Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Sales in Hong Kong Dry Up After Gov't Drops Tax Break (axios.com)

Tesla couldn't sell a single car in Hong Kong in April after the government dropped a tax break for electric cars on April 1, the Wall St Journal reports citing government data. From the report: "as a result of the new policy, the cost of a basic Tesla Model S four-door car in Hong Konghas effectively risen to around $130,000 from less than $75,000." There were 2,939 Tesla's registered in Hong Kong as of April. Further reading: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore.

103 comments

  1. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone who wanted one in the short term snapped them up right before the tax went into effect.

    1. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I'm thinking.

      If you announce a change like that in advance, of course the smart people are going to buy their cars before the price nearly doubles.

      And the stupid people couldn't afford one in the first place, which means there are no buyers for a few years.

      Eventually, people who really want one will come around to paying full price. Or else the Model 3 will be available as an alternative.

    2. Re:Or by Albanach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly what the article says - there were five times as many registrations in March (the month before the rule went into effect) as in February. Hardly surprising that, when they did a half year worth of business in a month, they now see a decline.

      For some other manufacturers, a decline to zero might be more concerning. I expect in the current Tesla market with only luxury vehicles, the vast majority of customers don't need to wait one more paycheck to afford the purchase.

    3. Re:Or by Albanach · · Score: 2

      Another interesting factoid from the article. Hong Kong had 3,000 new electric car registrations in 2016. Tesla sold circa 3,500 cars in the first three months of 2017.

      The headline that nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore might be hard to justify when we look at the data.

    4. Re:Or by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      It still shows that demand is pretty weak for them. The problem with Hong Kong, and any of these super densely populated area is nobody has their own garage and home charging. It's up to the complex to provide them. Presumably most owners who would have a car have a designated space so putting them in is likely problematic without rethinking the parking layout, not to mention expensive.

    5. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the only reason to own a Tesla is that it's as close to a self-driving car as you can get, you may want to have a look at comma.ai

      They are doing open source self driving. Much further along than anyone else. I'd call their capabilities: 90% what Tesla can do. (That close.) It makes a $20k car with a comma.ai seem like a real competitor to a $130k Tesla.

    6. Re:Or by Desler · · Score: 1

      Nice attempt at spin, but it still shows that signiificantly less people will buy one without subsidies.

    7. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the public transportation is really good. And the cost of living is really high. No one can afford a car in HK except super rich.

    8. Re: Or by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      There's no shortage of super rich in Hong Kong however.

    9. Re:Or by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      Everyone who wanted one in the short term snapped them up right before the tax went into effect.

      There's definitely that going on, but not only was there a big fat goose egg for registrations in April, there were only 5 in May: http://www.investopedia.com/ne... Anyway you look at it, that's a huge drop off in demand because a government subsidy was taken away.

    10. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But most of these super rich are foreigner and mainlander. The normal Hong Konger gets nothing. There's no shortage of ordinary Hong Kong families as well. These families are finding it harder and harder to provide for their family with high costs of housing and living. I am one of the average income residents. Now I have to look for somewhere else to live and raise my family because it is impossible to buy home in HK. Add to that an unstable political future and sadly Hong Kong really have no future, just it will become a part of China, completely wiped clean of its history by corrupt CCP.

    11. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So unless you subsidize wealthy people to buy a Model S they fail in the marketplace.

      Not terribly admirable.

    12. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And the stupid people couldn't afford one in the first place, which means there are no buyers for a few years."

      News flash. The majority of folks aren't going to drop ~$80k on a CAR which will do nothing but depreciate in value the instant you drive off the lot.

      These are not stupid people.

      Give it a few years for the tech to mature and the prices to come down to something reasonable or comparable to their ICE counterparts and you'll find more buyers.

      Until then, you can keep your overpriced status symbol.

    13. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't. I shows that when given the choice between subsidy and no subsidy, everyone choses subsidy.
      Next year's sales will show whether or not they'll buy it without subsidy.

    14. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the stupid people couldn't afford one in the first place

      Are you actually implying that all people who can't afford a Tesla are stupid?
      I hate to break it to you, but in my opinion anyone who buys a Tesla is stupid, and includes all the people that ever have had enough money to do so.

      I could easily buy a Tesla, but I'm smart enough to know that a car is not worth that much money. Cars, regardless of original cost are almost worthless when they are few years old. This makes all of them a bad investment with the very rare exception of the collector's item, and I'm not a car collector.

    15. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if your buddy got one a week ago for half the price, you'd never hear the end of it if you paid the doubled price. You'd want to wait awhile before swallowing your pride.

    16. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, if you're crazy rich, isn't paying exorbitant prices a badge of honor or some shit?

    17. Re: Or by Wain13001 · · Score: 2

      most crazy-rich people are frugal to an extreme that can appear almost revolting.

    18. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girls dad is loaded. He'll use coupons at gas stations and grows his own garden but won't think twice dropping cash on a round trip NA to China field trip.

    19. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Chinese politicians. They are happy to flaunt their money they get from corruption.

    20. Re: Or by kenh · · Score: 2

      Nice attempt at spin, but it still shows that signiificantly less people will buy one without subsidies.

      No it doesn't. [It] shows that when given the choice between subsidy and no subsidy, everyone choses subsidy.
      Next year's sales will show whether or not they'll buy it without subsidy.

      or, put another way, "significantly fewer people choose to buy the Tesla without subsidy"...

      --
      Ken
    21. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teslas in most markets cannot fight without taz breaks.

      thats a fact. its a 50k difference.

    22. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . I expect in the current Tesla market with only luxury vehicles, the vast majority of customers don't need to wait one more paycheck to afford the purchase.

      true, but I think you will find with such a jump the market has gone from upper middle class and above to online the wealthy. that is a significant reduction in potential market, would expect it would be a 90%+ drop in viable customers and that hurts no matter who you are.

    23. Re: Or by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Is it really a subsidy? They just reduced the normal 40% tax on imported vehicles. Sounds more like "not being fined for excessive pollution".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re: Or by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that is part of why they are rich. If I lived as frugally now as I did when fresh out of college (and invested all the saved money), I'd have about $1 million in the bank.

    25. Re: Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! When I was 18 and a junior technician, I did some work for a financial adviser and she suggested similar tactics to save and that I would have $1mil in savings by year such-and-such. It's fairly disgusting looking back at my 18 year old self and recalling all of the wasteful and pointless purchases and unwillingness to save. 15 years of that crap really sets ya back.

      Captcha: tutoring

  2. No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need RANGE for HK. Big place!

    1. Re: No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hong Kong is tiny. We are running out of space, that's why apartments are becoming so expensive (and because rich corrupt Chinese communist are coming in and buying them to hide their corrupt profits).

      So sad, but Hong Kong might be destroy itself long before 2047 return to Chinese control. So sad to see the land I grew up in so quickly get destroyed and changed for the worse. Now I really worry about trying to get other country's citizenship and leave this place to find a safe place to have a family and raising my kids.

      I will miss you, Hong Kong.

    2. Re:No Range w/Electric by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "Big place"... sure, kid.

      Hong Kong: 2755 square kilometers (1,064 square miles)
      Québec: 1542056 square kilometers (595,391 square miles)

      Keep in mind that Québec is only the second biggest province/territory of Canada, which itself is the second biggest country on the planet after Russia.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:No Range w/Electric by s.petry · · Score: 1

      See "sarcasm". Jeesh!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:No Range w/Electric by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm is "a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt". Sarcasm may employ ambivalence, although sarcasm is not necessarily ironic. "The distinctive quality of sarcasm is present in the spoken word and manifested chiefly by vocal inflection." The sarcastic content of a statement will be dependent upon the context in which it appears.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:No Range w/Electric by s.petry · · Score: 0

      Double Sarcasm: HK is a big place, like your brain.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re: No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really feel your pain. American here. Lived in Hong Kong for a couple of years 5 years ago. Overall, I loved it.

      If you are forced to move out, one thing I beg you: please bring with you all the knowledge to make great dim, Cha Chang tang good, and Hong Kong milk tea.

    7. Re:No Range w/Electric by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Triple sarcasm: my brain is mostly empty space.

      Hey, wait a minute...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double Sarcasm: HK is a big place, like your brain.

      See Poe's Law

    9. Re:No Range w/Electric by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Poe's Law: Idiots can't understand a joke, blame others for lack of humor.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that 1,064 sq. mi. includes water! If you count just land, it's only 427.8 sq. mi., which if it were a US city would be the 14th largest, between Suffolk, VA (400.2) and San Antonio (460.9).

      dom

    11. Re: No Range w/Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Québécois don't understand sarcasm. It's a fault of the education system created by the French elite.

  3. It is range anxiety! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most Hong Kong residents would not buy a car unless it can go completely across the entire country at least five times in one full charge or full tank of gas. No way Tesla could do it. Tesla might sell in a small place like USA but on a large country like Hong Kong, no way it would sell.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: It is range anxiety! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about...

      Most HK resident don't need a fucking car because we have a mass transist system (bus, rail, ship) that spans the whole city-state. So the common person doesn't need a car, only for rich who want to show off his wealth.

    2. Re:It is range anxiety! by kwbauer · · Score: 0

      Hong Kong seems to be roughly 25 x 40 miles. The contiguous USA is roughly 2800 x 1600 miles.

      WTF are you talking about. Is this a weird way to attempt to explain that Hong Kong is now part of China instead of still separate?

    3. Re:It is range anxiety! by kaka.mala.vachva · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoosh! That's the sound of the new Tesla flying electric vegan ICanHazCheezburger loving car passing overhead.

    4. Re:It is range anxiety! by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      oh man, I almost got taken in by this one and if so I'd be assigned the Whoosh Co. I'm thinking why would anyone buy a car of any sort in a congested place like HK. Even the airport is squeezed, there's many videos that landing a typical airliner is action and adventure (means need plenty of barf bags).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    5. Re:It is range anxiety! by slew · · Score: 1

      oh man, I almost got taken in by this one and if so I'd be assigned the Whoosh Co. I'm thinking why would anyone buy a car of any sort in a congested place like HK.

      Reminds me of one time when I visited my grandparents in HK as a kid (in the mid 1970's). He
      had use car from his job and wanted to drive us to go to dinner. Took about 20-mins and he dropped us off in front of the restaurant. With no place to park, he drove back to the house and walked back to the restaurant and joined us about 20-minutes later.

      Even the airport is squeezed, there's many videos that landing a typical airliner is action and adventure (means need plenty of barf bags).

      That was the old Kai Tak airport's infamous "checkerboard" approach. The new HKG international airport's over-water approach is pretty bog standard and relatively boring...

    6. Re:It is range anxiety! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the past 7 years I have landed and taken off from HK airport over 100 times. Never been an issue.

      Maybe it's because I use Finnair.

    7. Re:It is range anxiety! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Found the German!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:It is range anxiety! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1nterw3bs have been won by.. YOU!

    9. Re:It is range anxiety! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      There are places that getting to and from is a little more complicated than hopping on MTR. If you live on Conduit Road or the Peak, getting over to your yacht in Aberdeen can take far too long, especially when your maid is carrying all the groceries and won't ewalk any faster! Seriously though... having a car in Hong Kong means never being hot, wet, or having to stand. What is a month's salary on a car, anyway...

  4. Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doh! Nobody wants to pay $130k for a $75k car! ...and that's a shock to anyone how?

    1. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by Herkum01 · · Score: 2

      It costs so much because of the unreasonable import fee of 50% being placed on these items. It is forcing Tesla to build a plant in mainland China if they want to sell cars there.

      If only our own government could institute a similar policy on chinese products to protect american industries...

    2. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Hong Kong, next is California.....

    3. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong, being such a small city with the amount of road traffic, justifies such levy on cars, regardless of origin.

    4. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by nnet · · Score: 2

      ...protect american industries...

      From what? Its own greed, and avarice? Americans created the problem. Americans shipped American industry jobs overseas. Lets see what Americans do now.

    5. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Americans shipped American industry jobs overseas in part because there was low or no tariffs on imports, and the labor overseas is super cheap.

      If GM saves themselves $5,000 per car in labor and whatnot by building it in Mexico, and there's no import fees.. then why wouldn't they move to Mexico? If on the other hand the US Govt charged a $8,000 import fee for Mexican-based cars well.. now GM isn't going to be so happy to move. Even if the US Govt only charged a $4000 import fee (still saving GM $1000 per car,) they have to then compare the expected long-term savings against the immediate cost of having to build the factories and re-hire, re-train or re-locate employees.

      Now to that first approximation, Trump's "omg lets stop all imports!" logic actually makes a good amount of sense. Unfortunately there's other issues at stake here. Yes, Detroit gets screwed when GM closes a plant and relocates it to Mexico in order to save $5000 per car. But at the same time, everyone who doesn't live in Detroit is probably going to see at least a $4000 drop in price when they go to buy their next car, since a good portion of GM's savings will indeed get passed on to the consumer in order to undercut Ford or whoever (or compete with them, if Ford had moved first.)

      Think of how many people in the US today would be screwed if we imposed massive tariffs on Chinese imports and those people couldn't buy cheap shit from Walmart anymore. Its easy to say that you should be buying quality American items in the first place.. when you're living comfortably in the middle class or higher.

      But when you have a monthly budget of say $300 for food, clothes and other living expenses.. it becomes a hell of a lot easier to justify buying a $15 pair of crap jeans made by 12 year olds in Bangladesh rather than the $60 equivalent made in the USA, even if you're fully aware that they're crap and won't last as long and whatnot.

      Basically, if Trump chooses the import tariffs as the one thing he'll actually manage to succeed at.. be prepared for a significantly increased cost of living and an equally increased poverty rate. These things are somewhat self-correcting in the long term but that's a lot of suffering in the meantime (factories don't get built and restarted overnight!) and even after the self-corrections the US would be comparably further behind other countries.

      International trade because its a net benefit to all parties (ignoring things like arms trading in dictatorships which doesn't really follow economic principles so much as asshole principles.) And like the "return to coal" crap Trump's always spouting, his lack of deeper understanding may indeed benefit a few thousand local workers but it will be at the expense of everybody else in the country.

    6. Re:Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Tesla anymore. by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I really should proofread.

      International trade because

      .. International trade exists because
      Apologies, grammar Nazis!

  5. Buying spree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like an issue of people going on a buying spree before the tax break expires. I'm sure sales will pick up again in a couple month

    1. Re: Buying spree by kenh · · Score: 1

      I'm sure sales will pick up again in a couple month

      Sure, just as soon as everyone forgets it's $75K car they are paying $130K for...

      --
      Ken
  6. Soon. by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    Fully electric cars with tolerable range (my made up bs threshold: 200+ mi) don't seem to be cheap enough to compete on their own merits yet... will probably be a few more years, but it's coming.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Soon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully electric cars with tolerable range (my made up bs threshold: 200+ mi) don't seem to be cheap enough to compete on their own merits yet... will probably be a few more years, but it's coming.

      Well, you buy a Chevrolet Bolt today and get your 200+ miles, but I'm guessing you don't want to spend $35k on a Bolt, when you could (at the very same dealership) buy a Cruze or Malibu for much less and still get very good gas mileage along with better range.

    2. Re:Soon. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Fully electric cars with tolerable range (my made up bs threshold: 200+ mi) don't seem to be cheap enough to compete on their own merits yet... will probably be a few more years, but it's coming.

      Actually, China makes these already. And they're around $6000.

      In actual practice, people in Hong Kong going on a long trip would tend to use the very very fast High Speed Rail systems China and nearby countries have in place.

      Wake up, it's 2017, not 1997.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  7. Ouch by tbq · · Score: 2

    The base price for a Model S in the US is $69,500 before any local or federal incentives. At nearly twice that price now I can see why people in Hong Kong might be less interested than before. Would be be cheaper to buy one in the US and ship it to Hong Kong, or would the import duties kill any savings?

    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or would the import duties kill any savings?

      Probably not even legal to do so, or you would perhaps still have to pay that tariff.

    2. Re:Ouch by SciCom+Luke · · Score: 1

      Well, cars in the US are dirt cheap. Even petrol cars. A Mustang 5.0 V8 Fastback is about 38.5k $ in the US, new. It is about 115k $ equivalent in euro in Holland. That, and 8.5 $ equivalent per gallon of gas. Americans have just really been spoiled when it comes to tax on cars, so it is hard to make a comparison. 'Twice as expensive as in the US' can still be a pretty sweet deal.

  8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So now them there fancy new technology thingums = the left?

  9. Explains, why Musk is upset about "Climate" by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To me this is related tightly to why Elon Musk has publicly broken up with Trump over "climate". If, as Trump thinks, climate is not really a big concern and the government will stop paying scientists to say, that it is, Tesla becomes just another car — and an expensive one at that...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Explains, why Musk is upset about "Climate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reach. Reach for the stars. You can do it!!!

    2. Re:Explains, why Musk is upset about "Climate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an environmental scientist, but I lived with one for two years. If you think the government is paying them to say anything, you are sadly mistaken. They'd make twice as much for half the work in private industry, and I should know - we have the same degree from the same university, but I work for an oil company and he's a grad student. I'm doing very nicely, and he was renting a box room in my apartment. We both know that climate change is a man-made phenomenon, because it's clear as day from the data coming over both of our desks. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a moron or lying to you for profit.

    3. Re: Explains, why Musk is upset about "Climate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tesla needs co2 based taxing baaaadly.

      in finland a base tesla is like 80k. a normal car thats 80k in usa is 130k in finland.

      thats why he jumped trumps ship.

  10. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a YUGE win for the left. How could it not be?

  11. One month of data only!! by shilly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did the WSJ really publish a story based on just a single month of data showing a fall in sales?? That is ridiculous.

    1. Re:One month of data only!! by drhamad · · Score: 1

      Meh, going to zero is a pretty interesting data point, even if it is only a month. I'm sure they'll publish more as more data comes out.

      --
      -Daniel
    2. Re:One month of data only!! by shilly · · Score: 1

      Agree it's an interesting data point, but there's an awful lot of stew being cooked from that single oyster. It's really rather early to say that Tesla sales in HK have dried up with the removal of the tax break. And the last data point reported was April. There's been May and June since then -- surely the reporter could have gone and asked around to see if the story remained consistent, even if official figures are laggy.

  12. Cars just sold before the price went up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article
    "There were 2,939 first-time Tesla registrations in March just before the new tax rules kicked in, around five times that of the number in February."
    everybody remotely considering buying one, just bought them before the price went up. Check back in six months to a year to see what the real effect is.

    1. Re:Cars just sold before the price went up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXCUSE ME? If I get hit in the head with a rock & go down in a heap you don't need to 'wait a month' to decide on 'cause & effect'. The REAL Effect is obvious. Without huge government subsidies Tesla's in HK are unsellable. Why else would people rush to buy them BEFORE the end of the tax subsidy? Wow.

      That is true everyone their sold, whether that subsidy goes directly to the buyer or to Elon Musk in terms of government subsidies of his business. Now, I'm not saying Elon isn't a smart guy, in fact he's VERY smart, he's built a company whose valuation is huge yet hasn't ever made a profit & its only surviving due to government subsidies. If those were to dry up his companies would be screwed but Elon makes out like a bandit (having shares that are valued where too high & allowing him to leverage them for other government subsidized activities).

    2. Re:Cars just sold before the price went up by crioca · · Score: 2

      The REAL Effect is obvious. Without huge government subsidies Tesla's in HK are unsellable. Why else would people rush to buy them BEFORE the end of the tax subsidy

      Because it saves them a bunch of cash? Even if I'm happy to buy at $130k, why wouldn't I buy it at $75k and save myself $55,000?

  13. Good bye to Tesla big-letter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's as if nobody wants an electric rocket.

  14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The failure is the 50% import tax being imposed on an imported car. Using import taxes to create a barrier to international trade is more of a Republican/Trump/xenophobic-they-took-our-jobs move.

    Then again, the right has pushing insanely legislation and then blaming the left when it doesn't work, so you blaming the left is in line with how the party works.

  15. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Hong Kong is China huh? Then why are Hong Kong product is imports in China? Why is there a border? And hong Kong have its own money and passport and visa and law and police and education and freedoms. Yes, freedom to go to dangerous site like Facebook and Google that is blocked in China. Fucking commies suck on my Hong Kong dick all day long. We will never be a part of you corrupt CCP. Hong Konger for life.

  16. To, from? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    When the hell did people start writing things in the "To Y from X"?
    It makes more sense to write "From X to Y".

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:To, from? by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      It's a pun on the gameplan for Tesla models. The model S was first, we now have model 3 and X, and the final model is supposed to be the model Y.

      S3XY

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  17. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck to you. CCP seem to be eroding freedoms and democracy in HK starting at the top. The citizens there deserve praise for their efforts to resist.

  18. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    When I buy things on eBay, I always pick Hong Kong sellers if I can, even if it means paying a bit more. I get my items much faster, sometimes a week or two earlier than ordering from China.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  19. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your help. Please have sympathy for the people on Hong Kong and help us fight off the corrupt CCP :)

  20. Re:You know what else has dried up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This type of comment always bring to mind the fourth image on this page http://maddox.xmission.com/hat...

  21. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the kind words, but we can't do it alone. We need help from the west to keep us going. Please support our efforts and do what you can to spread words and support our efforts. Thank you for your help in saving democracy and freedoms.

  22. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Hong Kong is China huh?

    Basically, yes.

  23. Re: Nobody in Hong Kong wants a Chinese CCP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really have just proved your ignorance. As someone who has lived in both HK and China, I can tell you that you are dead wrong.

  24. Well, OK then, let's do an experiment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to de-fund all climate science for at least 20 years (to try the opposite of the funding of it during the past 20 years) and then watch to see how many people go into that field and produce the same rants about the planet coming to an end without a massive increase in government spending and control.

    Any bets on the results?

    Any time somebody disagrees with the AGW alarmism, the climate alarmists scream that the person might have gotten some funding from, or in some other way been tied to, the fossil fuels industry and is thus biased and untrustworthy. These very same accusers however then rage against the very idea the BILLIONS of dollars flowing from governments (which desire justifications for higher taxes and more regulatory power) to climate researchers who then produce reports that say the world is doomed if those goverments are not given higher taxes and more regulatory power is in any way tainting. Pot: meet kettle.

    When governments fund research, and make it plain that there is a desired result that will get all the funding, then you can guarantee the researchers will get the desired results (becuase, like everybody else, they have families to feed, medical bills, college loans, house and car payments to make, careers on the line, etc). Denying this is denying human nature and lots of human history. All the ranting by researchers about climate can be put on a graph with levels of government funding for "global warming" studies and there's an excellent correlation. Any pretense that climate scientists are honest, unbiased men of science went into the ash heap with the "climategate" e-mails leaks that exposed them rigging the paper publishing and peer review processes so that no contrary opinions were allowed (something religious cults do, not something honest researchers do).

    1. Re:Well, OK then, let's do an experiment... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Exon is funding plenty of climate science - and actually doing what you assume the government must be doing - simply because you don't like the results. Anyway, any legit climate scientist who thinks global warming is a government-funded hoax can easily find lucrative work for Exon and/or Koch Industries - or one of the Koch-funded 'think tanks'. So, no. Climate scientists are not finding 'phony' man-made warming for profit.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  25. Warehoused stock. by lindseyp · · Score: 1

    What Tesla did to soften the blow, was to register around 500 cars as owned by Tesla HK.

    So you can still buy a "used" Tesla with less than 20 miles on the clock, the 'one previous owner' being Tesla itself.

    Obviously this took quite a bit of investment, and won't last long, but it's managed to keep down the price of used Teslas for now.

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  26. Clarification of "Tax Break" by tempo36 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When most US readers read "Tax Break" they think that someone bought a car that was priced "X" and instead, paid "X-Y" where Y is some subsidy the Government offers...or alternatively they imagine that ALL cars cost "X+Y" where Y is a uniform tax. That's not the case in Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, a car that is imported from overseas is subject to a First Registration tax, that tax STARTS at 40% of the car's value and goes up from there "X+0.4X". This is a tax only on imported vehicles and previously all EV were exempt from it which put Tesla (and other imported EV) on level playing field with domestic Hong Kong vehicles. But that exemption has been removed for EV over a certain threshold, of which Tesla lands above. So now Tesla costs "X+Y" where Y is a tax that no domestic vehicles have to pay. So yes, Tesla is on an even playing field with other imports, but not with all other cars.

    So the folks saying "Ha! See, Tesla can't compete with other cars without a special exemption!" are ignoring that Tesla is now working at a handicap, not a level playing field.

    As others have pointed out, it's also likely that anyone who had the spare cash laying around who was planning on buying a Tesla, just did so prior to this phase out. People with lots of money aren't COMPLETELY oblivious to price fluctuations...especially when announced in advance.

    1. Re:Clarification of "Tax Break" by Gussington · · Score: 1

      So the folks saying "Ha! See, Tesla can't compete with other cars without a special exemption!" are ignoring that Tesla is now working at a handicap, not a level playing field.

      Also worth mentioning, most people in Hong Kong don't need cars anyway. The public transport is world class and being so small you can train/bus/walk or even taxi pretty much everywhere quicker and cheaper than driving.

  27. Oh well by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    Who cares? They are just a hair metal band who are well past their prime.

    --
    Huh?
  28. The same trend is seen in Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The introduction of taxes on electric vehicles - 20% - has effectively halted sales

  29. A pity by Camembert · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI I currently live in HK.
    Taxes are very high on new cars, at least 40%. The government previously wanted to boost electrical vehicles and thus gave the tax break for EVs.
    In fact EVs are ideal for HK. Never a range problem, and people in general are very positive about there being no emissions.
    Personally I think it is a pity that they stopped this tax break, it gave a great signal to the community. They could have reduced the tax to 20%, still a difference. Eventually Tesla and otther EV sales will pickup again of course but HK could have been at the spearhead of the move to zero emission cars countries.

  30. Where, exactly, does electricity come from? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 0

    Hydro power is already 100% spoken for in the western world. The extra electricity to power electric vehicles will come from any of nuclear, gas-burning, or coal-burning generators. A few percent of the demand *MIGHT* come from wind and solar.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  31. Wait, where is $140k coming from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a second here, $140k for a Model S? From what I can gather it costs around $70k for one here in the US (that might include some incentives). It sounds like there are "some" extra costs being added on top (import, registration, etc) in Hong Kong that would obviously (and artificially) limit the market for them.

  32. When subsidies expire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people stop buying. It happens everywhere.

    Take out all the subsidies out of renewable energy in the US and see what happens. EV sales would absolutely plummet, new installs of solar panels would be minimal, etc.

    Most people will say they care about the environment but w/o a financial incentive they quickly stop giving a shit.