Slashdot Mirror


Media Player Classic Home Cinema (MPC-HC) for Windows Pushes What Could Be Its Last Update (mpc-hc.org)

Popular open-source media player for Windows, Media Player Classic Home Cinema -- or MPC-HC, has issued what it says could be the last update the app ever receives. The team writes: v1.7.13, the latest, and probably the last release of our project... For quite a few months now, or even years, the number of active developers has been decreasing and has inevitably reached zero. This, unfortunately, means that the project is officially dead and this release would be the last one. ... Unless some people step up that is. So, if someone's willing to really contribute and has C/C++ experience, let me know on IRC or via e-mail. Otherwise, all things come to an end and life goes on. It's been a nice journey and I'm personally pretty overwhelmed having to write this post.

23 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is why not to use open source by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because that never happened with closed source...

    With maybe the difference that in closed source, nobody can pick up the slack and continue if he feels the software is worth supporting. Closed source maker going under, software is dead in the water. Sucks to be you if you depended on it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. VLC Killed it? by ZiakII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm guessing VLC killed it? I used to use it all the time but now I just use VLC.

    1. Re:VLC Killed it? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Killed it how? It said nothing about users and everything about developers. Whether you use VLC or MPC-HC is irrelevant to the developers working on the project.

      It is a feature complete media player which by all accounts has changed very little in the last 4 years. Maybe the fact that it works well killed it.

      Side note: Some parts of VLC infuriate me so I still use MPC-HC though I have both installed. I think maybe once ever 3-5 months I come across and old poorly encoded WMV that plays in VLC but not in MPC-HC which is why I keep it around.

    2. Re:VLC Killed it? by PoopMonkey · · Score: 2

      I have both MPC and VLC. I primarily use VLC, but some files for some reason it chokes on, and MPC doesn't have that problem with them.

    3. Re:VLC Killed it? by Junta · · Score: 2

      I used to develop a little-known software project, and then another project really took off and I switched to using that, because it just made sense.

      MPC-HC did a good job of continuing to use the Windows Media framework as best it could, fixing the breakage of the progress of windows media player. However, it was still based on a pretty crappy framework not of their choosing. At the time to be fair the alternatives weren't sufficiently feature capable, and in certain cases still has benefit (iirc, smooth video only does the ms framework)

      VLC and similar just dispense with that broken stack entirely, and so it's much more straightforward to get right without goofy 'codec packs' and such.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:VLC Killed it? by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      I can't believe I actually went back to mplayer over VLC. mplayer is just so much faster, and doesn't try to crap all over your GUI if it doesn't understand a media file format or thinks the contents are busted.

  3. C/C++ experience needed to contribute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, if someone's willing to really contribute and has C/C++ experience

    That's probably why "the number of active developers has been decreasing and has inevitably reached zero".

    People who know C and C++ well are becoming rarer and rarer. The ones who are good are too busy making big bucks in industry, even if they're working on open source software like the Linux kernel (which is heavily corporate-developed these days).

    If this project really wants to attract the next generation of developers to work on their project, they'll need to rewrite it in a fad language like Ruby, Go, or especially Rust.

  4. There is literally no alternative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't believe I'm typing this, but... There is literally no alternative. I have never found ANY other media player that supports what should be the most basic possible feature: BOOKMARKS! How is this possible? I have no idea, but VLC certainly does NOT support it. They have some sort of "fake" bookmarks which disappear once you close it, which makes them completely pointless.

    Since MPC-HC is the only program that does the most basic imaginable feature, I will have to keep running it even if they kill it. On the other hand, even "MPC-HC" is a "resurrection" from the original "MPC"...

    1. Re:There is literally no alternative. by aliquis · · Score: 2

      https://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_... ?
      I was really seeing if it had support for "plugins" though.

    2. Re:There is literally no alternative. by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      What?

      There's mpc-be.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:There is literally no alternative. by MrWeelson · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't believe I'm typing this, but... There is literally no alternative. I have never found ANY other media player that supports what should be the most basic possible feature: BOOKMARKS! How is this possible? I have no idea, but VLC certainly does NOT support it. They have some sort of "fake" bookmarks which disappear once you close it, which makes them completely pointless.

      Since MPC-HC is the only program that does the most basic imaginable feature, I will have to keep running it even if they kill it. On the other hand, even "MPC-HC" is a "resurrection" from the original "MPC"...

      PotPlayer supports bookmarks and plays pretty much everything I throw at it.

  5. Re:This is why not to use open source by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    As opposed to what? Relying on Microsoft and Apple? Even if you're willing to pay, both companies have taken a general direction of not listening to their users.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  6. Maybe it's good enough? by foxalopex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to admit I've used MPC-HC for many many years now, in fact I'm using an old out of date version. I wonder if basically it's "good enough" that it doesn't need further development? There's products like "PuTTY" which essentially don't update for ages because the open source product fulfills it's function. Unless the product needs more fancy features which often risks breaking things. Time will tell I suppose.

    1. Re:Maybe it's good enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I (total layman) have been under the impression that much of the development of the past several years surround integration of hardware acceleration APIs and fine-tuning the performance of newer codecs.

      So while it's "good enough" for *my* current uses, I imagine there may come a day where I have a good codec yet bad performance on playback.

      And I am *not* a fan of the UX of VLC.

  7. Re:This is why not to use open source by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The developer can decide to just end up not supporting it, with no option to pay for support. Open source is notorious for screwing over loyal users in this manner.

    Because that never happened with closed source...

    Yeah. I've been screwed over much worse with projects done using commercial software where my old project files are now unusable because the software either stopped being supported, or the vendor decided to "upgrade" in a way that was not back-compatable with old files.

    With maybe the difference that in closed source, nobody can pick up the slack and continue if he feels the software is worth supporting. Closed source maker going under, software is dead in the water. Sucks to be you if you depended on it.

    Yep.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  8. Re:This is why not to use open source by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Well, consider the time we're living in. It's more and more common that software gets altered in ways you do not like. A former for-license model getting changed to a subscription pay-by-month model, or some additional "enhancements" that make the software unusable or send your lifetime history to its maker to sell. And that's just what I come up with in the minute this took to write.

    In commercial software, your choice is to grin and bear it. For reference, see Windows in its latest incarnations.

    In OSS, you can at least remove the shitty bits that are detrimental to your interests. Or wait, you don't have to, because they don't get baked into the package because the maker of the software KNOWS you'd immediately remove that bullshit, so why bother waste resources on creating it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. If it works by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why keep working on something that works as intended?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  10. Thank you! by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The people who created and updated this software deserve a huge "Thank You" from people who used it for years, including me. I mostly use VideoLAN now, but still have MPC on my computers, where it has lived happily since Day 1 (and will continue). It has always done exactly what it promised without gobbling a lot of resources and without trying to make itself the star of the show. The best thing about it is that the developers never fell into the "bloatware" trap.

    So whatever happens, thank you Kacper Michajlow, XhmikosR, Goran Dzaferi and JellyFrog (still listed as "Active People"), and many now listed as inactive who contributed in the past.

    People forget that when Media Player Classic came along, it was at a time when Microsoft seemed determined to force non-tech users to use Media Player, which was becoming more bloated, invasive and greedy with every update. MPC was a breath of fresh air.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  11. Re:MPC-BE by jbridges · · Score: 4, Informative

    MPC-BE is still under active development, you can see some minor updates from 15 hours ago (new version of libpng)
    https://sourceforge.net/p/mpcb...

    The Doom9 support thread is still active
    https://forum.doom9.org/showth...

    V0lt is still active on the MPC-BE support forum (need google translate unless you can read Russian):
    http://mpc-be.org/forum/index....

  12. I'm not surprised by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MPC-HC has been incredibly feature complete for a long time. I mean the list of fixes, changes, and features look impressive with each release but frankly I'm running a 3 year out of date version on my desktop and compared to my laptop running something very recent ... errr.... the buttons look a bit different...?

    For the longest time it has truly excelled at it's core feature: The ability to play videos via a small footprint media player.

    Oh behalf of the many users: Thanks for your hard efforts over the years, and thanks for not turning it into a steaming turd as much of the rest of the world seems to embrace change for changes sake. I see the abandoning of this project after its long stability in design and core purpose as part of its success story.

  13. Re:This is why not to use open source by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

    Is someone forcing you to use systemd? Is it part of your license agreement? A paid contract? A gun held to your head?

    Free software is free-as-in-freedom. Runit, SysV init, Upstart, and GNU Shepherd all have their own virtues. Support one.

  14. Re:This is why not to use open source by danomac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good luck with that, considering more and more userspace applications have systemd as a hard dependency.

  15. Re:This is why not to use open source by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Got me a +4 insightful, why should I complain?

    I see it more as a symbiotic relationship.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.