Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are We Living In the Golden Age of Bailing? (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report that makes a case of us living in an era where bailing has become just too common: It's clear we're living in a golden age of bailing. All across America people are deciding on Monday that it would be really fantastic to go grab a drink with X on Thursday. But then when Thursday actually rolls around they realize it would actually be more fantastic to go home, flop on the bed and watch Carpool Karaoke videos. So they send the bailing text or email: "So sorry! I'm gonna have to flake on drinks tonight. Overwhelmed. My grandmother just got bubonic plague..." Bailing is one of the defining acts of the current moment because it stands at the nexus of so many larger trends: the ambiguity of modern social relationships, the fraying of commitments (paywalled), what my friend Hayley Darden calls the ethic of flexibility ushered in by smartphone apps -- not to mention the decline of civilization, the collapse of morality and the ruination of all we hold dear. [...] Technology makes it all so easy. You just pull out your phone and bailing on a rendezvous is as easy as canceling an Uber driver. There are different categories of bailing. There is canceling on friends. This seems to follow a bail curve pattern. People feel free to bail on close friends, because they will understand, and on distant friends, because they don't matter so much, but they are less inclined to bail on medium-tier or fragile friends. Then there is professional bailing. This tends to have a hierarchical structure. A high-status person will frequently bail on a lower-status colleague, but if an intern bails on a senior executive, it is a sign of serious disrespect. What do you folks think?

248 comments

  1. David Brooks? Seriously? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do I think?

    I think Slashdot is posting articles from David Brooks, one of the world's worst columnists, on Brooks being annoyed nobody wants to hang out with him any more.

    That's what I think.

    What next? Tom Friedman on how we'll find out if the next iPhone is a success in the next six months, and what his cabbie thinks about that?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'No, David. It's just you. Get a clue."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      I think somebody failed to notice that this has been the default behavior of Americans for the past 30 years.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      ^^^ This.

      Slashdot's next post will probably be from Andy Rooney / 60 Minutes. "Remember when X was a thing? Mah!"

    4. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't bail on people, people assume that I will be at certain places when I never agreed. They then whine and cry about me not showing up.

      Pretty hilarious.

    5. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm this. I have bailed and have been bailed on by friends and coworkers since High School (1990). My most memorable bail was on Senior Skip Day. I went go kart racing while most of my friends went to the beach. The only difference, you now find out at the time of bail instead of hours later when the person doesn't show. Cell Phones have made bailers considerably more Polite. They let you know now instead of you waiting and then complaining later.

    6. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Hussman32 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is not only an American trait, the only place where I don't see it happening regularly is Japan..

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    7. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I wanted to post about my amazon affiliate revenu stream but I dicided to bail out.
      -cremier
      support me!: https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

    8. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to write a long and insightful post on this article, making numerous and intelligent points, but I realized that I would much rather spend my time laying about and watching tv

      See you later space-cowboy

    9. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      It happens in Germany, not so much, so. It happens far less in Spain, France, Italy. Because the dating and "going out" culture is completely different.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i usually don't agree with squig, but hats off, you're right on this one.

    11. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by knightghost · · Score: 2

      When people bail on me then they are no longer friends. Clears things up very quickly. Peer pressure works.

    12. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My life is so much better without dealing with your drama-loving snivelling ass, so that's a huge win win!

    13. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      The whole "dating" concept is one I haven't figured out yet. How does it differ from going out?

    14. Re: David Brooks? Seriously? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      30 years sounds about right.

    15. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a really great friend.

    16. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The whole "dating" concept is one I haven't figured out yet. How does it differ from going out?

      When "dating" in Spain, you get a hand job at the end of the date. In France you get a blowjob. And in Italy, someone is getting fucked in the ass.

    17. Re: David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need friends. They disappoint me.

    18. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a self-centered, passive-aggressive douche.

    19. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dating is a stage of romantic or sexual relationships in humans whereby two or more people meet socially, possibly as friends or with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a prospective partner in a more committed intimate relationship or marriage.

    20. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No point asking him. He thinks adjectives aren't words.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole "dating" concept is one I haven't figured out yet. How does it differ from going out?

      The former has sex as a main goal, the later not so much.

    22. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Noble713 · · Score: 1

      Really? In my experience, Japanese women under 30 are probably the flakiest demographic I've ever encountered. Most reliable (outside of US Marines, but I'm biased in this regard): Vietnamese dudes and Thai women.

    23. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last one is Greece, not Italy.

    24. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, in Greece everybody is getting fucked in the ass. In Italy, often only one of you is.

      Don't you have internet?!

    25. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Dear David,
              My catfish keeps swimming away from me, but always emails me asking for another chance.
      Should I keep trying, or switch to crawfish?
                        -- Desperately Seeking Friends

    26. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Dating seems to imply that you want/will have sex or at least one party is hoping for it.
      Going out is going out, plain and simple.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    27. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Mr. Confused, if we talk about word order, we either talk about big endian versus little endian or "subject, predicate, object" versus "predicate, subject, object" or other variations.
      If you want to nitpick where an adjective or an adverb is placed in which language, then you are not only a confuciused one but a nitpicker.

      (For those who were not on the other discussion, I pointed out that most european languages have more or less the same 'word order', Mr. Confused correctly pointed put that roman languages usually have the adjective behind the subject/object and not in front like german languages ... however the 'subject, verb, object' order he seems not to grasp)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    28. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      squiggleslash is usually right on pretty much everything. You should probably take the time to listen to what he says.

    29. Re:David Brooks? Seriously? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      He's pretty much right: They're acquaintances.

  2. Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But in this case, the answer is yes.

    1. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hah, you call that bailing! Back in my day bailing meant a day in field behind a trailer. Now you snowflakes wanna lay around on the couch eating Doritos and call it bailing, well, maybe think about where those Doritos come from and get up off your asses and do something hard and rugged!

    2. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's baling, you illiterate clod!

    3. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      And the Europeans do round baling, which I nominate as the single stupidest idea in the history of agriculture. This is why:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

    4. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Round bailing is common in the USA too. The reason is that it's far more efficient to move them around. They're rolled, tight wrapped in plastic and set in the field. To move, you back up the pickup, lower the custom spike, lift the bail, drive and set back down.

      As far as the accident, do you also thinking crane lifting is a stupid idea? Because crane's have dropped stuff on innocent heads too.

    5. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      A standard rectangular bale with 2:1:1 proportions can be lifted by one man, and at the same time can be stacked very high to fill any storage space or to form large blocks that can be lifted with mechanical help. And they won't roll if they fall over in the field.

    6. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Round bales can be unloaded from the truck by one driver who knows how to use reverse and the brake.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2..1 by Desler · · Score: 2

      I see round bales everywhere in the US. Where did you get this idiotic idea that it was strictly a European thing?

  3. not news for nerds, nor stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not news for nerds, stuff that matters.

    1. Re:not news for nerds, nor stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Affiliate amazon link is something that matters please visit my site below and click on the amazon link.
      -cremier
      Visit my website and click on amazon link! https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

    2. Re:not news for nerds, nor stuff that matters by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Nerds don't engage in any of that mandatory synchronization in the first place. If a network connection happens, it is because everybody was already there, not because they had established obligations or a shared schedule.

      Sorry Mr Brooks, you just aren't stuff that matters. I'm so glad I don't read the stories.

    3. Re: not news for nerds, nor stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a book on Amazon about bailing. I haven't read it yet, but you should use my affiliate link to buy it.

      -Creimer.

  4. this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have always made tentative plans and when more important things in life come up, plans get changed.

    Not everything is new just because you are doing it on/over/under/next to a computer.

    1. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People have always made tentative plans and when more important things in life come up, plans get changed.

      Not everything is new just because you are doing it on/over/under/next to a computer.

      Speaking as an old person, that's was generally not true. In the past failing to show was a big deal.
      If plans to meet/have dinner/ see a show were made, it could not be blown off due to "more important things" unless it were an emergency.
      In the past, it was only a tentative plan if it was stated to be a maybe, and on the day of the meet, it was no longer tentative. That's because changing plans was difficult for the other people because they could not easily contact other people as is possible today.

      If a person said they were going to meet you somewhere, it was pretty much guaranteed they would show barring something serious happening. There's two reasons for that. One is that before cell phone/texting, it was very difficult to contact your friends if they weren't at home or work. So if you stood him/her/them up, they would be sitting for a long time waiting for you, and likely worried that something bad did happen.
      For that reason, if you did not show and had not an actual emergency (i.e. something involving loss of blood), this was considered a moral failing. Everyone would soon know about it, and if it happened too many times you were likely to get ostracized. If you had a business relationship, they would seriously question whether you could be trusted at anything.

      The rise of bailing is not all that bad
      What is different now is that thanks to cell phones, you can easily contact the other people at any time to let them know you won't be there and they can go on without you. Or, an even bigger deal, they easily make other plans thanks to their being able to quickly contact other people.
      And thanks to texting, you can do it without even having the embarrassment of lying to their face. Modern phones bring a great deal of flexibility to our lives.

    2. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faster and more reliable communication likely has reduced the social pressure to show up rather than canceling at the last minute however.

      For example, if you had to call someone's home phone to tell them you weren't going out after work you might need to call the day before otherwise they would likely not get the message before headding to the venue. If you had to coordinate via post, your lead time would be weeks. With everyone having a phone in their pocket at all times a text can usually reach them within minutes, this makes canceling on short notice much easier, and thus tehre is less guilt over doing it.

    3. Re:this is stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      If plans to meet/have dinner/ see a show were made, it could not be blown off due to "more important things" unless it were an emergency.

      I think you and the GP are talking about different things. Having dinner, seeing a show etc are things that involve effort and expense. People who bail on such an event quickly find themselves isolated from their former friends.

      On the other hand, attending a party, meeting for brunch in the city, or just chilling in an afternoon, well that hasn't seemed to change. We could blow that off in the past, and we can blow that off now. Even a simple "meeting" is dependent on the details. If you meet in a group it's quite acceptable for a person to not show up. If you meet 1 on 1 then it is not.

    4. Re:this is stupid by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, attending a party, meeting for brunch in the city, or just chilling in an afternoon, well that hasn't seemed to change. We could blow that off in the past, and we can blow that off now.

      Spoken like someone who has never grown up and thrown a real party.

      A real host throwing an adult party considers the guest list, who would like hit it off with whom, what kind of food would please everyone, and possible activities to help warm up the guests. As yeses, come in, additional guests might even be invited to make sure everyone can meet someone they have something in common, to avoid the usual cliques making anyone feel left out. That is basically impossible when 25 yeses might mean 15 people showing or 7 people showing. And that can also mean throwing out $400 of untouched food at the end of the event.

      The truth is that the skills for throwing parties started to evaporate in GenX, so lots of GenXers do not have a clue. What you may think of as normal may have been normal enough in your savage circle of friends who are lousy entertainers but do not know any better. The millennials are decidedly worse.

    5. Re: this is stupid by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Although my wife and I (technically millennials) are bucking that trend, having thrown a number of cocktail parties as of late. The success of the whole event basically boils down to how many people bail.

    6. Re:this is stupid by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Oh look, Mr Snooty equates adulthood with sharing his lifestyle. How precious.

      Somebody please send a telegram to Ireland informing them that their style of partying doesn't count.

    7. Re:this is stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A real host throwing an adult party considers the guest list

      A real host throwing an adult party prepares for the unexpected. I can happily host 10 or 60 people it makes no difference to me. There's no such thing as untouched food. There's only food that you didn't know what to do with because you didn't plan ahead.

      You say $400 in untouched food? I see a street BBQ, inviting the neighbours and family. Not that I would need to because part of planning a party is planning what to do with any leftovers.e.g. Cook delicious meals that get better with age: A goulash or lasagne is often better reheated the day after. Twice cooked recepies last longer in the fridge. Making burgers, well mince is low grade food that isn't negatively impacted by freezing.

      The truth is that the skills for throwing parties started to evaporate in GenX, so lots of GenXers do not have a clue. What you may think of as normal may have been normal enough in your savage circle of friends who are lousy entertainers but do not know any better. The millennials are decidedly worse.

      And yet you have just shown yourself that you're unable to manage a party. The truth is GenXers and after are better at planning and throwing parties than you ever were because if everything doesn't go perfectly for your meticulously crafted shopping list you throw stuff away or don't know what to do with it.

      Your comment has been most amusing. But if the no true "adult" party involves being your flavour of "true adult" then I'm going to have to flake out on wanting anything to do with your generation, especially your planning abilities or your idea of entertainment. Your parties are boring.

    8. Re:this is stupid by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your opinion, poseur. You may know a thing or two about throwing together the easy, casual parties (who doesn't?), but the breadth of the topic is well beyond you.

    9. Re:this is stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That may be, but hey I'm here for you, because while I'm no expert, you most certainly sound like you could use every bit of help you can get.

  5. Wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wat

  6. My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

    It's not that I want to flop on the couch, it's that I have over-committed my resources.

    Also, why do we need to make plans to do anything these days? Why can't we just grab drinks whenever. Or go for a hike when the moment strikes us. Want to go fishing Saturday? call me before 10pm the night before, I really don't need a lot of notice to prepare. But if you want to set up a big fishing expedition 2 weeks in advance, well a lot can happen then. I can't say for certain how I will even feel 2 weeks from now.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:My view on bailing by Octorian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This attitude towards planning pretty much requires you to over-commit your resources, otherwise you'll frequently end up bored with nothing to do... Because "spur of the moment" planning fails horribly when the "spurs" of your life don't line up with the "spurs" of everyone else in your social group.

    2. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment must be exhibit A. It clearly demonstrates the delusions and egocentric character flaws that lead to bailing. Everything that causes people to do nothing instead of creating opportunities. I can tell you how you will feel 2 weeks from now: Miserable, because you haven't got anything planned and you have to resort to passive entertainment because nobody wants to go fishing with you on a whim. What a surprise.

    3. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll probably go camping by myself tomorrow. It's not a big deal, but I don't depend on other people for activities. I could call a few people tonight and maybe someone will join me, if not, that's fine too.

    4. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we have plans on a specific day, then I plan other things with that in mind. We're going fishing, so I need to get a new pair of waders Saturday morning because I'm already busy Saturday night, which means I can't make it to that BBQ at Johns. If you screw me over by bailing at the last moment, you've put your immediate gratification ahead of mine and the opportunity costs I incurred in order to do something with you. You only get a couple of those before you stop getting invited.

      People with responsibilities can't just do what they want whenever they want, and flake out when it's no longer fun or convenient. It's the price we pay for being adults.

    5. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's exactly that type of attitude that pisses me off. Especially popular with the younger generations like my kids. Mostly because they expect ME to drop whatever to do whatever without any notice. I have a life and things to do that require planning in advance. If you want me to do something then I need sensible notice beforehand, preferably several days if not weeks.

    6. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "if the other people show it's fine, and if not, that's OK too" can get awkward if you plan a circle jerk with a bunch of friends, but the only other person that shows up is your brother.

    7. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > just grab drinks whenever.
      > when the moment strikes us

      I hear you brotha, Wouldn't we all like to live that way. But there's one thing you're not catching on to, (yet...).
      Life With Kids, (or demanding careers).

      One must literally carve time away for oneself once you have a family. Not that family is 'bad' but you'll be needed more. Expected more. And just flat out budgeted more.

      So when you make plans with someone in that world and you bail- don't expect to see them for a while because believe me... they are legitimately busy!

    8. Re:My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I have a life and things to do that require planning in advance.

      Me too, but I reserve that kind of planning work and chores. If I'm going to enjoy life, I can't sit down and plan every detail of my life and accommodate your every detail. If having a regimented life is satisfying to you, I guess, but I can't imagine that most human beings would thrive on an highly structured life.

      And no, you aren't expected to drop everything. You are free to say "sorry man, I'm busy. maybe some other time". I even ask my friend who never says yes because I know he is probably depressed and it's a good excuse to check on him even if I can safely assume he's going to turn down a last minute offer.

      But seriously, how much planning is needed to go to a movie or to the beach? I have friends who plan a 2 hour excursion to the local park several days in advance.

      I totally understand that plans need to be done to do something that requires reservations like a ski trip, but people take things to extremes. (although in my case I can do a ski trip on the spur of the moment because I have places I can stay near some of the ski resorts).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    9. Re:My view on bailing by swb · · Score: 1

      Is your interest in fishing or some other activity really so volatile that if you agree to go fishing in two weeks you might find yourself so uninterested in fishing that you'd suddenly decide you absolutely wouldn't go?

    10. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the mindset of an idiot / dipshit / child / flake. That's not an insult, it is merely a statement of FACT.

      Of course all your "friends" are going to also be like you, because no one who is worth a damn is going to tolerate
      your unbelievably childish attitude. And your entire life is going to be shitty as a direct result of all the poor life choices you make.

      if you ever grow into an adult state ( doubtful, but not completely impossible ) you will be embarrassed when you think about how you used to behave, and rightly so.

      I had an acquaintance who was in legal trouble and needed money badly so he could keep his driver's license. But this guy was a notorious flake, so
      when he asked me if he could "borrow" some money from me ( money I knew he would never repay ) I simply told him NO. And I have not seen this loser since that day. I call that a WIN-WIN.

    11. Re:My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      short answer: Yes.

      If my dishwasher is flooding my kitchen, then I probably shouldn't leave that mess for my wife. But it's always something, if I only went out when every chore was done I would never go out. Sometimes things are critical and force me to change plans, something they are not and I can put them off for a while.

      Also, I'm at that age where people in my extended family die and parents get hospitalized. After comforting my Mom because her Aunt died, I don't really feel like going fishing.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Literally carve? yikes.

      And there is a huge difference between having young kids, and having older kids. With older kids you do have a lot more flexibility with your time. You may prefer to spend time with your family, that's different. But tweens and teens, you can go to their sports games and that sort of thing. A lot of parents tell me they are too busy, but I know a lot who aren't always busy too.

      My job is SW engineer involved in silicon validation. so I work 12-hours/day certain times a year (when Si masks are being made). I think it's fairly demanding, it's not airline pilot or heart surgeon sort of demanding. But in terms of time and lack of predictability of my schedule my job is more demanding than a public school teacher for example.

      If you have some massive commute, or a child with disabilities or something like that. Then I totally get that you're busy. But average people are not really so busy they have to "literally carve" time.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re: My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd you're not prepared to plan, you're not that bothered about seeing somebody. Doesn't sound like friendship to me

    14. Re: My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      My friends have comments on me being loyal and I usually am one of the people they know who is flexible enough to drive hours to another city to pick them up. (sometimes trips have complications)

      Really I think every friendship is unique, and each person expresses their care for each other differently. I don't carry a rigid definition of what it means to be a friend. Simply enjoying a person's company can be sufficient. For others a willingness to plan elaborate dinner parties or trips is what it takes. (obviously I don't have too many friends who demand that of me)

      If someone wants to spend time with me without any sort of plan. I do have a regular schedule when it comes to going to the local pub, and they can meet up with me at the pub on those nights. They never do, even though the option was open to them for years. I don't take it personally, they have family, children, houses, jobs, etc. I'm certainly not going to claim bullshit like "Doesn't sound like friendship to me" over it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My view is that it's fscking rude. Your time is not the seating on a budget airline: don't double book it and not expect consequences.

      If a friend of mine does this more than once or twice or gives a transparently bs excuse, well, they're no friend of mine. Cancel in advance is fine, bail... goodbye.

    16. Re:My view on bailing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      short answer: Yes.

      If my dishwasher is flooding my kitchen, then I probably shouldn't leave that mess for my wife. But it's always something, if I only went out when every chore was done I would never go out. Sometimes things are critical and force me to change plans, something they are not and I can put them off for a while.

      Also, I'm at that age where people in my extended family die and parents get hospitalized. After comforting my Mom because her Aunt died, I don't really feel like going fishing.

      If it's a true emergency, then you excuse yourself just fine. Everyone understands if you cancel at the last minute because your dishwasher flooded the kitchen. It happens. Of course, if you repeatedly do it to skip out on things you agreed to weeks ago, then you're a flake for agreeing to and bailing. Your dishwasher flooding is a rare event. Just like you getting in a car accident the day before. It's rare enough that people understand you may cancel at the last minute because of it.

      If your relative is dying, then people would understand it too - though if you know they were ill, it would've been poorly advised to agree to take the fishing trip knowing you'll likely have to cancel or not be in the mood. In that case, your friends might ask just out of politeness, but really expecting a negative response.

      And yes, planning a fishing trip may require 2 whole weeks to prepare for it. If not enough people are willing to come, then the trip is cancelled. This includes getting the boat - either reserving the rental, or getting the boat ready by cleaning it and getting it gassed up and all that other stuff. Then you gotta get the bait, prep the gear, etc. So people do plan it out because things can take time - if you planned on fishing at the last minute, you might not get a boat, or your boat might need cleaning or gas or a thousand other little chores that you have to do so you do them instead of fishing, so no one has a good time.

      People make plans so they can prepare. Maybe for you you're always ready to go fishing, but for someone else, they need to arrange to borrow or rent or gather the necessary materials. And if you're not willing to go, then they'd do something else rather than go by themselves and save the time and expense.

      That's really the problem with "bailing" - people make plans because if you need to do anything to prepare, you can do that ahead of time as not all of them can be done day of. (Fishing permits too).

      Going to the movies might not seem like something that needs much planning, but perhaps you want a meal first? Or reserve tickets (some have reserved seating)? Sure you can fight it out, but sometimes, especially if you're a big group, it's nice to sit together rather than try to find a block of seats that will accommodate everyone without being in the corners or up in the front.

    17. Re:My view on bailing by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Those are still plans, just short term. Even "Hey, let's go get a drink." on the phone is a plan. And if you can't keep a calendar clear two weeks for a outing that requires more than grab your wallet preparation you shouldn't be making those kinds of plans.

      People that dork me on those kinds of things (w/out *good* reason) get one pass. Second time and I never make plans with them again because they're unreliable.

    18. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either commit or don't. Unless you are truly sick, part of committing is being prepared for the event, and part of that is not being over-committed or exhausted to the point that you will have to cancel. You don't commit to doing something in the early AM and stay out drinking all night the day before. You don't commit to going out at night and work late.

      That's the biggest problem I see now: people are liars and their word is junk. If you commit, you do it. If you commit and don't do it - you are a liar, plain and simple. If you aren't happy with your obligations you have committed to, stop making new commitments or be honest about not being able to commit. Better to just say, "My calendar is really full right now and I can't commit to anything else. But if you want to call me that afternoon, maybe I'll have had some things cancel or slow down and be available."

      I literally have a waiting list of things I want to do and commit to, but I cannot do right now because I have 3 other monthly commitments that will be ending with '17. When those other commitments ends, I know for certain I will be letting those organizations know under no uncertain terms that I am done with a firm commitment, but may stop by from time to time when I don't have other commitments going on.

      Everyone has a smart phone now and some sort of calendaring app. Use it. My wife and our entire immediate family does this. We can see what events are coming up in both our own calendar and our family members' calendars. Calendared items always come first. If it is not calendared, it isn't a commitment. When someone asks if we can do something, we stop right there and calendar it, and then we show up as committed.

      The only exception to this is a real sickness, death, or emergency.

      We are also very clear with new friends who flake. We have access to a number of resources (basically time share type items), and if they flake, excepting true emergencies, we won't invite them again. Nothing personal, I just have plenty of friends who don't flake who I'd rather plan to do things with.

    19. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell 'em! Screw being spontaneous...everything needs to have a plan and structure.

      Break time is over, get back to your normal life! Hut-2-3-4, Hut-2-3-4...pick up that pace soldier!

    20. Re: My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the 'Golden Situation' because he KNOWS he can simply bail.

      He knows his brother can't beat him within an inch of his life, he'll simply bail on nearly being beaten to death and everything will be OK.

      It's not like his brother can cut him into pieces and publicly feed his remains to the next person who bails, he'll simply bail.

    21. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was already awkward that you invited your brother to a circle jerk.

    22. Re: My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are social cancer

    23. Re: My view on bailing by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I wonder what that is even supposed to mean.

      (been fun burning karma on this thread, later guys)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    24. Re:My view on bailing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      call me before 10pm the night before, I really don't need a lot of notice to prepare.

      Sounds like you have a crap Saturday ahead of you when no one calls. If anyone calls me for anything 10pm the night before there's a very good chance the answer is sorry busy, maybe next week.

      I can't say for certain how I will even feel 2 weeks from now.

      What we can say for certain is that you're an uncommitted flaker who would bail on something that requires planning because of "how you will feel". I hope you're happy not being included in anything big.

    25. Re:My view on bailing by hazardPPP · · Score: 2

      Also, why do we need to make plans to do anything these days? Why can't we just grab drinks whenever. Or go for a hike when the moment strikes us. Want to go fishing Saturday? call me before 10pm the night before, I really don't need a lot of notice to prepare. But if you want to set up a big fishing expedition 2 weeks in advance, well a lot can happen then. I can't say for certain how I will even feel 2 weeks from now.

      See, this type of attitude is EXACTLY the problem. It shows you only care about YOUR time, not other people's time, only YOUR feelings and moods and not other people's feelings and moods. "I can't say for certain how I will even feel 2 weeks from now" is exactly the type of self-centred, selfish attitude that instant always-connected communication has allowed to proliferate.

      Now, there have ALWAYS been people with attitudes such as yours - the attitudes are nothing new in themselves. However, as a previous poster (AC) indicated, in the past, when instant communication was not possible, people generally had to stick to plans made in advance, since just not showing up without telling someone is a major social no-no (it still IS today; we just have the ability to contact people and cancel on short notice almost universally now).

      Here's what used to happen before: I want to see a friend. I phone his house until I catch him at home. It might take a few days to achieve this. Then I say - would you like to go for a drink? Yes? How about Wednesday? Wednesday at 9 pm works for you? OK, see you then. We meet Wed. at 9 pm.

      Here's what happens today, with a lot of people (not everyone of course): Call the friend (it's Monday). He answers instantly of course. Hey dude what's up? - Not much, working and [blablabla]. - Wanna meet up one of these days? - Yeah, sure, when? - What about Wednesday night, is that good? - Yeah, that should work I think...but let's talk on Wed. morning to confirm, just in case. Call the guy on Wednesday morning? Dude, are we meeting up tonight as we planned? - Uh, yeah, sure, why not! - Is 9 pm good for you? - I think so, but let's talk in the afternoon, I'll call you around like 2-3 pm, to see for the time. Call in the afternoon: yeah, 8 or 9 pm should be good, but let's talk at like 6-7 just to reconfirm. Then around 8:30 I finally know I'll meet the guy at 9 pm.

      Note that the above is the ideal scenario: no bailing. At any one point - including just 30 minutes before we are supposed to meet - the guy could bail with some excuse, just because he doesn't feel like going out or because he found something more interesting to do, or more frustratingly, because someone else who only works on "spur of the moment" type social planning called up him 2 hours before we were supposed to meet and said "hey man, let's meet NOW!" and off he went. This isn't just about being hung-up; it has a ripple effect on other people: if I'm perpetually waiting on Friend A to reconfirm our meeting until 15 minutes before the fact, I keep rejecting calls from Friends B, C, and D to meet up; I keep it "fluid" with them because A is "fluid" with me, and in the end I end up looking like an asshole. The end results is usually that you cut Friend A off eventually, unless he's really close and dear to you and you will bear this misbehaviour for those reasons.

      Note that I am not at all against "spur of the moment" acting and "spontaneous" meet-ups, that's all great, but that doesn't work all the time. You can pretty much only be on a 100% "spontaneous" schedule if you're a teenager on summer break. Once you get adult responsibilities in your life, you realize you have to plan things.

    26. Re: My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't say for certain how I will even feel 2 weeks from now."

      I can. You'll be on your period.

    27. Re: My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck you are high maintenance. I wouldn't want to hang with you either. Jesus. I wanted to bail from the task of reading all that. Dude. Just chill.

    28. Re:My view on bailing by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      If we all waited for perfect conditions almost nothing would get done.

    29. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have a crap Saturday ahead of you when no one calls. If anyone calls me for anything 10pm the night before there's a very good chance the answer is sorry busy, maybe next week.

      Calling me at 10pm on a Saturday probably won't even get a response as I'll already be busy doing something, possibly with someone who called at a more reasonable hour two days before.

      Now, there have ALWAYS been people with attitudes such as yours - the attitudes are nothing new in themselves. However, as a previous poster (AC) indicated, in the past, when instant communication was not possible, people generally had to stick to plans made in advance, since just not showing up without telling someone is a major social no-no (it still IS today; we just have the ability to contact people and cancel on short notice almost universally now).

      People with such attitudes tend to be those who rarely or never actually contribute anything, you can't even rely on them to bring anything to a BYOB or potluck as they just leech and expect others to provide for their social interaction and entertainment.

    30. Re:My view on bailing by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      ...it's that I have over-committed my resources.

      United Airlines, is that you?

    31. Re:My view on bailing by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If everyone is cancelling 50% of the time near the last minute, you have to schedule 5 things on a Saturday to be reasonably certain of not having anything better to do than watch TV.

    32. Re:My view on bailing by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      I have a life and things to do that require planning in advance.

      Me too, but I reserve that kind of planning work and chores. If I'm going to enjoy life, I can't sit down and plan every detail of my life and accommodate your every detail. If having a regimented life is satisfying to you, I guess, but I can't imagine that most human beings would thrive on an highly structured life.

      False Choice. Making commitments has exactly nothing to do with "a regimented life". We are talking about whether it is even within your skillset to make a single social commitment a month and actually show up, short of a genuine emergency (which is why Brooks jokes about "mom has bubonic plague", because of so many fake emergencies). No one is forcing you to make a commitment in any given week. And making 1 or more than 1 is entirely voluntary. But can you do this commitment thing ever without first fantasizing about the excuses you might have to make or how oppressed you might feel? If it is really so hard, the problem is you.

    33. Re:My view on bailing by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If I'm making 1 time commitment per week it isn't to these "friends" who would demand or expect it.

    34. Re:My view on bailing by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sounds like putting things off has left with you with an excess backlog. There is no solution for that. I mean there is, but if you were capable you'd have fixed it on your own.

    35. Re:My view on bailing by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you invited me fishing in two weeks and I said yes, and then I found out the reason you scheduled it that way was to spend two weeks planning it, I would cancel right away. That is a disaster waiting to happen.

      Same goes for somebody in the group wanting to make Reservations. I don't want to date my friends, and I don't want social events to be that weighty. If my friend likes to make Reservations and feel important, they should do that with appropriate people at appropriate times instead of trying to subject their friends to their control trips.

      If you don't have a boat, and you're going fishing with your friends, choose a type of fishing that doesn't require a boat. Or a lake that has on-site rentals. If they're sold out, the lake is already full of boats anyways, maybe learn how to find better fishing spots?

    36. Re:My view on bailing by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I care about my time.

      My friends are people who care about their time, not mine. We have shared values.

      You're not so special, and I would never make plans with you. So it would never impact you. Your fear that people might not be placing your own needs ahead of theirs is unfounded; they're not going to agree to it in the first place, and so they'll never violate your trust in that way. Wait, you are asking people's permission first, right?

      If somebody wanted to communicate with me 5 times just to casually hang out, I'm not even going to answer their calls anymore. Yikes. I'm not going to want to casually hang out with them if I see them.

    37. Re:My view on bailing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I mean seriously it's obvious this guy doesn't have kids, likely he doesn't have a wife or girlfriend, and doubtful he even has a job. For those of us that do have other responsibilities in our lives than just feeding ourselves, there's planning a couple weeks ahead.

    38. Re: My view on bailing by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I"m honestly curious about your age ( Perhaps you mentioned it earlier and I missed it).
      What I have noticed is that when you're young, everything is last minute, no plans, bail, etc.
      As you get older, that falls away: Life gets complicated: Marriage, kids, dogs, family members need help, and suddenly you really need to plan things out further in advance. It's not that you don't want to be impulsive, you just don't have the time slots.
      For example, when I was younger, weekends were two days of whatever I wanted.
      Now, I'm officially booked every Saturday Night: elderly parents need help and to have dinner, and often times that spills over into Saturday Day for other tasks. Sunday is my family time as well as chores needed for the following week. I only have possibly some early time on Sat, but don't know if that's there.
      A lot of this is stuff you can't just say "simplify your life". you can't drop your parents who are sick, can't drop having time with your family.
      So, if I have friends who are doing last minute stuff, I generally end up missing it.

  7. Bailing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    WTF? Bailing doesn't mean not showing up. It means leaving. Flaking means not showing up. The example in TFS even includes the example "gonna have to flake", it's not "gonna have to bail". If you're at the event, and you get a phone call from your bra, then you gotta bail, right?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re: Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bail on people frequently. Although you claim that you need to work late, the truth is that you saw some gay porn and need to go rub one out. That's pretty typical for Slashdot users, too.

    2. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      WTF? Bailing doesn't mean not showing up. It means leaving. Flaking means not showing up. The example in TFS even includes the example "gonna have to flake", it's not "gonna have to bail". If you're at the event, and you get a phone call from your bra, then you gotta bail, right?

      Bailing often means canceling plans before they happen and therefore not showing up is part of that action.

      Honestly, this is all bullshit semantics. Talk about Stuff that doesn't fucking matter. This sure as shit ain't News for Nerds.

    3. Re:Bailing? by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

      > "⦠you get a phone call from your bra, â¦"

      Wow, I didn't know that Smart Wear was that far developed already.

      Also, I didn't know that I had any bras! TIL â¦

      --
      urd
    4. Re: Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinkypoo is probably into cross-dressing. He should know that Jesus doesn't approve of his lifestyle.

    5. Re:Bailing? by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry for the (type?) error.

      ⦠== ...

      --
      urd
    6. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, an appointment especially between friends is a promise to appear. Like it's already gonna happen.
      So one can Flake to others, but to your peeps, (who consider you 'already there' then not showing up is in fact Bailing.
      You've bailed on the ship you're committed to.

      Plus flaky and prone to flaking are adjectives- like they can be blown off course so easily because they are like a flake. Here now gone in a moment.
      Not a verb.

    7. Re:Bailing? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      Honestly, this is all bullshit semantics. Talk about Stuff that doesn't fucking matter. This sure as shit ain't News for Nerds.

      Obviously. Nerds don't have friends.

    8. Re:Bailing? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      It's "brah" dude. "BRAH"

      --
      I tend to rant.
    9. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bail = notify the other person that you're not going to show up.
      Flake = fail to notify the other person that you're not going to show up.

    10. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      womens undergarments arent relevant, twit.

    11. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for the love of fsm just don't fscking use that stupid fscking word, dude. For the love of fsm don't fscking use that stupid fscking word.

    12. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and you get a phone call from your bra

      I've heard of IoT but that's new to me

    13. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dood, bruh.

    14. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet of Tits.

    15. Re:Bailing? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you're at the event, and you get a phone call from your bra, then you gotta bail, right?

      Most women I know will simply remove the phone from their bra and answer it. No need to bail on the entire even to take a call. That would just be rude.

    16. Re: Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you haven't noticed, but Jesus is usually depicted wearing a gown.

    17. Re:Bailing? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Don't be. Slashdot and Unicode just don't mix.

      Unlike other, more modern, news aggregation websites, /. never bothered to code in Unicode support when it started to become de rigueur. Now that the site has settled into the long slow decline to obscurity the Corporate Overlords say that there just isn't a business case for it, sorry.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    18. Re:Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot a comma after "brah".

    19. Re: Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With drinkypoo as a username, I bet he's into something else entirely. Same goes for poopjugler.

    20. Re:Bailing? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's what cats are for, or if you don't like that much commitment, cat pictures.

  8. Weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this post is terrible, I don't come here to read this type of worthless crap.

  9. WTF is this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2017:
    Having (time for) a social life of any kind

    I'm too busy to have much of any of a social life, and almost everyone I know who I'd want to be social with is likewise busy all the time, too, so there isn't much of any scheduling of social time to start with. When something is scheduled, it happens.

    To be quite honest it sounds to me more like the author of this is the one getting 'bailed' on all the time, and just hasn't figured out yet that it's just him and not anyone else who is experiencing it. Sucks to be you, dude.

  10. I choose by nnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bail on me once, shame on me. Bail on me twice, I won't acknowledge your existence anymore. Its simple fucking respect, if you make an arrangement, follow through. We're people, not stupid social media endpoints.

    1. Re:I choose by Guillermito · · Score: 2

      My policy on flakes is a little bit more lenient. You flaked on me once? I can still hang out with you. You just lost your plan-ahead privileges. You want to grab some drinks? You mean right now? Sure! Oh, you mean on Thursday. OK, call me on Thursday and we can hang out if I'm free.

    2. Re:I choose by geekmux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bail on me once, shame on me. Bail on me twice, I won't acknowledge your existence anymore. Its simple fucking respect, if you make an arrangement, follow through. We're people, not stupid social media endpoints.

      How ironic you bring up social media, a place where humans are nothing more than a product.

      People used to value a real friendship. Now it's all about clicks, likes, and amassing as many "friends" as possible while pointlessly showcasing rampant narcissism, which for some fucking reason has become a valued commodity in society today. Attention Whore is a recognized profession that will probably be further validated by a Doctorate program soon.

      Social media has distorted the very definition of friend so much we now need to invent a new fucking word to better define what a true relationship between two humans really is. Then we need to change human behavior to highlight the value of simple fucking respect.

    3. Re:I choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh great, grandpa is off his meds again.

    4. Re:I choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh great, some kid is off his meds again.

    5. Re:I choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh great, grandpa is off his meds again.

      Says the poorly educated smart-mouthed prick who would last about 1.5 seconds in a streetfight.

    6. Re:I choose by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Exactly my POV as well.

    7. Re:I choose by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      social media, a place where humans are nothing more than a product.

      You're conflating the owner of the media (FB, /.) with the people using it. Unless, of course, you actually see your friends and acquaintances as products.

      People used to value a real friendship.

      They still do, you need to find better friends.

    8. Re: I choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that have to do with anything. People who participate in street fights for reasons other than self defense are garbage, who would want to be one.

    9. Re:I choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much the same, except one addition. If I'm planning a trip or some big activity, and you have flaked on me in the past causing me to cancel, I'll plan on going with or without you going forward. If that means them get stuck in a shitty seat or loud room, that's their fault.

  11. That's a bad habit by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Bailing is for losers and flakes. People should be responsible and never just g

  12. I'll tell you what I think by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    In the comment I post an hour from now.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  13. Flakes.... by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

    How is this news? Addicts flaking out on folks is nothing new... and that's exactly what we're seeing here. You may not see it as that at first, but that's what it is.... folks are ADDICTED to their mobile devices, tv, and the internet... addicts aren't just pill poppin crack smokin junkies any more...

    If you have friends that flake out a lot, it's not likely because they are busy, it's because they're addicts... perhaps it's time you had a talk with them.

    1. Re:Flakes.... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Somebody in their alliance on the castle defense game is being attacked, surely that counts as a serious emergency?! If you don't stay home to defend them, they could lose 2 or 3 days worth of score accrual.

  14. Re: Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betteridge's law is one of those really stupid ideas that makes no sense. That explains why the users here keep trotting it out. Most readers on this site are pretty stupid. What if the headline read, "was Hitler wrong to exterminate the Jews?" Would you answer no to that? My god the people here are stupid, just like Betteridge. Anyone who invokes Betteridge's Law should automatically be modded down to -1.

  15. Re: Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betteridge's Law is gay. Hope that helps.

  16. The worst part by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    is all these damn kids on my lawn.

    1. Re:The worst part by slew · · Score: 1

      is all these damn kids on my lawn.

      Old man, I think you are on the wrong thread, the pokemon go thread is over here
      </snicker>

    2. Re:The worst part by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Those are grass blades, not kids. Mow the damned thing!

  17. Personality flaw by oic0 · · Score: 1

    I associate being a flake with selfishness and self centeredness. Yes the population has been moving that direction, and yes I avoid people like that. Even the flakes appreciate people who aren't flakes and hate each other.

    1. Re:Personality flaw by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I associate being a flake with selfishness and self centeredness.

      That, or being too cowardly to call up and cancel. Which is another kind of selfishness, really.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Half hearted, and half assed by s.petry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Bailing" is not a thing, personal responsibility and accountability are things. "Bailing" is a symptom. Computers have made us less accountable for our acts, and less responsible. The only aspect I would say is "new", is that these traits are promoted as good and righteous. Not by everyone, but have you ever "worked" in Silicon Valley? Have you ever attempted to debate UBI on this site?

    In the Military we called it slacking, and if you are a slacker in one area you will be a slacker in another. Basic human nature and psychology.

    Slackers have always been around. The only difference between today and 50 years ago is that slackers are being promoted as the new "norm".

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Seems like the majority of people I know are severe slackers, laughably self centered, and don't consider it a bad trait at all. They can just randomly cancel or expect something on a whim and that's just ok.

    2. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slacking isn't just a way of life; it's a religion. We are everywhere.

    3. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever attempted to debate UBI on this site?

      I have, but its detractors always seem to fail to provide citations for their arguments as to why it can't work, and they keep making the same arguments again and again even after they've been thoroughly discredited, as if stamping their feet and repeating themselves would make their opinions any more valid as fact.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps people have finally worked out that the status quo is just a socially engineered form of slavery and have turned the table on their slavers a little bit. When your attitude prevails, only the slavers, for whom you work so hard, will win. You've been conditioned to feel great pride in working so hard for your masters.

    5. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, we need guaranted coal mining jobs for everyone!

    6. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      It is a matter of time control.

    7. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Anyone disagreeing with UBI takes a Karma hit. The fact that you can't read history does not mean I need to provide citations. Citations don't matter to idealoges who want to promote their religion of communism. Facts, like economists and history, result in being karma hit as a troll or posting flamebait. This is even though the proponents of UBI provide nothing except "Elon Musk says." or "Mark Zuckerberg says" as their great citations.

      UBI isn't debated here because one side of the argument is punished for discussion.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slackers were absolutely being promoted as the new norm in the 1960s, which believe it or not were 50 years ago. You might want to find a new phrase to express "in the good old days" now that "50 years ago" is no longer the direct post-war period where everybody had just come out of conscription.

    9. Re:Half hearted, and half assed by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Meh, I'm a slacker. But I don't flake or bail unless something serious comes up, in which case that other thing is a higher responsibility and it would be more morally reprehensible to not bail or flake. What I do though is refuse to commit to doing things that I don't intend to follow up on. Just because someone is a slacker in respect to one or more things doesn't mean they'll behave the same way when it comes to an unrelated activity.

  19. The Millenial RSVP by DalM · · Score: 2

    Yes means maybe. Maybe means no. No means "I don't like you."

    1. Re:The Millenial RSVP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I can't, I have cancer means a new MMORPG update is on the same day.

    2. Re:The Millenial RSVP by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      ...Unless you REALLY DO have cancer.

    3. Re:The Millenial RSVP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cancer is the same as global warming, pseudoscience made up by the liberal media to scare you away from the right side

  20. The Golden Age of Slashdot by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Are We Living In the Golden Age of Bailing?"

    No, clearly we're Living In the Golden Age of Slashdot, represented by showers. Clearly someone's taken a piss all over the concept of Stuff that Matters.

    I'd comment further, but I'm gonna bail instead...

    1. Re:The Golden Age of Slashdot by shapano · · Score: 1

      Yeah. WTF is going on with this site? With the articles/topics being posted I don't recognize it anymore. Starting to remind me of the Drudgereport, Technical edition. Been around since almost the beginning; if it continues like this I won't be around much longer. CIAO.

    2. Re:The Golden Age of Slashdot by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Been around since almost the beginning; if it continues like this I won't be around much longer. CIAO.

      Cue the userid wars...

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  21. What me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have to ever bail. I'm a teetotaler.

    1. Re:What me? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely on how much the 1st Officer has had to drink, now doesn't it?

  22. NY Times Bailing on Journalistic Integrity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does NY Times even report hard news anymore? Or is it all opinion articles now?

    As for people changing plans at the last minute, nothing new there. NY Times is scraping below the barrel these days to fill their pages / site with fluff.

    1. Re:NY Times Bailing on Journalistic Integrity... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They have other stuff behind their paywall, it just doesn't get much attention. Liberals have always considered the NY Times to be a big money shill, and the right decided that if you're shilling anything but their new flavor you must be a libraal, so they cast out what they used to worship. They have no demographic left, other than people who actually live in NY.

      Brooks gets linked because he's also on teevee.

  23. What I think? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    The writer has undiagnosed clinical depression and is blaming his shitty outlook on the world on technology. I'm genuinely impressed with how much loathing was packed into a short summary.

  24. Bullshit by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Flakes are hardly new. The writer is either young or stupid (and possibly both).

    The difference between today and yesteryear is that now pretty much everyone is connected 24/7, so there's more pressure to actually communicate that you're going to be a no-show instead of simply not showing up.

    1. Re:Bullshit by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It started for me actually as a friend gifted to me an answering machine for my landline.

      Still have it, but it is disconnected.

      My iPhone is in "good night mode" till 11AM in the morning. Actually the best feature of a smart phone.

      If the wrong person calls at the wrong time, I cancel the call.

      And on top of that list was for a long time my mother.

      The instant messaging revolution is a revolution because you can ignore all that text as long as you want and can catch up when you feel like it.

      However 90% of the people using instant messaging simply don't get that and demand immediate answer. But they also demand 100% focus on them and don't want you to "chat with others" simultaneously.

      Ah! How nice must the times have been when a letter over the Atlantic took 4 or 8 weeks.

      Can you imagine working in a company where the boss sends you an email and calls 30 minutes later: "did you receive my email?" ....

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Bullshit by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >Can you imagine working in a company where the boss sends you an email and calls 30 minutes later: "did you receive my email?" ....

      30 minutes? LUXURY!

      I am an information junkie so it took me a long time to 'unplug' after 24/7 connectivity became a thing, but I DID learn.

      My phone only accepts calls from a select few contacts, and phone calls are the only thing that make noise - everything else is generally vibration only, and I turn that off too when I want peace and quiet.

      I grew up in a time when your parents would ask you 'do you have a quarter?' when you left the house, so you'd be able to make a payphone call if you needed help. At least people like me know what the disconnected life was like... it must be so much more difficult to realize its something worth having when you've never lived it in the first place.

      Then again, I still look back at much of the remaining generation prior to mine with pity; the ones who never figured out how to get 'online' in the first place, the ones who don't know how to use a search engine when they want to check a fact or find the nearest restaurant or whatever.

      It's all about finding a happy medium. Connected enough to get what you need, disconnected enough not to be pestered by what you don't.

  25. The problem is YOU by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If people prefer to spend their time watching crappy TV, rather than spending time with you, that just says that you're not very interesting.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than hang around here

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:The problem is YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not fooling anyone!

  26. Ha, try organizing something on the weekends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I've had maybe a 10% success rate getting people to show up to a social event on the weekend. I think we're all running pretty close to the limit in terms of how much energy a person has to do things each week.

  27. weird timeline by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of someone planning to have drinks with someone Thursday on a Monday. Who makes casual plans like that?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:weird timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of someone planning to have drinks with someone Thursday on a Monday. Who makes casual plans like that?

      Adults who have busy schedules and responsibilities they take seriously make casual plans like that. If you ever join the adult world you will learn this is not oddball behavior, it's actually quite normal behavior. It might seem like weird behavior because Slashdot selects for

    2. Re:weird timeline by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Half of my friends ...
      And often Monday and Thursday are not in the same week.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:weird timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of my friends ...
      And often Monday and Thursday are not in the same week.

      Fuck people with kids... Well, not literally, they are literally fucked enough as it is, that is why they have kids.

    4. Re:weird timeline by godrik · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of someone planning to have drinks with someone Thursday on a Monday. Who makes casual plans like that?

      People that have complex daily lives?
      If you are a single parent with kids, grabbing drinks mean you need a sitter. That means you need to schedule work for someone else.
      Some people that work with strange schedules and the likelihood you will catch them on a particular day is low..
      If you really want to grad a drink with a particular someone (as opposed to anyone), you better make a precise plan, otherwise he/she might have a plan that does require more preparation.
      Maybe Thursday is your next free evening after a long and crazy project crunch, and you really want to go out once you are done.

    5. Re:weird timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes damn all those people perpetuating the species

    6. Re:weird timeline by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of someone planning to have drinks with someone Thursday on a Monday. Who makes casual plans like that?

      Bars don't require people to brings friends. You just sit at them and order drinks. After a few drinks you start talking to other people at the bar.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    7. Re:weird timeline by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is the answer right there, people who take themselves Very Seriously and expect their friends to take them Very Seriously even though their choice of activity is something very-not-serious.

  28. The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad how many of you think it's ok to say you will do something and then flake at the last minute.

    It's not ok. It's rude and inconsiderate and it is the behavior of a piece of shit rather than a man.

    A man's word means something. If you make a promise, you need to do what you said you'd do. If you can't be sure you will do something, then don't say you will do it. This is basic adult behavior.

    Of course I realize that most of you who spend time on Slashdot have yet to reach the adult stage, but that doesn't negate the fundamental truth that a person ( man or woman ) of good quality keeps his word.

    I do agree that generally David Brooks is a douche bag, but his douchebaggery doesn't mean all his claims are therefore erroneous, and only an idiot would attempt to take that position. Of course, many of you ARE idiots. Do the world a favor and don't breed.

    1. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't formally swear an oath to show up to your kid's birthday party, and I think it's weird that you think we all should. If asked, I'll say that I'll try to make it. And you might be the kind of person who will press me for a definitive answer, the answer is: no, I'm not going to your kid's birthday party if you're going to be a twit about it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't formally swear an oath to show up to your kid's birthday party, and I think it's weird that you think we all should. If asked, I'll say that I'll try to make it. And you might be the kind of person who will press me for a definitive answer, the answer is: no, I'm not going to your kid's birthday party if you're going to be a twit about it.

      Who said anything about a birthday party ? Have you been using intoxicants ? ( I expect the answer is yes ). No one said anything about "swearing" either.

      You're ( rather pathetically ) attempting ( but failing ) to make it look like there is something wrong with the people who expect others to honor commitments they have made. There's nothing wrong with people who expect others to do what they said they would do. Nor is there anything wrong with people who want to know what to expect relative to attendance at an event they are planning. You're attempting to shift blame for your own childish mode of behavior, but the only people who will be persuaded by your bullshit are the other flakes who are looking for validation for their own behavior. Everyone else will immediately understand you're just a jerkoff who has no respect for others.

      In the end, if you can't make and keep a commitment for a social event, the problem of your behavior will solve itself, and the only "friends" you have will be people who behave like you, which is a nice example of poetic justice.

      By the way I hope you didn't actually breed. The last thing the world needs is the offspring of a jerk like you.

    3. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simple: look at calendar, weigh up options, give a definite yes or no by the RSVP date (see, my spellcheck even thoughtfully capitalised it for you). Bailing is excusable only if you have a genuine excuse (not obvious, transparent, made up bs) and, barring truly exceptional circumstances, give notice well in advance.

      I would actually prefer a definite no in most circumstances rather than some annoying quantum superposition of yes/no/maybe.

    4. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      By the way I hope you didn't actually breed. The last thing the world needs is the offspring of a jerk like you.

      Hooray! I love the internet. I meet such lovely people on it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see that this is a real problem in your life, hence the anger. Unfortunately, the reason you are frequently rejected like this is because you're the kind of person who uses phrases like "Have you been using intoxicants?" and no-one actually wants to be stuck with you. The good news is that with a lot of psychological help, one-day you can become someone who people enjoy spending time with.

    6. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      For some reason the youtube videos I watch tend to have really awesome comments, so I miss out on a lot of content.

      I come to slashdot to keep plugged in to the asshole world, without the dangers of redit(sp?) or that other one that's worse. I don't want to lose all my edge, but I don't really want to sharpen it, either.

      The internet is like a billion boxes of chocolate...

    7. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most people feel more at ease if you phrase it, "Are you fucking high?!"

    8. Re:The quality of humans is lower than ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that YouTube has censorship. The moderators of a channel can remove comments that are offensive, and are motivated to do so if it means they can get more subscribers.

  29. It's a golden age alright ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's called the Midas touch, everything affluent people touch turns to gold.

    Then they starve to death from lack of appreciation.

    Excessive affluence is corruption, all civilization eventually die from the greed and irresponsibility of the privileged.

  30. I'll give you my views on bailing in the body by PatientZero · · Score: 1

    Meh, nevermind.

    /bail

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  31. What the heck? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Are We Living In the Golden Age of Bailing?

    Growing up, I was repeatedly taught "there are no stupid questions, except for unasked ones".

    Well... Slashdot just proved that old saw false. What the heck kind of stupid question is this, anyway?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:What the heck? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well... Slashdot just proved that old saw false. What the heck kind of stupid question is this, anyway?

      From the dep't of betteridge's legal services

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:What the heck? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Whenever somebody claims there is no such thing as a stupid question, I always want to ask them, "Are you fucking stupid? But that was a good question, right? Do you like to be punched in the face? May I punch you in the face right now? How about, can I sneak up and punch you in the face when you're not expecting it? Are those good questions? Are you fucking sure, Asshole? Did you stop beating your wife yet?"

      It is so easy to find a stupid question, it might even be easier than finding a stupid answer!

  32. Who you gonna call? by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    "What do you folks think?"

    That if this is your problem then you don't have any real friends.

    Seriously. Reevaluate your relationships with people if this is what they're doing to you.

    1. Re:Who you gonna call? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If a person has this problem, they should probably ask themselves, "Is the problem that I feel embarrassed drinking alone, and feel ashamed drinking alone at home, but I really need to schedule drinks every night." If so, maybe just forget about making plans and pretending those are "friends," and just find a bar to frequent where everybody knows your name. (because you're there every night)

      Or, something something about meetings or calling somebody.

  33. Sort of. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Age of Planshopping and Flaking? Yes.
    Golden? Wouldn't call it that.

    Here's the deal: Social media and always on culture shorten attention spans to a minimum and cyberpunk culture disintegrates social ties we've had since the early age of man. Planshopping and bailing are a sideeffect of this. I dislike it a lot and try to sniff out and steer clear of people who indulge in this before wasting my time with them. Likewise I try my hardest to cherish the people who can treat me fair and with respect, keep an appointment and don't need to be fumbling on their smartphone every odd minute.

    The way to deal with this is, of course, to slow electronic interaction to a more managable level. I get annoyed when I message with more than 3 people at a time and even that is too much. I only recieve something like 5 meaningful non-bot emails a week and write roughly 2 or 3. Which is exactly the amount I can handle and has been every since the mid-90ies when I started using e-mail.

    I consider much of our allways-online social networking culture a mental illness epidemic and avoid it as much as I can. Treat me like a single-use friend and I will try my very best to avoid you like the plague and ignore you in the future. Although it really rubs me the wrong way to treat people like an asshole, even though they did it with me.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  34. Well at least.. by issicus · · Score: 1

    Well at least they aren't getting stood up .

  35. Answer is NO by al0ha · · Score: 1

    Bailing is nothing new, and it has not increased.

    Bailing is pure bullshit - I have never bailed on plans with a friend and never will. That is the definition of friendship. I might not want to go when the time arrives but guess what, I do, and am usually happy I did, because I feel good about keeping to my word and seeing a real friend is always good too.

    Acquaintances on the other hand? Bail away... And here is a clue, people who bail on you are not your friends, they are acquaintances.

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:Answer is NO by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      That's an unusual definition of friendship.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Answer is NO by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Doing what you promised to do is not an unusual definition of friendship.

    3. Re:Answer is NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an unusual definition of friendship.

      No, it's a realistic and quite normal definition of friendship written by a person who understands the value and importance of behaving respectfully toward others, in the manner of an adult.

      To be blunt, you have some things left to learn if you want to become a man.

    4. Re:Answer is NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not holding people to ransom if they don't jump through arbitrary hoops is also not an unusual definition of friendship. Personally, I can understand if a friend wants or needs to flake or bail. They're not perfect. I don't expect them to be.

    5. Re:Answer is NO by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because nothing else in life could ever come up that trumps having to see you? Self-centered much?

      "Yeah, I know that my leg is broken, but you were going to act like a whiny bitch if I went to the hospital instead."

    6. Re:Answer is NO by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      To be blunt, you have some things left to learn if you want to become a man.

      You've really ritualized this, haven't you?

      I respectfully disagree with your assertions.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Answer is NO by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      That's an unusual definition of friendship.

      Everyone's definition is different. Do you want people you can rely on through thick and thin? Or just people to have fun with?

      I tend to agree with GP and call the first kind "friend" and the second kind "acquaintance". You can have fun with complete strangers, but you can't rely on them in a time of need.

      Besides, if your friends will happily bail on you at the drop of a hat, who do you turn to when things go south and your life's in the gutter? As someone much wiser than me once said:

      A friend will help you move, but a true friend will help you move a body.

  36. The mind is weak by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I guess the problem is very simple. People "agree" (in fact get convinced and are to weak to say "no!") on something they are not committed to.
    And the closer the date/time comes the more uncomfortable they get. And then shortly before the event: they bail out.

    Has lots to do with how you spent your evenings (different countries do that completely different, e.g. I like Spain and Italy, of course also France).

    I actually don't really like to meet "old school" in a restaurant/pub with a prescheduled date. I either go there and we meet by accident or we don't or we do it on short notice. Short notice means half a day max: "what are you doing this evening?" And then I can bail out right away: "Oh, I'm occupied!"

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:The mind is weak by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      I actually don't really like to meet "old school" in a restaurant/pub with a prescheduled date. I either go there and we meet by accident or we don't or we do it on short notice. Short notice means half a day max: "what are you doing this evening?" And then I can bail out right away: "Oh, I'm occupied!"

      That's fine if you're just going for dinner or drinks, but what if you're going somewhere that requires you to buy plane tickets?

    2. Re:The mind is weak by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Plane tickets implies vacation, a trip, not a simple 'going out together'.
      Don't get your point/question.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:The mind is weak by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like there's a line you would draw, somewhere between getting dinner and going on an overseas trip, where you would be unhappy if someone bailed at the last minute. Where is that line?

      On a related note, if someone frequently bails on you for casual get togethers, would you still plan a long trip with them?

    4. Re:The mind is weak by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There is no such line.
      A friend of mine bailed out on a flight to north Africa. He said he had tooth problems.
      I never really investigated ... as I still consider him a friend.

      I luckily did not make the experience that people bail out on appointments. But I hear plenty of stories.

      Point is, I rarely (and only with selected people) propose an appointment, hence the situation that one is bailing out is rare.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  37. Collapse of morality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to mention the decline of civilization, the collapse of morality and the ruination of all we hold dear

    Sounds like a right-wing bible thumping piece right there wack job stuff right there. Sorry Trump loyalist, but the world is in fact not getting worse, we are in fact getting better day by day, even with set backs from the conservative front who want to strip away all freedoms and ruin humanity.

  38. I don't bail and don't deal with people who do by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    This isn't a new thing, all my life I've found some people bail often. We call them "flakes".

    I don't bail unless it's for a really good reason (car trouble, or I can give plenty of lead time (24 hours).

  39. Looking forward to things? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with planning stuff? I don't know about other folks but it sure as hell helps me get through tough/dreary times when I know I have something fun coming up.

    People cancel yeah, it happens, and is understandable. This article talks of people I wouldn't keep around me very long though, and you know what they say, good friends are hard to find.

    --
    I tend to rant.
    1. Re:Looking forward to things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with planning stuff? I don't know about other folks but it sure as hell helps me get through tough/dreary times when I know I have something fun coming up.

      People cancel yeah, it happens, and is understandable. This article talks of people I wouldn't keep around me very long though, and you know what they say, good friends are hard to find.

      -

      There is nothing wrong with planning stuff when you are a responsible adult. In fact planning stuff is how winners do it. Losers and bums don't like to make plans and drift from one moment to the next until ( surprise ! ) the end comes and they die.

      You need to keep in mind that Slashdot is predominantly used by people who have poor social skills and who are given to childish narcissistic behaviors. On Slashdot you may as such be the oddball, but in the real world the situation is reversed and the Slashdot majority are the misfits and weirdoes.

      Don't ever mistake internet forums, or Facebook or any of the rest of such crap for real life. It's not and never will be.

    2. Re:Looking forward to things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Losers and bums don't like to make plans and drift from one moment to the next ...

      People who are not bums, beg to differ.

      One day, you will be in trouble. And those very dependable friends will turn away from you the moment you are in trouble, exactly because you are in trouble. Simple as that. They want perfect people, as do you, and they will discard anyone who is less than; including you, once you are in trouble. (Of course, there are many who are successful for life. You should not forget, though, that karma can always be a certain kind of woman.)

      There are people who have learned to choose not to appear anywhere simply because their childhood experiences of having to appear anywhere have been traumatic.

      School is one of those places, where kids are forced to go to. If going to school becomes a matter of anxiety every day because of trauma from school, then the more comfortable option is not to go once they won't have to anymore, or once they have the freedom to exercise not going. This translates to adult life.

      The affected feel pressure in the knowledge, that they are expected to appear somewhere. As the time comes closer, the anxiety grows to the point that they bail or flake. It's not always easy with friends like that, but phone communication and IM allows things to be cleared up, if the other side is forgiving.

      You are one of those who does not have the time, the means, or the expertise to fix other people. That's fine, in a way. Because not everyone can fix other people. Then again, you and your kind cannot really be expected to be this dependable. Ever.

  40. Re: Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Betteridge's law is one of those really stupid ideas that makes no sense. That explains why the users here keep trotting it out. Most readers on this site are pretty stupid. What if the headline read, "was Hitler wrong to exterminate the Jews?" Would you answer no to that? My god the people here are stupid, just like Betteridge.

    Actually it's a corollary of good writing practices, in the context of newspaper journalism.

    Headlines need to be as short as possible, so if you're waisting letters on a question word it better be because your article explains why the answer is "no" as otehrwise any editor with half the title would have cut it down to the shorter declarative statement, or tossed the article in the trash if all it does is restate the headline in paragraph form.

    For example:
    "Will Earth Explode Tomorrow?"
    "Earth to Explode Tomorrow"

  41. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's way easier to just not have friends in the first place. Bam! No bailing or social obligations to worry about!

  42. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to post my well reasoned response, but aliens just landed in my bubonic plague culture again. Gotta run.

  43. kids by meglon · · Score: 1

    not to mention the decline of civilization, the collapse of morality and the ruination of all we hold dear.

    Those damn kids on their motorybikes and that blasted rock and roll music! I knew it would end badly! Next they'll be taking drugs and playing that evil Dungeons and Dragons!!!!

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  44. Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

    I find myself "bailing" on events I was high pressured into in person, often held semi-captive, but then divesting myself of it when I had freedom again. Often, for example, people assume that you do not like them if you do not agree to their request. That's rarely true. It's more convenient to agree to go, then not go. There are limits of course, if someone is spending money on the event or going out of their way I will be blunt (ex. weddings) but thats about it.

    The only trend in society that may be destructive to in-person relationships is that there is *always* plenty to do. Meat-space meetings with friends are pretty confining and limited in scope, rarely with any expected gain. I also imagine there was a day when one might be so bored that one didn't bail, that even a dubious meeting might be preferable to sitting on your couch watching The Jeffersons. But that day is well in the rear-view.

    In reality I do not want, nor do I ever seek social events of any kind, everything I want or need is in my house at my keyboard, with the exception of time. That I never have in the quantity I would like. If I accept such an invitation I'm almost certain to bail but felt like I had to accept due to some real or imagined pressure on me. I will never do the inviting, and if I do you can be sure I won't bail on YOU, that really is rude. I have had people arrange large get-togethers from diverse social groups who bail, leaving those groups confused and stuck with each other...that's just a dick move.

    1. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/world/what-in-the-world/japan-inemuri-public-sleeping.html

      In Japan, sleeping in public is a symptom of hard work. A conspicuous outward demonstration of a person's honor and work ethic.
      I think bailing is the same way. It it like "conspicuous consumption" but with our time. It's how we show how busy we are and that our time is valued by others who want it.

    2. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's a dick move to say you're going to be somewhere if you have no intention of going. We call that being a liar, and nobody likes liars. The payback for doing that enough times is that people think you're a lying dick who can't be counted on.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by hazardPPP · · Score: 2

      In reality I do not want, nor do I ever seek social events of any kind, everything I want or need is in my house at my keyboard, with the exception of time. That I never have in the quantity I would like. If I accept such an invitation I'm almost certain to bail but felt like I had to accept due to some real or imagined pressure on me. I will never do the inviting, and if I do you can be sure I won't bail on YOU, that really is rude. I have had people arrange large get-togethers from diverse social groups who bail, leaving those groups confused and stuck with each other...that's just a dick move.

      So essentially, you are an extremely anti-social person (you do not seek social events of any kind) who feels awkward while communicating with other people (you accept invitations to events because you feel some sort of pressure, and cannot say no to a person's face). That's fine, and actually I sympathize with your position, however you should realize you are in the minority and not exactly qualified to comment on the state of "in-person meat-space" relationships.

    4. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you bail because you have no back bone and can't be honest with your friends? hmmm....

    5. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however you should realize you are in the minority and not exactly qualified to comment on the state of "in-person meat-space" relationships.

      This is not true at all. Introverts are all around us, and it taxes them to put up with the social requests demanded by extroverts. The question is why do extroverts mostly assume that being introverted is a disability, or labeled as anti-social? Introverts have as much of stake in commenting on "in-person meat-space" relationships as extroverts do.

    6. Re:Cost/Benefit of Bailing is very positive by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      you should realize you are in the minority and not exactly qualified to comment on the state of "in-person meat-space" relationships

      Evidently not, or this thread wouldn't exist. I only ever have to do this with work acquaintances, the one aspect of my life where I absolutely must meet the social bar to eat. If I could excise that, I would do so, and actually would have nothing to offer this thread. But, as it happens it is a problem I have to deal with and this is how I deal with it. It works fine, and if any hostility is engendered it hasn't yet bit me. Feel free to conduct a statistical study.

  45. Sorry, I was going to leave a comment, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to flake, bail, whatever.

  46. What do you folks think? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Eh, I'll have to pass. No comment.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  47. What do you folks think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you folks think?

    I think I hate people. And for me that has been a constant since the days of land lines up until this moment.

    I think the ambiguity of social relationships is a big problem. The girls I want to be serious with don't and the ones I don't ... do. Being a recluse is far more rewarding.

  48. Its Katz back? by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    I blame Columbine.

  49. Speak for yourself, Millennial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think these millennial bloggers need to speak for themselves. For this pathetic generation, making and breaking plans is absolutely nothing new, and is arguably one of their defining characteristics. The astonishing lack of commitment is also not confined to social obligations, but to work as well.

    Other generations do not have this problem. We grownups make commitments and stick to them.

  50. The last time I had plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last time I had plans, I ended up casting off a few "friends..."

    Five of us made plans... at 5PM, to meet for dinner and drinks at 7PM.. in two hours. Knowing that most of my cohorts ran a little late, I showed up at 7:15... I was still the first one.. I got a table for five and sat down, ordered a drink.

    Then the texts started coming in... one by one "$excuse" after "$excuse" which really just means "something more betterer just came up and Ima go do that instead, sosry!"

    I ended up by myself at a table set for 5... moved to the bar and chatted with the bartender while I had some food and then went home. Haven't spoken to any of those fuckwits since.

    1. Re: The last time I had plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good.

      Physical injury is what they need if they show their faces around again.

      Without penalty there's no reason.

  51. Was going to go read the article by Vektuz · · Score: 1

    But eh, it was behind a paywall, and, you see, I'm going to have to flake on reading paywalled content tonight.

  52. Dude, I flaked. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I was going to read TFS and TFA, but I flaked.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  53. Surrender your phones by erexx23 · · Score: 2

    Surrender your phones before any social gathering and its obvious what the problem really is. No one knows how to act in a group anymore.

  54. Bailing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought bailing was what you did when you hit a rock that put a hole in the bottom of the canoe so that you didn't end up at the bottom of the lake.

    And yes, in circumstances where bailing is required, everyone bails!

  55. What do I think.. by Altrag · · Score: 1

    I think the hyperbole is strong with this one..

    not to mention the decline of civilization, the collapse of morality and the ruination of all we hold dear.

    Really? The ruination of all we hold dear? I didn't realize the whole of modern society was relying on me making it to a Thursday night party. Guess I better brush up on my beer pong!

    Other than that, this seems like "No duh, but with internet!" Time and energy are scarce resources for most people, and we're not all taught how to manage them properly. Energy especially. You can find time management courses if you feel you need them but I've never heard of a course that teaches you how to manage your life such that the party you get invited to on Monday when you're well rested after the weekend still seems like a good idea when Friday night rolls around and you're exhausted. Never mind if you have a family and every excursion requires either hiring a babysitter or having to choose whether you or your spouse gets to go out tonight or whatever other dynamic you have to deal with.

  56. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No!, It's just a lot more obvious now.

  57. I have a most convincing proof of his thesis by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I have a most convincing proof of his thesis. I'll post it tomorrow.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  58. What this really means by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

    ...is that slashdot is officially dead, as there is no more news for nerds nor stuff that matters. I find it unbelievable that we now have "articles" that are nothing more than someone whining about no one wanting to hang out with them. I can't even call this fake news. SAD.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:What this really means by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Well, it enticed you to post something. It's a Win-Win!

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  59. For sure, I'll comment on this post... by s1d3track3D · · Score: 2

    I'm totally gonna comment on this article in a few minutes
    ...
    ...
    oh sorry, can't get to it after all, cool? raincheck for sure thou...

  60. Re: Reference to Betteridge's law coming in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were inported in the US by Euro nazi SS people

  61. I stop asking them by imidan · · Score: 1

    If I keep inviting someone to meet up and they flake out repeatedly, I just stop asking them. I'm not worried about it--if they can't bring themselves to participate, then I suppose they're not that interested and I move on. I'd rather invite people who will actually show up, and the ones who don't are obviously happier doing whatever they do, possibly including vegging on their couch. Not my problem. It's a win-win, right?

  62. "Paywalled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can read all the NYT articles you can absorb as long as a) you allow session cookies and b) disable scripts. HTH.

  63. Please remove the "Stuff that matters" tag line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not "news for nerds" or "Stuff that matters". This is the kind of shit the homecoming king and queen worry about. If this had been about a bail on the X5000/40 it would have mattered!

  64. No by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    No, and we don't even need Betteridge for this.

    What we are in is the diamond encrusted platinum age of retarded news stories.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  65. Epic way to die by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

    Cellist Mike Edwards died instantly when the 50-stone cylindrical bale careered down a slope, flipped 15ft over a hedge and smashed on to the roof of his van.

    Holy shit! Hands down the best way to die I have seen in a very long time.

    --
    Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
  66. On pubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pubs can have smokers and alcohol, so that people with jobs, spouses, and/or children specifically avoid those establishments in order not to smell bad later that evening or the morning after. Your friends also avoided seeing you in the pub, because they wanted to see only you; they calculated, that there might be another of your friends there. Friends with spouses and children must also think how they keep their offspring busy, or if a spouse is at work when they have to look after the kids. Then there are chores, and the wife/husband/kids also want attention.

  67. adult responsibilities is a common excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pretty much only be on a 100% "spontaneous" schedule if you're a teenager on summer break. Once you get adult responsibilities in your life, you realize you have to plan things.

    I used to plan things when i was younger. But I'm in my 40's now, and I go out of my way to be more spontaneous now. It's been a real drag to speed a several days making phone calls to get four or five "friends" together.

    Now I kick out an email and have my own BBQ whenever I feel like having one and I don't negotiate with anyone on the details. Show up, or don't. Glad to have you, not a big deal if you can't make it.

  68. Barry Sobel "I flaked", 1992 by Kogun · · Score: 1

    http://www.cc.com/video-clips/idgl7i/stand-up-barry-sobel--flaking

  69. you are a CUNT ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more convenient to agree to go, then not go.
    and then ..
    If I accept such an invitation I'm almost certain to bail but felt like I had to accept due to some real or imagined pressure on me.
    Maybe it's more convenient for you, fuckwit, but your dishonesty fucks up the planning for everyone else.
    When it's inconvenient for you to be honest about such routine matters, you've become a sociopath.

    Don't be mistaken, though - your "friends" already know that you're unreliable as a human being - how do you feel about that?