China's All-Seeing Surveillance State Is Reading Its Citizens' Faces (wsj.com)

China's government is using facial-recognition technology to help promote good behavior and catch lawbreakers, reports the WSJ. From the article: Facial-recognition technology, once a specter of dystopian science fiction, is becoming a feature of daily life in China, where authorities are using it on streets, in subway stations, at airports and at border crossings in a vast experiment in social engineering (alternative source). Their goal: to influence behavior and identify lawbreakers. Ms. Gan, 31 years old, had been caught on camera crossing illegally here once before, allowing the system to match her two images. Text displayed on the crosswalk screens identified her as a repeat offender. "I won't ever run a red light again," she said. China is rushing to deploy new technologies to monitor its people in ways that would spook many in the U.S. and the West. Unfettered by privacy concerns or public debate, Beijing's authoritarian leaders are installing iris scanners at security checkpoints in troubled regions and using sophisticated software to monitor ramblings on social media. By 2020, the government hopes to implement a national "social credit" system that would assign every citizen a rating based on how they behave at work, in public venues and in their financial dealings.

Comments

Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

Can't wait for that to be exported to the US and Europe, where you don't have to just deal with eking out a living, but deal with what people think of you. Say one thing unpopular, and there goes your career.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[ganjadude]

lol

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[tripleevenfall]

Yelp for people!

I'll look forward to my "People hate me on YELP" sticker

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[cayenne8]

n't wait for that to be exported to the US and Europe

Sadly, may not be too far away....

In Great Britain, I hear of all the cameras they have all over the place in London....

In the US, look at all the many traffic cameras they now have up in many towns and cities.

Once they're there, not much more of a step to enhance their capabilities.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[deesine]

Communist China is leading the world in large scale human rights advocacy. China is healthy and growing and its large population demands the government be prepared and sensitive to human rights. Safely observing citizen actions and making necessary corrections to policy are two important concerns of the Chinese People's Government. China's most vocal critic is the U.S. government, who most recently was revealed to be conducting large scale intrusive surveillance on its own citizens. Such a government should never be accusing other governments of rights abuse.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, no. We've already seen the kind of bullshit the lefties pull without that kind of power. Giving these people the power to go through everyone's private lives as well is far too dangerous.

We're already seen that when someone says the wrong thing in public, something like "I think we should listen to what guys have to say" and they end up being ground to a paste like Laci Green or Cassie Jaye. Or saying something like "we can solve the problem together" and be screamed at for it to the point of having an anxiety attack like Boogie was.

Feel free to keep championing that cause though. Just know that you're either on the right side of the intersection or you're merely useful to the cause, and if you think you're on the right side of the intersection, be ready to get cut out at any time, just like how white women became the enemy of feminism for being too successful and keeping everyone else down.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

A) Do you work as a Chinese troll?

B) The US Government did not pen this piece.

C) this system is not about the people in China getting what they ask for, it is about the Government in China controlling the people.

D) As other posters have pointed out, this will come to the US and Europe as well.

Re: Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

Boo hoo hoo!

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

The only thing the Chinese Communist government wants out of its human population is complete submission and control.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[rogoshen1]

it's okay, we all look the same to them (oh the irony) -- so, I'd wager that tom cruise would be flagged as being responsible for basically everything.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

China's most vocal critic is the U.S. government, who most recently was revealed to be conducting large scale intrusive surveillance on its own citizens. Such a government should never be accusing other governments of rights abuse.

And only the Americans and people in similar cultures get so upset about the legal surveillance. Why would China compare that to abuse and proclaim hypocrisy when it is the central part of their own social order? Communist Red herring defense will not distract the Chinese citizens or the world from the issues.

Re: Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

Boo hoo hoo!

I guess working together to solve the problem would cut into your revenue stream. Can't have that, now can we? Others need to stay oppressed so you can profit?

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

I reckon there will be a rise in hat usage. Not just for the hats but for technology you can place in them (presuming it's invented) to confuse such cameras etc.

Re: Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

They already do this in the UK and EU. There are CCTV cameras everywhere.

Re: Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

And when they get biped robots, they will suddenly have a severe overpopulation problem.

The only thing people with power want, is more power. Given mind reading technology, these people would subject their fellow man to constant monitoring for no more than deciding how they should think for today. Give them mind altering technology and these people will subject their fellow man to forcibly mounting it to the skull, for no more than deciding what they will think about today. Give them robots for combat, they will create wars just to use them, give them robots for manufacturing / sales they will push every one out of a job. Give them digital currency, they'll mandate it just to make your life hell if they want, give them your personal info, and they'll trade it so much you'll never be able to confirm your identity via remote attestation again.

Every thing is all for their own gain, it shouldn't surprise anyone that a government like china's would desire such control over it's population. As others have said already, it's no stretch to think such abilities wouldn't make their way to other nations like the US or the UK. The goal is ultimate control, and we're (us) just watching the death of democracy in slow motion, while we wait for our dear leaders to bandwagon us off of a cliff and out of this universe.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, no. We've already seen the kind of bullshit the lefties pull without that kind of power. Giving these people the power to go through everyone's private lives as well is far too dangerous.

Well then you should have told your rightie overlords to vote down the P.A.T.R.I.O.T act when your rightie president Bush first proposed it.

Or did you think that there would never be another Democrat Party (sic) administration to take advantage of all those good surveillance tools and Freedom grabs?

Re: Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

You are being watched. The government has a secret system: a machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know, because I built it. I designed the machine to detect acts of terror, but it sees everything. Violent crimes involving ordinary people; people like you. Crimes the government considered 'irrelevant'. They wouldn't act, so I decided I would. But I needed a partner, someone with the skills to intervene. Hunted by the authorities, we work in secret. You'll never find us, but victim or perpetrator, if your number's up... we'll find you.

Re:Whuffie scores anyone?

[Anonymous Coward]

IIRC there was certain facepaint shapes you could apply to confuse facial recognition software. Not sure if it was the material or simply the presence of black shapes on a face which cause da failure to recognize.

Now this is a cyber story!

[Anonymous Coward]

Yet no use of the great cyber.
Shameless!
Cyber it up guys.

Holy shit

[Anonymous Coward]

It's really happening.

Too late

[thegreatbob]

Too late for them; resist this sort of stuff before it consumes you entirely. Don't see the changes from day to day? It's called "creep" for a reason.

Re:Too late

[MangoCats]

Social credit system, anybody remember Black Mirror Season 3, ep 1? (I only remember because it was the first one I watched, and I only watched a handful before giving up on the series, but it was a good one.)

Re: Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

Came to say this.

The episode where everyone had a video camera in their iris was a good one too.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

That was about the only black mirror that was entirely technically possible. We just have to figure out if that's the future we want. Like this post on Facebook if that is the future you want. Oh wait... :)

Re:Too late

[grep -v '.*' *]

It's called "creep" for a reason.

And here I thought it was named that way for the person doing all of the camera watching.

But that was in the good old days when people manned the monitors, not now when you point a cam at a monitor and let the computer do the watching for you.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

Also Psycho-Pass. They just need an evil AI overlord and guns that make people explode.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

It's not like the U.S. is far behind. And the U.K. has already been at it.

Re:Too late

[thegreatbob]

Would mod up if I wasn't OP xD

Re:Too late

[Rick Schumann]

Some of us do, and what do we get for our attention and trouble? We get labeled 'conspiracy theorists', or maybe 'luddites', or maybe 'potential terrorist/criminal' ("what do you have to hide, CItizen?"). Meanwhile idiots gobble up so-called 'social media' like it's candy, post their entire lives on it, and give you the stink-eye when you try to tell them that their right to privacy is valuable, and that they're just giving it away to corporations and governments that don't give a flying fuck about them as human beings, just as revenue sources, or as 'work units', or whatever governments think of people as. We're already living in a country (U.S.) where people are voluntarily purchasing with their own money technologies that can and are used to spy and surveil them 24/7/365 (smartphones, 'smart' TVs, Amazon Alexa and similar, game consoles with built-in cameras and microphones that require always-on internet connectivity, 'Iot' devices like Nest, so-called 'fitness bands', and so on) and are having some innocuous technologies forced on them ('smart' utility meters, which of themselves are not evil, but the immediacy of the data collection can be used to feed into profiles of people; when they're home, what they might be doing, etc; traffic monitoring cameras everywhere you look, etc). ISPs collecting data on everything you do on the Internet (even though they have to be lying when they say they aren't doing it, 24/7/365) and so on. Then there's so-called 'self driving cars', of which Google would love to see a world where no one is allowed to drive themselves, and the car has no controls whatsoever for a human occupant anyway, so you have ZERO CONTROL over the vehicle; of course it's got cameras and microphones inside it to monitor you, and GPS, and it can be remotely controlled by law enforcement, the government, and of course any criminals with the technical chops to hack into it and seize control of the car's systems. THIS IS THE WORLD WE'RE ALREADY LIVING IN, AND NOBODY IS REALLY COMPLAINING YET. If you do complain, as previously stated, most people look at you like you're nuts.

There will be a sharp drop-off at some point. Something will go too far, and it'll be the thing that finally gets people to wake up. Sadly, it'll probably be when the government(s) decide to openly treat citizens like convicts in a prison, with no freedom to speak of, and full knowledge that you're monitored and judged 24/7/365 everywhere you go, whatever you're doing. China and it's assholery anti-human policies is just the foreshadowing of what's to come. No government ever cedes power back to the citizens; power always seeks more power. There is a small chance that enough people like you and I are paying attention and speaking up, so that everyone else will be aware enough to avoid this sort of extreme dystopian future, but at the moment it's looking rather slim. It might take it being too late and there having to be an uprising. Or perhaps it's all really coming on too slow and subtle, and no one will notice until it's way too late to stop it. Or, even worse: it'll happen, and everyone will have been so thoroughly indoctrinated, that they'll think it's good and right and normal.

I'm actually glad I probably won't live long enough to see it all happen, and even gladder that I don't believe in an afterlife or reincarnation. I don't want to see what happens afterwards. :-(

..but on the other hand: I hear rumblings of Chinese citizenry getting good and bloody well tired of Communist Chinese government bullshit. Wouldn't be the first time in China's history, or the last I suspect, that there was an Uprising and a Revolution of one kind or another. You don't want to piss off a BILLION people, now do you? They could kill 500,000,000 of them in a civil war and still lose. *shrug* you never know, human rights and democracy might win out in the end. Despite all my gloom-and-doom, there is always a spark of hope left.. We might have a Star Trek future yet..

Re:Too late

[thegreatbob]

Finding the right way in which to raise points is critical to raising overall awareness... It's difficult not to come across as trying to steer a conversation into conspiracy-nutter territory. Also disturbingly difficult to get through to people that:

We're not trying to say that all surveillance is inherently bad.
Despite best intentions, mankind's history ensures that anything that is abusable will be abused (sooner, not later, and as much as possible).
If people don't regularly raise a stink about enchroachment upon liberties, they irrevocably vanish.

Re:Too late

[networkBoy]

or, blather away all the time on FB about trite and mundane aspects of life, whist keeping truly tight lipped about what one does want actually private, all the way to including use of a separate phone and phone number for said private activity.

I believe that analytics is so good now (and remember if you're in pics others post on FB then you have a FB profile already, it's just not named and is a guid) that social "holes" stand out more than the other methods of enforcing privacy. Because of this I use the approach above, though I'll wager neither is all that great at real bulletproof privacy.

Re:Too late

[arnott]

>conspiracy-nutter territory

In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" ... to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the "Official" Narrative

more

Its sad.

Re:Too late

[Rick Schumann]

If people don't regularly raise a stink about enchroachment upon liberties, they irrevocably vanish.

Smartphones. The Media. Television. Movies. Social media. Professional sports. There are probably other things that should go on this list, but they're all 'Bread and Circuses', 21st Century Edition. They're distracting the vast majority of people from actually paying attention. Then there's the religion angle: keep the Faithful more concerned about the Afterlife than THIS life -- and more afraid of what the Other Religions want to 'do' to you, than what's going on with your own government. The so-called 'war on terror': People who are KEPT in a constant state of terror, have their higher reasoning abilities essentially shut off; they'll turn to whoever it is that says they can 'save them', and will agree to almost anything (i.e., trading your actual freedom for a false sense of security). It's a battle, but it's an uphill battle.

Re:Too late

[Rick Schumann]

I don't think that's a new play invented by the CIA, I think that's a really old one out of a very old playbook: claim anyone who disagrees with you is insane. It's just another form of devaluing and discrediting someone, which is a much more effective strategy than killing them outright; you discredit someone thoroughly enough, they'll never recover from it. You kill someone, you create a martyr, and you can't hurt a martyr, you can only make them stronger.

Re:Too late

[Rick Schumann]

Because of this I use the approach above, though I'll wager neither is all that great at real bulletproof privacy.

I have a close friend who does that. Problem is, no matter how careful you are, you let a word or two slip here and there. They can even glean quite a bit about your personality even from how you write things, what your sense of humor is like, and so on. I don't use any social media anymore, and I don't use my real name online. I know damned well that corporations and the government still have data on me because aside from going completely dark (no internet, no phone, pay cash for everything, etc) I still 'leak' some data. But I'll be damned if I'm going to give it away freely.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

here's a tip

if you want to go on and on about something, make sure you hadn't already went on and on about political conspiracies. You know, the ones from the last US election? Which were all targeted at one political party? No wonder you guys get a bad rap when you're being taken advantage of and so many of your numbers just go with it without a second thought

Why can't conspiracy minded people police their own?

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

OR people are well aware that they're giving up their privacy and are actually ok with the trade-offs in convenience, entertainment, and efficiency. It's possible that people are looking at you like you're nuts because the only options you present are "surveillance state where everything you do is tracked and exploited" and "no more smart phones, social media, or generally any video/audio recording devices that can be connected to the Internet." If you continue to characterize the entire situation as Illuminati against V for Vendetta, you're going to be marginalized for good reason.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

Why do you even care? Go read another thread if you're bored.

Re:Too late

[Anonymous Coward]

...see the changes from day to day?

That's more because we don't recognize a change has occurred. The best example is Tv cop-shows of the last 30 years: There's been a dramatic shift in permitted police behaviour but no-one talks about it. The usual propaganda is:

    Police are the good guys, so their crimes are excused.
    Citizens have to prove they're not criminals.

Back in the real world, politicians are certainly demanding:

    Citizen have to prove they're not criminals.
    Preventing crime excuses all government oppression.

... resist this sort of stuff ...

Thousands of people have put their names and addresses on the internet and nothing bad has happened. In this case, 'bad' means run-over by a terrorist. Lots of people have suffered cyber-bullying and death threats, had their identities stolen, even lost their jobs because they could be found on the internet; when someone disagreed with what they said.

People spend very little time thinking that they can be affected by the words and thoughts of their fellow netizens, until it is too late.

Re: Too late

[denis.goddard]

Yup. Crap like this is why I moved to New Hampshire, with thousands of other freedom activists.

Re:Too late

[zippthorne]

Or people are ok with the trade-offs they think they're ok with and assume those are the actual tradeoffs.

Re:Too late

[kelanos]

I don't believe in an afterlife or reincarnation

What do you suppose reproduction is?

The afterlife will persist without you, the descendants of others will live, and by your genetic relatedness, you too will continue to live in part.

You cannot give up. If you do not fight you will be dragged on anyway, even after your body is gone.

You should reconsider your perception of self. Don't buy the 'individualist' falsehood that is pushed on us all by the plutocrats' media machine. We are all connected, we all live in one another.

just end it now

[Anonymous Coward]

Suicide is preferable to this.

Re: just end it now

[Anonymous Coward]

Stop it, Michelle Carter. You're in enough trouble already.

Guilty before proven innocent

[Anonymous Coward]

Mass surveillence IS guilty before proven innocent, no matter what government does it. This is the angle we need to push if we want to stop it. The average person hasn't even begun to arrive at that conclusion, because the average person is too lazy to think.

Re:Guilty before proven innocent

[Anonymous Coward]

Mass surveillence IS guilty before proven innocent, no matter what government does it.

This weeks winner of the biggest non sequitur is...

Re:Guilty before proven innocent

[Qzukk]

This weeks winner of the biggest non sequitur is...

"You have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide."

Catching up?

[magarity]

So does this mean they'll catch up to the UK soon? Last time I was in London a few years back cameras were everywhere. Their favorite spot is at the tops of escalators and stairs aimed so that even with a hat brim they can catch your face.

Re:Catching up?

[MangoCats]

What the UK isn't doing is getting in your face with real-time analysis of your social infractions. This is sort of heading down the advertising road shown in Minority Report and other movies... they want you to know they know who you are, and what you do, and what you like to do...

Re:Catching up?

[Anonymous Coward]

Which makes the only real difference between China's practice and the UK's practice the degree of openness and honesty. The UK is already combining sources to create social profiles for early identification of terrorists. And their current mood makes pre-crime arrests very possible.

Re:Catching up?

[Anonymous Coward]

You don't need fancy data-bases to spot a paki.

Re:Catching up?

[Anonymous Coward]

You mean the anti-social behaviour orders? Combining the facial detection with anti nose-picking algorithm leading to automatic credit rating reduction and job dismissal or pay cut is the way to complete the picture. Imagine the worse parts of the high-society, monitoring and doing completely illegal things to harm us according to their arbitrary norms, 24/7.

Re:Catching up?

[Anonymous Coward]

They are doing real-time analysis of your "social infractions" (not sure what your term means, but I'll assume crime or administrative infraction). They have been arresting people that were fugitives for many years based on facial recognition on music shows and other events for a few years now.

Re:Catching up?

[Anonymous Coward]

And of course the question remains. Who is watching the watchers?

Re:Catching up?

[fustakrakich]

What the UK isn't doing is getting in your face with real-time analysis of your social infractions.

How do you know? Yeah, they might not be in your face, but for sure they are collecting the data.

Re: but.....

[Anonymous Coward]

Don't most of them wear ninja suits? Or maybe that's japan....

If you think this won't happen in the US

[Anonymous Coward]

you're crazy.

Re:If you think this won't happen in the US

[Anonymous Coward]

If you don't have anything to hide then what are you worried about?

MAGA

Re:If you think this won't happen in the US

[Anonymous Coward]

I have plenty to hide from a government I do not agree with.

Why are Americans so interested in keeping 'the right to keep and bear arms'? Same thing.

Re:If you think this won't happen in the US

[thegreatbob]

Keeping only bear arms is generally considered an unpleasant and anti-social hobby. One needs a well-rounded collection of appendages to keep up with the Joneses in 21th sentury murica.

Re:If you think this won't happen in the US

[desdinova 216]

what about keeping a bear with shark arms?

Re:If you think this won't happen in the US

[thegreatbob]

That's borderline, but I like your thinking.

Another "It's not US it's China" story

[kelanos]

Never forget that OUR surveillance state is rampaging across our lives, cutting off our potential, turning us into cattle. Anything China is doing the western plutocrats are doing better.

It's up to the middle class to stand up and take charge of their own lives. We need to foster community and stand up to the machine, or the entire Earth will be desolated.

Re:Another "It's not US it's China" story

[Anonymous Coward]

O give it a rest. The US/Western Governments aren't blameless. But it's not even CLOSE to the same. At least 'in theory' in the US we can at any time vote out the people running the show & get rid of any level of surveillance we want. We can as well sue the government to stop them from overreach, as some already have. NOW, does that mean there are 'secret programs' of people doing things a 'free society' shouldn't abide? Sure, probably, but notice those are 'secret', there is no reason for these to be secret in China as this article demonstrates they are 'in your face' with exactly what they are doing & why. There is no recourse for Chinese citizens when their government blocks them from accessing internet sites, there is in the US.

Re:Another "It's not US it's China" story

[BlueStrat]

O give it a rest. The US/Western Governments aren't blameless. But it's not even CLOSE to the same. At least 'in theory' in the US we can at any time vote out the people running the show & get rid of any level of surveillance we want.

LOL!

You think they'd allow elections/votes to go forward that would actually, seriously, limit their power and abilities & methods to surveil and control the population? The *only* way such votes/elections would be allowed to go forward is if the 'fix' was already well-in. It would be Russian/Chinese/N. Korean hackers, voter fraud, climate change, stock market crash, terrorist attack...they'd throw something out there to stop it otherwise.

No, taking back freedom and liberty, this far along towards a police/surveillance-state, is going to eventually require bloodshed. Hopefully minimal, but not likely if history is any indicator.

Strat

Terminator Franchise looks like a walk in the park

[Anonymous Coward]

Compared to the future that this technology will usher in.

Hey china

[Anonymous Coward]

You guys produce tons of those cheap laser pointers that emit 10-20 times more light than the allowed 5mW, maybe you should start using them for something constructive. Like wrecking those cameras.

So China are catching up

[Anonymous Coward]

to the psychopathic government surveilance in the UK and US? Leave it to the always-honest WSJ to report sincerely and honestly. The country could literally be on fire and the WSJ would publish a front page reading "This is fine."

Re: So China are catching up

[Anonymous Coward]

LOL what?

They are the first to implement this kind of system. They are the leaders of keeping tabs of citizens. They have something called the "great firewall of China" for Christ sakes.

Take your FUD and go home. You are drunk.

Trum's election vindicates their feelings.

[Anonymous Coward]

To the Chinese chaos is the greatest evil and the deconstruction of important institutions that the Trump administration represents is something the Chinese public will happily give up privacy to prevent. They're not stupid. They know it's a game to keep everyone polite and in order.

    They saw how rouge far-right press has crippled some of the most powerful western states and they want to avoid the same populist shit show. (Don't forget that the US far-right claim to be anti-government politicians)

Will it come back to bite them in the ass? Probably. It's inevitable that such power will be abused to the point where it causes more problems than it prevents. Benevolent dictators grow old and pass away. The Chinese government's legitimacy is predicated on continued growth and prosperity (Which They're doing quiet good at. Billion of former dirt farmers are now middle class). The moment that stops it all goes out the window and people will resent the thought police.

Facebook government

[Anonymous Coward]

Social-network-ist regime.

It will rot in new and interesting ways. Life always adapts, intelligent life even more so. My guess is that last resort of resistance is apathy: drag your feet, don't make large transgressions but don't seek or care for rewards from the system, just don't cooperate, make them push and carry you anywhere they want you to go; sort of large scale, out of parliament filibuster done by masses. That's how Roman Empire fell, that's how SSSR fell, that's how British Raj fell, that's how any tyranny too strong to beat by force ultimately falls.

captcha: poisoner

Re:Facebook government

[Anonymous Coward]

Zuck for President!

Behold his mighty echo chamber.
Behold the rise of pluralistic ignorance.

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!

What good is this technology...

[Anonymous Coward]

If they all look alike?

Guilty before proven innocent

[Anonymous Coward]

Enough said.

Lets play "Who can be the most Orwellian?"

[Anonymous Coward]

Creepy

the trick

[Anonymous Coward]

They use just one photo. And when they put it up, everyone believes it's them. Everyone breaks the law over there.

There is no face reading technology.

In the USA it's called

[Neuroelectronic]

PRISM

but it's not a big deal since only blessed corporations can use it in their on-boarding process.

EC did a good video on the social credit system

[barc0001]

And if even half of that comes to fruition in the final "product" it's terrifying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI

Selling face masks in China

[m33m0]

Something tells me China will have a demand for face masks. Everyone would want a Jet Li or Jackie Chan face mask.

Many All-Seeing Eyes, So Few All-Thinking Brains

[Anonymous Coward]

Many All-Seeing Eyes, So Few All-Thinking Brains

Moving farther out

[Anonymous Coward]

The more this type of complete bullshit takes hold in the world it will spread everywhere. I've already moved to where no cameras currently exist and will gladly move deeper into rural America to get more privacy and farther away from the reaches of the over reaching governments who are scared of their citizens.

I can fully understand and appreciate why so many people I know are moving into deep Montana. Unfortunately, even a huge state like Montana doesn't have enough land for everyone who values privacy to have 500 acres.

Hey ...

[CaptainDork]

... it's their country.

It's ours next.

How can this possibly work in China?

[NotQuiteReal]

They all look the same, don't they?

Re:How can this possibly work in China?

[kelanos]

The western-imported camera recognition software says:

Try again, some one blinked

ad infinitum

Still True Today

[hduff]

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." benjamin Franklin

Too late for us too

[Anonymous Coward]

Too late for them; resist this sort of stuff before it consumes you entirely. Don't see the changes from day to day? It's called "creep" for a reason.

Too late by far. Should have stayed of facebook, and not tagged/posted photos to any of the other (anti)social media.

Oh well, back to binging this season's latest whatever until they come for us.

Wait a minute...

[ckatko]

Isn't that what the UK has been doing for like... a decade or longer?

Resist how? Not possible.

[SuperKendall]

Too late for them; resist this sort of stuff before it consumes you entirely.

How are you supposed to "resist" extensive surveillance exactly? You have zero control over who puts cameras where. At great effort you can try to arrange your life to avoid cameras, but to what end? It's not really resisting, it's avoiding and will not stop the inevitable spread of cameras and AI as both get cheaper and faster and smaller ad infinitum.

You could also wear masking patterns on the face that fool facial recognition software. But again this seems pointless as you will come to be identified by the uniqueness of the patterns and the back-tracking to where you came from, not to mention very probable extra scrutiny from every system.

The ONLY way to even come close to resisting the world of cameras everywhere, is to have your own personal feed or sets of feeds you record 24x7. Then if a problem comes up at least you have an unedited feed to back up what you are saying (because as video editing also becomes simpler and more accurate it will be abused mightily by the state). I would put a camera in every place you spend much time, and also ideally put a camera on your person somewhere like a police body cam.

I'm not yet at that point (I don't even have a dash cam in my car) but am getting pretty close.

Black Mirror as an instruction manual

[Anonymous Coward]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive

Lacie Pound (Bryce Dallas Howard) lives in a world where people can rate one's popularity out of five stars, from friends to strangers on the street. Lacie, who is obsessed with being well received, begins the episode with an approval rating around 4.2. She lives with her brother Ryan (James Norton), who has a lower approval rating and does not worry about it. Their lease is expiring, and Lacie is eager to move out to the "luxurious" Pelican Cove, against her brother's advice. In order to live there, she must either pay an exorbitant rent or earn a discount by having a rating of 4.5 or above.

CAPTCHA: Grader

Meanwhile, in No.10 Downing Street...

[BellyJelly]

In 10 Downing Street, Theresa May is reading this and drooling. Once she is rid of that pesky human rights convention............

Re:Resist how? Not possible.

[thegreatbob]

Spurring public discussion is generally my goal, but coming up with a good way of convincing people that it's not a lost cause is a difficult matter. I'm not claiming to have good answers to these problems, but rather trying to keep conversations on the topic from being disregarded as conspiratorial nonsense. Your concerns are well-founded.

Having your own private surveillance schemes in place is definitely not a bad thing; I personally only run a dashcam as a result of absolutely horrid driving behaviors endemic to my area. You touch on a very, very important point regarding video editing... it makes me curious (in a sort of morbid way) what schemes are currently mature enough to supplant classic video surveillance as a useful source of evidence.

China's? What about the UK?

[Excelcia]

Can't wait for this to be exported? China's surveillance? Good Lord, have you seen the number of cameras in the UK? There are more cameras per capita and square meter there than anywhere else in the world. Between that and ANPR, you can't move without the government knowing about it. It's absolutely frightening.

Proper protest is due

[Anonymous Coward]

It would seem the most proper way to protest this abuse of basic humanity would be to cross illegally, or run red lights while wearing a mask and displaying the severed head of a Chinese official. I know it's a lot to ask, but that would really make my day to read that story. Good luck and happy hunting :)

What's with this Control Stuff?

[Neuronwelder]

They figure out ways to generate more forms, complicate instead of simplify. Take instead of adding to life they take away freedom.. I'm not at all, saying, all technology is bad but - What good is technology when you have people who design it to make other people feel miserable or incarcerated?

So is the USA

[WillAffleckUW]

Face it, there are illegal and unconstitutional camera loadings of American citizens into facial recognition databases without permission occurring at all federal buildings and most airports right now. They even use bus depots.

Fun Fact: still easy to defeat. Still incredibly inaccurate in real world situations.

Facemasks

[Frescard]

Except, they're all just gonna wear face-masks (as many of them do already), so good luck with that...

Re:China's? What about the UK?

[wyHunter]

There are more cameras in Britain than there are people.

Anything the Communist do

[Anonymous Coward]

America is sure to follow.

Already in OZ

[Anonymous Coward]

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jun/09/commonwealth-games-alarm-at-plan-to-use-facial-technology-to-spot-terror-suspects

China Needs to Be Nuked

[Anonymous Coward]

.. way back into the stoneage... before this idiocy and lack of morals spreads here

Time for us 'luddites' to segregate.

[Anonymous Coward]

The only way we will retain any privacy is to move outside the boundaries of established nations. Establish a nation full of privacy minded indivuduals, breed with privacy minded individuals, and ideally, given the mindshare and motivation, go off to space with likeminded
individuals.

The time where privacy minded individuals could pretend that mainstream society held the same values they do is long past. Short of nuclear annihilation the technological no-privacy singularity will not be turned back, and the only option left for us today is an exodus, like so many other exodus' from the past. If we don't do this, we will just find ourselves slowly purged as each step of societal evolution removes one more facet of privacy from our lives. Gone are the days when you could move a town over to get away from your past. Now you couldn't even move to another continent and ensure you would.

In an age of social harmony...

[Anonymous Coward]

I can think of one startup that

(_)
( _)>-
(_)

got disrupted

YYEEAAHH

Klout

SRSLY

In the now IP friendly chinese legal system, would Klout have standing, or would the chinese government toss out the lawsuit since you can't sue the state?