Slashdot Mirror


WSJ Op-Ed: The Post Office Is Delivering Amazon's Packages Below Cost (zerohedge.com)

schwit1 shares a pay-walled op-ed from the Wall Street Journal (also excerpted at the URL below): The U.S. Postal Service delivers the company's boxes well below its own costs. Like an accelerant added to a fire, this subsidy is speeding up the collapse of traditional retailers in the U.S. and providing an unfair advantage for Amazon... First-class mail effectively subsidizes the national network, and the packages get a free ride. An April analysis from Citigroup estimates that if costs were fairly allocated, on average parcels would cost $1.46 more to deliver...

My analysis of available data suggests that around two-thirds of Amazon's domestic deliveries are made by the Postal Service. It's as if Amazon gets a subsidized space on every mail truck... Congress should demand the enforcement of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, and the Postal Service needs to stop picking winners and losers in the retail world. The federal government has had its thumb on the competitive scale for far too long.

5 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. First Anti-trust rumblings, now this... by EvilSS · · Score: 1, Informative

    Guess some B&M stores decided to step up their lobbying and PR efforts.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  2. Story is a bit misleading by Artagel · · Score: 5, Informative

    The story focuses too much on Amazon. It is a postal pricing policy that applies broadly. The fact is that if the post office has mispriced the service, it has done so for all participants, not just Amazon. This is done all too often by news outlets to pump up eyeballs on the story.

    Sure, the Post Office should price its services correctly. But how do you know if it is wrong? Marginal cost is hard to estimate when you are driving the route already. And if the post office changed its pricing, it could well be that a different package last-mile business would step in. The post office is staffed with union employees, and it could be possible to beat the post office's last mile service on price if the price was raised $1.50 a package.

  3. Re: Total Nonsense by negRo_slim · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should support it because it's hugely useful to the country overall and it's an institution enshrined in the Constitution. We're in this together irregardless of what's benefiting to just you.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  4. Re: Same with China by ChrisMaple · · Score: 5, Informative

    The headline and summary are deliberately misleading. Amazon takes advantage of discounts for presorting and local delivery that any entity with enough shipment volume can also take advantage of.

    Apparently, those discounts are excessive. As are the discounts for junk mail.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  5. Re:Since when does Amazon use USPS? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Informative

    It sucks because the mailman can just put it in my mailbox (live in a condo, mailbox is detached), but everyone else has to deliver to the door.

    Sure beats FedEx refusing to leave stuff unless I'm home to sign for it when they come -- in the middle of the day, when, like their drivers, I am also at work. Even better, there is no FedEx distribution center in my city like there is for UPS. So a "local pickup" requires a 45 minute drive.