Slashdot Mirror


Tech Companies Capture A Third Of This Year's Emmy Nominations (engadget.com)

"Streaming companies like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu snagged nearly 1/3 of Emmy nominations this year, the most ever awarded to tech companies," reports Axios, adding that streaming companies "are pouring billions of dollars into content...and it's paying off." An anonymous reader quotes Engadget: After passing 100 million subscribers, overtaking cable TV in customer numbers in the US and expanding to over 190 countries, Netflix is starting to cement something else: sustained prestige. A record haul of 91 Emmy nominations puts Netflix -- which had 54 nominations last year -- just behind perennial frontrunner HBO with 110... A key component of this upgrade in status is the sheer number of original offerings Netflix has put out. If you throw everything at an awards committee, quite a few of them might stick... Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos has said Netflix spends over $6 billion a year on its own shows, in comparison to Amazon's reported spend of nearly $3 billion, with HBO at $2 billion...

Hulu picked up 18 nominations, up from two last year, including a first series nomination for dystopian A Handmaid's Tale. Together with Netflix's House of Cards, Stranger Things and The Crown, the majority of nominees in the competitive Outstanding Drama category were from streaming services. Amazon picked up 16 nominations, the same as last year.

The shows nominated for the most Emmy awards were NBC's Saturday Night Live, followed by HBO's Westworld, but Netflix ultimately ended up with more Emmy nominations than ABC, CBS, and Fox combined.

31 comments

  1. You know what else got nominated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY BALLS!!! Suck 'em, nerds!

    1. Re: You know what else got nominated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, +1, Interesting

  2. Good by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Hey old Media , meet the disruption.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You used a buzzword. Return to Go. Do not collect $200 or feel superior.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, the comment was dynamic and forward-thinking.
      Where's your synergy?

  3. AC Captures 1/3 of Today's First Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    french toast, mademoiselles

    1. Re:AC Captures 1/3 of Today's First Posts by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Comment ça? Pas de gâteau?!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  4. "Tech companies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a very loose definition of a tech company.

    1. Re: "Tech companies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say this.

  5. I haven't watched a single one of the nominees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any of them good?

    1. Re: I haven't watched a single one of the nominees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill nye rappin about sex junk with DJ seahorse was entertaining.

  6. Dinosaur broadcasting companies by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Just like the dead tree media companies. Old, outdated, replaced.

    1. Re:Dinosaur broadcasting companies by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      What do you mean, "dead tree companies"? Like the toilet paper? /idiocracy

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Dinosaur broadcasting companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, "dead tree companies"? Like the toilet paper? /idiocracy

      It looks like you have just proven his point. You don't even seem to know about newspapers. It even doubles as toilet paper in emergencies!

    3. Re:Dinosaur broadcasting companies by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      It's funny, you just said "toilet paper even doubles as toilet paper in emergencies".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  7. Making TV For Viewers by Artagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what happens when you make TV for the viewers. Network TV has to make every show 42 minutes long, with 18 minutes for commercials, and having to repeat the last scene when coming back from the TV break. It also has to consider what advertising demographic is drawn to it.

    When you only care about the paying viewer, the show is as long as the story takes, and no shorter or longer. You can plan for immersion. Non-advertisement cable made the invasion a while ago. No commercial breaks for Game of Thrones.

    I hope this continues.

    1. Re:Making TV For Viewers by hazardPPP · · Score: 2

      Very well put. I would just like to add that this is a natural result of technological advancement that makes paying viewers easy. When TV began, using a direct paying viewer model was almost impossible; so the indirect paying viewer (with advertisers being the intermediaries) became the norm. Now, technology makes the direct payment between TV viewer and TV content producer both easy and cheap.

    2. Re:Making TV For Viewers by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 2

      Very well put. I would just like to add that this is a natural result of technological advancement that makes paying viewers easy. When TV began, using a direct paying viewer model was almost impossible; so the indirect paying viewer (with advertisers being the intermediaries) became the norm. Now, technology makes the direct payment between TV viewer and TV content producer both easy and cheap.

      There are pre-internet precedents though. I live in Canada but have donated to the US public system years ago. They had leading edge programming at the time.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:Making TV For Viewers by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Do not underestimate greed and the evil of advertisers.

      Do you see dancing cigarette packs before every show? No, because advertising evolved. Well, get ready for *everything* you see in a show to be a product placement.

      Soon enough they'll be using "green screen" props with corner markers for real-time replacement with the imagery of the product of whoever pays the most - for an 'impression' sold based on all the data your streaming service has collected on you. That's right, you're going to get customized product placement. The show you watch today might very well look different when you watch it again next week. Or even if you back it up a bit to watch a scene again.

      Ultimately I expect it's going to be 100% script-based real-time CGI anyway. Wait until you see what advertising will do to that... I mean, maybe Shrek needs to be yellow this time to promote Chiquita bananas (on special at your local grocer right now!) because you bought a bunch of bananas last week.

      I've seen the potential of the future, and it's awesome. I've also imagined what we're likely to do with that potential, and it's shitty.

  8. These aren't "tech companies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These aren't "tech companies." They are entertainment companies.

    NBC was never in the business of broadcast technology. They were and are in the entertainment business.

    Stupid fucking title.

    1. Re:These aren't "tech companies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The typical slashdotter doesn't know the difference. They have a hard enough time discerning a fantasy land movie with reality.

  9. Tech Companies Take Credit for Emmy Noms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fixed the headline... Throwing money at something doesn't mean you made it. Also pretty much every video player has a ton of drm in it so no respect there either.

    Still like it more than "made for commercials" tv. I just don't think they should be allowed to put their brand name on it if they didn't make it. Tech companies make tech. Filmmakers make cinema.

  10. Oxford Comma FTW by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    Not sure I have seen or heard of Stranger Things and The Crown, but it sounds interesting.

    1. Re: Oxford Comma FTW by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      ", and..." looks stupid. Proper use of italics, bold or quotes around the movie names would make it clear.

  11. Tech comanpies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when are Amazon, Hulu, and Netflix "Tech companies"?
    Amazon is an online shipper, Netflix is a media rental and streaming company with a studio attached, and Hulu is a streaming media company attached to a bunch of studios.

    Are they "tech companies" because they use technology? Great; now Ford is a "Tech Company"! Or is this another "just like something else, but on a computer" case like most cyber crime laws?

    1. Re:Tech comanpies? by SeriousTube · · Score: 1

      Amazon had nearly 10 billion in revenue from AWS in the last 12 months. That's purely technical and it's not chump change.

  12. Well by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "sustained prestige"

    And we express, like George Costanza, restrained jubilation about the broadcasting companies' demise.

  13. If they are Tech companies ... by houghi · · Score: 2

    ... then every other company is a tech company, because they use tech.
    Just because you add the words "Internet" does not mean that it is new or tech or whatever. Google is a marketing company using tech to sell ads. Netflix is a media distribution company that has some own content using the Internet to distribute what they have.

    This is why most media companies use editors to correct this stuff. (See what I did there?)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did the "Super Bowl LI Halftime Show starring Lady Gaga" get 6, but Bordertown got nothing?

  15. pay-per-view by smithcl8 · · Score: 2

    This shouldn't be a surprise. 20-some-odd years ago, Pay-Per-View became "a thing" for live sporting events. The analysts predicted that eventually, you'd only pay for what you wanted to watch and some day you could watch whenever you wanted. PPV was way ahead of it's time and didn't take over, but DVR and streaming services have made it happen. This feels like a completely natural evolution to me, as the tech has made it happen. (Not that I was a fan of PPV. I never bought anything that way and I firmly believe PPV is the root cause of the downfall of boxing as a premier American sport. What a shame.)

  16. But cable is tech companies too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you think the record and transmit their shows? Telepathy?