Slashdot Mirror


Apple Pulls Anti-Censorship Apps from China's App Store (fortune.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Fortune:Services helping Chinese users circumvent the "Great Firewall of China" have been pulled from Apple's Chinese App Store en masse. On Saturday morning, at least some software makers affected by the sweep received notification from Apple that their tools were removed for violating Chinese law. Internet censorship in China restricts communications about topics including democracy, Tibetan freedom, and the 1989 Tienanmen Square protests. The culling primarily seems to have affected virtual private networks, or VPNs, which mask users' Internet activity and data from outside monitoring. According to a report by the New York Times, many of the most popular such apps are now missing from the Chinese App Store.

108 comments

  1. Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is the Apple way. Whether hiding taxes or helping repressive regimes, whatever Apple needs to boost profits, Apple will do. And Google, too. And Microsoft. And...

    1. Re:Money before ethics by bjwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Take a look at how much of that useless crap you own is made in China. A good portion of the U.S. economy -- your paycheck included -- goes to that repressive regime.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    2. Re:Money before ethics by myid · · Score: 1

      Take a look at how much of that useless crap you own is made in China. A good portion of the U.S. economy -- your paycheck included -- goes to that repressive regime.

      I try hard not to buy stuff that's mad in China. If I can find a brand that's made in another country (preferably the US), I'll get that brand, even if I have to pay more for it.

    3. Re:Money before ethics by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's actually a non-sequitur but you offer it as if it were a proper response to the point the grandparent post made. That's no justification for Apple's choices. Be it employing Foxconn, a firm with worker labor standards so low they installed suicide nets on the building outer wall after a spate of worker suicides came to public attention, or Pegatron which seemed to have lower standards than Foxconn, forbidding recycling extractable & usable spare parts from old computers, freeing the source code to systems they're not distributing anymore such as the Newton (distributing non-free code is bad as well), setting up devices to be bricked if non-authorized repair workers work on the device like they do with the iPhone 7, campaigning against right-to-repair laws, practicing censorship, spying on users, or pioneering tax avoidance techniques, there are lots of good reasons to not do business with Apple.

    4. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple percent goes to China - about $350 billion. That's a lot of money, but coming from a $15 trillion economy, it isn't all that much.

      Apple's earning from China are proportionally little, yet to protect them Apple gladly (and quietly) climbs into China's bed.
      If they're that easy to cow when just a few percent of their income is threatened, what are they doing to stay on the good side of the US Federal government?

    5. Re:Money before ethics by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A good portion of the U.S. economy -- your paycheck included -- goes to that repressive regime.

      Not me! I work at the dollar store!

      (seriously, a lot of stuff at the dollar stores is NOT made in China)

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Money before ethics by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Check out how things have actually gotten better for the 20% of the human race who lives under that repressive regime, thanks to americans buying their stuff. Would you rather they starve, or repeat the cultural revolution? Torture 20% of humanity in order to make a political point?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    7. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Weird, the rest of us outside of the USA see the USA as being equally repressive.

      You have the highest prison population per capita in the world, and many of the prisons are forced labour institutions.

      You have elected a sexual predator to be president, and go look at how corrupt he is, how many tens of millions of dollars he funnels into his own bank account by staying in his own properties, yes you stupid tax payers pay Trump for all those bodyguards etc etc etc to stay there. Of course he does not like the Whitehouse, he makes no money from it.

      You spy illegally on your own population, and on others.Boo Hoo, the Chinese are spying on you, well WTF do you think you are doing to every other country on the planet. Yes, every country has the right to treat the US the same as the US treats them.

      You have invaded more countries than any other nation, causing millions of deaths

      You are NOT the freest nation on earth
      You are NOT the country with the greatest freedom of speech
      You are NOT the country with the greatest freedom of the press
      You are NOT the country with the best education, or health, or welfare in the world
      You are NOT the leader of the free world
      You are NOT the reason why Germany lost WWII, Russia did far more than the USA
      You are NOT the most moral country, the US will arm terrorists groups if it suits them. Boston was the greatest source of weapons and money for the IRA for a start.

      And the rest of the world is finding that Trade with China is actually easier and more beneficial than trade with the USA.

      Close your boarders, put up your walls, remember every time you chant USA First, the other 96% of the worlds population says "USA last".

    8. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft, HP, Dell, Samsung, Motorola, Cisco, Sharp, etc etc etc etc etc etc are all customers of Foxxcon.

      Notice how Apple is the ONLY company that gets external auditors in and how they cancel contracts when abuse is found.

      Did you hear also the suicide rate at the factories is less than half the national average

      Or how about the pay they get is also much higher than average.

      And how everything you stated applies to most US corporations.

      But don't let the truth (vs alternative facts) hit you on the but on your way out.

      And I note that Trump has failed to bring back any jobs to the USA from the companies in China etc who make the crap for his golf courses and hotels. He's certainly not willing to put his money where his mouth is. But in the mean time, by staying at his properties all the time he gets to rake in tens of millions in payment for all his entourage to stay there.... cash straight from the tax payer into Trumps back pocket.

    9. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFLMAO "thanks to Americans".... you do know the rest of the world (i.e. the 96% of the population who are NOT american) also Trade with China.
      Its actually easier to Trade with China than the USA, especially when it comes to food stuffs, the US pays huge chunks of tax payers money to farmers due to lobbyists efforts, never mind all the artificial barriers to trade the US has set up.

    10. Re: Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a quick question: who's propaganda are you repeating?

    11. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, the rest of us outside of the USA see the USA as being equally repressive.

      Well, it's good to hear that all the world's idiots aren't in the USA.

    12. Re: Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points I would mod you up. The US is a nation founded on the back of violence, the murderous forced removal of natives from their lands and black slavery. They have zero moral high ground.

    13. Re: Money before ethics by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I thought you said you try not to buy from oppressive regimes. USA is oppressive too.

      Yeah but we turned it into an Olympics.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    14. Re:Money before ethics by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      (seriously, a lot of stuff at the dollar stores is NOT made in China)

      which dollar store? I don't think I've ever seen anything at dollar tree which wasn't made in china, except the occasional pullback that they stock instead of letting it go to grocery outlet. I stopped shopping there eventually (some years ago) as everything stinks, literally. It's all cheap, nasty, rapidly offgassing plastic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re: Money before ethics by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Clearly not the redneck propaganda.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple sure pays a lot for its propaganda

    17. Re:Money before ethics by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      It's Dollarama, in Canada.

      I agree, some aisles do stink of offgassing plastic/etc but most of the food comes from Canada, U.S.A., europe, etc. I'd say only about 25~33% of the non-plastic items come from somewhere else than China. But even for the plastic items, a lot come from Canada and the U.S.A.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    18. Re: Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And what's the history of your third world banana republic?

      Get back to us when you live in an angelic country with no history of anything bad.

      Good luck with that.

    19. Re:Money before ethics by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's Dollarama, in Canada.

      Well, I find the whole subject distasteful at best, but I bet if you do the math there are virtually zero of those stores compared to the mass of dollar tree and dollar general stores. Ugh, okay, I'll fucking look. And a-yup. There's over twenty times as many dollar tree and dollar general stores (put together) as dollarama stores. Virtually all dollar store stuff is from China.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now take your pills, Richard. You're going to get yourself all worked up again and not able to go beddy-bye on time tonight.

    21. Re:Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about china is making golf courses in America?

    22. Re: Money before ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to find a "redneck" who can't debate better than your 100% ad hominem.

      "So grease up your baby for the ball on the hill..."
      --Monster Magnet

    23. Re: Money before ethics by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    24. Re:Money before ethics by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Far be it from me to defend the US, but you know what the biggest difference between the US and China is? In the US, you're allowed to say what you just said. Try saying something like that about China, in China. Dumbass.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  2. I'm gonna pull something out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, my DAMN balls, and you nerds can suck on them

    1. Re:I'm gonna pull something out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you actually go to the trouble of posting this in every article? Jesus. What a sad cunt. It isn't even funny, or annoying. Just 100% meh, as I expect you yourself are.

  3. Think different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, they're only chinamen. Thanks Apple.

    Oh, are you taking pre-orders for iPhone 8? Can hardly wait!

  4. Material support for a hostile foreign government by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but doesn't the U.S. have laws that make it illegal to comply with demands like that? If not, why not?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. How the universe doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Psalms 115:15, “Ye are blessed of the LORD which made heaven and earth.”

    Look at our amazing sun, dwarfed in comparison to the size of other stars. The Science Channel has been airing a very popular DISCOVERY mini-series of programs called, “HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS!” I've watched the series, including the expanded edition, and it's some of the most Godless, offense, unscholarly and retarded speculation I've ever heard and seen in my life! They ought to rename the series to “HOW THE UNIVERSE DOESN'T WORK!”

    How the Universe Works is a mini-series that originally aired on the Discovery Channel April 25, 2010 to May 24, 2010. The first season was narrated by Mike Rowe and the second by Erik Todd Dellums. It was released on Blu-ray on February 28, 2012. The second season of the show moved to The Science Channel, consisting of 8 episodes. The second season aired between July 11, 2012 and August 29, 2012.

    SOURCE: How the Universe Works - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Our text verse from Psalms 115:15 from the Word of God proclaims that the Lord God made heaven and earth. In the picture above of our sun to the left, and Arcturus (mentioned in Job 9:9; 38:32) and VY Canis Majoris (the gigantic star to the right), VY Canis Majoris is 1,000,000,000 times bigger than our earth's sun. Scientists had never really viewed the magnificence of the stars until 2004 when the Spitzer space telescope was launched into space. It uses infrared to detect heat, finding discoveries that were previously impossible. One astronomer said, “All you need to make a star is hydrogen, gravity and time.” How arrogant, lame and unscholarly!

    Only God can create a star! Genesis 1:16, “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” I love that... “HE MADE THE STARS ALSO”!!! Evolutionists and secular astronomers are idiots. They sound like total ignoramuses... “Oh yeah, making a star, no problem, you just take some hydrogen, gravity and time and Walla, presto magic... A STAR IS BORN! Only an idiot believes that stars formed that way! Where did the gravity come from? I feel sick when I listen to arrogant atheistic fools make such bold claims about HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS, as if they know exactly what happened (they don't have a clue), when their best guess is that it all came from nothing by chance!

    In sharp contrast, the Bible teaches that NOTHING in creation happened by chance. Isaiah 45:18, “For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else.” Isn't that beautiful? I am so thankful that God didn't leave us at the mercy of fool-headed reprobate university-trained liberals, scientists, evolutionists and astronomers who think the incredibly orderly, intelligent and brilliant universe all evolved by chance from a chaotic Big Bang.

    They believe two rocks collided in space to form the earth and moon, somehow becoming rounded. So how did all the other planets in our solar system form and settle in their respective orbits? Did they all come from rocks colliding? How insane! Life, they say, started with cosmic dust striking the earth, which somehow formed water, somehow created life, somehow evolved into thousands of different species, somehow produced intelligent humans with spirits (but animals that do not), and they cannot account for the sin-nature or the desire to worship God in mankind's very being. This all happened by luck, chance and being in the right place at the right time? Seriously?

    1. Re:How the universe doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genesis 1:1 proclaims that God created the universe. To deny creation by God is to deny the Bible.

      Some of us, however, are Old Earth Creationists.

      "O, Almighty God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee!"
      --Johannes Kepler

    2. Re: How the universe doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cool story, bro

  6. Causality... or Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their logo is an apple with a bite out of it.

    Bad things resulting shouldn't really be that much of a surprise.

    1. Re:Causality... or Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an apple? Who knew.

      I thought it was a bite out of a chinaman's ass.

    2. Re:Causality... or Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really more of an advanced Gnostic class.

  7. They know who their master is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple just knows where their bread is buttered. If they piss off China, they might actually have to pay a company in the US or Europe to make their devices.

    It is a two way street though. What prevents Apple from selling all the 24/7 location data they slurp up from iOS devices and handing it over to China?

    1. Re:They know who their master is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing prevents them. apple probably does this all ready.

    2. Re: They know who their master is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to firewall logs, they don't.

  8. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We aren't at war with China, obviously. So how, exactly, would imposing the wartime rules you're thinking about work?

    When you're in a country - your own, or someone else's - you are expected to obey their laws. If you choose to disobey them for any reason, you should do so knowing that the country will probably punish you if they catch you.

    Seriously - how would it go over if the US arbitrarily said "other countries' laws do not apply to our citizens"?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. There can only be peace when one side surrenders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You either submit, or fight. There is no in between.

  10. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    doesn't the U.S. have laws that make it illegal to comply with demands like that? If not, why not?

    Because it would be bad for big business.

  11. IOS and now iOS by seoras · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The original "great firewall" was built by Cisco for the Chinese government who then rewarded Cisco by setting up Huawei to compete directly against them.
    It's all down to money, if you want to sell in that country you have to abide by their laws.
    The Five Eyes are putting visible pressure on their governments to crack open encryption and provide back doors.
    That'll be the real test for Apple, will they stand up to FVEY & it's governments or will they buckle?
     

    1. Re:IOS and now iOS by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's all down to money, if you want to sell in that country you have to abide by their laws.

      And that's the way it is in most countries.

      But more to the point, when the general consensus even here at Slashdot is that the primary duty of any shareholder owned company is to maximize profits, should this be any surprise?

      As long as corporate law does not define some non-abstract requirement to be beneficial to society - and what does that mean, anyway? To me one thing, to the Chinese, another - than what is done with one's products is of no consequence.

      Zyklon B, anyone?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But more to the point, when the general consensus even here at Slashdot is that the primary duty of any shareholder owned company is to maximize profits, should this be any surprise?

      That is a lie.

    3. Re:IOS and now iOS by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      But more to the point, when the general consensus even here at Slashdot is that the primary duty of any shareholder owned company is to maximize profits, should this be any surprise?

      That is a lie.

      Perhaps, but it's often pontificated here in exactly that way.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lie, oft repeated, is still a lie.

      Fiduciary duty does not mean, profits above all else.

    5. Re:IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...That'll be the real test for Apple, will they stand up to FVEY & it's governments or will they buckle?

      I can say without reservation that if Apple thinks they can make even one single dollar more, they will throw yours, mine, and anybody's ass to whatever government asks for it.

    6. Re:IOS and now iOS by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Fiduciary duty does not mean, profits above all else.

      Nice platitude, but in all practicality, here in the US and quite often elsewhere - ... cough...Volkswagon...cough... - it DOES mean profits above all else.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10000000 times this.

    8. Re: IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Apple is full of shit because they clearly caved to the Chinese government. How else would they be allowed to succeed in China?

    9. Re:IOS and now iOS by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Zyklon B, anyone?

      Zyklon B is small potatoes in this context. Try slave labor used by some German corporations during WWII.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    10. Re:IOS and now iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC, but I'd think the most important part here also is that the courts pretty much define 'fiduciary duty' in the context of businesses with shareholders to mean 'profits above all else.' It's not quite as simple as that, yes, but that is the gist of how the courts define it as currently in this particular context & sufficiently close that deviations would require consulting lawyers to determine if you could successfully argue that your sacrifice of present profits does not in fact constitute abandoning your fiduciary duty.

      If you want to blame anybody for this situation, how about the shareholders who brought the lawsuit that got us here? If the decision they were complaining about was bad, then I would hope there would be reasons they could give for it other than 'our dividend check was not as big as it could have been.'

  12. Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  13. Manufacture and invest elsewhere by myid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad Tim Cook is trying to protect the environment, and that he's trying to avoid using conflict minerals. But I wish he'd stop making things in China, as long as China's government was so repressive. I also wish he wouldn't invest in Chinese companies, or build a "new research and development center" there.

    Suppose Xi Jinping repressed only people of a certain race, or only gay people. That would be outrageous discrimination. But since Xi severely limits the freedom of all of his citizens, that's not "discrimination" - it's just "unfortunate". However, it's not unfortunate enough to stop doing business there. (I'm talking about all American companies that do business there, not just Apple.)

    I'm very glad to read about the Apple-related manufacturing plants that will be built in India and the US. I hope this is the start of a trend away from manufacturing in China.

  14. You make me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when the Chinese government massacre people in Tienanmen square you say "That's none of our business. The dead students should have expected to be punished."
     
    And gassing the Jews was legal under German law.
     
    Our Grandads fought tyranny. You applaud it. You make me sick.

    1. Re: You make me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have picked our own cotton, niqger.

    2. Re:You make me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Africans and Native Americans thank your Grandad for fighting tyranny. So do the Chinese when your Grandad was part of the 8 nations attacking China at once and for putting up the Chinese Exclusion Act when there was a tidal wave of China refugees.

    3. Re:You make me sick by phayes · · Score: 1

      Hey AC, what have _YOU_ done to defend the downtrodden? You can't even screw up the courage to login to post so clearly you _are_ a coward. _That_ is the difference between people like you and that of your grandparents: All mouth, no action.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    4. Re:You make me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't even know how to italicize text properly, you goof lmao

  15. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    doesn't the U.S. have laws that make it illegal to comply with demands like that?

    No. We do not, and should not.

    If not, why not?

    It is none of our business and would be ineffective and unenforceable. America is not going to "fix" China. That is up to the Chinese people.

    One of the reasons that Liu Xiaobo was so ineffective is that he was viewed by many Chinese as a Western sycophant. Reform in China may work better if outsiders keep their noses out of it.

  16. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be un-American. It's like banning people going to North Korea. Wow, stop encouraging a nanny state please.  It's people like you that wants a tyrant government.

  17. Re:Donald Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For a second I thought you might be inciting violence, but there's no wrestling gifs so I guess it's all good.

  18. Just like google.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ....letting that huge market get in the way of their alleged principles.

    1. Re:Just like google.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft, and HP, and Dell, and Cisco, in fact the list of US corporations not acting the same is much much smaller than those that do.

      He even you "Bring back jobs to the USA" president Trump gets all his stuff made in the like of China, I notice that he has failed to bring back any jobs that would impact the profits of his businesses or those of his family.

      Turns out sexual predators are not the lowest of the low, they can still get elected president....in the USA.

  19. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is none of our business and would be ineffective and unenforceable. America is not going to "fix" China. That is up to the Chinese people.

    Agreed; OTOH where should we draw the line regarding American companies assisting the Chinese government's abuse of their citizens? e.g. If China had a law on the books demanding that Apple immediately report any private message that mentioned democracy, so that the sender and receiver could be jailed and tortured, would it be morally acceptable for Apple to comply with that law?

    IIRC IBM willingly assisted the Nazis with the IT tasks necessary for their roundup and attempted genocide of European Jews and other minorities, and IBM was rightfully criticized afterwards for having done so. How can we avoid a repeat of that sort of thing?

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  20. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    How would would it if "the US arbitrarily said "other countries' laws do not apply to our citizens", well apparently they accept it under threat of nuclear strike and genocide of their population. Is it quite legal as far as US law is concerned for US agents to break any law they care too in foreign countries and in point of fact, you in a foreign country report US agents breaking the law in your country and report it to the public, they consider you an espionage agent and will seek to prosecute you ie Julian Assange and wikileaks, in a foreign country, gained all sorts of information about the US government and it's agent criminals breaking all sorts of laws all over the place and reported it to the public, the US desired response, varied from extradition and prosecution, assassination and even a drone missile strike, the punishment for obeying the law at your location when you expose criminal activity by the US government at your location.

    Then you have US bases in Syria, attacking the Syrian government forces, in Syria for approaching their own territory because, the US will start murdering the Syrian population including the US government allowed use of first strike nukes. How about arming Afghanis to collapse the Afghan government to drive out Russia so that the US could invade instead (I don't get that one, use terrorist to kill Russian troops to drive then out, so those very same terrorists could kill US troops instead, WTF was the purpose of that, spend my tax payer dollars, how much profit does the US war industrial complex make each time they kill an American in uniform, it seems to be quite a lot).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  21. Doesn't iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a built in VPN? Android does, and if I have to travel to that communist shithole for work, I use it to access the world through server in Hong Kong (not too slow because of proximity). Of course this will require a friend on the outside to set it up or paying a company for VPN server information though, but if you really care about privacy and avoiding the censorship this is the best solution.

  22. the problem with walled gardens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the problem with letting a single entity control what software anyone may run on "their" device.

    To preempt the oh so predictable reply, yes, it is true that a tiny number of technical people will find a way around it. But that isn't the point. The point is the vast majority of common people aren't going to jailbreak their iPhone and find a non-app-store VPN app and find an IP that isn't already blocked by the GFoC.

    When you give someone else control over your computing, that means you no longer have it. Even if that party is temporarily seeming to be "on your side", they can be pressured by someone bigger, they can change their mind later, they can suffer bad times and sell out to new owners, etc.

    Consider carefully what it means for control of "personal" computing to be taken away from the people, no matter who it is doing the taking, not just Apple in particular.

  23. Uh-huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I know Tim 'globalist' Cook is full of crap. He's all too happy to capitulate to oppression for Apple profits. Wouldn't bother me if he didn't present the face he does so very publicly. He's pretty much just a west coast corporate hypocrite as far as I'm concerned. Whatever, dude.

  24. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has some of the most stringent anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws for its businesses, and it enforces them quite strictly. US companies to not give bribes for contracts, or for expedited deliveries, or the like. If they do, the US punishes them - to the tune of billions of dollars There are a few dozen major, and hundreds of lesser, convictions every year. Including US congressmen.

    This has actually been a longstanding complaint from US businesses that claim it makes it harder for them to compete with European and Asian companies that do give bribes.

  25. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    IIRC IBM willingly assisted the Nazis with the IT tasks necessary for their roundup and attempted genocide

    That is very misleading. During the war, IBM's German subsidiary operated independently, and was outside the control of both IBM's HQ, and American law.

  26. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everything you said made sense. And yet I fear the world where any company will roll over and submit the moment the government wants something. A lot of modern rule of law is based on the assumption that a private entity like say your phone company has records and the government needs a warrant to see it. Whether that system is officially broken like in China or unofficially broken like with the NSA in the US, it's getting to the point where you should just assume any information given to any organization for any reason whatsoever is stored and passed to the government willingly or unwillingly. And since most of us have embraced civilization and is dependent on trade to survive it's pretty hard to avoid. It's depressing.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  27. Tariff Apple products made in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If tech companies want to lecture the American public about morality, then it's time the public taught them the same lesson.

    1. Re:Tariff Apple products made in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Just as soon as you tariff _every_ other corporation doing business with China _too_. But that's not what you're calling for, You want there to be special unconstitutional laws for apple.

  28. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Apple workers are not ( should not ) be in China so APPLE-corp can do any fecking-A thing they like to China without fear of reprisal. What you say ... USA investor profit lives in China? Then shoot-a-few such investors as traitorous azzwholes and such acquisitive pricks will have their greedy affection cured!

  29. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No... we are not at war with China. Yet common sense says that China's admiration of the Flying Tigers has severly faded with age. So here is the new regulation.. for the U.S.

    http://taa-ups.eaton.com/USA/TAA/default.asp

  30. False Equivalence Link For You by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1
    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  31. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Many of the comments here seem to think the rest of the world is some sort of US colony.

    US companies frequently have to censor things in various countries in order to adhere to local laws which are less liberal than those in the US. Facebook, Twitter, youtube, etc. all have special country-specific censorship in order to deal with government requests to block content. Germany particularly has stricter laws on threats and Nazi propaganda which end up being enforced by US companies on a regular basis.

    You can't operate in China while breaking their laws. And despite China's crackdown on information, the net result of tech there is that the society and government are being forced to slowly liberalize their policies. Apple and other US companies' presence there is a net positive even when they are forced to abide by laws with which they'd rather not.

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  32. Re: Material support for a hostile foreign governm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not true. IBM was sending employees once a month to repair and maintain the machines. The arguement that they didn't know what their customer was doing with their machine doesn't fly because they continued the maintainence schedule!

  33. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by phayes · · Score: 1

    You"re seriously proposing that the U.S. should have laws that force a U.S. company to sell software to citizens of another country that has been deemed illegal by their government?!?! You _do_ know that that doing so would be reciprocal with other countries being able to impose upon U.S. citizens, right?

    If you're proposing that the U.S. be able to impose their laws unilaterally upon foreign countries, by what right?

    As you're the one proposing to upset the current status of international relations, _you_ are going to have to explain how that'll work, not just play fake innocent and ask "why shouldn't we".

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  34. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The US has some of the most stringent anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws for its businesses, and it enforces them quite strictly."

    You are shitting us right?

    Subprime mortgage - anyone in jail?
    Bhopal disaster - Jail? ......

    On the world corruption index (https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016) USA is number 18....

  35. why "godwining" ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Most if not all those story about pulling app or stopping software is solely about china censorship laws. Going to the crime against humanity was unnecessary for the argument.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  36. Apple's market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not very significant in China. They will continue using their rooted Android phones.

  37. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Zumbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed. Many of the comments here seem to think the rest of the world is some sort of US colony.

    US companies frequently have to censor things in various countries in order to adhere to local laws which are less liberal than those in the US. Facebook, Twitter, youtube, etc. all have special country-specific censorship in order to deal with government requests to block content. Germany particularly has stricter laws on threats and Nazi propaganda which end up being enforced by US companies on a regular basis.

    Indeed. And US companies often censor things in order to adhere to US culture, even if the local culture is more liberal than US culture. For instance Facebook and Apple routinely censor tits in Denmark even though they are not compelled to do so by Danish law or Danish culture.

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  38. Re:Donald Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We have the power, the military, the police, and the firearms."

    You real big cracker.

  39. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Rockoon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The lefts "view" of China is so fucked up.

    They decry oppression and then decry the capitalism that is rapidly alleviating most of it.

    Every country that has industrialized has gone through growing pains. The people that migrate to the factories were literally subsistence farming the previous day.

    The suicide rates at Chinese factories that the left went ape-shit over just a few years ago... has never been as high as the suicide rate on American college campuses.

    Today they are going ape shit over Trump telling the police to commit more acts of brutality, but are not going ape-shit over the applause and cheers that he got from the thousands of police officers that he was talking to. It was practically a standing ovation, but the left is crying about Trump and isnt saying shit about the reaction Trump got which is clearly a far more disturbing thing. The left are pretenders. Fake alarmism.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  40. Does this affect what's already installed? by evanh · · Score: 1

    As in, is the app suddenly removed for the installed base as well?

  41. good, and more of that is needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese currently live in a weird dimension, in which they _think_ they are free because they have some workarounds like VPN, which they use to follow their favorite stars on facebook, more than learning about history.

    In fact they are heavily brainwashed, and they do not see the conditioning they are subjected to. It is impossible to show them, as it would take professional psychological deprogramming. The Chinese government has created a closed psychological system within China, basically a cult.

    They have political discourse, but it is limited, closed, blinded by a lack of information and a huge amount of fake news from their government, which unfortunately they are unable to critically dismiss. There is basically ONE main narrative in China, which does account for government skepticism, but does not realize how easily it is redirected by official media and government control.

    It is just incredible what kind of weird stuff they believe, I have spoken with people from major cities in high pay jobs, and they have zero idea about the world outside of China, regardless of their precious VPN, and even the world inside of China.

    Of all the people I talked to, ZERO of them knew anything about the death of Liu Xiaobo. They did not know who he was, and were not sure what the democratic movement in China was. And this is regardless of the VPN which would have given them access to foreign news, but they don't look at it, as it is outside of the narrative of their cult. They are completely incapable of escaping the conditioning, they are shells, minions, not responsible agents anymore.

    Their usual response to any further restriction of liberty from their government is "but the Chinese people are smart, we can find a workaround".

    Losing their precious VPNs would be a GOOD thing, as they would finally realize how much their government is encroaching on them.
    It would be a shock and difficult to explain away. However, I do not think this will happen, because it would be actually BENEFICIAL to the critical thinking of the people. Some might wake up from the dream.

    So what I think will happen is just a toughening of theoretical fines that will seldom be applied, and a strengthening of the narrative that "looking at unapproved news sources is a BAD thing. Even worse than before. See? We closed SOME VPNs".
    Some way to access VPNS will still be there, so the population will still get their Facebook and Hollywood fixes, and can forget about the prison they are in.
    Because which prison? We have VPN!!!!

    After many years of following China, I have little hope for them. I think it is going worse and worse, and will become a huge problem for the whole world very soon.

    1. Re: good, and more of that is needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at their history for fuck sakes. They believe that each dynasty was descended from the gods. And this isn't even that long ago. Dynasty rule just ended 1918ish.

      So this whole government shit and is new to them. Give them a break.

    2. Re:good, and more of that is needed by thegeniushimself · · Score: 1

      You must speak to very special people, or be a liar Among the Chinese I meet frequently ( in China ), they have very good knowledge of things, and has their ow opinions for sure. They are well informed regarding Tianmen square, Ai Weiwei, Liu Xiaobo, Taiwan etcetc. - No they are not writing an article in a newspaper about it. But claiming they are unknowing is not true. As traveling in both China and US frequently, I often feel the Chinese are better informed than the Americans. And better at seeing their own flaws, and understand them. I know more brainwashed Americans than brainwashed Chinese. And for Liu Xiaobo, you can just use www.baidu.cn ( Chinese "Google" ) and search for his name. 431000 hits. http://www.baidu.com/s?ie=utf-...

  42. Re: Material support for a hostile foreign governm by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    And the maintenance contract was paid directly to Armonk, NY to boot.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Re: Material support for a hostile foreign governm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might makes right. We have forced many countries to change their laws to further our interests. See how Sweden has turned around on piracy. China is a different matter.

  44. Dont worry they will pull them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From yours also..\

  45. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 2

    Do you not realize that Apple has already changed China? Keep in mind that millions of Chinese citizens are using iMessage encryption to have communication that their government cannot read. The use of these apps is another good example.

  46. IBM and moral precedence? by boa · · Score: 1

    IBM took a lot of Flak for assisting nazi Germany back in the thirties. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    IMHO, if IBM were to blame, the same principle applies to all companies doing business with totalitarian regimes, like China, Iran, and Saudi-Arabia. These companies aid the regimes suppressing their citizens, for profit. The right thing to do for anyone believing in democracy and human rights, is to boycott Apple and others.

  47. Re: Material support for a hostile foreign governm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf do those have to do with the subject at hand? Try to stay on topic.

  48. Thanks a lot Apple by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    For giving in, to the Communist Chinese. See what happens when you put all your eggs in one basket? They pretty much "make everything". Piss off the Chinese, and all of a sudden there will be production delays, shipping delays on Apple products.

  49. So if slavery were legal in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if slavery was legal in China, Apple would be entitled to use slave labour to build its toys- according to the "their country, their laws" arguments of all you neo-liberal and neo-liberal cretins?

    There is a clear distinction between different legal systems of nations- and nations that implement obscene policies against Humanity. Of course, today America, with the largest and most murderous killing machine in Human History, the US armed forces, is the planet's no.1 offender against greater Human Rights. So for NDA linked entities like Apple, things are more than a little confused here.

    The current master of Apple loves to talk about 'gay' 'rights', while helping to ensure as many gays and others are mass murdered in target nations of the US military, like Libya and Syria. Apple is a corporation that not only has no morality- but is actually positively evil. But then that makes it no different from Microsoft, Google, Oracle et al. America, under neo-liberal and neo-con rule, is experiencing its darkest days.

    America has exported wahhabi legal rule across as much of the muslim world as possible- and wahhabi legal rule means the death of female and homosexual rights. Iraq, Libya, North Nigeria have all experienced the death of secular rule under the post-911 PNAC plan from people like Clinton and Obama- and Apple has supported this atrocity 100% of the way.

    Of course, cos the average yank is so thick, Apple (like Google) pretended otherwise for a time- but now think things have moved to far for it to be worth pretending any more. Clinton and her supporters in the Democrat AND Republican party can call for the outright destruction of Syria and Iran, and the US public no longer even blinks. Thickie yank now wants war at any cost in N Korea, Iran, Syria- hell even Russia- cos thickie yank no longer thinks there can be any downside to war- so long as 'the other' is dying in their hundreds of thousands, not the thickie yank his/herself.

    And Apple operates in this new reality. US warmongering has liberated police state tendancies in nations across the planet. And the form of the police state varies nation by nation. In the UK and China- it is total censorship at point of access. In yankland, it is ensuring the absolute zionist control of all media, so the message is always 'correct'.

    When Obama, or whatever other horror is in the White House, tells Apple not to sell its toys to the "sub-Humans" of Iran or Syria, Apple is happy to comply and the war loving idiots of yankland cheer. The days are dark, but they are about to get much darker again.

  50. Re:Material support for a hostile foreign governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously - how would it go over if the US arbitrarily said "other countries' laws do not apply to our citizens"?

    They would probably use it as propaganda for recruiting Al Qaida and ISIS members claiming that the US is occupying them.

  51. Re:Donald Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done repealing Obamacare. All these things you have didn't help much there did they, cupcake? lol.

  52. Re:Donald Trump is a traitor by Maritz · · Score: 1

    I like how he feels the needs to add "firearms", as if police and military may or may not have these things. But then, he's a Trump supporter, so what d'you expect? He's a fucking simpleton.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  53. Re:Donald Trump is a traitor by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    lol omg ... yea this is edgy ... like edgy and stuff, in soviet europe merkel would be on it and skinhead houses would be searched at this very moment looking for evidence of hatespeech ... and i dont know how far off that is and btw, the russians had molotov coctails and scorched earth, they still wiped the nazis ass with dysentery and "shit" like that
    i guess apple is doing what in america and europe would be called "complying to the law" lol
    sad but true huh ? so where's the factories with the million jobs ? they're still cook'in ?

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?