Slashdot Mirror


'Apple's Refusal To Support Progressive Web Apps is a Detriment To Future of the Web' (medium.com)

From a blog post: Progressive Web Applications (PWAs) are one of the most exciting and innovative things happening in web development right now. PWAs enable you to use JavaScript to create a "Service Worker", which gives you all sorts of great features that you'd normally associate with native apps, like push notifications, offline support, and app loading screens -- but on the web! Awesome. Except for is one major problem -- While Google has embraced the technology and added support for it in Chrome for Android, Apple has abstained from adding support to mobile Safari. All they've done is say that it is "Under Consideration." Seemingly no discussion about it whatsoever.

25 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. DO NOT WANT!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    who the shit would want this?

    1. Re: DO NOT WANT!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nobody. Nobody wants anything "push". Everybody hates loading screens. If sw even have a splash screen, it is TOO SLOW.

      Ad people may want push, that drives this. Too bad for them, I turn js off.

  2. Loading screens. by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's 2017 and programs still have a "loading screen".

    Idiots, all of you.

    1. Re:Loading screens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, apple needs to support this kick ass new technology so that websites can have splash screens. It's the least they can do after they killed off flash, the previous kick ass technology enabling the awesomeness of splash pages!

    2. Re:Loading screens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Compare: modern application startup time on windows 10 (or 7 if you prefer) 4Ghz processor with SSD and DDR4 memory, vs similar application on windows 95 era pentium 133 with SDRAM and an IDE hard drive.

      How the fuck did we get here 2017?

    3. Re:Loading screens. by shmlco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do not want web apps to be "first class" citizens. We got rid of Flash precisely because of the security issues giving unknown apps system-level access entailed...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:Loading screens. by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fuck web apps as 'first class' citizens. If you want that level of control over the user's machine, then the user should have that level of control over access and use of the software. The last thing I'd want is a 'web app' having control of my system's layout/rendering layer.

      Currently, users understand web sites as ephemeral, as any services they provide can disappear at any time, and like users, developers see them as something they can change at any time. This is very different from conventional standalone programs, where users see them as something they have control over (and can thus trust more), and developers see them as for-pay version upgrades. Blurring this line is consumer hostile.

    5. Re:Loading screens. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah. Time to switch back to safari.

    6. Re:Loading screens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bad or lazy developers and designers adding more "features", relying on frameworks on top of frameworks, ignoring critical thinking and not culling what is not needed.

      That is how we got here.

      You can witness it firsthand year by year on the internet archive by looking at popular web pages. They start with handcrafted html that is byte-level sensitive. Then automated generators and css that add no functionality, on to plugins, php where it isn't needed, endless javascript. Now even the most basic websites need to load scripts from half a dozen domains and relies on layered frameworks. Not to mention the endless threat vectors this brings.

      Web pages that were once less that 1KB sans media are now over 10MB and have dozens of single points of failure with no discernible increase in usability or features. Even slashdot became this way.

      Go to slashdot.org, it tries to load from:
      fsdn.com
      pro-market.net
      slashdotmedia.com
      stacksocial.com
      janrain.com
      taboola.com
      truste.com
      multiple subdomains of cloudfront.net
      ml314.com
      rpxnow.com
      google-analytics.com
      crsspxl.com

      There are one or more scripts running from each, I don't know how many, I block them. Just to get slashdot to render properly 2,524 CSS rules must be loaded. Why is there a 123KB "app.css" file of 1204 rules that must load?

      What a mess. We ought to be following best-practices, saying "No" more often to marketing, vendors, pr, sales, and the army of people in IT that don't have the talent need to get the boot.

    7. Re:Loading screens. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jon Blow talks about this -- Why does it take Photoshop about 7 seconds to display your image on a modern computer???

      Jonathan Blow "Making Game Programming Less Terrible" Talk at Reboot Develop 2017

      > How the fuck did we get here 2017?

      Lazy programmers who don't giving a fuck about the user experience. i.e. Bloated C++ and OOP as opposed to DOD (Data Orientated Design.)

  3. Progressive Web Applications? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm more in favor of Conservative Web Applications.

    1. Re:Progressive Web Applications? by harperska · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about alt-web applications?

  4. Not a detriment by dogvomit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    which gives you all sorts of great features that you'd normally associate with native apps, like push notifications

    There you have it. Push notifications are not great features. They are evil, distracting, manipulating, crud that leads to more and more advertising.

    Let's hope Apple at least has the sense to contain this disaster.

    --
    Happy happy oh my friend

  5. Apple is in the right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google's test bed for developers might be ok to put this to play around with. But the real world USES are very little if any. These things are beyond fucking annoying. I've blocked every single request for a page or site to send me updates. It's not needed or wanted.

    I view this functionality as a gaping security hole and a resource hog. It's not needed. Who the fuck wants this other than the site owner to push more ads?

    1. Re:Apple is in the right by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... I've blocked every single request for a page or site to send me updates. It's not needed or wanted....

      It is wanted by someone --- the advertisers whose ads will ride piggy-back on every push notification you see.

  6. And who wants this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the fuck would I want a website to have push notifications? Or worker threads on my machine? Or use this shit to have even more ads? Or let it access more of my information?

    Sorry, but the web is insecure in large part because every asshole web developer thinks the default should be for us to enable everything so their crappy site can work -- which makes us vulnerable to malicious ads, viruses, and all sorts of shit.

    I will never trust a fucking web application the way I would a native application, because we have seen time and time again, the web isn't something you can trust.

    Boo goddamned fucking hoo ... your new web technology may not be something we want anyway.

    I let javascript run on a whitelist basis only. I'm sure as hell not letting arbitrary websites have even more access to my machine.

    Fuck you, fuck off.

    1. Re:And who wants this? by doconnor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My website does bus arrival predictions, so it would be useful to have notifications so I could tell the user when their bus is about to arrive.

      I block a lot of my apps from doing notifications, but there are still lots of situations where notifications are useful.

  7. PWA is a "Crock of Shit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can tell that the entire concept is bullshit just on how they are marketing it ... "Progressive Web App" -- who are you trying to fool? HTML5 was progressive, they didn't need to call it "PHTML" to sell us on it because it proved its own merrit.

    If you're trying to do something complicated that requires native binaries, but you're using Javascript instead, you're doing it wrong. Period.

    (And regular old javascript can run offline already ... PWA is utter nonsense.)

  8. Who would not want this? by clovis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this a way to bring back the features of IE6 and ActiveX controls, only now they can install themselves more easily?
    Who would not want this?

  9. PWM by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Progressive Web Malware

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  10. Nice by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A slashvertisement for push-marketing software that's also a marketing attack piece aimed at an industry holdout.

    Who voted for this dreck while in the firehose, or did it simply get "inserted"?

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  11. Conservative web applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm more in favor of Conservative Web Applications.

    If by "conservative" you mean limited in scope, efficient in their use of resources, and cautious in their assumptions - security and otherwise - then I'm right there with you.

  12. Don't need it by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Insightful
    like push notifications, offline support, and app loading screens

    Push notifications are evil. I have one iphone app that I turned them on for, then turned them off, and they still come through any way from time to time. Now I'm starting to see more and more websites that want to send them. I don't need offline support. Who does? And what are "app loading screens" and why do I supposedly need them? All this post has done is make me very grateful to Apple.

  13. Real Applications by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...which gives you all sorts of great features that you'd normally associate with native apps, like push notifications, offline support, and app loading screens -- but on the web! Awesome.

    Here we go again. Web devs trying to pretend they're making native apps. Folks, there are so many reasons why you would not want that. Native and web are two separate disciplines with two very different roles. You're screwdrivers not hammers. Quite trying to turn nails.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  14. Apple's Right to be Cautious by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounds to me like the latest exploit-vector.

    I DO NOT WANT "worker processes" being shoved onto my computer, regardless of Sandboxing.

    Just wait. There WILL be an exploit or hundred that use this.

    And I will sit back and laugh.