Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Launches Experimental Voice Search, File-Sharing and Note-Taking Tools For Firefox (techcrunch.com)

Firefox has just launched three new Test Pilot experiments that bring voice search, built-in note taking and a tool for sending large files to the browser. From a report: While the new voice search, which currently works on the Google, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo homepages, and note-taking features are browser plugins, the new Send tool is web-based and allows anybody -- no matter which browser they use -- to send files up to 1GB in size. It encrypts the file as it is uploaded and gives you a link you can share with your friends and co-workers. Files are automatically deleted after one download or after one day. That's not exactly the most novel concept (and Mozilla has often been criticized for diverting its attention from its core competencies), but the built-in encryption and the open-source nature of the tool do make up for that.

74 comments

  1. Bloat, bloat by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and more bloat.

    1. Re:Bloat, bloat by apoc.famine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't there an article about how they sped it up just a day or two ago? I'm guessing that they needed to take that step forward so they could take these two back. It's all part of their master plan to slowly sink into oblivion.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Bloat, bloat by darkain · · Score: 3, Informative

      I still remember the days of how FireFox started. Mozilla browser was "bloated" in their eyes because of the mail and chat client, so they wanted to rip those parts out and make everything separate applications. Now they're just shoving the kitchen sink back in again, because WHY THE HELL NOT!? Good thing to know that history never repeats itself.

    3. Re:Bloat, bloat by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flamebait? For calling bloat bloat? These "features" should be plug-ins, while keeping the core browser as lean and efficient as possible.

    4. Re:Bloat, bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope it repeats itself in this case.. i'm tired of waiting for phoenix|firebird|firefox the next generation. i want my damn browser back without all the crap added (that's what addons are for) and without the chromification.

    5. Re:Bloat, bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in the Firefox 0.x days I remember all new internet users were using webmail, and MSN for chat. With a bit of IRC and FTP for nerds.

      The main benefit of Firefox was really cutting the GUI noise and also have GUI themes and things. In terms of CPU, RAM, rendering speed I don't think Mozilla Suite and Firefox were very different. We had hundreds of MHz and more than 100MB RAM! That was really good for the task at hand since the web was still made for Windows 95 computers with dial up and youtube didn't exist yet.
      But we didn't need an "internet communication suite", esp. the non US people who weren't around for the Usenet days and so didn't have experience of any kind of non-web Internet kitchen sink software for Amiga, DOS, Windows 3.1, Unix etc.

    6. Re:Bloat, bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. This is part of the Pilot Program. It is an extension. Don't want it? on't get the extension.

    7. Re:Bloat, bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ''is'' a plugin, you moron.

    8. Re:Bloat, bloat by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. Firefox should just focus on being a really good 'core browser'. I don't want frills and extras for social bookmarking, file-sharing, or note-taking. I don't want them continually dumbing-down the UI, either. (Remember when you could disable image loading without jumping into about:config?)

      Chrome is kicking their ass, and it's not because Chrome has lots of pointless extra features. It just works really well.

  2. *sigh* by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wish they'd spend some development time to actually improve the browser, rather than let it continue on the decline it's been engaging in for years now.

    1. Re:*sigh* by enrique556 · · Score: 2

      I just wish they'd spend some development time to actually improve the browser, rather than let it continue on the decline it's been engaging in for years now.

      Yeah, *sigh*, SMH, tsk tsk, *smirks sagely*, they need to get off their asses and do some REAL work, instead of developing whole new programming languages to fix the security issues, rewriting the rendering engine from scratch, and publishing multi-process speedups only the other week.

      Seriously though, these new tools probably took up 1% of their development time, and less that 1% of the binary size & memory footprint. Firefox got way way faster & more memory efficient only the other week, due to years of serious development work with the backend, which continues with an entirely new-from-scratch rendering engine. More than anyone else, they are pumping programmer hours into making their browser better in important and fundamental ways. How could you possibly imagine that a note-taking tool or file-sharing would take up any programmer effort at all? As for voice search, microsoft, apple and google are all trying to obviate one another with voice search built right into their respective OS's. You will be the exact guy who brays about firefox being irrelevant and featureless for not having built-in voice search like all its rivals in 2019.

    2. Re:*sigh* by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      My point is that the changes that have been made to Firefox over the last few years have been making Firefox consistently worse. Literally the only reason I continue to put up with it is the existence of the NoScript plugin -- which, from everything I've learned, is impossible to replicate in their new plugin system.

      Adding these sorts of things to it only perpetuates that decline. I'm not necessarily against these new features (although I do miss the days when FF was a lot leaner), but I'd like to see real improvements as well.

      More than anyone else, they are pumping programmer hours into making their browser better in important and fundamental ways.

      I suppose that depends on what you consider "better". I'm not seeing any meaningful improvements, but I am seeing a lot of changes that are the exact opposite of that.

      You will be the exact guy who brays about firefox being irrelevant and featureless for not having built-in voice search like all its rivals in 2019.

      Not even close. Voice search is a feature that is off exactly zero interest to me, no matter where it appears.

    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I looked up regarding Noscript on WebExtensions

      https://blog.mozilla.org/addon...
      https://www.ghacks.net/2017/03...

      Some skepticism is understandable, the clock might run out leaving us with no suitable Noscript release ready for Firefox 57 or 58 or 59. But uncertainty aside I'm confident enough that Noscript WILL run on new Firefox.
      Specifically the extensions system is a superset of the Chrome extensions API with Noscript support as a stated goal. I have about one extension which I fear might not be remade for Firefox 58 or 59 but we'll see.

  3. I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wish they'd get accelerated video working on Linux instead of shit like this. I know they don't care because Linux is such a low percentage of users; but seriously, how long do we have to wait?

  4. Next Steps? by bobstreo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a firefox user, I wonder if I'll ever see an emoji?

    Or if I could actually watch netflix in my browser.

    Glad to see they're working on features that will be so beneficial to their users.

    Hopefully they use checksums on their file transfers, so they only need 1 copy of the 1080i version of the latest cam recording of latest movie.

    1. Re:Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a firefox user, I wonder if I'll ever see an emoji?

      As a firefox user, I sure as hell hope I never see an emoji.

    2. Re: Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix works in ff on Windows. Are you talking about Linux?

    3. Re:Next Steps? by xfizik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I watch Netflix in Firefox. On Linux and Windows.

    4. Re: Next Steps? by xfizik · · Score: 1

      It works on Linux too.

    5. Re: Next Steps? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      I installed the appropriate font for Linux, and I can see emojis.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    6. Re:Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a firefox user, I wonder if I'll ever see an emoji?

      On your phone. Seriously? This is a point of contention for you? Kids these days.

    7. Re: Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it shift_JIS? ;)

    8. Re: Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had these things out of the box, but often you have to zoom in to make them out and they resemble a black blob or turd.

      So, I'm fully satisfied with the rendering.

    9. Re:Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck emojis. In every mail and chat program I use thats the first thing that I turn off.

    10. Re:Next Steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too :slightly_smiling_face: :rolling_eyes: :turd:

  5. fix broken stuffs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like FF to stop break when it updates. every other update it does breaks java and flash and I have to uninstall java flash and FF multiple times before it starts working again. making it less of a memory hog would be nice too. This is just more shit I wont use.

    1. Re:fix broken stuffs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you're stupid. Getting rid of java and flash is the solution. Axing the interface for mouldy old plug-in architecture simplifies the code base.

  6. more reasons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we have a couple more reasons for FireFox to crash? Awesome.

  7. Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Voice-to-text wrappers are a nice touch - but they really shouldn't be a 'browser' feature - but a system feature that can be used in ANY application, so you don't have to tweak it separately for every tool you use.

    Note taking is also an occasionally neat thing - but not something you want constrained to the browser developers controlling. Browser developers shouldn't have an interest in getting a piece of that pie, or shaping that 'market', even between open source options.

    And file sharing tools? That's an odd technology to push into - not too removed from HTTP/FTP (filezilla) logic at times, but very fiddly even for companies that devote their full focus on it. That said, I'd love it if the 'default' tools could smoothly resume arbitrary download after an interruption, integrate multiple downloads from identically hashed sources, and so on... but companies that take such tools on as secondary interests tend to let such tools fall to dust shortly after trumpeting their first launch. Also, something better done through an official plugin, rather than integrating directly.

    Honestly though, these should all be officially supported PLUGINS ("add-ons"), not integrated components. Oh, and they should focus on NEVER BREAKING PLUGINS - they've basically killed half the plugins I've liked about their browser over time, due to their allergy to backwards compatibility options.

    Want to know what makes for a good base product over time? Become a platform that bigger hits work with smoothly. Support that platform, and make a brand out of the efficiency, stability and reliability of that platform. Don't try and redefine yourself every two weeks. Let the plugins redefine what can be DONE with your platforms instead - best of both worlds.

    Don't just slap a new forced coat of paint or end-user feature on, and pretend that you're trendy - you're not a public traded company, you shouldn't have to play that game.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re: Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give users privacy, no tracking, and no ads. They will flock to Firefox.
      Unfortunately these things are seen as necessary evils which is why it won't happen.

  8. Do we really need more data exfiltration routes? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Informative

    If your organization has any restrictions on sharing information, this is just another hole to monitor and / or plug.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  9. Opera had this by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    Opera had a voice feature several years ago, but I don't recall it being very popular and it wasn't one of the things they brought in the new version. Who is the target audience for a feature like this?

    1. Re:Opera had this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could be some dumb fun for luddites like me still with a beige tower and wired keyboard, meaning I can sit far back (or have food plates in the way) and use only the mouse sometimes.

      But the main reason is probably that they've been doing research on voice features. And so this is a way to expose it to the public, more specifically willing users. This might well bring attention to that "Test Pilot" programme in the first place.

      Even if it's kind of useless, the four or five evil giant companies are pushing voice interfaces, some of them apparently selling a few zillions devices even. So there's something of a danger of leaving it entirely to the faceless giant companies. And if this thing only types words into a search box, at least we can understand what it does. Good thing to keep it dumb. Less things behind my back. Ideally this could be an entirely offline feature.

  10. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win95 had voice input that worked pretty well. I remember playing Need for Speed by voice.

    My guess is that Dragon Naturally bribed MS to stop it.

  11. Re:Do we really need more data exfiltration routes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean you're not white-listing in such situations?

  12. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 0

    ...Want to know what makes for a good base product over time? Become a platform that bigger hits work with smoothly. Support that platform, and make a brand out of the efficiency, stability and reliability of that platform. Don't try and redefine yourself every two weeks. Let the plugins redefine what can be DONE with your platforms instead - best of both worlds....

    Gee, I said about the same thing, and it was marked flamebait.

  13. Make up your damn mind by Hentes · · Score: 2

    Mozilla needs to decide whether they want a rich browser or a minimalist one. The Firefox strategy used to be to remove as many features as possible in order to make the browser more like Chrome, while encouraging the development of extensions that replace those features. The problem was that Chrome only started as a barebones browser out of necessity, and have been steadily adding stuff while Mozilla was removing them. Meanwhile, the Chrome-like rapid release schedule was causing problems with compatibility, weakening Firefox's extension ecosystem. But while abandoning the minimalist strategy might seem like a good choice, I don't think Mozilla has a coherent plan of what to do next. These additions seem haphazard, putting in a bunch of complex functionality should come after solving the basic problems. As long as I need separate extensions for mouse gestures or rebinding hotkeys, integrating a dropbox clone into the browser should be pretty low on the priority list. I guess this is a common problem in open source, unpaid hobby developers will want to work on te new and interesting stuff, and nobody wants to do the housekeeping. There may be a lesson to be learned here: open source projects should be a lot more careful than commercial ones about removing features, because they will have a hard time convincing their coders to develop the same thing again if they change their mind later.

    1. Re:Make up your damn mind by Kjella · · Score: 2

      I think nobody at Mozilla sat down and had a real talk about what's core features and what's customization and accessories, because I think they should be treated differently. To use the car analogy, certain parts are essential like an engine, brakes, suspension and such. These typically follow a linear pattern from basic to premium where the best option is generally considered to be the objectively best. Customization are generally things that you must choose, but have trade-offs or are a matter of preference, like do you want more seat space or more cargo space and what color do you want it to be. Accessories are things some want like spoilers, entertainment system and ski boxes - they don't need to be there.

      It's a lot easier to work backwards, IMHO accessories should not be in core Firefox. I'd go with three general rules of exclusion:
      1) Features that don't directly relate to browsing
      2) Tied to a particular site, service or back-end
      3) Manipulates the DOM
      Particularly the last one should evict most, if it's trying to "enhance" the web page you were served it's not core. There's been too much such junk.

      Customizations I think should try to preserve as much flexibility and provide as much functionality as possible, like the organization of tabs, bookmarks, search & filter capability, download manager and so on. Still with limits 1) and 2) above though. Here I feel they've stripped away functionality where it doesn't really make much sense because it becomes more of a "you can have any color you want as long as it is black" situation. Here extensions should be considered more like betas, you absorb functionality.

      Core features are basic things like rendering web pages, without crashing and in a separate process in a sandbox so bad plug-ins don't do too much damage and with performance metrics on what is eating CPU/memory/IO so you can identify what plug-ins are causing trouble. Here there's been way too little effort on the fact that many plug-ins will be crap. A simple way to reload with vanilla Firefox wouldn't hurt either. Mozilla should have concentrated way more on this.

      At least in my head the goal is not a DIY car. But it sometimes felt like vanilla Mozilla ships extremely stripped in order to not "take" anything from the extension community, that even the basics of managing pages, bookmarks and downloads. Those parts they should embrace, the fluff they should reject and then they should build that sandbox so we don't have to guess which combination of plug-ins went apeshit now. Because I felt that I was forced to use them, then when I used them it was like the problem doesn't exist in vanilla so Firefox doesn't have a problem. But I as a user felt it was a pretty big problem.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Make up your damn mind by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      in order to make the browser more like Chrome

      Which is one of the problems with the direction FF is going.

  14. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by maestroX · · Score: 1

    Want to know what makes for a good base product over time? Become a platform that bigger hits work with smoothly. Support that platform, and make a brand out of the efficiency, stability and reliability of that platform.

    Perhaps the bell rings once global usage drops below 5%, after almost reaching 50% in 2009.

  15. RIAA/MPAA will have SIX FITS over this by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    They'll probably either insist that they not include this filesharing feature or insist that there be some sort of screening of files to ensure there isn't any piracy going on.

    1. Re: RIAA/MPAA will have SIX FITS over this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For frack's sake can we decriminalize sftp already? Hammers don't kill people, angry carpenters do.

  16. No! by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Mozilla- please stop it!

    Stuff like that needs to be in ADDONS, that is why we have ADDONS! If you want to make it something official, then release your own addon for those features. If you REALLY think it should be included, make it an included addon that we can still easily turn off and/or uninstall.

  17. No emojis ? by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

    No kidding ? I need to switch back to firefox just now

  18. expires after 1 download? by jb_nizet · · Score: 2

    So, if I want to share a 1 GB file with 3 friends, I need to upload it 3 times? And send 3 different (non-encrypted) emails?

    Or I could just use GDrive or Dropbox, which don't have this awful limitation. Seems to me that they forgot usability an only thought about privacy and security.

    1. Re:expires after 1 download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One download or one day. And you might send an SMS if you wish, typed manually on a dumbphone keypad. That'd be good, since I don't know my friend's email and won't have to call him to tell to check email.

  19. Failed emulating Chrome by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    So now it looks like they want to emulate Edge? Guess what? Edge is declining marketshare as people migrate to 10. No one wants it or care about cortona or MS pen and OneNote integration. At least folks wanted Chrome

  20. I see people say bloat... by slack_justyb · · Score: 2

    I read a few comments here and I think there is something worth pointing out. This is part of the Test Pilot program and only is in your browser if you've opted in on the Test Pilot program and only then is it "added" to your install.

    Do note, this isn't me condoning anything here, I'm just merely trying to point out that if you aren't in the Test Pilot program, then you're not seeing these tools/invasion of privacy/wherever you stand between those two points. I don't know what the ultimate intention is here and honestly I forgot my asbestos suit at home so I'll abstain from any flame.

    1. Re:I see people say bloat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Test Pilot is an ... Add-On, and each feature can be enabled or disabled individually. None of the commenters seem to have cared to actually read the article.

      Have any of you actually ran bare nightly + uBlock lately? It is fast and lean, to put it mildly.

    2. Re:I see people say bloat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots here is all. You are exactly right and should be upvoted. If you want a sane conversation, got to HackerNews.

  21. They are! by Chozabu · · Score: 1

    Just have a look at this: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/201...

    I've just installed firefox again... and it no longer seems slow and bloated!

  22. Do Slashdot commenters ever READ anything anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good lord, people. These are *extensions*, not built into the browser. Mozilla is piloting them as side projects to show that they can walk and chew gum (while making Firefox competitive again, but all of that news suspiciously never gets mentioned here on Slashdot).

    It's like you guys ignore everything that actually goes on at Mozilla, only to live in your little bubble of ignorance, and come out every time there's something you can (wrongly) interpret to get on your pulpit and preach to Mozilla whatever you feel they should be doing (which almost invariably is what they're ACTUALLY doing at the time).

    Oh well. I guess I should be happy you're here instead of in a voting booth, etc etc.

  23. Key exchange by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    the new Send tool is web-based (...) It encrypts the file as it is uploaded

    How did they implement key exchange with recipient? Encryption is of little value if the operator also transmits the key.

  24. Real work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I draw similarities between tablets and workstations/desktops:
    I use firefox as a casual test platform to mess around on but to get real work done I use chrome.

    Firefox has turned into a Chinesium toy that has a use for a few moments, breaks extremely quick and needs to be replaced often.

  25. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember playing http://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/star-trek-bridge-commander using the voice recognition. So immersive to play it that way. Of course, there were times I was seriously concerned about the intelligence of my officers, though.

  26. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you missed it, Firefox is not a browser, but an operating system.

    Making wrappers available for the platform is a great idea. I just wish it better wrapped, you know, the operating system.

  27. Remember when a browser was just a browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of us don't want or need applications with an extreme feature set. They are complex, hard to maintain, and difficult to make secure.

  28. Re: Do we really need more data exfiltration route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. I'm tired of the games of crippling software functionality in the name of aiding incompetent IT staff and leadership

  29. Fix the damn RAM usage first! by iliketrash · · Score: 1

    Why don't those Mozilla imbeciles spend a a few days making Firefox so that releases some memory after it is done with it? It's normal to have FF sitting there WITH NO OPEN WINDOWS using 1.5-2 GB of RAM.

  30. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Voice-to-text wrappers are a nice touch - but they really shouldn't be a 'browser' feature - but a system feature

    Didn't you get the memo? The browser *is* the system!

    > that can be used in ANY application

    Thou Shalt Not Have Any Application Beyond The One Browser.

    Diversity is evil, diversity is death.

  31. Voice search hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And who needs filesharing?

  32. who exactly asked for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    firefox users are asking for mozilla to:
    * not ruin extensions
    * stop ruining the user interface
    * quit adding bloat
    * use less memory

  33. Re:Do Slashdot commenters ever READ anything anymo by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    (while making Firefox competitive again, but all of that news suspiciously never gets mentioned here on Slashdot).

    Maybe because they're not?

  34. Oh well by b0bby · · Score: 1

    Just last week I finally threw in the towel on FF on my home machine. Random hanging just got too annoying. Guess I won't be changing back, since they're getting even further from what I want in a browser.

  35. Re:Trends! Trends! TRENDS! by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    Voice-to-text wrappers are a nice touch - but they really shouldn't be a 'browser' feature - but a system feature that can be used in ANY application, so you don't have to tweak it separately for every tool you use.

    I agree that the system should provide voice-to-text or voice control capability.

    Note taking is also an occasionally neat thing - but not something you want constrained to the browser developers controlling. Browser developers shouldn't have an interest in getting a piece of that pie, or shaping that 'market', even between open source options.

    Do one thing and do it well. Oh, make it easy for plugins to extend functionality. Note taking should be a different app.

    And file sharing tools? That's an odd technology to push into - not too removed from HTTP/FTP (filezilla) logic at times, but very fiddly even for companies that devote their full focus on it.

    File upload should be part of the browser, IMHO. I'm not sure I like how they implemented their gigabyte upload.

    That said, I'd love it if the 'default' tools could smoothly resume arbitrary download after an interruption, integrate multiple downloads from identically hashed sources, and so on... but companies that take such tools on as secondary interests tend to let such tools fall to dust shortly after trumpeting their first launch.

    You can't do that for arbitrary downloads; the web server needs to fully support appropriate HTTP headers (such as chunked transfer encoding and byte serving)

  36. Does note-taking relate to 1) ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps note-taking tool would be useful to write things about your tab sessions, bookmark groups, sites and authors, topics of interest, research subjects and so on. So you can have a try at organizing and be able to reason about what you're doing.

    It's debilitating that computers and programs allow you to bookmark, save page, keep tab open, enter tags, do web 2.0 crap etc. but you can't just easily write and keep it in the context of what you're doing, as was possible on paper. With a pen or pencil you could write in the phone book, on the walls, on a piece of paper taped to the oven's handle, on free paper, in a book's margin, add a sheet with some overview or summary or notes to any kind of folder, dossier or school lesson or homework.
    That is, you can put things in context and computers offer a lot of bad possibilities : writing dozens of small .txt stored in a single place in the home directory or on the desktop, putting them all in a single specific note-taking app, putting them on a webmail (specific notes feature or sending mail to yourself) or why not putting everything into a big word processor document.

    Taking notes in a browser could be useful, as they're notes about your browsing or perhaps notes about a specific browser based task like buying a train ticket.
    They're stored in the same place as the bookmarks and history and the current tab session : the browser profile.
    I could imagine a music player or file manager that allows me to take notes about the music collection : which music I really like, what I'd like to get in better quality or different version, which music I should procure, what genres and artists should I keep on USB drive/SD/mobile device, whatever. It could be a simple file manager feature that allows me to write and review notes (as free-form text) in a pane or window, when I visit the /path/to/music directory. So it'd be in context!, and it would work equally well for a porn or work directory. Er, I meant a documents or work directory.