, just...wow by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We seem to be having a world government trend with attacking reporters who expose their nations problems. The US, the UK are also attacking reporters. It's creepy who many nations are using Chinese/Russian style tactics to control the contents of reporters.The question is, when is the public going to take the governments to task for this sort or behaviour.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re: Wow, just...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never. They just turn the conversation to partisan politics and personalities and everyone forgets the real problem. Like yelling squirrel to a dog in the movie "Up".

    2. Re:Wow, just...wow by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nonsense. In the US, the press is making things up out of whole cloth in order to bring down the government. And an increasing number of people see it for exactly what it is - that's why the favorable opinion of the press is in the single digits, below even Congress. And anticipating the next argument - Trump is the effect, not the cause.

    3. Re:Wow, just...wow by caseih · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree Trump is the effect, not the cause, but the rest of your post... just wow. How is reporting on what is actually happening making up things out of whole cloth? It's definitely newsworthy that Muller may be investigating possible obstruction of justice, for example. That's not fake news. It's not being made up.

      You've made an extraordinary, blanket claim without evidence. That's just not honest. Trying to sow this kind of distrust of the media (well distrust of everything) is disingenuous and pernicious. This movement to discredit the media is extremely dangerous to democracy. Encouraging skepticism is appropriate, encouraging wholesale distrust of just about everything (other than what you say apparently), is not. It's not thinking critically.

    4. Re:Wow, just...wow by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ummm..there is a LOT of misinformation. Problem is a lot of people are drinking the Kool-Aid. Trump is know for the very things he accuses anyone who speaks ill against him. It's true that we have a lot of misinformation or incomplete information but if you look CAREFULLY (like Fox News who constantly has to correct their headlines and are used by intelligent comedians for material), is the media with misinformation is often corrupted/coerced/bought out by the very people who accuse the media .Trump has been shown praising Fox news. Because they are basically mouthpieces of Republican party. Their official excuse is as a "balancing force" for the pro-Democrat news media outlets. All of that is basically government propaganda no better than the mainstream in China or Russia. So using Trump as an example of media abuse is a contradiction in terms (sorry but there is proven evidence). To be clear, I don't trust EITHER party (both have been shown corrupt at high levels) and I think we need a fresh 3rd party to keep them honest. But there ARE independent journalists and they are the ones primarily attacked. I'll give a few sources for you to examine:

      https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/
      http://theintercept.com/
      http://www.theguardian.com/
      http://independent.co.uk/

      Hopefully there will be more. Folks, please feel free to add to this list. Of course these people need donations to pay for their work. BTW, The Guardian and The Intercept worked together to expose the unconstitutional behavior of the NSA provided by Snowden. Pretty ballsy. If we want "real news" we need to find it and support it. otherwise the media companies and/or political parties will mute anything we truly need to know to have a real democracy.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    5. Re:Wow, just...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is a source ladder. It starts with WaPo, and NYT, but much more the WaPo as of late. Something something according to "Gov't Officials"..blahblah, then it gets dragged through every other media outlet using WaPo as source. In the end it is mostly bullshit. True, it isn't all fake. Indeed, one team won the game. They had a score. Someone, somewhere, certainly got shot. But when we are talking about the US Gov't and it's constant wars of attrition..No. Just no. You are being lied to constantly. It is legal to push propaganda on the US public, particularly since NDAA 2012. Does this mean that Breitbart is credible? Of course not. But don't be a fool.

    6. Re:Wow, just...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independent press is the fourth pillar of the State. The other three have been attaching each other plenty during the time of the Montesquieu-inspired republics. The press has to be able to defend itself as effectively as the others eventually. Although, in this case I rascistically suspect that the cartels are just protecting their employment practices. I also suspect that I made up the word rascistically just to give some colorful wavy lines to my post.

    7. Re:Wow, just...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What someone "may be" doing is almost never newsworthy. It's just politically-motivated leaks or inventions combined with speculation disguised as analysis. Does the media make it up "whole cloth?" No, usually not. They're not that clever. But they have, at various points in time, created or amplified lies that had profound effects upon American policy. Remember the Maine, the famine in the Soviet Union, Richard Jewell, George Zimmerman? The news industry is not uniquely innocent or precious, and given its outsized effect on policy, we should be very wary of any narratives that go beyond the 5 W's.

    8. Re: Wow, just...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only not thinking if you think it is not his goal to discredit the foundations of democracy. It is deliberately done by agents provocateur, and the partisans leap to the defense of their team, no matter what.

  7. we need better opsec education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This pattern is repeated endlessly against anyone who has rocked any political boats or embarrassed anyone in power. There's been directed surveillance against the Standing Rock protestors, for example, and so on all across the world in any kind of political situations.

    We need better opsec education. When protesters use Facebook to coordinate, they have to understand every single thing they say or do is under surveillance... so avoid Facebook and anything like it for coordination. We need people to understand how to avoid installing surveillance malware. We need people to know how to use strong end to end encryption, and avoid compromise of the systems running the encryption. They need to realize the huge attack surface exposed if they run javascripts in a web browser, given that's been how past protestors were infected.

    If you rock any boats, you WILL be targeted (directly, not in the mass surveillance way we all are), and you have to act in a defensive way. Technical illiteracy and political engagement are not good bedfellows.

    1. Re:we need better opsec education by r2rknot · · Score: 1

      There is cause for that surveillance however as it stands to reason that protesters might be tempted to perform industrial sabotage on the pipeline. In fact someone has already sabotaged the pipeline lending even more cause to the reasoning. And as the consequences of it failing with all that Oil are great, they need to take measures to safeguard the integrity of the pipeline to prevent an ecological disaster*.

      *The issue of it's inherit danger to the environment not withstanding.

      --
      "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..."
    2. Re:we need better opsec education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is cause for that surveillance however as it stands to reason that protesters might be tempted to perform industrial sabotage

      Yes, a handy excuse for a surveillance state to use in any possible situation.

      "We actually have cause to monitor people criticizing the king / our god / this politician / governmental corruption. They might turn violent and destroy property."

      Some nations have laws such as the 4th amendment in the US to prevent such blanket excuses. Outsourcing the surveillance to a private entity does not constitute an end run around the law.

      I don't even agree with the pipeline protestors. They still deserve protection from warrant-less surveillance.

    3. Re:we need better opsec education by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In fact someone has already sabotaged the pipeline lending even more cause to the reasoning.

      Any indication that it was an actual protester?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Welcome to the future! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    I hope this dystopia was everything you hoped it would be because it sure does suck for humans!

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  9. TFS sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Editing fail. When TFS doesn't talk about what's in the headline, the editor has failed.
    Summary doesn't mention "using texts as lures". No, I won't RTFA.

  10. Cmdr Taco: Mexican Invader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illegal Mexicans like Cmdr Taco must be rounded up and deported ASAP! Taco boy, along with his swarthy bean eating sidekick Vaquero "Cowboy" Neal, must be cuffed and frog marched back across the border into the waiting hands of their cartel buddies.

    It is a new era. There is a new sheriff in town, President Trump. And wetbacks like Cmdr Taco and Cowboy Neal will no longer be mollycoddled. Get out of our country, you filthy beaners!

    1. Re: Cmdr Taco: Mexican Invader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look buddy just because you and Trumpy have the same penis envy problems that most of your Nazi species has, doesn't mean anyone cares to hear your ignorant rants. Go back to Nazi land with that nonsense. Oh wait we kicked the shit out of them, didn't we? The supreme race of Nazis got it's ass kicked by multicultural America and the rest of the allies including the commies. You Nazis are a joke and soon your good in office will be exposed for the Putin Patsy he is. Heil idiots.

  11. Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You know, maybe if Mexico spent less time doing things like this, and more time working on improving the conditions of their people, their northern neighbors wouldn't be contemplating a big wall (in response to a problem Mexico says doesn't exist, but really doesn't want addressed nonetheless).

    Then again, they're just following the popular trend here.

  12. Want to Find The Criminals and Terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start with that Mayor of Iguala and his wife who abruptly disappeared after being implicated in the massacre of those 43 students. Then continue on to the rest of the corrupt politicians. Then continue on to the corrupt police. Then follow the leads back to the criminal gangs.

    Really, it's not so hard to find the criminals and terrorists. No need to bug the journalists, just ask around! Of course the problem is, you have to want to put the criminals and terrorists in jail. Unless you want to hit the criminals and terrorists up for favors and hush money?

  13. Disingenuous and Pernicious by admiralh · · Score: 1

    Great band name.

    But seriously, I agree with your comment completely.

    --
    Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
  14. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the question is when do we move to China or Russia, due to a healthier economy, and no real political differences?

  15. Not a bug; works as intended. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    human rights lawyers, journalists and anti-corruption activists

    I think all governments guilty of corruption and human rights violations classify these groups as terrorists.

  16. Are these MX going on the US Denied Parties List? by redelm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The appropriate and usual US sanction for violations of ITAR/USML/EAR regulations and conditions is listing of the offenders in the US Federal Register as "Denied Parties". This forbids any US entity/subsidiary from any dealings or "facilitation" of their transactions. Nastier than it sounds -- what it doesn't freeze outright, it costs at least 10% more to skirt.

    Wall whining or not, what do you want to bet the US DoC/DoJ does no such thing? For one thing, hypocrisy is already pegged.

  17. Misleading headline - click bait-ish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headline should indicate it is the ***MEXICAN*** government behind this otherwise it could imply the Trump administration is doing this.

  18. All-inclusive list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The classification is "criminals" and "terrorists". A terrorist is someone the government is afraid of without having been able to convict him of a crime yet (or anytime).

    For example, the U.S. is fond of creating laws against agroterrorism, meaning people uncovering (often illegal) commercial mistreatment of animals. People calling for boycotts are trade terrorists. People filing for government records are FISA terrorists.

    Terrorists are everywhere these days, just like high sea robbers (namely pirates).

    You can't really expect Mexico to employ more stringent standards than New Mexico.

  19. don't speak truth to power ? by swell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Mexico's National Commission on Human Rights reports over 120 journalists have been killed since 2000"
    You can learn more about atrocities in Mexico at: https://www.democracynow.org/t...

    The problem seems to be that they don't honor the secret code that pervades US journalism: Don't offend those in power. Whether they be advertisers, government, powerful corporations or individuals, etc. Mexican journalists have been heroic in reporting despite the grave danger they face. We need that courage everywhere.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  20. I wonder how much the people of Mexico paid. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I've been complaining for several years now that our spyware, used for terrorism and mundane criminality, i.e. small things, will be used or cloned by despots to keep billions around the world down.

    Hooray for our police! Buying a few solved crimes and some dozens of deaths at the hands of enslaving billions around the world!

    I just had no idea ae would be participating directly.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re: I wonder how much the people of Mexico paid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you work for that Israeli company?
      All malware should have a backdoor killswitch. Especially if you sell it. Never know when someone is going to violate your license and give up their rights to use it.

  21. Get a couple of burner phones by PPH · · Score: 2

    Text some stuff that pisses of the gov't. Meeting to be held at Location X. Then text some stuff that pisses off the local cartels. Meeting to be held at Location X. Sit back with popcorn and watch the firefight.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re: Get a couple of burner phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Watch the firefight."

      They realized they know each other and sparked up a blunt.

  22. cellphones spy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Yup, cellphones constantly spy on everyone, and the government officials in charge of that spying are totally corrupt. Anyone who doesn't enthusiastically support predatory capitalism is a terwawrist.

    In other news, the Pope is Catholic, and water is wet.