California May Restore Broadband Privacy Rules Killed By Congress and Trump (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A proposed law in California would require Internet service providers to obtain customers' permission before they use, share, or sell the customers' Web browsing history. The California Broadband Internet Privacy Act, a bill introduced by Assembly member Ed Chau (D-Monterey Park) on Monday, is very similar to an Obama-era privacy rule that was scheduled to take effect across the US until President Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress eliminated it. If Chau's bill becomes law, ISPs in California would have to get subscribers' opt-in consent before using browsing history and other sensitive information in order to serve personalized advertisements. Consumers would have the right to revoke their consent at any time. The opt-in requirement in Chau's bill would apply to "Web browsing history, application usage history, content of communications, and origin and destination Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of all traffic." The requirement would also apply to geolocation data, IP addresses, financial and health information, information pertaining to minors, names and billing information, Social Security numbers, demographic information, and personal details such as physical addresses, e-mail addresses, and phone numbers.

Comments

Off the mark?

[Anonymous Coward]

Its not really the history aspect that concerns me. Its the potential of throttling netflix or hulu, paid "fast lanes" and ISP's potential to shut down site's they dont agree with that concerns me.

Re:This is how it should be

[Slashdot Junky]

Let states decide what makes sense

So, what is a person to do when all of the states supporting his or her real life needs adopt the same "screw the citizen" approach? This notion that a person can just move to a city or state that works for them or take their money to a business that is not trying to screw over the consumer in an endless pursuit of unreasonable profit is bullshit. Choice tends to not exist in the practical sense, because there is no alternative when all are the same. This is specifically true for profit driven businesses. What are you going to do when your state of choice creates a legal and regulatory environment not to your liking? Are you to insist that it be decided at the town/city level?

Re:This is how it should be

[TheGratefulNet]

no, it should NOT be on a per-state basis. why do you think some states 'deserve' privacy and others do not?

no PERSON would want to give away their privacy. any fails on net-neutrality or privacy is solely due to politicians collecing kickbacks when they sell us all out. they stopped representing us a long time ago.

no, basic human rights (of which privacy IS one) should not be sold out based on which state (and more so, which color your state is) you are in.

if you think states should decide this, maybe you also think states should allow slavery again? or that child labor is 'ok' in some states.

some things should be national. human rights and quality of life issues are NOT state-specific!

oh, and fuck trump and his GOP 'screw everyone but the rich' agenda. impeachment can't come soon enough for that orange idiot.