Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: Your Favorite Ride-Sharing App?

There are many ride-sharing applications on the market but only two get all the media attention: Uber and Lyft. As many of you know, Uber has had a tumultuous year marked by a high-stakes legal fight with Alphabet over Google self-driving car trade secrets, a investigation by the U.S. government into the company's use of a software tool that helped its drivers avoid detection in parts of the country where the service wasn't allowed to operate in, and a sexual harassment investigation that resulted in 20 employees being fired. Uber's CEO Travis Kalanick resigned due to many of these scandals and investor pressure. Despite all of this, Uber continues to do well. Last week, the company announced it hit 5 billion rides across 6 continents, 76 countries, and 450+ cities.

Meanwhile, Lyft, which is only available in the U.S., just announced it hit one million rides a day. The company also says it's seen 48 consecutive months of ride growth and is on track to hit an annualized ride rate of 350 million. Our question to you is this: what ride-sharing app is your favorite? Have you found yourself gravitating more towards Lyft due to Uber's messes, or does that not matter much to you? Bonus: do you have a favorite ride-sharing app that's not Lyft or Uber?

20 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. ride-sharing? by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uber? Lyft? Get real. That's not 'ride sharing'.

    Those are just taxi apps.

    You summon a car with a driver to your location, they pick you up and take you where you want to go, and you pay them. How is that anything but a taxi service?

    An apps to setup and coordinate carpools... now THAT would be a ride sharing app.

    1. Re:ride-sharing? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean the cab company I actually have to call to talk to a human being that doesn't know when the cab will arrive, or if it will arrive at all?

      Actually the local cab companies all have apps now, automatic dispatch systems, sms notifcations when your cab is close etc. Oooo.... does that make it a ride sharing company?

      The innovation in ride sharing apps is not in the app itself

      Again. That's innovation in taxi dispatch. Nothing to do with ride sharing.

      but in the controls they've put on the drivers to stop some of the frequent scams that almost everyone hates,

      So they could replace them with new scams that everyone hates? like surge pricing
      Or reinventing old scams that were regulated out ... like discrimination against minorities or the handicapped.

      In any case uber etc may well have improved certain parts of the taxi experience in certain cases; but that just makes them an innovative taxi company.

    2. Re:ride-sharing? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which service do you prefer?

      See here's the thing... the local taxi company has a perfectly serviceable app and I use it more than anything else. As I see no real difference between it and uber or lyft, I guess I'll go with that.

      The app my friend had me using in Melbourne last time i was there was also fine.. again for some local cab company.

      Or am I only supposed to cheer for big silicon valley taxi companies that pretend they aren't?

      Or did you just write a comment to make yourself feel superior?

      I did it just to provoke you.

    3. Re:ride-sharing? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, Lyft, which is only available in the U.S.,

      I use Krzykstn for my ride-sharing service, but its only available in Upper Slobovia where I live. If you're nice, you get to be the one to hold the reins. If you're less nice, you get the bucket and shovel to collect the.. uhh... byproducts.

  2. Phone App by mentil · · Score: 2

    Call up a friend/relative, tell them to pick me up. It's free, and I know exactly who the driver will be and the condition of their vehicle. They tend to speak my language, give good smalltalk, and not be an asshole, as well.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Phone App by brokenin2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You had me until "not be an asshole".. That's not our family at all.

  3. No. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will not fund unlicensed cab companies.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:No. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing worse than an unlicensed cab company is a licensed cab company.

      You're seeing two groups of people in the same bottom-end job fighting over which master should rule the land. Neither master is kind or generous, but the workers know they have scraps from their current master and won't if the other master's workers take over.

    2. Re:No. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      The only thing worse than an unlicensed cab company is a licensed cab company.

      I don't support any company that under-performs.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:No. by silverdirk · · Score: 2

      I don't know squat about it either. Maybe you could inform us about the value you're adding to the cab system by owning this license? Then people won't suspect you of being a parasite.

      --
      Mark of the Coder fades from you. You perform Opening on World of Warcraft. Warcraft crits GPA for 4. GPA dies.
  4. Stil Uber by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Mostly out of laziness, but I still use Uber instead of Lyft. Lyft would be fine too and I'd probably turn to that if I saw no Uber drivers at hand.

    I greatly prefer Uber over Taxis, even though I tip both - I don't care about cost as they are similar enough. I have had many, many very bad experiences in taxis ranging from horrifically maintain vehicles (even in the U.S.), to really really surly drivers including some who obviously hated women (would not take payment from my wife).

    If an Uber driver had any of those issues they would be gone in a flash. Uber drivers have been friendlier and nicer all around. Have you ever tried t complain about a taxi diver? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

    I'm sure it's the same for Lyft drivers (being friendly and pleasant). Basically I feel like supporting Uber/Lyft I am supporting people trying to get by, and not a criminal cartel...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. Re:Public transit and the sidewalk by speedplane · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a New Yorker who has never used Uber, Lyft, or any other ride sharing app ...

    As a fellow New Yorker, I'm surprised you're not using all the transportation options available. NYC has a huge variety of transportation options, and there's a complex calculus you have to do to get from point A to B depending on a variety of factors.

    In NYC, I use all of the following services:

    Taxi Apps: Uber, Lyft, Juno, Gett
    Car Sharing Apps: Via (as well as Uber and Lyft's car sharing)
    Ferry: Water Taxi, NYC Ferry Service (great in the summer)
    Subways and Buses: Ranges from beautiful to agonizing
    Uni-Directional Car Rentals: Car2Go
    Car Rentals: Maven, Enterprise Car Share, ZipCar (recently canceled), and HertzOnDemand (sadly now defunct)
    Walking: The old standby
    Biking: I have my own bike, but I use CitiBike when I don't want to deal with retrieving it.

    Just yesterday, I used an Uber pool to get to the ferry, took the ferry to the Rockaways, took a bus to get to the beach, walked back to the ferry, ferry to Sunset park in BK, Car2Go from lower BK to upper BK for a 4th of July party, Subway ride back into Manhattan. That's the proper way a NYer gets around!

    --
    Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
  6. Uber/Lyft NOT Rideshare by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop calling this miserable business model a ‘ride share’
    Sharing your ride is like taking a co-worker who lives on your route, to work. Or taking someone to the store with you who needs to go shopping
    Accepting money to drive someone you don’t know to a destination you wouldn’t normally go is a taxi service, NOT a ride share. period.
    Corporate Uber extracts it’s revenue off the lowest common and weakest link in the chain- the driver. Instead of wages and benefits of being an employee for a taxi server, Uber drivers get all the costs, taxes and maintenance on their shoulders. After everything is calculated, drivers would be dollars ahead flipping burgers for $10/hr.

  7. Game changer, but only in some locales. by RockyMountain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I'll get my nitpick out of the way first: I've always hated the mis-application of the term "Ride Sharing" to Uber and Lyft. They have nothing to do with Ride Sharing. More like taxis, but I don't totally buy that equivalency either. Here's why.

    For people who live in a "taxi city" like New York or Chicago or London, there really is very little difference between Uber, Lyft, a classic taxi, or a minicab. These are cities where a significant fraction of the populace uses taxis much of the time already. Here Uber and Lyft are additional players in the taxi economy, but they don't change the game one iota. I won't get into the politics of whether they are good or bad in these locales. That's not my soapbox.

    But what about other locations? Smaller towns, or cities that were never traditionally taxi-centric -- where most folks own private cars and use them most of the time. Or in outer-lying suburbs of big cities that are poorly served by taxis. If you live in or frequently travel to such an area, you'll understand that Uber and Lyft really *have* changed the game -- by being truly distributed rather than depot-centric, and much more adaptive to demand. Call a convectional taxi, and the dispatch office will tell you it'll be 20 minutes. Call again an hour later, and the dispatch office will tell you 20 more minutes. Repeat another hour later, and once again the answer will be 20 more minutes. There's no way to ever know whether and when you'll get your ride. If and when the taxi ever shows up, the driver very likely doesn't know how to get to your destination, and speaks very little language in common with you, and besides by then you probably no longer want to go!

    Uber and Lyft have fixed that (but not everywhere). There is now a relatively reliable service, that you can call at pretty much any time, and the estimated arrival times really are reliable, and usually pretty short, and if there will be a long wait, you know about it and can plan accordingly. And when there truly is nobody available, you know it -- you don't get strung along.

    Even the dreaded surge pricing has not been a problem for me (so far). I've almost never had to pay it, and the few times I have haven't affected my long-term average cost much. I have occasionally gamed it, switching to Lyft when Uber is surged, and vice versa. Very surprisingly, that worked!

    So, YMMV, but for me Uber and Lyft have indeed changed the game. For me, they've made me much less dependent upon rental cars when I travel, and have made other forms of public transit more viable too, by solving the "last mile problem".

    I'd like to see more players in the game, though.

  8. There are many good options to Uber/Lyft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    waze.com/carpool [available in all of california]
    takescoop.com [available in some parts of CA]

    For older kids
    hopskipdrive.com

  9. Mixed feeling here... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

    As a driver, I like Uber better, but as a rider, I prefer Lyft... I drive for both and have ridden on both..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  10. Re:Not ride sharing... by arth1 · · Score: 2

    They're untrained and unlicensed pirate taxi drivers in uncertified vehicles.

    But they're not ride sharing.
    Many regular taxi companies are more ride sharing than they are, and have shuttle services for airport rides, or after bars close, where they pick up several passengers who share the ride.

  11. Re:Public transit and the sidewalk by skam240 · · Score: 2

    Well if you sit around on your ass all day you dont have to worry about transportation options at all.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  12. Tinder by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    If you know what I mean by "ride".

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  13. Internet of Routed Things by hughbar · · Score: 2

    Agree with all the commentators that say that Uber and Lyft are not ride sharing, or in a wider context 'sharing', they are extractive. Worth reading a little McKenzie Wark on this subject too: http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p... see the commentary on 'vectorialists'.

    About ten years ago, I started in on this: https://sourceforge.net/projec... now rotting quietly away on sourceforge. One (of many) things that stopped me at the time was that Google Maps was the only source of geo-stuff, now there's Open Street Map. My idea was something that would be useful to what has now become the platform cooperative movement: https://platform.coop/, that would be genuine sharing, both the platform and the rides.

    However my madness did not end there. In my mind, I looked forward to routing everything that moved around, a) dealing with half filled vans, lorries and cars, the whole lot b) creating public data that would be performative in that it would advocate for new routes where there was market failure, for example. I note that Amazon has started a project for transport consolidation: http://www.scdigest.com/firstt... so this idea is probably valid but the ownership isn't cooperative.

    Ok, I'll end there. This isn't to self congratulate, it's just publication of an idea that I've nearly abandoned and someone younger might want to take up. If you do, give me a shout.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!