Slashdot Mirror


NYTimes: Move Over, Bitcoin. Ether Is the Digital Currency of the Moment. (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The price of Bitcoin has hit record highs in recent months, more than doubling in price since the start of the year. Despite these gains, Bitcoin is on the verge of losing its position as the dominant virtual currency. The value of Ether, the digital money that lives on an upstart network known as Ethereum, has risen an eye-popping 4,500 percent since the beginning of the year (alternative source). With the recent price increases, the outstanding units of the Ether currency were worth around $34 billion as of Monday -- or 82 percent as much as all the Bitcoin in existence. At the beginning of the year, Ether was only about 5 percent as valuable as Bitcoin. The sudden rise of Ethereum highlights how volatile the bewildering world of virtual currency remains, where lines of computer code can be spun into billions of dollars in a matter of months. [...] The two-year old system has picked up backing from both tech geeks and big corporate names like JPMorgan Chase and Microsoft, which are excited about Ethereum's goal of providing not only a digital currency but also a new type of global computing network, which generally requires Ether to use. In a recent survey of 1,100 virtual currency users, 94 percent were positive about the state of Ethereum, while only 49 percent were positive about Bitcoin, the industry publication CoinDesk said this month.

117 comments

  1. BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy tulip bulbs now! Get rich quick!

    1. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ether is an entirely new and DIFFERENT SORT OF tulip. Nothing to with that boring old Buttcoin tulip.
      I pledge 100 kg of cheese for the next batch!

    2. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our technology is better now. People used to say humans would never fly, now we have private space tourism.

    3. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, we have moved from speculating on a flower bulb to speculating on 1s and 0s. Either way, you're going to lose.

    4. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      We are speculating with something that strives to become a currency.

      Oh, the irony!

    5. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Joke's on you, I've been buying dozens of kilograms of 2's.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by mtmiller100 · · Score: 1

      psssst! yes you! hey man, I got some 3's over here I can sell you! Get in early!

    7. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the he'll would I buy tulip bulbs? They can spoil. They can be replanted and make infinite tulips. Crypto currency does not spoil. Crypto currency either has a fixed supply or a controlled release schedule.

    8. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your dollars, they'll never print more!

    9. Re: BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha, you wish so!

    10. Re: BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tulips are finite, limited by farming constraints. Crypto has no such limit. Bitcoin has a limit, yet is about to be dethroned by a crypto that didn't exist at time of inception (nullifying the network effect argument). This can continue ad infinitum. When transaction costs don't rise with demand (better scalability), it should be harder to displace.

    11. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tulip bulbs are not fungible. Any given crypto-currency is.
      Tulip bulbs are not divisible. Crypto-currencies are.
      Tulip bulbs are not durable. Crypto-currencies are.
      Tulip bulbs are not scarce. Most crypto-currencies are.

      That you were rated +5 insightful means there is a lot of people on slashdot who do not know the properties of sound money, and they do not understand why the tulip bulb analogy is ridiculous.

    12. Re:BUY TULIP BULBS NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tulip bulbs are not fungible, durable, scarce, or divisible. BitCoin and Etherium are all of these things. In short tulip bulbs lack the properties of sound money while cryptocurrencies have these properties. In addition the blockchain technology is an innovation allowing transactions without 3rd party counter-risk. That has never existed before. For these reasons comparing the explosion in crypto-currencies to the tulip bulb bubble is fallacious.

  2. Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The rich have way too much money sitting around. They're investing in nothing backed by nothing on the promise that it might one day be something. It's insane. What ever happened to investing in building something?

    1. Re:Clearly.... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Has little to do with the rich. Unless you consider the rich to be :

      Chinese who have spare cash and don't want to put it into a bank account (which can be seized) or buy an apartment in a ghost town.
      Indians who lost a lot of their saved (off-the-books) cash. (You may like the idea of reducing corruption and the black-market economy ... but not everyone agrees with you. And black market economy includes the poor okra farmer selling his own veggies.)
      Or perhaps you missed the socialist paradise of Venezuela? What if you feared that?
      Or maybe you lived in Egypt or Cyprus and you had problems accessing your own "safe","secure", "bank-held" currency.
      Or maybe you live in places where these events no longer look far-fetched to you and you want to squirrel a little away.

      It's not the big movers who are raising the price of BTC. It's the small guys.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re: Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are investing currency into a different currency. Using your logic they are investing nothing into nothing to get nothing. Clearly though, they have something, a lot of somethings since they are rich.

    3. Re:Clearly.... by spikenerd · · Score: 1

      They're investing in nothing backed by nothing on the promise that it might one day be something

      They are investing in having an entry added to the majority of the many copies of the block-chain that uniquely identifies them as owning a quantity of nothing tangible. It is backed by cryptography and the greed of all the people who are trying furiously to mine more of them. There are currently many people willing to trade these "nothings" for a lot of money, especially since they offer many unique properties and some guarantees that are not available in traditional bank notes. Which component of all this do you anticipate vaporizing first?

    4. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a digital commerce and self-enforcing contract infrastructure?

    5. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The attention or investing done by these folks is a token gesture. The real point is to draw suckers into the topic and fleece their money.

      By investing the pittance of 1 mil (or so) in new tech, currency, or any new thing...s a person or group can draw in other 'investors' and pursuers of shiny things. They see the initial investors as 'leaders'. Soon the initial paltry sum can return three-fold or more when you've got enough people or groups interested.

      The topic is inconsequential, the buzz & anxiety of being left behind is what's being played here.

    6. Re: Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In any of those cases, i would rather own a good that can be traded or bartered.

      $500 of crypto is only $500 until the market bears or bulls.

      $500 worth of potable water/copper scrap/cotton cloth/wheat is still $500 worth of something with known and stable demand.

    7. Re: Clearly.... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Water - poisoned, polluted, infested, evaporates
      Copper - Stolen, hard to haul
      Cotton - Rots
      Wheat - Rots

      And all four of those can be confiscated by Governments, and have been. You can't steal or confiscate that which you can't even see, or know about. And as for Fiat currency, almost all are Fiat Currency. And the greatest of all capital (human labor), is largely restricted by tyrannical governments threatened by a free and industrious people. BTW, this includes the USA.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re: Clearly.... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      Yes. True. But the advantage of BTC is that it is portable. You can have a very secure brainwallet. And it's much easier to travel with BTC then it would be trying to bring a suitcase of valuables with you. Can thieves, border guards beat or torture you and get your BTC? Of course. But which would you rather have BTC or try to leave the country with valuables (diamonds, gold) in your pockets and suitcase?

      Even if that wasn't the only concern? Example: what about transmitting your savings from place X to place Y (China to the US for example)

      Or, so fearing the value of the existing currency (Venezuela anyone) that even if BTC took a 20% hit you would still rather have BTC then the paper your government is peddling.

      Are there problems? Of course. BTC is not a cure all. It is simply a digital way of storing and transmitting a value.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    9. Re:Clearly.... by KGIII · · Score: 2

      When BTC first got started, I mined a bunch of them. Well, not a bunch - like 28. I then forgot about them - for quite a while. Finally, they hit like $450 each and I wasn't sure how I'd realize the income and pay taxes on it, so I got pretty high and donated them to EFF. I don't want to say that I regret my choice. No, I don't want to say that.

      I have changed my view, however. If you need money and have spare compute power, get in early and hoard 'em. They probably won't all pan out, but it's seems like a reasonable strategy - though I imagine it'd take some attention to monitor for new currencies. And, if you don't need 'em you can always just give 'em to EFF.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re: Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 worth of potable water/copper scrap/cotton cloth/wheat is not "still $500 worth of something"

      especially in wartorn places. All we have to do is look to Haiti for this, where developed and "stable" countries like the US just pump product into these places rendering your held items worthless.

      You could pour your life savings into water(pun intended) thinking you'll be able to trade it later for food...then Big Helpful America shows up with 30billion bottles of Nivea water given out for free, and now all of the sudden you starve to death because your commodity of choice now has no tangible value.

    11. Re:Clearly.... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      They are speculating with something that they have two contradictory hopes about:

      1. They hope that the value skyrockets so that the value of the amount of it that they have will increase dramatically.

      2. They hope that the value will stabilize enough that people will start using it as a currency.

      Basically, they are hoping that somebody else will be more stupid than they are.

    12. Re:Clearly.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      I'll settle for rising asymptotically to a stable level. And plenty of people are already using it as a currency. The network is doing about 3-4 transactions per second right now. Compare to Western Union which does 31 transactions per second, it's not a huge gap.

    13. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Universe has an average energy density of exactly zero. Everything we know of is literally made of nothing. You may want to re-word your sentence in a way that better describes the relationship between what you meant by "nothing". Even real world money is backed by the "promise" of future work by someone else. Is this "something" or "nothing" by your definition of "nothing"? Technically all forms of money have imaginary value at the time it is received and is only made real at the time you exchange it for something, assuming that event ever occurs.

    14. Re:Clearly.... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      According to Google, 1 Bitcoin equals 2696.84 US Dollars. Multiplied by 28 equals 75511.52 US Dollars.

      You're welcome.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    15. Re:Clearly.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The rich have way too much money sitting around.

      You don't get to be rich by letting your money "sit around".

      What ever happened to investing in building something?

      In America, the NIMBYs will not let you build anything.

    16. Re: Clearly.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      In any of those cases, i would rather own a good that can be traded or bartered.

      In Venezuela, hoarding will get you arrested. In Maoist China and Stalinist Russia, it would get you executed.

      $500 worth of potable water/copper scrap/cotton cloth/wheat is still $500 worth of something with known and stable demand.

      All of those things can be easily stolen or confiscated. None of them can be carried in your shoe across a border.

    17. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the swath of other Russian attempts to undermine the West as of late, I'd be surprised if there weren't a lot of rubles flowing into Ether.

    18. Re:Clearly.... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm still not really regretting it. I probably would still donate it, even at the current price. My accountant is an angry old lady. She has yelled at me, multiple times. It is easier just to donate it - then I never have to tell her. I just can't write it off.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re: Clearly.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      $500 worth of potable water/copper scrap/cotton cloth/wheat is still $500 worth of something with known and stable demand.

      Paying the bills with crypto is a lot more convenient and secure than paying with pieces of copper tubing. The convenience and security is what creates value and demand.

    20. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're investing in nothing backed by nothing on the promise that it might one day be something.

      Isn't this what the entire world economy is based around? The idea that some possible future something will bring additional profits?

    21. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an order of magnitude gat between 'all of bitcoin" and 'one bank'. As tehre exist more than 10 banks it's at least a two order of magnitude difference if we assume Western Union is representative rather than cherry picked to make the gap look small.

    22. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get to be rich by letting your money "sit around".

      In America? No. You get rich by inheriting it from your parents and the estate pays no capital gains taxes. No one pays them.

    23. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still not really regretting it. I probably would still donate it, even at the current price. My accountant is an angry old lady. She has yelled at me, multiple times. It is easier just to donate it - then I never have to tell her. I just can't write it off.

      So you are married then?

    24. Re:Clearly.... by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      If you mined those coins, then there's no way to tie them to you. Why worry about taxes?

      In any case, taxes should be easy to calculate. Use either the short-term or long-term capital gains rate against the current value of the coins (since you acquired them for $0).

    25. Re:Clearly.... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You don't get to be rich by letting your money "sit around".

      If you let it "sit around" in an S&P 500 index fund for a very long time, you can.

    26. Re:Clearly.... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Ethics. I don't mind paying taxes. I kinda like paying some of them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you're just pulling stuff out your butt and making this about the rich, on little to no evidence.

    28. Re:Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And all of these people will learn the hard lesson that a deflationary currency is bad for their economy. If people really start to switch to deflationary e-currencies on a large scale, we really might see a world economic crash. It's somewhat insane that people pushing ecoins make headlines about how much they have increased in value, which, it turns out, is actually a very bad thing for a currency because it discourages investment in things that have real economic value. i.e. it destabilizes the economy. A much better role of the blockchain is as a substitute for an electronic payment clearinghouse rather than a currency itself. That does not have the economic stability implications. Going even further there would be no currency at all, as the blockchain would make division and transfer of ownership of real assets seamless. One could pay another in some fractional share of some algorithmically-managed mutual fund of publically known value. No need for that value to be removed from the economy in order to be traded.

    29. Re:Clearly.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      It's an order of magnitude gat between 'all of bitcoin" and 'one bank'.

      Western Union isn't a bank, it's the world's leading business for international money transfer, which is a function that bitcoin can provide with less hassle, more security, and lower fees.

    30. Re: Clearly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post brought to you by corporate propaganda!

    31. Re:Clearly.... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      it's the world's leading business for international money transfer, which is a function that bitcoin can provide with less hassle, more security, and lower fees.

      It may well be that bitcoin can provide international money transfer with less hassle, more security, and lower fees, but that's mostly a function of how Western Union is set up rather than the advantages of bitcoin.

      Let's say I want to send the equivalent of $500 to Gunther in Austria. To do that, I pay someone to transfer the appropriate amount of bitcoin to Gunther's wallet, and Gunther transfers it to someone else to get euros. That's two relatively expensive transactions. I'm assuming here that neither Gunther nor I are active bitcoin users, since most people aren't. It doesn't matter if I am, since that's still two transfers to get Gunther his euros. If Gunther is, he's assuming the risk of currency fluctuation. Gunther, in addition, needs to know an accessible reputable bitcoin exchange, and if I don't hold my own bitcoin I need to know one too.

      Western Union can presumably do a bank transfer of my money to their account, and a bank transfer of their money to Gunther's account, if they can't do it directly. That's two bank transfers which are not inherently expensive, and trusting one company rather than two.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re:Clearly.... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If you mined those coins, then there's no way to tie them to you. Why worry about taxes?

      Nobody's coming after him because of bitcoin. If he'd kept the bitcoin and sold it for $75K, the IRS would be very interested in his acquisition of that amount in dollars.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    33. Re:Clearly.... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have various investments, primarily in stocks and bonds. These have the advantage of representing real things. There is a company called 3M that I hold stock in. As long as 3M is around and healthy, these shares have some real worth. Somebody's going to want them enough to pay me for them, and I can collect my share of dividends issued in the meantime. I have bonds, which are basically legally enforceable promises for a company to pay me money at some future date. As long as the company stays solvent that long, these bonds have monetary value. Neither is a sure thing. I've had stocks and bonds in companies that went bust before. However, both stocks and bonds are things that will hold value as long as the companies do.

      If I were to invest in some cryptocoin, I'd be betting that there would continue to be a thriving subeconomy using them. If I bought a few hundred bogocoin, and it never caught on, my money goes away, as there is no trace of inherent value in a cryptocoin. Bitcoin is doing well currently, but that's no guarantee. It's currency speculation, and I'm not touching that any more than I'm touching day trading. I'd feel too much like a wounded fish in a shark tank.

      It's true that any currency that's not a promise to give me something valuable (and "valuable" is a difficult-to-define word here) has similar risks, but let's look at the US dollar. It's the main currency in one very large economy and in several small shaky ones. The most powerful government on Earth and its numerous subgovernments require that people who deal with it do so in dollars, and when it's required to show them some accounting it has to be in dollars. As long as these are true, dollars will be in demand.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. self fullfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.

  4. I suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's becoming increasingly difficult to mine bitcoins and is becoming less profitable. I suspect that Ethereum mining can still be profitable and a lot of the activity is based on people mining and then needing to trade/buy/etc. to use the mined currency.

  5. Good Day To You Sir! by airrage · · Score: 1, Informative

    I seem to only comment every few years...so just thought I would log back in and say hello. I shall now go back to my experiments. Good day to you sir!!

    by airrage on Thursday June 18, 2015 @04:10PM...
    by airrage on Friday January 21, 2011 @04:26PM

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Good Day To You Sir! by Tx · · Score: 1

      Well aren't you the loquacious one!

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:Good Day To You Sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not wearing any pants

    3. Re:Good Day To You Sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't cutting fuck yourself on that edge.

    4. Re:Good Day To You Sir! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Pump it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pump it. Pump it good.

    Oh yeah baby, I'm about to dump...

  7. Nobody cares about Ether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anything the banks invest/invent or have a big stake in might just as well be avoided. Ether is one such thing. Bitcoin can be improved, and it's the only 'free and open' currency out there without stupid cocks being in control of it.

    1. Re:Nobody cares about Ether. by war4peace · · Score: 0

      I like stupid cocks.
      (to be modded informative)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. repost by Falos · · Score: 0

    we already had this slashvertisement

    i don't think this is even sourceforge's doing, it's just slipping in submitted

    1. Re:repost by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do my best to mark every crypto/blockchain submission in the firehose as 'stupid' - because everyone here should have enough brain cells to put together to have figured out why it's all shit that can't possibly work.

      Most of the posters here do nothing but mock these submissions, though there are a few dedicated cultists... and even so they tend to have low discussion participation levels.

      Yet Slashdot keeps approving the stupid things. There must be a cryptocultist among the editors. I can't imagine it's just approvals for click bait since they aren't working on that front.

    2. Re:repost by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      Slashdot was recently purchased by a group who have high hopes of deriving revenue from operating it. It hasn't been a 'hobby' of the owner for well over a decade, but the domain name and database of user IDs keeps getting passed around to 'interested operators' trying to accomplish various things from owning it.

      Right now it appears to be operated by clickbait operators.

    3. Re: repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +100000

    4. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cryptocultist"? wow. you have some serious anger and jealousy there dude.

      i am disturbed at each /. post about cryptocurrencies, where people like this shit on them. i *get* it. you don't want to invest. SO DON'T INVEST. who said you should buy a volatile new currency? nobody. can you please let the rest of us developers study the technology and see what cool things we can create from it? blockchains are already changing the world.

      did it ever occur to you that maybe the enthusiasm surrounding cryptocurrencies has less to do with some big vague conspiracy about tulips and pump and dump....and more to do with the fact that nerds enjoy learning about, programming, and using cryptocurrencies?

      we are nerds. we like computers. we like numbers. we like encryption. we also like money, just like everyone else. guess what? cryptocurrency is ALL of those things! yay!

      who cares if i lose some money playing around with them? i've learned so much about encryption just by studying the code. i'm not expecting to get rich by owning a couple. i don't tell ANYONE to buy them. but i tell everyone ABOUT them.

      perhaps instead of bitching and moaning and trying to stop everyone else from having fun, maybe you just check it out? download the code perhaps? learn how to design a simple blockchain?

      maybe you'll have fun. hell, maybe you'll get to participate in the newest and most important technology since the birth of the Internet.

  9. "despite these gains?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite these gains, Bitcoin is on the verge of losing its position as the dominant virtual currency.

    Why would anyone suspect that an unusually high (or low!) exchange rate with another currency, might possibly cause people to favor it?

    You might even say that slow change in perceived value, would make it more attractive as a currency.

    "Despite" was almost exactly the wrong word.

  10. What if Ethereum doesn't like you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't Ethereum the digital currency that arbitrarily rolled back transactions because they didn't like them? Or maybe they liked them too much? In any case, even the ability to roll back transactions make this a non-starter.

  11. Useless currency by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    You won't be able to use your currency because there will be so many types, that you'll first hafta get it converted.

  12. Video card prices... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a new gold rush in crypto currency that is causing video card prices to go up as everyone and their mother tries to mine the latest and greatest from the ether.

    http://www.pcgamer.com/it-looks-like-cryptocurrency-mining-is-driving-up-nvidia-graphics-card-prices-too/

  13. 2020 Move over Etherium. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Move over Etherium: Latinum is here to stay.

    1. Re:2020 Move over Etherium. by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      Peasant! Unobtanium is the Coin of the Realm.

    2. Re:2020 Move over Etherium. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So much hope, many Doge.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  14. Holy sensationalism Batman! by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    My brain is still spinning!

    --
    I tend to rant.
  15. Really? by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bitcoin is on the verge of losing its position as the dominant virtual currency

    In terms of actually being used as a currency, i.e. people using it to buy and sell things, I don't think I've personally come across anywhere accepting Ether. I've bought software, VPN service, pharmaceuticals (no, the legal kind) with bitcoin, which seems to be widely accepted. Surely before you can say that Ether is replacing bitcoin as the "dominant virtual currency", it would have to gain widespread acceptance as an actual currency, rather than just something to get speculators excited.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alphabay has accepted ethereum for nearly a year. I know this because a friend told me.

    2. Re:Really? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Long term I see Bitcoin being used as 'currency' the same way gold is used. With the size of the blockchain and amount of time it takes to do much on Bitcoin it's much more useful as a 'gold'.

      If Ether has speed advantage it'll start being used for transactions. Hopefully Ether (or competitor) will take off as a digital cash with faster transactions. Imagine trying to checkout of a grocery store with Bitcoin or waiting around with your independent pharmaceutical representative while you wait for Bitcoin confirmations roll in.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin transaction fees are nearly $4 per transaction now from what I've read. This is due to the fact that the network is at capacity. Nobody is going to continue to use it at those prices. Ethereum can handle more transactions per second and block times are only 15 seconds as opposed to Bitcoin's 10 minutes. Ethereum is superior as a payment system at the moment.

    4. Re:Really? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Most old gold coins are unworn and shiny because they spent most of their time sitting in bank vaults.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:Really? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      And yet 15 seconds seems like an eternity compared to the speed of Digibyte.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the he'll would someone want to wait hours and pay dollars worth of fees for bitcoin when you can use ethereum in seconds and pay pennies or nothing at all?

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is it opt-in like monero?
      In which case how many vendors actually accept it?
      Because I don't remember many being keen on accepting monero last time I visited.

  16. Pump and Dump by randomErr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This kind of jump, especially against an well established currency sounds like a Soros-esce pump and dump scheme. The idea is simple:

    * Buy a bunch of currency which drives the cost of buying more currency up with another currency or precious metals
    * When the currency hits its peak sell off all of your stock of said currency
    * When the currency crashes buy back your stock back for pennies on the dollar or what every your currency's equivalent is.
    * Rinse and repeat until you become an enemy of the state

    Give it 6 months and you'll see a huge crash and then it will normalize at about 1/3 of its current value. After that look for gradual but steady increase in price.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Pump and Dump by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > Give it 6 months and you'll see a huge crash and then it will normalize at about 1/3 of its current value. After that look for gradual but steady increase in price.

      Exactly. We even have a graph of the bubble.

      I guess we're in the mania phase.

      --
      Oh look, it is Bitcoin Tuesday ... starting back in 2015.

    2. Re:Pump and Dump by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I guess we're in the mania phase.

      Hearing the amount of negativity, I guess we're still in the early adopter phase. Sure, there's a certain amount of mania, but still very limited as a percentage of the population.

    3. Re:Pump and Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are multiple currencies propping it up as well. whattomine.com/

    4. Re:Pump and Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "How can I make this about my political biases. We all know there are no big money right wingers running ACTUAL scams like say fake Universities, or fake nutritional supplements, or usurious payday loans"

    5. Re:Pump and Dump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Rinse and repeat until you become wealthy and respectable.

      FTFY.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. Ether? Haven't seen it anywhere in actual use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bitcoin has and is being used as well as expanding into the real world.

    Ether seems more like an investment with the hype of a startup but has no products. More like a pyramid scheme... there must be many pyramid scammers trying to get their own block chain... IT WILL HAPPEN. Maybe not Ether... but somebody will win the honor of 1st to do the scam.

    Most people are thinking currency investment trading and simply having your coins get higher value than bitcoin doesn't mean a great deal.

    1. Re:Ether? Haven't seen it anywhere in actual use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...but has no products"

      Really? Just because you don't believe in them, doesn't mean they don't exist:

      https://dapps.ethercasts.com/

  18. bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Notes on Ethereum
    -Key man risk of 22 year old kid. Benign dictatorship akin to Torvalds.
    -Supply isn't limited like Bitcoin, annual inflation.
    -Currently hugely overvalued due to ICOs, not to say it doesn't have some value .Money is what people believe it is.
    -Its blockchain is huge, bloated and doesn't currently scale very well. Network clogs quickly.
    -Smart contracts are promising, interesting technology that have some very useful cases but very specific cases. Prediction markets are gold for this. Put a blockchain on it is the new put a bird on it.
    -Enterprise use is mostly vapourware. Banks all trust each other and know each other. The Gov knows itself. They just need better databases. Consultants and innovation theatre practioners looking for a passing bandwagon. What back office is left to automate?
    -Premine for the insiders
    -Not immutable. Read about the ideological split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic. Gresham's law gone wild. The bad money turned into the good money and good money the bad. Could be argued Etheruem should actually be $20.
    -Bitcoin has been a ridiculous bubble for 9 years. Keep thinking that. If it fell to $1000 the longterm trend still holds. Better money will win.

    1. Re:bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - This must comfort you when you go to sleep.

      - I'm so sorry you're missing out on the invention of the century because of idealism.

    2. Re:bullets by ras · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After a few 1000 words of crap, we finally get a post that sums up the situation. I wish I had mod points.

      You could have expanded on the ICO's though. They are driving this current bubble. ICO's are to ETH as Bitcoin is to real currency, which is to say where Bitcoin is a virtual currency whose value is measured in fiat currencies, the value of ICO's is measured in ETH's. Since ETH's is a virtual currency I guess you could say ICO's are virtual-virtual, or virtual squared. They are an idea within an idea - they are about as real as a virtualised CPU in Minecraft.

      Perhaps one example will make it obvious what is going on. Golem is an Ethereum ICO, whose ambition is to become a market place for CPU cycles. They an awesome looking web site (if you are into CSS candy), but no working software, no hardware, no users. They put a ETH market cap on themselves of $302M.

      Here is a list of the top 10 ICO's. Being merely an idea expressed in a virtual space, ICO's can breed at the rate of rumours in a girl's school. Which is pretty much what is happening, and it's driving an Ethereum bubble.

  19. confirmation bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ether is the next BTC because all the articles say it is. Therefore Ether is the new BTC. Rinse and repeat every month until userbase rises or filters it out.

  20. Prudent Investing is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canned food and shotgun shells

    1. Re: Prudent Investing is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My buddy became a blacksmith on the side for when the zombie appocolypse comes. No lie. He told me everyone will need a valuable skill when thing go tits up. So he chose to be a blacksmith.

      I think I'll open up a whore house. Seems legit. Besides how many bars and strip clubs will there be when things go haywire?

    2. Re: Prudent Investing is ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Just a tip: if the zombie apocalypse happens, you'll hear people say "Zombies? Fuck zombies!" it won't mean what you think it means.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re: Prudent Investing is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, you have to start skilling up now. So, move to Nevada I guess?

  21. Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital currencies are not a real investment or even a sustainably currency as it fluctuates way to much.

  22. Hold my beer. by geekmux · · Score: 2

    (Tin-foil hatter) "There's a global conspiracy to keep the US dollar strong! Billionaires man, the 1% control it all! And they lobby to maintain anonymous cash to fund illegal cartels! Millions laundered every day! I mean, have you ever seen something so artificially inflated before? There's nothing else that can even touch that shit!"

    (Cryptocurrency) "Hold my beer and watch this."

  23. Re:Little piggies by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

    Hay, we had pork chops for barbecue this week. Don't be dissing pigs.

  24. Ethereum is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unlike Bitcoin it is not decentralized

  25. Re:Little piggies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pot, meet kettle.

  26. I'll wait for *next* Ethereum-like currency by mtmiller100 · · Score: 1

    Ethereum is a good step on the road towards a block-chained cryptocurrency, that will actually take off... but I don't think it currently has what it takes. The next step, which learns from Ethereum, and addresses problems, might be the one that makes it big.

  27. Bart Bucks & Manishmarks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Another kleptocurrency? The way things are going we'll all have one of our own.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  28. What I have learned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    - Not only are 4+ GB graphics card (GPU) prices going up, high wattage power source units (PSU) are on back order and prices are going up. (2 GB GPUs and lower have hit obsolescence with popular coins like Ethereum).

    - Asic mining has made Bitcoin mining all but irrelevant for the Average Joe. But speculating, trading, holding, mining, and supporting other currencies that do not benefit from Asic mining and trading some to hedge your bet with Bitcoin is possible. Bitcoin is still the gold standard. As it rises, it has dips and corrections. It has not seemed to stabilize yet.

    - Exchanges have made it easy to trade 100's of currencies for Bitcoin for cents per trade. One example is Cyptopia: https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?baseMarket=BTC

    - APIs like Shapeshift have made currency exchanges within your wallet possible. No need to use an exchange for the more popular/adopted currencies. They also charge pennies on the dollar.

    - Want to figure out what you can mine at the best value per dollar based on your GPU rig: whattomine.com

    - Want to turn your Bitcoin into money? You have several options. https://bitpay.com/ offers prepaid visa debit cards for a fee %. Or you can link paypal, a bank account, etc. to something like https://www.coinbase.com.

    - Some merchants are taking Bitcoin and other crypto currencies directly as payment without need to exchange for local dollars.

    There is no doubt that most of the crypto currencies will fail to materialize profitability. It is safe to safe for the time being, acceptance is growing and people are profiting and creating crypto economies with a select few currencies. Beyond speculation, there are many uses for these cryptocurrencies. It may seem counterintuitive to say gold or coins, but those intrinsic materials have access issues for the world's poor. When hyperinflation hits a place like Venezuela and its citizens don't have access to gold, they have access to Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc. They may not have access to mining equipment either, but still hedging inflation with digital currency only requires money to trade, internet access, and knowledge of how cryptocurrency works. People will always find a way to get paid, as in the will learn how to use alternative currencies. Yes cryptocurrencies are also used on black and grey markets by those who crave anonymity to some degree, making borderless transactions at the push of a button that is as fast or faster than banks. However, governments are starting to recognize these cryptocurrencies as well and figuring out how to tax them. Crytocoins will stabilize individually, but the Cryptocoin market as whole has yet to stabilize.

    Uses for cryptocurrencies are growing daily, markets are being created around these currencies, and governments are taxing these markets.

    1. Re:What I have learned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to add companies are legitimizing crypto coins with ransomware...

  29. elephant in the room by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Until somebody can solve the big problem with all digital currencies they are destined to be technological playgrounds and not true digital currencies.

    Currently all digital currencies are extremely concentrated in very hands, much more so than even fiat currencies.

  30. Cryptocurrencies aren't sustainable. by cunina · · Score: 1

    By which I mean, they're not environmentally sustainable. The current volume of Bitcoin is $9 billion, and it's estimated that the power used to mine the coins and keep the currency afloat requires the full output of a mid-sized nuclear power plant. There's no reason to think the Ether would be any different.

    The cryptocurrency that wins is the one that uses "proof of useful work" instead of "proof of work" to secure the blockchain. One such scheme is REM, but even that requires trusting Intel.

    1. Re:Cryptocurrencies aren't sustainable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By which I mean, they're not environmentally sustainable. The current volume of Bitcoin is $9 billion, and it's estimated that the power used to mine the coins and keep the currency afloat requires the full output of a mid-sized nuclear power plant. There's no reason to think the Ether would be any different.

      One nuclear power plant, that's all? Compare to the amount of power to takes to keep physical currency "afloat"?
      Remember to count every single light bulb in every single bank, every ATM machine, every change machine in laundromats, etc..

      The cryptocurrency that wins is the one that uses "proof of useful work" instead of "proof of work" to secure the blockchain.

      Citation needed.

  31. cheaper to mine bitcoin with dapp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cheaper to use the etherium network to mine for bitcoin.

  32. This is why virtual currencies suck by kiminator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A currency is most useful if its value is stable: if the dollar in my pocket will buy me roughly the same amount of goods a month or a year from now, then that dollar is useful because I can make a promise for an exchange a year from now based on that dollar.

    Imagine, for example, if your rent had been defined in terms of a number of Bitcoins per month for a year. The price of Bitcoins fluctuations so much over the course of a year that you might end up paying vastly more for rent by the end of the year than you paid at the start, or conversely you might end up paying vastly less. No reasonable person or entity would dare writing a long-term contract based on Bitcoin. And the rapidly fluctuating values make it dubious for most products, as they'd have to readjust the value frequently.

    Maybe the concept of a blockchain could be useful as a medium of exchange, such that the buyer converts their money to Bitcoins and the seller converts it directly to the currency of their choice upon receipt. But I doubt it. It seems overly-complicated for the task.

    If Bitcoins crash, and Ethereum takes over, then it's only a matter of time before Ethereum crashes and the next cryptocurrency takes over. But none of these currencies will ever replace government-backed currencies. Because they can't assure stable value.

    1. Re:This is why virtual currencies suck by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      But none of these currencies will ever replace government-backed currencies. Because they can't assure stable value.

      So, how's that working for the Venezuelan Bolivar ?

    2. Re:This is why virtual currencies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its so useful when its stable, why does the world hold usd when it fluctuates so much.
      2015 it was valued ~20% less than today in my home currency. And about 10% less than where i work (another currency).
      This is before inflation.

  33. Why Bitcoin and Ethewhatever are not currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currencies are a store of value so people can use them to exchange goods and services. For currencies to work their value has to be hold steady. A currency which changes its value especially at these rates is not a reliable store of value. It is a pyramid scheme.

  34. Tulip mania mania by sevenfactorial · · Score: 1

    Isn't it funny how almost all the upvoted posts are saying something like "crypto is crap, it's a mirage that's about to vanish!"

    Do we live in a world of deluded fools where only the commenters on Slashdot can see that the emperor has no clothes? There may be a lot of hype around crypto, but almost everyone you talk to has a negative view and says it's a balloon that's about to pop.

    So... who are the idiots buying this stuff that don't have the brains of the highly elite Slashdot readership? Why can't they see the writing on the wall? If all it's going to take is someone shouting that crypto is crap for the whole illusion to collapse, I guess the word is out. Good work -- it'll be a relief to see this nightmare of a decentralized digital asset die tomorrow. It must be really horrible if almost everyone who reads a website dedicated to technology enthusiasts hates this particular piece of miraculous technology.

  35. Is it possible to short sell cryptocoins? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    So you would make money when they have their massive collapse.