Slashdot Mirror


Roadside Cameras Infected with WannaCry Virus Invalidate 8,000 Traffic Tickets (yahoo.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader nri tipped us off to a developing story in Victoria, Australia. Yahoo News reports: Victoria Police officials announced on Saturday, June 24, they were withdrawing all speed camera infringement notices issued statewide from June 6 after a virus in the cameras turned out to be more widespread than first thought. "That does not mean they [the infringement notices] won't not be re-issued," Assistant Commissioner Doug Fryer told reporters, explaining that he wants to be sure the red light and speed cameras were working correctly. Acting Deputy Commissioner Ross Guenther told reporters on Friday that 55 cameras had been exposed to the ransomware virus, but they've now determined 280 cameras had been exposed. The cameras are not connected to the internet, but a maintenance worker unwittingly connected a USB stick with the virus on it to the camera system on June 6.

Fryer said that about 1643 tickets would be withdrawn -- up from the 590 that police had announced on Friday -- and another five and a half thousand tickets pending in the system would be embargoed. Fryer said he was optimistic the 7500 to 8000 tickets affected could be re-issued, but for now police would not issue new tickets until police had reviewed the cameras to ensure they were functioning properly... The "WannaCry" malware caused the cameras to continually reboot, Fryer said. Fryer said there was no indication the malware had caused inaccurate radar readings, but police were being "over cautious" to maintain public faith in the system.

Last week Victoria's Police Minister was "openly furious" with the private camera operator, saying the group hadn't notified the relevant authorities about the infection.

11 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. For once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bad guys accidentally did society a favor.

    1. Re:For once by djrosen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speed limits are arbitrary and are in place to make money.
      https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/sp...
      "Despite the general acceptance and wide-spread use of speed limits throughout the world, there has been no consensus among practitioners concerning the methods and techniques that should be used to select the most appropriate speed limit for a particular facility. At the current time, it appears unlikely that any consensus will be achieved in the near future. This leaves practitioners without definitive guidance on this important issue, and in search of information to assist them. This report provides the information necessary for practitioners to make informed decisions in selecting a method for setting speed limits in their jurisdiction."

  2. Some justice served by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This makes me happy. :-)

  3. Won't not by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They really do speak the Queen's English down there.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  4. Consequences of non-stop drive by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to cut taxes. Local governments have to scrap for every penny and resort to crap like this. I don't think you'll find any honest traffic engineer who says these things make the world safer. If you want safe make the yellow longer. Problem solved.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  5. Private Operator by Dan+B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LOL. Once again the government outsourcing their responsibility to private operators turns out to be (yet) another million dollar mistake, fully funded by the taxpayer. Except in this instance, it's not an expense, rather a lack of revenue, and no one is crying because we all know in Victoria cameras are revenue machines, not road rule enforcement/deterrent. That's why most of them are on straight sections of highway with limits of 100kph or more.

    I reckon they should 'fine' the operator their commission for the year.

    Commission? Yes, commission; the operator gets a slice of each ticket issued.
    You think that makes them do their utmost to issue as many tickets as possible? You bet, about $1bn worth every year.

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
    1. Re:Private Operator by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Informative
      The traffic camera company RedFlex Holdings is a case study in corporate corruption and incompetence. Their US division had a massive bribery scandal in Chicago. The parent company, based in Australia, made two members of the board directors and the sales chief resign. Three execs in their US division were fired as well. One of them, the former president, ended up getting 30 months in federal jail because of bribery in Chicago and Ohio.

      If you read the Australian news article they make it clear the the virus was introduced to the cameras from an infected USB stick. On top of that, their camera systems don't work very well, and there is another investigation going on in Australia looking into that issue.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. The real story here is ... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The real story here is that the cameras were farmed out to a for-profit company.
    A "sin tax" is one thing and bad enough, giving a third party a chance to make a profit from it hurts everyone apart from the profiteers.
    Time to start looking at the former government for kickbacks or a special job for the guy who sold the farm.

  8. Police State Victoria by Lurks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This should be understood on the background of how speed cameras operate here (Victoria, otherwise referred to in Australia as Police State). The damn things are everywhere. There's no responsibility to tell people where they are, so they're not used as a deterrent like other states, they're used to raise money and they're GREAT at that. More than a billion dollars in the last three years .For a place that has the population of Wisconsin.
    There's a classic one in Chadstone, which is the champion for raising $$$, located just as 70kph turns into 40kph. They must be cackling with glee over that one.

    Also, there's no leeway on these things. 77% of speeding fines are for exceeding a posted limit by less than 10kph (6mph). I've had one for being 3kph over, while being the only guy on a double lane straight highway for miles and miles... (cops hide in the vegetation in the median strip). Good one guys, beats catching rapists eh?

    Fundamentally, other \.ers have called it right. The fundamental problem is that a commercial operator will basically install as many of them as you let them since they get nice revenue from it. The state government sees this as $$$, and can pull up all sorts of charts telling you that they are 'safety cameras'. All the while, this is a state where cops do nothing about rampant tailgating, driving around with fogs + high beams, hoons spinning wheels at every traffic light, failure to indicate and so on... because that would need police work rather than just ticking a box on a form and waiting for the money to roll in.

    Occasionally, just occasionally, one sees a burnt out speed camera with still-smouldering tyres at the base of it. Digitally burn the things? Bring it oooon.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion