Slashdot Mirror


Why So Many Top Hackers Come From Russia (krebsonsecurity.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader tsu doh nimh writes: Brian Krebs has an interesting piece this week on one reason that so many talented hackers (malicious and benign) seem to come from Russia and the former Soviet States: It's the education, stupid. Krebs's report doesn't look at the socioeconomic reasons, but instead compares how the U.S. and Russia educate students from K-12 in subjects which lend themselves to a mastery in coding and computers -- most notably computer science. The story shows that the Russians have for the past 30 years been teaching kids about computer science and then testing them on it starting in elementary school and through high school. The piece also looks at how kids in the U.S. vs. Russia are tested on what they are supposed to have learned.
Fossbytes also reports that Russia claimed the top spot in this year's Computer Programming Olympics -- their fourth win in six years -- adding that "the top 9 positions out of 14 were occupied by Russian or Chinese schools." The only two U.S. schools in the top 20 were the University of Central Florida (#13) and MIT (#20).

45 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They may be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If only we had decent hackers in the US. Then maybe they could release the Russian hooker piss-tapes to Wikileaks. I love watersports.

  2. Hackers in Russian media by Tuidjy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been watching a lot of Russian language media lately, because I have been trying to restore my language skills. Hackers in Russian movies are much more realistic than in American ones.

    One gets asked whether he can get in a secure system? He does not boast, he answers "I will certainly try."

    He does not mash the keyboard while he is getting a blowjob, he deploys an arsenal from 'Flashka' or from a alphabetical soup URL.

    He examining an air-gapped system, looking for a way to get at the hardware, and mumbling about which patches seems not to have been applies.

    He gets asked to get some video records? He asks "Do I have an hour and a half"?

    Etc... And that is from police shows, where the staff hackers are not necessarily named characters, and definitely not the focus of the series.

    This tells me that that the population at large has some idea about IT... you would not make a movie in the US where the driver will shift three times while driving backwards, would you? I mean... Uh, you get the point.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
    1. Re:Hackers in Russian media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... you would not make a movie in the US where the driver will shift three times while driving backwards, would you?...

      US films are usually about making money via drama and "entertainment" (whether or not you're entertained is subjective). So yes, we most certainly would, assuming the scene was intense, dramatic, put viewers on the edge of their seats -- all with hopes of making tons of cash at the box office.

      The last glimpse I saw of accurate "hacker" portrayal in the US was in the 1992 film "Sneakers".

    2. Re:Hackers in Russian media by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      To GP: Your post is frightening and enlightening.

      To anon parent: GP's comment, possibly half tongue-in-cheek, was alluding to American's being focused on powerful cars and high stakes driving, and it being reflected in movies that will accurately portray skillfully driving expensive cars. The Fast and the Furious moviegoer will not, in fact, expect the driver to shift three times while driving backwards, because there is only one gear for going backwards. (For the record, I have not seen a Fast and the Furious movie).

      Likewise, GP is claiming that Russian media accurately portrays hacking because it would be insulting to Russian viewers (who are more knowledgeable about hacking) for the hacker to bang out the hack while getting a blowjob, as in Swordfish (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfy5dFhw3ik).

    3. Re:Hackers in Russian media by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sir nailed it on the head.

      In the USA we coddle the idiots and the stupids. WE tell them they are special and make sure hard things are not hard for them.
      Elsewhere the coddling does not happen, they create TV shows that support intellect and thought... instead of the US Where We have basically "ow my balls" , "dancing with ow my balls", and "thinking is hard news channel"

      This is the difference. you treat a populace as if they are highbrow they get embarrassed if they dont understand and aspire to learn. If you cater to the lowest common then you get everyone degenerated to that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Hackers in Russian media by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      there is only one gear for going backwards. (For the record, I have not seen a Fast and the Furious movie).

      You have not driven a recent Mercedes with a 7G-Tronic transmission either. They have two reverse gears, R1 and R2, with different ratios.
      And older Mazda rotary engine cars like the RX3 could run the engine both ways - if you rolled backwards, turned off the engine, put it in first and dropped the clutch, it would start in reverse mode, and you could now use all gears.

    5. Re:Hackers in Russian media by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the difference. you treat a populace as if they are highbrow they get embarrassed if they dont understand and aspire to learn.

      This may well be a factor. In the US, few people seem to be ashamed of being ignorant.
      Just last week I mentioned to someone that I'd like to visit Malta again, and he said "Where's that? Africa?". It's not that he didn't know, but that he had no embarrassment or shame whatsoever. If I didn't know where a country was, I would have looked it up before opening my mouth, or at the very least have apologized for my ignorance instead of flaunting it.

      Before Internet took off, most people also had an encyclopedia in the bookshelf; even if they couldn't afford Encyclopaedia Britannica, at least a small one. Except Americans, who at most would have a Scrabble dictionary. This perplexed me - didn't people want to find out things? It took me a while to accept that no, in general, they don't, and they were not the least bit ashamed of that either.

    6. Re:Hackers in Russian media by radarskiy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'the US Where We have basically "ow my balls" '

      Have you ever seen Japanese game shows? Half are basically "Ow My Balls" with a hyperactive announcer and scrolling text on all four edges of the screen. The other half are basically "Ow YOUR Balls".

      '"dancing with ow my balls"'

      See Eurovision, which is basically "Dancing with Ow My Balls" with bribery.

    7. Re:Hackers in Russian media by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In American, you fucked around with lead in fuels and are still stupid enough to have lead water pipes and just to ensure mass stupidity like to fire lead bullets, at rifle ranges basically mainlining lead in huge doses (gun nuts are gun nuts because sucking on lead bullet exhaust is a national pass time). Yep, you poisoned your population and are continuing to do so because greed, unlimited greed, more greed, more (continuing to do so in the most flabbergasting stupid fashion). Don't want to understand it, check lead poisoning levels to crime statistic for specific regions, well, perhaps get another country to do it for you, the people you send will lie because greed and they are poisoned by lead.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Hackers in Russian media by jandersen · · Score: 2

      ... they were not the least bit ashamed of that either.

      Sometimes I get the impression that Americans are proud of being ignorant - or at least pretend to be proud of it (and I say this without malice). I wonder if it is because of the general mistrust in anything to do with government and 'city slickers' that seems to have been a feature of much of American culture - the sort of sentiment that seems to be crystallised in Sam Cooke's song, "Don't Know Much About History". Bookish knowledge and education is something that can feel as if it is dictated by some authority (which it is, in a sense), and it also tends to make students strive to leave the ways of their parents behind, which looks and feels a bit like 'class treason'.

    9. Re:Hackers in Russian media by tommeke100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Look at all the great hackers and coders from the demo scene in Finland and Scandinavian countries.
      I think most cracked games I saw from the C64 and Amiga era were from groups in those countries.

    10. Re:Hackers in Russian media by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I always thought it was because children are encouraged to ask questions and learn constantly, and not be embarrassed about it.

      Should people be embarrassed that they don't know something and have asked about it? Seems to me like they are trying to improve themselves. I'd be more inclined to think they were an idiot if they seemed not to know and not to be interested in finding out.

      I think it's not so much pride in ignorance, it's that people have been convinced that their opinions matter. There was some politician on the TV telling the journalist that even though crime stats say crime is down, what matters is that people *feel* like they have gone up. You see the same thing on Slashdot all the time, people relying on personal experience or incredulity when faced with actual data and solid evidence.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Hackers in Russian media by r0kk3rz · · Score: 2

      In the US, few people seem to be ashamed of being ignorant. Just last week I mentioned to someone that I'd like to visit Malta again, and he said "Where's that? Africa?". It's not that he didn't know, but that he had no embarrassment or shame whatsoever.

      To be fair, 'Africa' is not a bad guess. Malta is a tiny island located between continental Africa and Italy.

      As a counter-anecdote, last week I was in France for a music festival, and one of the bar staff there was clearly american. I'm not french and so she wondered where I was from, I answered and her immediate response was; 'I have no idea where that is, my geography is terrible, I'm from the states'.

      So apparently being American is a sufficient excuse for being ignorant about stuff, I don't think she was being proud about it as such but certainly not ashamed.

    12. Re:Hackers in Russian media by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      I certainly hope you enlightened him with a surprised look and an answer like "Where Malta'd Milk comes from, of course..."

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    13. Re:Hackers in Russian media by arth1 · · Score: 2

      You're advocating that people should be embarrassed and ashamed when they don't know where Malta is located? Unless that person is a cartographer who specializes in European maps, it's not a big deal to know about Malta.

      Oh, basic geographic knowledge isn't just for cartographers or those with special interest.

      I specifically said that it was not the ignorance that threw me, but his flaunting it.

      That there's not even a grain of embarrassment in showing ignorance does appear to be a cultural difference between Americans and the most of the rest of the world.

    14. Re:Hackers in Russian media by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I specifically said that it was not the ignorance that threw me, but his flaunting it.

      You have quite the chip on your shoulder. Nothing in your description shows he was flaunting his ignorance. He was seeking knowledge by asking where your vacation location was. It shows interest in gaining knowledge, instead of the alternative of continuing to be ignorant about a small self-governing set of islands in the Mediterranean. It also shows the maturity to ask someone for help instead of thinking it shows weakness.

      Not knowing where neighboring Algeria, Libya, or Italy might cause some embarrassment, but not knowing about a 450k population country? I would be as embarrassed as if I couldn't identify where Matola, Londrina, Gdansk, Yamoussoukro, or Adygeja are, which are all cities with a greater population than Malta. Do you also criticize someone not knowing where the Stapedius is, or not knowing what the 409 HTTP Response Code is?

      You need to grow up. Knowing the names and locations of all 196 countries is closer to obscure trivia than something you should expect everyone to know.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re:Hackers in Russian media by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Oh, sorry, I thought you said "car"...

      (Sorry, could not resist. No offense intended!)

    16. Re: Hackers in Russian media by shaitand · · Score: 2

      That is going a bit far. There is only so much time in the day, even someone who spends all of it learning (which is certain going to minimize their ability to DO anything) would have to "not bother" learning more things than not. The probability that a piece of knowledge will be useful is a reasonable filter for choosing which things to "bother" learning.

      That said, learning at least the locations and capitals of every nation in the world is standard curriculum in U.S. elementary schools but most don't retain that information because they never use it. For most it falls under the category of trivia, the most you'd get out of it is saving a google search when something that also won't impact you happens there and is mentioned on the news.

  3. Education system that educates, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the Russians aren't wasting time trying to figure out what bathroom a student should be allowed to use or letting some precious snowflake change the language because he doesn't like to be called "he"?

    Maybe the Russians tell the violent kids they're fucking violent and kick their asses out of school, and don't care how it might correlate with racial statistics?

    Maybe the Russians have an education system that isn't run by a union intent on playing politics with every damn thing?

    1. Re:Education system that educates, perhaps? by alexo · · Score: 2

      Agree, and also maybe because religious groups aren't lobbying to have "intelligent design" taught as SCIENCE, and that perhaps the earth is not flat and jesus didn't ride dinosaurs.

      Article 148 of the Russian Criminal Code disagrees with your assertion.

  4. Too many lawyers in the US by johanw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the US, there is an extreme risk-averse culture. Not risk-averse as in "start a company and it might fail" but as in "don't even think about trying to beat the system, someone might sue you for it". So the very thing that causes many of the most succesfull companies to be founded in the US is actively suppressed when it comes to hacking skills.

    1. Re:Too many lawyers in the US by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Want a secret to being a raging success at work? have the balls to make a decision and own it.
      So many executives are spineless pussies that refuse to make a decision. Be a underling that makes decisions owns those decisions and takes the credit when you are right and the blame when you are wrong, you will stand out dramatically against the scared pussy-willows of the rest of the corporation that the ones that matter will notice.

      And you will piss off the ones that dont matter.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Too many lawyers in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... secret to being a raging success ...

      There are 2 rules to success:

          1. Never tell anybody all the rules.

    3. Re:Too many lawyers in the US by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      --If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...

      Hmmm, interesting analogy. I don't think I agree. If construction were like programming, many buildings would have corridors that wind through the building with no entrances, it would have others with one way doors that you enter on the ground floor that take you through corridors with no exit to the top floor and exit through a one way door into thin air, it would produce buildings intended to function as a public library where the books have to be brought up, one at a time, from a basement filled with rooms indexed with the first word of the title and shelves indexed with the second stored in the order of the third word per shelf, for books with three or more words in the title. An entire second layer of basement would contain similar rooms indexed by the first letter of the author's name, etc, where the only items in card catalogs are the titles (hence first three words) in each author's name. An incorrectly fitted lock is more like a syntax error or typing error in a program -- comparatively easily found and corrected. Even if the lock is the primary entrance -- so it DOES block the use of the building -- the building doesn't "crash" as in have to be rebuilt, it just needs to have the lock fixed so that the building can be used.

      In other words, there are plenty of places where the analogy does work. If you build a building with inadequate structural members, it might WELL come crashing down and have to be redesigned and rebuilt. If you build a building that is too small or too poorly designed to fulfill its primary function, whether it is as a residence or business or manufactory, you might need to tear down and start again, or do "extreme remodelling". All of those ARE features of coding as well.

      I'd be more inclined to say that construction, or engineering in general, are a lot more like coding than not like it. Engineers build machines, or buildings, or bridges, out of structural elements that have properties, purposes, and that follow a certain logic. Coders build "machines" out of words. Special words, no doubt -- words that are structural elements with properties, purposes, and that follow a certain logic -- but words. That's the main difference.

      To bring the (gentle, I hope) philosophical rant above back OT, serious coders are those that build their first machine out of words and then say to themselves how cool was that! At that point, to my own direct experience, you can't really stop them, especially if they learn that they can get material rewards for doing it as well. They will teach themselves what they need to know to pursue their (a)vocation, they will scrounge resources, they will stay up late (the only time you can code is late at night when all of your life 'distractions' have gone to bed:-), neglect their personal hygiene, and start drinking Jolt Cola to maintain their edge when they have to function in the "real world" on four or five hours of sleep in order to get 6 to 8 uninterrupted hours to code.

      Personally, I think that the death of the US coder was caused by Windows and the various post-Mac Apples. PC-DOS provided a built in path for computer owners to start to write programs -- the original IBM PC has BASICA in ROM so you couldn't own a computer without owning at least one programming language in its own "development environment". BASICA got dropped from ROM as clones appeared, but it was replaced by "turbo" compilers that were cheap IDEs that anybody could buy (and did) driven by the fantasy of writing a game or killer app for the platform. Then Windows came along, and it was no longer easy, or cheap to write a program with graphics. This raised a huge barrier between the kids who might have become hackers/coders and actually doing so. At this point NO laptops or desktop computers sold with pre-installed Windows have anything like programming support.

      This means that the only platform in the

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  5. Re: Consequentialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This aricle is about the education system in Russia, not Capitalism vs (failed) Communism. Also, don't you realize that you Amerikanos have Google due to Russia/Soviet Union?

  6. The dumbing of down of U.S. Education by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has been going on for a little more than 30 years. How many "person on the street" interviews have you seen where young adults, heck, even some older adults Can't find their own state on a map, can't tell you who the president is, can't tell you which side won the civil war and on and on. Is it any wonder the government (both R&D's) have been able to strip away rights, bloat the government, encroach on your every waking minute?

    1. Re:The dumbing of down of U.S. Education by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, I suspect that if you did this (i.e. conducted an experiment that polled random people on the street about such topics) you'd find that the overwhelming majority could answer perfectly fine. If however, you're running an entertainment program or a news show (which is kind of an entertainment program now-a-days anyhow) you probably toss out all of the correct results and only show the clips from the people who get it wrong or act like complete duffusses for the camera. If you only actively highlight the stupidest people you can find, of course things seem worse than they are.

      I'm not terribly worried about poor schooling as IQ scores have been trending upwards over the past century since we started measuring intelligence. People will succeed and figure things out despite shortcomings in the educational system, just like people largely manage to overcome shitty or sub-optimal parenting and turn out to be decent. People tend to look back at the old days through a rose colored lens and focus on the good without looking at the bad. Somewhat recently I was talking with a relation of mine who recounted his years in high school and how much of a joke it was as one of the teachers was a drunk and taught them next to nothing and another would pass anyone on an athletic team no matter how poorly they did.

      If today's world seems so horrible it's only because we have access to news media from all around the world. I can spend all day reading about bad things happening from half way around the world, whereas 30 years ago that was practically impossible even for government intelligence agencies. Once again, if you only put the worst on display, it leads one to make incorrect assumptions. Things in general are getting so much better, maybe not as quickly as everyone would like, but the trend line is moving in a positive direction overall.

    2. Re:The dumbing of down of U.S. Education by arth1 · · Score: 2

      To be fair, I suspect that if you did this (i.e. conducted an experiment that polled random people on the street about such topics) you'd find that the overwhelming majority could answer perfectly fine.

      In the US tech company I have worked with, I think a majority of employees would fail basic questions about computer topics. That includes most of management, which is unsurprising, but even a fair number of people in tech positions.

      Many would likely see basic questions as advanced, because their concept of computer proficiency is if you can hit Reply All in Outlook and use Excel as a table formatting tool instead of a as a spreadsheet.

      But simple questions like how a stack works, what endianness is, or what Boolean operations do will have them stumped. Even a tech director thought that an xor encryption with a random one-time-pad could be brute forced and needed to be "protected in transit by stronger encryption like ssl", because he couldn't grasp the basic concept of an xor.
      I'd laugh, if it weren't so sad.

    3. Re:The dumbing of down of U.S. Education by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2

      To be fair, I suspect that if you did this (i.e. conducted an experiment that polled random people on the street about such topics) you'd find that the overwhelming majority could answer perfectly fine.

      Uh, unfortunately not.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  7. Their math education was superior for generations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife grew up in the Soviet school system. She told me all about math training there. People from the former Soviet Union are sought out everywhere as math tutors. American schools just flop around when it comes to math and send students up a grade even if they don't have the skills.

  8. Re:Their math education was superior for generatio by davecb · · Score: 2

    I worked with a Russian-born testing theorist: she and they were really really good and worked insanely hard at anything that was amenable to an academic approach.

    --dave (hey, Safia!) c-b

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  9. How do you define good? by plopez · · Score: 2

    The ones with the most newspaper clippings? Or the ones who never get exposed?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  10. Education over generations by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Education has value. The schools teach. People want to learn.
    Exams are passed on merit to get into a really great university.
    So the math skills are created.
    Also consider a long history of maths and science. Computer access and later faster network access.
    Other nations tried to do the same over the years. What did Russia get right and so many other nations totally fail at?
    The UK had its BBC Micro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... for education and a lot of very poor people all around the UK got so see and use a computer.
    Given the funding and early access to computers the UK should have been a very advanced computer nation?
    If it was only about hardware the early attempts at computer education would have allowed the UK to advance.
    The USA educated generations in science after the 1950's with more funding. That provided a good selection of very good US teachers for the next generations.
    The USA filled some of its schools with new computer labs, books, networks, educational software, robot kits and teachers who could teach. A lot of equipment and books got offered to different schools all over the USA.
    Some parts of the USA got vast amounts of new funding for very poor students, per student. Did any of it help or change results? Not as much as expected per generation per student when tested given all the new spending.
    If it was only about computer access, the best teachers and funding the USA on average would be very advanced given the amount of funding per student in some US states and cities..
    What was the difference?
    Passing exams, staying with real merit advancement. In Russia getting good grades and knowing things is seen as a good thing.
    A culture of math, science, art, languages, music, sport, faith and education is encouraged and supported.
    A pride in culture, art, engineering, maths, Russia is passed to each generation who want to learn and study.

    For people in the USA trying to get a wide picture of history try Gymnasium (school) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Not much on Russia but it shows a different way of approaching education that has shaped different nations.
    On Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    The key is the exams and the need to pass on merit. The USA and UK selected very different educational systems over the last decades and per student funding.
    The results of such very different failed methods show decades later over entire nations.
    Too much social promotion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in some nations and not enough low cost passing tests only on merit.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Re:Their math education was superior for generatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cool story. The answer is still no, Dave. Stop calling me.

  12. Re: Consequentialism by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are you talking about Sergey Brin, half of the duo who started Google, or how Russian scientists were involved in the mathematics behind eigenvalues, which is the underlying fundament for Google's pagerank algorithms?

  13. Russian Engineers by west · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In much of the West, crime doesn't pay, or at least pay well. Your average street thug probably makes less than minimum wage. Sure, there are a few that make a lot of money, but it's like trying to make a money as a rock band. Only the 0.1% make a middle-class income, and only the 0.001% make the money you see in movies. Plus, you're likely to wind up dead or in jail.

    Consequently, for the most part, only the badly educated or stupid become criminals. There's the odd smart criminal, but having a legit job (if that's available) is simply superior in every way.

    And then you have the former Soviet Union, with a ton of really smart, very well-educated, very talented engineers, with virtually no decent job prospects at all, but still fairly good virtual contact with the West.

    And suddenly, given a lack of options, you have smart criminals.

    And that is a recipe for total disaster.

    As a matter of survival of the Western world, we need to open immigration from Russia so that these smart, talented engineers can find decent jobs that benefit us before they find ill-paying jobs that cost us terribly.

    (Many of my most capable co-workers have been Russians who were able to leave, and man, we their talent working for us, rather than against us, for both our sakes.)

  14. Re:Their math education was superior for generatio by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can thank the absolute bullshit like common core for screwing things up as well. The ye olde by rote system we learned oddly ~30 years ago worked just fine, then they decided to start fucking around with it. And...scores dropped, then they screwed around more, and more. Welcome to the present. The US isn't the only case either, this is what's happening in Canada as well. Though we're only ~15 years behind the US in following this.

    It actually get's a bit worse up here because they've also pushed the entire curriculum to be "female friendly" and those changes over the last 12 years have dropped male scores between 1.40pts and 3.80pts(ratings are on a 10pts scale the provincial average is 6.1/10 - some districts have seen male students as low as 2.20pts while female in the same school are 7.18pts) depending on the school district. You can read about the absolute shitshow going on here if you want. And it is a shitshow, one so bad that a province once known for having some of the top students in north america for math have lost it in a decade.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  15. Re:Their math education was superior for generatio by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    To teach K-12 in the US, you need a degree in 'Education' which is for the most part a cultural indoctrination.

  16. Not just education by dmpot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is true that Russia places a much greater emphasis on teaching math, physics, and CS than the West. However, it is only possible because of Russian culture puts more value on knowledge of those subjects. Their knowledge means both more social prestige and better prospect of finding a well-paid job.

    BTW, many Russians tend to preserve this attitude to math even when they emigrate to the US. As result, their children do better in math on average than American kids. For example, Sergey Brin has never attended any education institution in the Soviet Union, but he was successful in math and CS. Similar, many Asian kids do well in math, because of their parents.

    Anyway, Russia has a large pool of young well-educated people, but Russia does not develop as much software as it could given human resources that it has. As result many young people cannot find a legal well-paid job, and some of them get attracted to the dark economy. Usually Russian authorities will not go after them as long as they choose their targets abroad.

  17. Re: Consequentialism by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you saying that the US system doesn't produce "evil people that commit crimes and make the world worse?" Because I'm pretty sure the rest of the world disagrees.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Re: Because by aliquis · · Score: 2

    CYKA BLYAT MUDAK IDI NA HUI isn't a thing? I could swear CS:GO was full of crying Russians.

  20. deficit by batukhan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a former-soviet-state citizen, I think it's because of "deficit". A very well known word for soviet people. You couldn't get anything. Food, clothes, household items. Everything was in deficit. And it came in batches, so you needed to go on hunting trips around town to find some new item in a shop. So naturally, computers were a deficit when I grew up (20-30 years ago). You didn't go to a shop to buy new one. You got an old one from an institution and made do. You got bits and pieces and hacked something together. Software: obviously piracy. Who pays for software!? With piracy comes lots of little hacks and cracks, you get to know and learn the systems. You don't have a support line which caters everything on a silver platter. I don't know. It just feels like this hacking and cracking mentality is coming from that.

  21. Re: Consequentialism by Maritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Russian education system - great at making hackers, not so great at making people who resent living in a kleptocratic autocracy.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  22. Donno about teaching computer science by bezpredel6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a product of post-soviet education of past 20-30 years, from a reasonably large city, and I can tell you that my generation (from which a lot of those hackers seem to come) was not "taught" any computer science, or tested on it, not on highschool, and certainly not in elementary school. Whatever my friends and I have learned was from playing with things on our own. The educational system, however, did provide us with very solid math foundation, geared towards multi-step problem solving, logic, and at least some critical thinking. In my opinion, the abundance of russian hackers is due two a combination of lack of consequences and lack of other as-lucrative economic opportunities. In US, one could easily end up in a world of legal trouble for experimenting with hacking. In post-soviet space, the worst that can happen is one would have to share profits with some thugs (from the government or otherwise).