New Sharpened Images From Hubble Telescope Contradict Post-Big Bang Theories (nasa.gov)
An anonymous reader quotes NASA:
By applying a new computational analysis to a galaxy magnified by a gravitational lens, astronomers have obtained images 10 times sharper than what Hubble could achieve on its own. The results show an edge-on disk galaxy studded with brilliant patches of newly formed stars... The galaxy in question is so far away that we see it as it appeared 11 billion years ago, only 2.7 billion years after the big bang... The resulting reconstructed image revealed two dozen clumps of newborn stars, each spanning about 200 to 300 light-years. This contradicted theories suggesting that star-forming regions in the distant, early universe were much larger, 3,000 light-years or more in size. "There are star-forming knots as far down in size as we can see," said doctoral student Traci Johnson of the University of Michigan, lead author of two of the three papers describing the research.
Magnetism increased in gauss
What does "increased in gauss" mean?
until poles began to form
Are there no poles when only so little magnetism is present?
; with north and south pokes come lines of force, and from these, eddy currents form.
Eddy currents in what? Doesn't a current require some sort of conductor?
These eddy currents are energy.
Ok
This caused the poles to begin to rotate.
The poles create the currents and then those currents cause the poles to rotate? How/why?
Since a stationary magnetic field is not moving (by definition) there was no mass or energy, ergo no universe yet.
Hm
But a rotating magnetic field is moving, so it can create a universe.
Why?
a tangent curve is simply a sine wave as viewed from outside the system.
Could you explain this?
The asymptote(s) appear to be a Big Bang because of this.
We (humans) are simply viewing the universe as a virtual system from outside it.
Can you elaborate on this?
This does away with not only pi
Why?
but also "dark matter/energy".
Why?
I ask you to think about it
Did that, raised the above questions.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
If the universe is defined as the entirety of what exists that is causally connected go us, even theoretically, then these other universes in a greater multimeter is just a renaming of the universe.
By definition we can never see or detect or be affected by anything outside of our universe. If another "universe" "made" ours, then that's just renaming an older part of our universe.