Slashdot Mirror


Solar-Eclipse Glasses On Amazon May Not Meet NASA's Safety Requirements (qz.com)

For those planning to watch the solar eclipse on August 21st, you're going to want to make sure you have some specialized, ultra-dark glasses to see safely, especially if you're not in the "path of totality." If you're on the hunt for said glasses, please be on the lookout to make sure you buy glasses that meet NASA's safety standards. Quartz is reporting that there are many "fly-by-night manufacturers looking to turn a quick profit by selling subpar and potentially dangerous goods to unsuspecting Americans." From the report: The first stop for most seeking a pair of eclipse glasses is likely to be Amazon, where there are literally thousands of listings for the devices, ranging in materials from cardboard to bronze. I, too, went on Amazon to scout out a pair. I picked more or less at random: I chose a cheap pack of 10 cardboard glasses with five different designs, at least two of which were not garishly jingoistic. About a week after I bought them, I had a thought: Maybe I should double-check to make sure they met safety standards set by the scientific community. Next stop: NASA. NASA, of course, has a website dedicated to the 2017 eclipse, and on it, they have a section dedicated to eclipse-viewing safety. The site says that eclipse-viewing glasses must meet a few basic criteria: Have ISO 12312-2 certification (that is, having been certified as passing a particular set of tests set forth by the International Organization of Standardization); Have the manufacturer's name and address printed somewhere on the product; Not be older than three years, or have scratched or wrinkled lenses.

82 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Welding helmet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Works well.

    1. Re:Welding helmet by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      I do the same thing; it's designed to protect against the exact same thing (light emitted by a hot plasma, containing blinding amounts of UV and excessive visible and IR). The main downside is it makes you look like a weirdo when you're standing around in public looking at the sun with a welding helmet on ;)

      I guess if you want to go hardcore, you could have the welder with you and act like you're trying to weld the sun. Then people will stop seeing you as a weirdo and just think that you're high instead. ;)

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    2. Re:Welding helmet by l20502 · · Score: 2

      Just use the spare glass instead of the full mask

    3. Re:Welding helmet by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      and don;t forget to have a jacket handy, the temperature does drop a bit when the sun is blocked

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    4. Re:Welding helmet by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Be sure to use a lens for _arc_ welding not gas welding.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  2. Floppy by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 1

    Easy!

    Just use the Disk inside a regular 5 1/4 Floppy .

    If you don't have one handy, use a 8" one instead.

    1. Re:Floppy by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The first solar eclipse I remember seeing, there were no solar eclipse glasses.
      The newspapers told us to soot a piece glass with a kerosene lamp.

    2. Re:Floppy by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do not do either of these.

      A floppy disk has only marginal IR protection, and blurs the image heavily.

      Soot works if you deposit it at the right thickness, but it's easy to get the thickness wrong, and the slightest smudge can eliminate your protection; the coating is very fragile.

      A common third trick is looking through CDs. Which can work, if you pick the right one, but their transparency varies dramatically, so there's no guarantee that an arbitrary one will offer sufficient protection. If you're willing to risk your eyes with an improvised filter, a CD should be good if you can barely see an incandescent bulb through it.

      Photography filters and photographic film should never be used for looking at the sun. They don't block nearly enough IR.

      More info about various homemade and professional filters tested here.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    3. Re:Floppy by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Well, I have watched a moon eclipse with my regular sun glasses and my eyes feel just fine so, I assume I will be fine watching the sun eclipse with my regular sun glasses.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    4. Re:Floppy by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My first solar eclipse I watched in a pail of water. The reflection.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  3. sounds like a racket though. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    look, you could buy a pre certified glass, put it on some cardboard and not meet the requirements. it might pass the safety requirements though as a device, if it was put into them, but the short blurb makes it like they wouldn't.

    besides than that what you will find is ISO 12312-2 "compliant".
    oh the days of just using smoked glass.

    the device might pass the safety checks - it just doesnt have the paperwork... that doesnt mean that it will make you blind.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re: sounds like a racket though. by VendettaMF · · Score: 2

      And you're willing to bet your eyesight on a random eBay seller's word that it "would" pass the tests and is totally safe?

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    2. Re: sounds like a racket though. by VendettaMF · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looking at the sun hurts. People glance and look away.

      Looking at the sun through a bad filter that does not block UV does not hurt. People look and keep on looking. Then days, weeks or months later they find they have huge blind spots in their vision which spread outward over time and far to often are permanent.

      Please, be careful with your incomplete advice.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    3. Re: sounds like a racket though. by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      It's dangerous to look at the sun directly when it's almost eclipsed, because the overall brightness is low enough to not trigger a blink reflex.

      https://www.space.com/37199-so...

    4. Re: sounds like a racket though. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think the main purpose of the glasses is that they darken the sun enough to let you focus on it.
      Sure, people glance at the sun, but they definitely don't focus on it for any length of time. Instinct makes you look away very quickly.

      Anyhow, I don't see the point in watching the sun during a solar eclipse. You can create one every day with a piece of black cardboard and a skylight.
      To me, the interesting parts of a solar eclipse are the unique colors landscapes are washed in, and how flora and fauna reacts during the eclipse. But the sun itself is there every day, and can be eclipsed every day. It's by far the least interesting part.

    5. Re: sounds like a racket though. by Bartles · · Score: 1

      People don't blink when they look at the full sun either. An eclipse is dangerous because the darkness dilates the pupils and allows the viewer to look at the normally bright, but reduced output, eclipsed sun without any natural response of the iris.

    6. Re: sounds like a racket though. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      No, you really can eclipse the sun every day. Not with the moon, but a piece of something opaque cut to the right size and a skylight.

    7. Re: sounds like a racket though. by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Well then, it's a good thing that the moon shields the earth from most of the UV radiation emitted by the sun during a solar eclipse.

    8. Re: sounds like a racket though. by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are still far lower than they would be from an unobstructed sun.

  4. Shade 14 welding glass by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

    I consider my eyesight to be valuable, so the only direct viewing of the eclipse I'll be doing is through a piece of shade 14 welding glass.

    1. Re:Shade 14 welding glass by Sneftel · · Score: 4, Funny

      According to Revlon, it's mauve. Seems like a poor choice; it's not even after labor day.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    2. Re: Shade 14 welding glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe it's maybelline you insensitive clod.

    3. Re: Shade 14 welding glass by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      This comment deserves more attention and modding.

  5. Welding Glasses to watch Eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hope people are careful. It is very easy to damage one's eyes looking directly at the eclipse, or thru inferior filters. Check this link out for proper protection.

    https://www.space.com/36941-solar-eclipse-eye-protection-guide.html

    Welding glass filters may work - but one needs to get the right shade. "Only goggles made for electric arc welding can be used to observe the sun, and they must have a shade scale number of 12 or higher. Shade 13 is ideal for solar viewing, but that shade is typically not sold in stores, Fienberg added."

    1. Re:Welding Glasses to watch Eclipse by damonlab · · Score: 1

      I purchased the American Paper Optics glasses that seem to be recommended on nasa.com and space.com articles. They were $16 for a 10 pack.

  6. Re:Nanny state socialism by Teun · · Score: 1

    Yes, the state has an obligation.
    Some of these glasses might even be criminally deficient and law enforcement needs to act.
    But that would be after the fact, damage was already done, therefore a caring society has a government that sets and enforces safety standards.
    If not, Obamacare will make you pick up part of the bill :)

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  7. from an amateur astronomer... by 4im · · Score: 4, Informative

    You only have one set of eyes, don't be foolish about this.

    Chances are that non-certified stuff has deficiencies in UV/IR filtering, so while you may be able to look into the sun for much longer than usual, your eyes still may get an unhealthy dose of radiation. No protection at all will at least have you turn away in time (unless you're foolish enough to look at the sun through an unprotected telescope, binoculars or tele lens).

    As an amateur astronomer, I use Baader visual solar filter film, adapted to my different scopes and lenses. An A4 sheet (you could make a load of sunglasses from this) comes at 25EUR, which is very cheap compared to other options for observing the sun. Most of all, it's safe!

    1. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by sheramil · · Score: 1

      You only have one set of eyes, don't be foolish about this.

      Agreed. Although... we do have two... "do not look into laser with remaining eye" etc.

    2. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      An A4 sheet (you could make a load of sunglasses from this) comes at 25EUR, which is very cheap compared to other options for observing the sun

      A few years ago, when we had a local partial eclipse, many of the shops around town were giving away free eclipse glasses. That's a lot cheaper than 25EUR.

    3. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Were they buying them bulk off Amazon

      Probably not, as they had store advertising on them.

    4. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I second the Baader Solar Film. You can get sheets relatively inexpensively and as the OP said, an A4 sheet is enough to make several lens adapters as well as multiple pairs of sunglasses/viewers. It's used and has been used extensively in the amateur astronomy community for quite some time so is very well regarded and safe.

      --
      ~X~
    5. Re: from an amateur astronomer... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Doesn't like 90% less uv and ir radiation strike the earth during a full solar eclipse?

    6. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by Solandri · · Score: 2
      From TFA:

      To date five manufacturers have certified that their eclipse glasses and handheld solar viewers meet the ISO 12312-2 international standard for such products: American Paper Optics, Baader Planetarium (AstroSolar Silver/Gold film only), Rainbow Symphony, Thousand Oaks Optical, and TSE 17

      I'm leading a party of 20 family and friends, and I bought mine from Rainbow Symphony a year ago. I thought of making my own with a sheet like yours, cardboard, and glue, but the pre-made glasses were about 75 cents each in bulk (again, this was a year ago) so I just bought them. My camera and telescope have Baader solar film filters (over the front).

      At this late stage in the game though, I wouldn't be surprised if some Chinese company were making substandard knockoffs with fake printing claiming to have been manufactured by one of these companies, to try to make money with no concern about the eyesight of a few Americans. No way in hell I would trust anything sold on eBay, and even stuff shipped from Amazon is suspect (they mix their inventory with those of third party sellers). Use the pinhole projection method other posts have described.

    7. Re:from an amateur astronomer... by rnturn · · Score: 1

      As a kid, I had a Gilbert reflector telescope with a solar viewing attachment that replaced the eyepiece, It was a conical assembly that had a thin sheet of white plastic over the end that the mirrors would projected the sun onto. You could safely see sunspots and, once, a partial eclipse. Sort of wish I still had it.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  8. Basic planning and preparation... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyone buying eye protection from random amazon sellers at this late stage doesn't really deserve to have eyes.

    Sadly all reliable sources of actual good gear (Thousand Oaks; if it's good quality solar film without their logo on it then it was bought from them and rebadged) have notices on their sites that essentially come down to "too late now".

    Good times ahead for the American eye-care industry.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:Basic planning and preparation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the parent comment, VendettaMF argues that people who do not adequately vet their suppliers, deserve to be blinded. Yikes.

    2. Re:Basic planning and preparation... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Good times ahead for the American eye-care industry.

      Not really. If you have a damaged retina from excess sunlight, there's nothing that can be done, except waiting and hoping it recovers.

    3. Re: Basic planning and preparation... by VendettaMF · · Score: 2

      It's the kids whose parents are careless that I fear for. Any adult who purchases safety gear for something this vital from sunny_eyeseller69 on amazon/eBay or from a roadside vendor kinda has it coming.

      I'd give the ones buying offline slightly more sympathy. The first group are proven to have Internet access.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    4. Re: Basic planning and preparation... by cogeek · · Score: 1

      Think of the children! We need laws and fines and prison time! Senate hearings, 5 new government agencies for oversight, anything to avoid any personal responsibility!

    5. Re: Basic planning and preparation... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Troll declines to (or is incapable of) distinguishing between punishment and consequences.

      Yawn.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  9. Re:Anti-liberty nanny state! by thsths · · Score: 1

    And of course every proper American will accept this responsibility and have their glasses tested scientifically (instead of the government just testing a sample). Seems reasonable to me.

  10. or just make your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://hilaroad.com/camp/proje...

    Just like we did in grade school in February of 1979.

  11. Jingoistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Garishly jingoistic? Oh my a God, they had American flag patterns on them? That must have been so hard to experience. Twerp.

  12. Use Number 14 welding glass by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes a piece of welding glass works great but make sure you use at least a #14 glass per NASA recommendations. This is widely available through welding supply companies. Not all welding eye protection is adequate for looking at the Sun.

  13. The only safe way by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    No form of looking through something at the sun is safe, so always use projection.

    Rummage through your pile of Amazon boxes for a long skinny one. Cut a hole in the center of one end, and then tape a piece of aluminum foil over the hole to cover it completely. Make the smallest possible pinhole in the foil, to project the sun onto the other end of the carton. Cut a sheet of white paper to fit flat inside the end where the image is projected.

    On eclipse day, all you need to do is go for beer and select a virgin for sacrifice.

    1. Re:The only safe way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On eclipse day, all you need to do is go for beer and select a virgin for sacrifice.

      Can you just sacrifice her virginity or does it have to be the whole virgin?

    2. Re:The only safe way by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Good point. I would also guess that metallic pinhole glasses would be relatively safe, as the hard barrier blocks all frequencies equally. (As others have pointed out, the main issue with cheap glasses is filtering visible light while letting IR/UV through.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re: The only safe way by Bartles · · Score: 1

      That's way overkill for a pinhole viewer. I just use my fingers.

  14. Other vital Eclipse advice... by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Informative

    And for anyone using telescopes, binoculars or slr cameras...

    Set a loud damn alarm for ten seconds before the end of totality, and do not leave unfiltered devices on tripods pointed at the sun. At best you'll wreck your camera. At worst some idiot kids (or adult) will try to sneak a peek.

    I've seen the eyepiece cover of a Celestron kids telescope melt fully into the eyepiece itself on a scope left mounted after totality in China 2009.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:Other vital Eclipse advice... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt it, but if so it certainly had nothing to do with the eclipse. The moon would have protected the telescope from more extensive damage caused by the full output of the sun. Pointing a telescope at a non-eclipsed sun on any other day, is far more damaging than pointing it at an eclipsed sun where the moon is shielding the telescope from ~95% of the light.

    2. Re:Other vital Eclipse advice... by rnturn · · Score: 1

      I remember hearing those sort of warnings back in the days of curtain shutters in SLRs. Many, like the one in my FTb, were made out of rubberized fabric (lighter than metal and capable of faster shutter speeds) and pointing it at the sun for even brief periods without the lens cap on could burn nice little holes in the curtain.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re: Other vital Eclipse advice... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Think in terms of where the light is being focused...

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    4. Re: Other vital Eclipse advice... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      In the same place place it would be in full sunlight, only it would be quite a bit less.

    5. Re: Other vital Eclipse advice... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      This was a telescope that had been used to look at the corona during the Eclipse totality. Immediately after totality it was left pointed at the sun. During totality no filter was used as you'd expect. A cap was put on the eyepiece to prevent anyone looking at unfiltered sunlight. Said cap was melted by the focused sunlight as the coverage waned.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    6. Re: Other vital Eclipse advice... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Normally in full sunlight there would be solar film on the "front" of the telescope. There was no such film in this case because it had been used for viewing during totality.

      I'm not sure how much simpler I can make this for you.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  15. The Strain by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Does this news make anyone else nervous?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  16. Use #14 welding glass by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Welding glass filters may work - but one needs to get the right shade. "Only goggles made for electric arc welding can be used to observe the sun, and they must have a shade scale number of 12 or higher. Shade 13 is ideal for solar viewing, but that shade is typically not sold in stores, Fienberg added."

    NASA recommends #14 welding glass.

    1. Re:Use #14 welding glass by cogeek · · Score: 1

      I think the guys at space.com are probably a more reliable source than anyone at NASA. Not like NASA has any rocket scientists left to get this sort of information from. =-)

    2. Re:Use #14 welding glass by PPH · · Score: 1

      I just wear sunglasses under a #12 welding helmet.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Is there anywhere to check ISO 12312-2 validation? by gman003 · · Score: 2

    I bought a pack of glasses off Amazon. Not the cheapest ones, I figured the plastic-framed ones would be less likely to be fakes than the cardboard ones, and of course I made sure it at least claims to be ISO 12312-2 tested and compliant. But it was still a somewhat shady dealer, and anyone can print the words "ISO 12312-2" on the packaging.

    I would think there would be a site to check that something claiming ISO certification actually was tested against it, but I've not been able to find one. Does anyone know of a way to confirm?

  18. BE SAFE! Use a pinhole projector by hillbluffer · · Score: 2

    The SAFEST way to view the eclipse is INDIRECTLY, not looking directly at the sun.
    Instructions:
    https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/s...
    https://www.timeanddate.com/ec...

    1. Re:BE SAFE! Use a pinhole projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. Cardboard box viewers make the image of the sun easier to see, because your eyes are in the dark box. But if you don't want to make a cardboard box viewer, you can do this: Cut a piece of aluminum foil (or thick paper), about 5 by 5 inches. Using a needle or a pin, punch a hole in the aluminum foil. Then grab the foil and a piece of white paper (maybe a sheet of computer paper), and go outside. Hold the foil a few inches over the white paper. The crescent will be projected onto the paper.

      If you want to impress your kids, punch lots of holes, of varying diameters, into the foil. Then instead of projecting the "sun crescents" onto the paper, project them onto the sidewalk where your kids can see them. They will say, "Ooh, cool!"

    2. Re:BE SAFE! Use a pinhole projector by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Yep. It doesn't actually take much to do a "pinhole". One eclipse, I only noticed because a tree's shadow was casting hundreds of crescent images, where the sun filtered through the leaves. I looked at that, thought, "That's funny," and then realized there had to be an eclipse going on. I went inside, and one of our blinds was down, but the row of sunlight dots coming through the edge also projected crescents on the far wall.

      Another time, someone brought out a colander. It was built with a hundred circular holes arranged in a star shape. When used as a projector, you got hundreds of sun crescents making a star pattern on the ground, which was really neat.

      You can also just make a grid out of your fingers, and get multiple pinholes at once, though it's harder to hold than a piece of paper, probably.

  19. Re:Nanny state socialism by Wootery · · Score: 1

    Talking this way is why people think libertarians are crazy.

  20. Camera requirements by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Boy, can you imagine the number of dead/damaged smartphones on the 22nd of August, after people point their phones at the sun? You know there will be those that do it. I've got an ISO 12312-2 filter for my dSLR all ready to go. It amazes me the stupidity of some "oh, I'll just wear dark glasses".

    1. Re:Camera requirements by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about getting one of these sheets of solar filter for my dSLR and making a pipe fitting like the top rated review shows. Looks like it should hopefully be dark enough since they use it for certified viewers too.
      I might save a bit of this sheet for my smartphone camera, though - but there'd be no safe way to look at the screen to see if I aimed that camera correctly since the shades would be too dark to see the screen with.

    2. Re: Camera requirements by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      I use cokin filter adapter rings (not the filter holder, just the adapter ring) and just glue a circle of the filter sheet to the flat front of the ring.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    3. Re: Camera requirements by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for a quick change, because I want to take the filter off at totality and I won't have long.

    4. Re: Camera requirements by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. I'll be switching lenses in full (12 seconds to be back in focus on my last practise run) as I want to be closer pre totality and a bit further out during totality itself.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  21. Pinhole camera by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I always recommend a pinhole camera. Zero cost from stuff you already have lying around. Zero chance of frying your eyes since you are looking at a screen with the sun at your back.

    Me? I'll flip a coin between my Coronado PST and a small travel scope with a Baader mylar filter. Cherry red or a faint bluish tinge...

    ...laura

  22. A cheap, easy and safe solar viewer by Slugster · · Score: 1

    Here is another way that not a lot of people seem to know of:
    1. Go buy a small convex round rear-view mirror at any auto parts or department store. (This is the kind of round mirrors that bulge out in the center, and ANY size will work--even the little 2-inch across ones)
    2. To view the sun, on a clear day stand near a building where the building's wall is in the shade of the roof overhang.
    3. When you hold the round mirror at a 45-degree angle, you will see a round spot of light projected onto the shaded wall. Any activity on the sun such as sunspots (or eclipses) will be easily visible as dark spots on it.

    There might be spots caused by dirt on the mirror, but if you rotate the mirror, the dirt-spots will rotate also. The sun spots will stay in the same place.
    The farther you stand from the wall, the larger the reflected image is, but the fainter it is also...
    This is a nice kids' group experiment to do as it appears BIG on the wall and doesn't involve anybody looking straight at the sun at all.

  23. Alternatives to a Welding helmet by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    4 bucks at Northern tool for just the glass, 4 bucks for welding goggles at Harbor Freight or 5 bucks for a flimsy paper pair of glasses. Going with the welding goggles.

    And can re-use them later as a Steampunk Costume Prop. . .

    1. Re:Alternatives to a Welding helmet by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      If you go with the welding goggles, you'll be sorry. They're not designed for that bright of light. For gas welding, they're great. Use them all the time. They're better than sun glasses, not good enough for the job of looking at the eclipse.

      Protect your sight. Always use safety glasses, always use the proper filters. Once your sight is gone, it's gone.

  24. After reading all these comments... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    ...could someone please tell me at what point during a solar eclipse more light reaches the viewer and the light intensity increases compared to any other day when the sun is not eclipsed? Just checking because a lot of these comments lack a basic understanding of what's happening during a solar eclipse.

    1. Re:After reading all these comments... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      If more light is reaching the viewer just before and after totality, why is it so dark outside relative to a normal sun?

    2. Re: After reading all these comments... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      More light is reaching the viewer's retinas because THEY ARE LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SUN in a manner not generally done in everyday non-eclipse situations.

      In the case of telescope and (SLR) camera users almost all the light that hits the front lens (much much larger than your eyeball) is being concentrated down into the smaller area of your retina.

      Neither of these concepts should be difficult to understand.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    3. Re:After reading all these comments... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      The problem arises just before and after totality, where the intensity of VISIBLE light is very low (so your eyeballs go wide open trying to collect more light), but the intensity of UV, X-Ray, and other heliospheric emissions is still about normal.

      It's a lot easier to cook your retinas when your lenses are wide open in the dark while you're staring into a huge UV/X-Ray generator.

  25. Projection, or welding glasses #14 by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Don't bother with the expensive solar filters, unless you already have them, from a reputable source.

    Use welding glasses, but they have to be #14, not anything less.

    The other way is to use projection. A small binocular is enough. Tie it to a tripod, and cover one side. Tilt it so it projects an image on a white piece of cardboard, then look at the cardboard with your back to the sun. This is safe. I did it for the Mercury transit last year.

  26. We'll be going old-school... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... with a large cardboard box, a piece of white paper taped on the inside, and a sheet of aluminum foil taped over a hole across from the paper with a tiny hole poked in it. Essentially, a pinhole camera. There's really no need to be looking directly at the sun. Through anything. Dear $DIETY, I can't think of any reason to trust something bought on Amazon to use for viewing the sun. I'm expecting, though, to hear about numerous people with destroyed retinas on the news the day after the eclipse.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  27. Re: floppy disks and cds by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Do NOT do this. There is (near as makes no difference) zero UV protection from old floppy disk interiors, unless you leave them in their covers and don't open the metal flap.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  28. And in other news ... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Solar-Eclipse Glasses On Amazon Might Meet NASA's Safety Requirements

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  29. No freedom for informatrion... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Just a related kvetch. The concept of laws that mandate standards you have to pay to see is something I've long found irritating. Why should there be a legally mandated "standard" that is kept a secret behind a pay wall?
    You can't find out what the testing requirements are for a filter to view the eclipse without paying to look at the standard...

    https://www.iso.org/standard/59289.html

    --
    NRRPT/RCT