UK Parliament Emails Closed After 'Sustained And Determined' Cyber-Attack (theguardian.com)
An anonymous reader quotes the Guardian:
Parliament has been hit by a "sustained and determined" cyber-attack by hackers attempting to gain access to MPs' and their staffers' email accounts. Both houses of parliament were targeted on Friday in an attack that sought to gain access to accounts protected by weak passwords... The estate's digital services team said they had made changes to accounts to block out the hackers, and that the changes could mean staff were unable to access their emails...
The international trade secretary, Liam Fox, told ITV News the attack was a "warning to everyone we need more security and better passwords. You wouldn't leave your door open at night." In an interview with the BBC, he added: "We know that there are regular attacks by hackers attempting to get passwords. We have seen reports in the last few days of even Cabinet ministers' passwords being for sale online. We know that our public services are attacked, so it is not at all surprising that there should be an attempt to hack into parliamentary emails."
One member of Parliament posted on Twitter "Sorry, no parliamentary email access today â" we're under cyber-attack from Kim Jong-un, Putin or a kid in his mom's basement or something." He added later, "I'm off to the pub."
The international trade secretary, Liam Fox, told ITV News the attack was a "warning to everyone we need more security and better passwords. You wouldn't leave your door open at night." In an interview with the BBC, he added: "We know that there are regular attacks by hackers attempting to get passwords. We have seen reports in the last few days of even Cabinet ministers' passwords being for sale online. We know that our public services are attacked, so it is not at all surprising that there should be an attempt to hack into parliamentary emails."
One member of Parliament posted on Twitter "Sorry, no parliamentary email access today â" we're under cyber-attack from Kim Jong-un, Putin or a kid in his mom's basement or something." He added later, "I'm off to the pub."
So perhaps it isn't such a bad idea to use your home-brew email server after all.
... convenient excuse to regulate the internet.... how jaded am I with my government ...
how jaded am I with my government ...
Not enough yet.
"His name was James Damore."
Wouldn't requiring two-factor auth be a better idea?
#DeleteChrome
Why can't the email for MPs use client side SSL certificates for authentication instead of passwords. This isn't really all that hard to do, just a little extra effort.
This password nonsense needs to end.
Why is it too bad? Cyber attack stopped, no one needs emails on the weekends anyway (politicians rarely work when they are supposed to in the first place), and it was time to clock out. Should he not be compensated for the work he did, and not get to spend it the way he wants?
If they've got nothing to hide they've got nothing to fear...
In light of all the anti-privacy legislation that the UK government has been passing, I've got to wonder if somebody's making a point.
a kid in his mom's basement or something
It's like I have a twin!
WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
I'm guessing the Parliament feels a bit like a kid who hasn't studied and got a snow day right now.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Not at all - instead itâ(TM)s a great justification of why having unencrypted data sat on a server (or data encrypted in a way that that server knows how to decrypt) is a bad idea. This is exactly why end to end encryption is needed.
MPs said they were unable to access their emails after the attack began. ... (outside Westminster)
An email sent to all those affected,
What could possibly go wrong with this means of notification?
I don't think the EU would be screwing British expats - that would make them lose the moral high ground. My best guess is, EU will allow them to get a second nationality easier than it is now.
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
You are a fucking retard! Check out the Magna Carta sometime, and realize the difference in law systems means UK civil rights are even more secure than the US constitution provides.
Aren't US legislators forbidden from admitting they drink alcohol, unless it's in a tearful confession after arrest or in rehab?
Wouldn't a 'security probe' or 'multiple failed logins' or something of that nature be more accurate? I've had enough of all these bad and misleading analogies. Is computer security really so hard? Just enforce secure passwords and multifactor authentication and take it seriously. Account lockout after 10 unsuccessful attempts etc. And don't use Microsoft software of any kind.
Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.