Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are Interactive Computing Devices Addictive?

This question came from two things noticed by Slashdot reader dryriver:

"Myself and just about every other kid I was friends with in the 1980s were definitely addicted to computers when we were young, and stayed that way until we reached college."

"There is increasing concern about everybody from young kids to people 60+ staring into smartphone, tablet computer and laptop screens for hours and hours every day and not partaking in other activities they used to before the "glowing screen" hooked them."

His question: Are interactive computing devices, whether networked or not, addictive in nature? What kind of applications appear to be the most addictive? (AAA games? Casual games? Social media? Texting?) And could the addiction have something to do with "Neuroplasticity", the fact that doing an activity over and over again each day that you place great importance in, and pay great attention to, can actually rewire the neurons in your brain?
Nicholas Carr once argued that "We're training ourselves, through repetition, to be facile skimmers, scanners, and message-processors -- important skills, to be sure -- but, perpetually distracted and interrupted, we're not training ourselves in the quieter, more attentive modes of thought." Slashdot readers seem uniquely qualified to address this, so leave your own attentive thoughts in the comments. Are interactive computing devices addictive?

98 comments

  1. everything Could Be addictive by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you let it

    1. Re: everything Could Be addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was addicted to sex... then marriage happened and things changed. I foresee that in 20 years (tops) I'll be totally sex free.

    2. Re:everything Could Be addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. And who the fuck is to say that these "other activities" are more important or better than whatever people are doing on their computers or smartphones?

      Nicholas Carr once argued that "We're training ourselves, through repetition, to be facile skimmers, scanners, and message-processors -- important skills, to be sure -- but, perpetually distracted and interrupted, we're not training ourselves in the quieter, more attentive modes of thought."

      What I say to that is "so what?" Perhaps little Nicky Carr (whoever he's supposed to be, never heard of him) should stop being such a busybody and focus what he's doing and not what others are doing.

    3. Re:everything Could Be addictive by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      if you let it

      This exactly. What is addictive? I find browsing the internet addictive. It releases endorphins and makes me happy so I continue to do it. I also do the same with wakeboarding, and tinkering with electronics.

    4. Re:everything Could Be addictive by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      It depends on who you're talking to.

      In colloquial speech, yes, anything can be addictive.

      For people going on medical definitions, no. People can experience compulsions around nearly anything, but generally behaviors don't cause addiction, except for things like a runner's high. Many professionals have started explaining compulsions as "behavioral addictions" since many people don't understand the terms that well.

      Compulsive behaviors can include nearly anything that a person does where they develop a life-impacting urge to do things, usually followed by no reward. Gambling disorder, eating disorders, people who become "couch potatoes", binge watchers, "video game addicts", compulsive shoppers, hoarders, all can become compulsive behaviors.

      Some medical dictionaries are updating their definitions of addiction to include compulsion, but most of the big ones are unwilling to do it.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    5. Re:everything Could Be addictive by hey! · · Score: 1

      I often find restating a question makes it better: how good an analogy is "addiction" for the way people use their mobile devices?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:everything Could Be addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, gotta laugh. This Nicky Carr has a book to sell and he's glommed onto the current fear craze. Pompous ass, he no doubt uses a computer in his work, making *him* addicted to the tech.

      "quieter, more attentive modes of thought" What the hell does that even mean? You want to find out, you buy his book.

      Oh, my guess is he means reading a book. Just an ass hawking a book.
       

    7. Re:everything Could Be addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's addicted to paying taxes?

    8. Re:everything Could Be addictive by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      i suppose "we should make them kids watch more television and read books from libraries again?"
      and then forget how google and facebook came into existence ... but that might not be such a bad thing since do no evil is euh ... an urban legend i think by now
      besides ... tape recorders made the beatles into beggars since those kids wouldnt stop copying ... public libraries might be under scrutiny soon enough since all those books inthere are actually non-piratable ... its a bit of "how the law is its own bullshit again" and im running off topic and short on time for the day ...

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Yes. by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    Anything can be addictive if you like it.

    1. Re:Yes. by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Goes to show how little you know of addiction.

    2. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goes to show how little you know of liking things.

    3. Re:Yes. by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is all about brain states. Any activity that produces a individually desirable brain state ie happy will inherently be addictive, why would you not want to feel more content, that is the way a normal brain is genetically programmed. So some individuals find exploring thoughts more fun, more comfortable than exploring people or exploring the environment, whilst others are the opposite. The problem is in the nature of control freaks who demand that you alter your activities to suit them, their ego, their greed and their warped lusts.

      As far as society is concerned, your behavioural addictions just need to be allowed and be usefully incorporated in that society, not that you be psychological tortured for the rest of your days to feed the egoistic demands of the minority who have usurped control of that society from the majority.

      A developing society is all about individual specialisation working collectively to promote the greater good of the majority. That individuality, those personal behavioural addictions, allowing different minds to approach, different problems, from different directions, so as to produce the best possible solutions for those problems and allow the continued advancement of that society.

      They are addicted to those behavioural patterns that their brain finds most genetically suitable, why the fuck would you force them away from it, psychologically torture them to fit your mild, your desires, which is what psychopathic capitalism does, which is what we currently do. Enslave the minds of people to feed the ego and greed of a minority.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re: Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Goes to show how much posts on /. goes to show.

    5. Re: Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addictive comment section is addictive.

    6. Re: Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you know that games are designed to addict by using psychological gimmicks? Autoplay on youtube? Number showing how many days you have been connected with your friend on snapchat? Ot is all addictive by design. Without proper education you don't even know how they control you.

    7. Re: Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books, tv, music and gossip were all addictive in the past. A smartphone has all these plus games & gambling - of course it is addictive.

      But no problem if phone time simply replaces tv time . . .

    8. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon since I moderated. While I generally agree with your notion to an extent, you fail to incorporate self-harming behavior that often is the result of addiction. Good look finding a way to make alcohol or heroin addiction usefully integrated in a society.

  3. Um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No

  4. are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every day, i find myself spending 8 hours sitting in a bizarre grey cube doing what people who are called my "bosses" tell me to do. Mostly it involves typing things into a black box, which then shows me markings on a screen, after which i type more things into the black box.

    Twice a month i receive "credits" in an "account" - essentially i am just making a number go up in a database. Much like a gamer.

    If you count travel and lunch time, i spend 50 hours a week doing this activity. I'm starting to get worried. At this "Workplace" we are not supposed to talk about sex, drugs, racism, or anything controversial. There are cameras watching us all day long and recording our keystrokes. It can get a bit weird after a while. I wonder if I have joined a cult?

    But mostly, when I tried to stop "doing work", i was told that I had to move out of my apartment, stop driving my car, and stop buying food! This "work habit" had gotten way out of control - i couldn't live without it.

    I don't know if there is a solution, but I wish someone could help me. Even my psychologist asked me for "money" when I tried to talk to her about it! ! ! Crazy.

    1. Re:are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we are addicted to work so we can fund the opposite sex. (oh crap 'opposite' may no longer be acceptable)

    2. Re: are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work is an addiction that you can be from, provided you work first on other addictions. Here's a list:
        - Addiction to comfort (reasonable housing, air conditioning, good clothing).
        - Addiction to food and beverages.
        - Addiction to have sex and maybe even have kids.
      Once you are free from those, you are ready to be free from the Work addiction.

    3. Re:are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But mostly, when I tried to stop "doing work", i was told that I had to move out of my apartment, stop driving my car, and stop buying food! This "work habit" had gotten way out of control - i couldn't live without it.

      And what happens when you stop playing the "free" games on your phones/tablets? Nothing -- you don't get thrown out of your apartment. The plague of MMO free games suck 10 to 30 hours/week from your average player (higher hours if you are young or have an addictive personality).

      These games constantly add new content kinda like adding a new carrot after the donkey has eaten the previous one. They really need to ban these types of "free" games that have caused students to fail exams and workers to stumble in their careers.

    4. Re:are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Yes indirectly. You are addicted to money. It is a very powerful addiction encouraged by reality

    5. Re:are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course its acceptable, for every alleged gender theres an anti-gender.

    6. Re: are we "addicted" to the workplace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "reality" but capitalism. Please be always aware that they may appear to be but in fact are not the same thing.

  5. 4-Function Calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I've been addicted to variants of the 4 function calculator for years. Did you know if you type 55378008 and turn it upside down it spells BOOBLESS, and that was the start of internet porn. Of course who can forget SHELL OIL.. 710.77345 and that is how we all got hooked on fossil fuel propulsion.

  6. How about no by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Do you foam at the mouth if you can't play a game when you want? Do you twitch when you can't get at your facebook profile? Do you break into people's houses when you can't get a grindr match?

    You ain't addicted, you're a lawyer looking for a way to get your stupid ass client off whatever stupid thing you did.

    1. Re:How about no by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      Do you foam at the mouth if you can't play a game when you want? Do you twitch when you can't get at your facebook profile? Do you break into people's houses when you can't get a grindr match? You ain't addicted, you're a lawyer looking for a way to get your stupid ass client off whatever stupid thing you did.

      There are varying degrees of drug addiction - from caffeine all the way to alcohol, opiates, cocaine, and the even stronger addiction to nicotine. Withdrawal symptoms vary too, from mild, to uncomfortable, to excruciating, to deadly. Previous posters in this thread have noted, (perhaps tongue in cheek, but there's truth there nonetheless), that 'anything can be addictive'. Anything that causes a pronounced, consistent, repeatable physiological and / or psychological response has addictive potential - all the way from 'healthy' things like meditation and running, to life-destroying hard drugs. Smartphones, TV, and the like fall somewhere between the two extremes.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:How about no by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are varying degrees of drug addiction - from caffeine all the way to alcohol, opiates, cocaine, and the even stronger addiction to nicotine. Withdrawal symptoms vary too, from mild, to uncomfortable, to excruciating, to deadly. Previous posters in this thread have noted, (perhaps tongue in cheek, but there's truth there nonetheless), that 'anything can be addictive'. Anything that causes a pronounced, consistent, repeatable physiological and / or psychological response has addictive potential - all the way from 'healthy' things like meditation and running, to life-destroying hard drugs. Smartphones, TV, and the like fall somewhere between the two extremes.

      I would also argue that just like a psychological disorder, it should only count as an addiction if it interferes with your life. If someone plays video games 4 hours a day but is happy with their life and is still able to pay their bills and takes care of what needs to be done, how is that different than someone who likes to take long walks in the evening or even someone who works a second job. There are plenty of people "addicted" to their job so much that it affects their life whether it is divorce or something else. On the other hand, if you're content working 2 jobs, working out at the gym 4 hours a day, or playing video games 4 hours a day, other people might not agree with your choice but it doesn't matter if you are fine with it.

    3. Re:How about no by jiriw · · Score: 2

      I'm addicted to water. Even daily doses don't cut it for mild withdrawal symptoms. I have to have a hit every couple of hours. If I go three days without it, withdrawal symptoms become murderous, literally. And it's not only me. Wars are fought over it. It's the most destructive drug on the face of the earth. Not only for about every living thing, but also for the earth itself... Erosion is mostly caused by water (related) processes.
      More than 7 billion people and even most animals are addicted to the stuff, not to speak of basically most every living thing on this blue globe! Some creatures even need to swim in the stuff to survive!
      If you think about it, how could it be otherwise? She (Earth) is tempting us with the stuff, let it seem to be in abundance. But there is, compared to total mass, very little of it, only at boundary of Earth's crust and atmosphere it's in 'abundance' and much of it needs to be pure enough for actual 'safe' use, else diseases spread like wildfire, worse than heroin and contaminated needles. There are some 'safe' adulterants for 100% H2O... certain minerals, some carbohydrates and derivatives. But they are mostly stop-gap measures and many only make you need more of the stuff eventually.
      We really need to stop this addiction. Let's blow up the earth and never be addicted again!

      (Disclaimer for those who don't get sarcasm: This post is intended as and should be considered sarcasm. I do not intend to actually blow up the earth. I'm not affiliated to any terrorist movement without or with capabilities of doing so, except a government that seems to have 'leased'/'allowed stationing'/'whatever' some WMD's of a certain bigger government that might be able to 'make a dent'... I repeat again: This post is intended as and should be considered sarcasm. That includes parts of this bracketed disclaimer that don't mention sarcasm.)

    4. Re:How about no by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it an addiction, but I would call it playing into human weakness.

      Humans are naturally attracted to bright glowing rectangles that have things that move on them. It doesn't have to be a smartphone screen, it could be a TV screen, or computer monitor. Or even airplane avionics.

      When the old steam gauges of the past were replaced with the modern glass panels of the future, the attractiveness of such screen was noticable - your eyes are just drawn to them. Not really a big problem when the only planes to have them were airliners and military jets, but when they started appearing in GA aircraft, pilot distraction was noticed, especially on VFR flights where most of the flying is done by looking outside the aircraft (few to none flights are done VFR for commercial and military flights)

      So I wouldn't call it addiction (unless you get withdrawal symptoms when it's taken away), but more of human nature - a glowing box with stuff on it is far more inviting to the eyes than anything around you, including the outside. Smartphones are just another instance of the glowing rectangle.

    5. Re:How about no by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it should only count as an addiction if it interferes with your life.

      There are plenty of functional alcoholics, smokers, even users of heroin. Just because you've managed to incorporate it into your life doesn't mean your not addicted, or that it's a good thing. But in general I completely agree with you, it's just that most addicts are incapable of realizing that they have a problem on their own. (I.e. I'm not addicted! It's not hurting anyone!)

    6. Re:How about no by mjwx · · Score: 0

      it should only count as an addiction if it interferes with your life.

      There are plenty of functional alcoholics, smokers, even users of heroin. Just because you've managed to incorporate it into your life doesn't mean your not addicted

      Just because you manage to incorporate something into your life, doesn't mean you're addicted to it.

      In fact when it doesn't interfere with your life, its pretty much not an addiction. Addiction is defined as a substance or activity that becomes compulsive and interferes with ordinary responsibilities and concerns. So someone managing a drinking or gambling habit so that it does NOT interfere with their lives is not an addict. You can argue that it isn't healthy, but its not an addiction if they're not sacrificing for it. An addict isn't someone who drinks regularly, an addict is someone who eschews eating to afford to drink.The difference is when it comes down to food or drink, the non addict picks food where as the addict picks drink.

      There is a huge difference between use and abuse and another difference between abuse and dependence.

      I've yet to see anyone, no matter how glued to their phone that will give up food for screen time. So I'm calling bollocks and Betteridges on this "phone addiction" BS. Seriously, deprive someone of a phone for a few days and they'll get over it pretty quick. They'll find another way to entertain themselves. Deprive a smoker of cigarettes and you'll see some pretty bad mood swings. Anyone who compares the two is a complete moron.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:How about no by dddux · · Score: 1

      If someone is satisfied with his or hers life, as in *being happy*, addicted to *whatever*, why is it being bad for as long as it's not hurting other people? I'm quite fine with other people being addicted to whatever they want, for as long as they don't hurt anyone in the process. If they want to kill themselves slowly, then be it.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  7. Designed In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software can be designed to be addictive, hardware provides just the palette and canvas for the willing designer.

  8. I'm sorry by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    The summary was pretty long. I did skim the first couple of lines, but - was there a question or something in there, somewhere?

    - Sent from my iPad

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'm sorry by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The question was, "Dude, like, are smart phones bad? Are the padawans turning into jeejahs?"

    2. Re:I'm sorry by locater16 · · Score: 1

      Not so far as I can tell. Something about tying an onion to your belt because that was they style at the time...

    3. Re:I'm sorry by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You must be addicted to Slashdot to post on this article.

      - Sent from another non iPad device.

  9. I'm not distrac... oh a screen; great cat video... by youn · · Score: 1

    wait, I was doing something... I forgot... wow, another cat video... I didn't know cats could do that, this is awesome

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  10. If the headline is a question.... by DalM · · Score: 1

    Computers are habit forming but not addictive. Addiction is caused by chemicals screwing with your biology. If you take a computer away from someone for a week, it bothers them because is breaks their habit, but they don't go through withdrawal like heroine or nicotine. Computers don't do that.

    1. Re:If the headline is a question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And internet porn screws with your biology and we know that's not addictive.

    2. Re:If the headline is a question.... by DalM · · Score: 1

      That's correct, porn is problematic for a number of reasons but addiction isn't one of them. Again, a person doesn't go through withdrawal if they don't watch porn for a few days.

  11. I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by WarlockD · · Score: 1

    It just replaced my grandpa's TV. He would spend hours watching Direct-TV. Then he found Netflix and the same thing. Now its browsing any random shit he finds on YouTube or Facebook.

    There is no epidemic. He is just board. Being forced to use a smart phone, he uses this rather than his computer because its more daunting. Rather than reading a book or watching the TV, we now just shit post on the internet for fun.

    Though, even as I say this, even I want to tell my grandpa to turn the TV on once in a while.

    1. Re: I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He is just board.

      Well, I hope his favorite chair at least has good lumber support

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re: I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> He is just board.

      > Well, I hope his favorite chair at least has good lumber support

      I'm drawing a plank.

    3. Re:I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by hughbar · · Score: 1

      See, Bonzo Dog Band, I'm bored even: https://youtu.be/tz_4qJBAlbc?t... Sorry unable to resist that, I'm very old too and aliens have replaced my brain with porridge.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    4. Re:I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no epidemic. He is just board ... Though, even as I say this, even I want to tell my grandpa to turn the TV on once in a while.

      No doubt, he should branch out!

    5. Re: I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sycamore puns

    6. Re:I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> There is no epidemic. He is just board
      > No doubt, he should branch out!

      It wouldn't be that hardwood it?

    7. Re: I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      isn't the internet porn for lumber support?

    8. Re:I can say, for the past 60+ crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's pining for the fiords.

  12. Yes/No/Maybe Now, Maybe Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use a pen to write a letter, are you addicted to pens?

    "Interactive Computing Devices" are tools. Use them enough, and yes with neuroplasticity, they will become extensions of one's body.

    Now, the better question is, are these devices turning their users into superficial, reactive, unimaginative, close-minded idiots? And I respond, What if they are already those things? They certainly aren't doing much to help these users by becoming more and more appliance-like (no user serviceable parts, no schematic included, absolutely no tinkering or we'll sue you).

    As for "not partaking in other activities they used to before the 'glowing screen' hooked them." God I can only hope this is the case. Boomers and bankers have driven up the price of property and insurance so high, I can only hope the crash comes soon enough. Going outside and doing "anything" other than pulling up weeds or kicking rocks around costs money. Everything outside has a price, by design. Admission fee, parking fee, trail fee, tolls, license for this and that, fines, taxes on top.

  13. The optic nerve is high bandwidth, direct bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A wise man once said, "The eye never has enough of seeing, nor the ear its fill of hearing."

    So yes, anything that is amazing to watch, see, or listen to has the potential for addictiveness.. Radio, TV, Record-players, 8-Tracks, books.

    Additionally, the optic nerve has its own high bandwidth bus directly to the brain so it doesn't have to compete with the rest of the body.

    Since in the first world, we don't have to spend every waking moment on survival, we have options. Unfortunately, our technology is adapting much, much faster than out species and companies are doing their best to capture our eyeballs and our wallets. Food, technology, commercials and just about everything is manufactured to be addictive.

    If you want to get your Phd, the question you should be asking is "How addictive are interactive computing devices?" instead of "Are interactive computing devices addictive." As and added bonus you can get quantitative data :)

  14. Easy... by xlsior · · Score: 2

    ...Just count how many "computer addicts" are pimping themselves out to random strangers so only they can afford to play another session of WoW?

  15. Addictions are more linked to society's problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that addiction is more like a defense system for society hardships, and everyone can be addicted to anything that flips those emotions, illegal drugs are the only ones that are being fighting, but we see alcohol, tobacco, sex, gaming, energizing drinks, legal drugs are other addiction vehicles, but we can see also some other addictions like money, power, influence, social status, fisical appearance, beauty products, parenting, partying, dancing, enterteinment (like reading, watching films or reading news), and other small vehicles that for some people are something they do depend on to satisfy a part of themselves that do not feel part of the society cluster they are living.

    We can get extremely attached to anything if that keeps our minds feeling better, the vehicle for that might vary but the effects for each individual are pretty much the same.

  16. It's not the hardware. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Are interactive computing devices, whether networked or not, addictive in nature?

    No. You can easily make any device frustrating enough to use that people will hate using it even if it saves them hours of work.

    What kind of applications appear to be the most addictive?

    This is the heart of the issue, the applications! A significant amount of neurological research has gone into how to trigger the reward centers in the brain which is what causes some software to be addictive. Some people research this and only this because it's become a very lucrative field.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:It's not the hardware. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You can easily make any device frustrating enough to use that people will hate using it

      Proof: Windows Mobile

    2. Re:It's not the hardware. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      That's at least arguable. If you want proof then you need to have someone try to use GIMP 1.x without yelling obscenities. It just cannot be done.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  17. Make people 'guilty' to make them weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah slashdot- where the social engineering never ends...

    What does organised religion do? Tell the suckers they should feel 'guilty' for all the things they do naturally in life. Then tell the suckers they need to 'trust' in god's 'authority' as represented by the priest class, for their 'salvation'.

    Today 'organised religion' has mutated to a raft of social engineering methods like 'political correctness' - which boils down to the same old tactic- namely "you're doing it WRONG so let us think on your behalf". Addiction- do any of you people here fall for such pathetic Orwellian methods?

    "Repent, citizen, and let Big Brother's annointed ones help you to a better place"

    For the one million + years of Man's history, life has been hard and short. This last hundred years or so a golden age has finally appeared for the Common Man- and now everything this golden age has brought, you are told to 'hate' by the same people who help Saudi Arabia spread wahhabi terror across the planet.

    This is the clue, people. Yeah most of you are too thick to escape the trap of 'guilt' so the bad people can use that against you- but you can at least see what else the self same bad people are doing. You see if the person that insults you by calling you a tech addict is also providing wire guided missile systems to the extremists butchering people like you in Syria, you can probably guess what their real motivation is and dismiss their criticism of you.

    You are born with a inherent sense of self- and you do not need anyone else to tell you how it is. If you are an addict, you already know this. The truth is that most people hate the idea of 'work', and wish they had most of their time for leisure. Modern tech brings leisure to all those periods that before were just functional (for most) like commuting or walking or waiting. And the monsters don't like the fact that now- instead of listening to their propaganda on the radio, or in the paper, or on TV, you are doing something else instead.

    You now choose, and they hate that you choose.

  18. Rewiring??? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    "rewire the neurons in your brain" = learning. We all do it all the time. Re: "Are Interactive Computing Devices Addictive?" -- Social media services; Facebook, Twitter, etc.; are designed to be as addictive as possible. They make their money out of having lots of eyes on their web pages so they hire gaming (read: gambling) consultants to "game-ify" their services, and like the gaming industry, they do it regardless of any negative effects this may have in people's lives. The biggest difference is that the gaming industry is strictly regulated, social media is not. Cory Doctorow gave a presentation about how this works at TEDxObserver a few years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... I hope this helps :)

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  19. yep by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"Myself and [...] until we reached college."

    Eeek, try "I"! Did you finish college? Anyway...

    >"Are Interactive Computing Devices Addictive?"

    Absolutely. But just about anything can become "addictive." The human brain almost seems to be wired to become "addicted" to all kinds of things. I watch many people twitch when denied access to their phones for just short periods of time, as if they can't survive 10 minutes of just silent thinking, contemplation, or even just a hour of conversation (often the same people walking off the curb into traffic, swerving while driving, and ignoring everyone around them at a dinner table).

    I do think the word "addicted" is overused and twisted around a lot. "Dependent" might be a better description for some of the more common things we see now.

    >"perpetually distracted and interrupted, we're not training ourselves in the quieter, more attentive modes of thought."

    Exactly. As if everyone has become ADHD and yet also just living in the present moment.... no thought to the future or re-examining the past.

    1. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      10 minutes?
      I know LOTS of people that can't go more than 2 without looking at their phone. You could make a game show where people have to sit with their phone on silent and face down and see who could make it the longest without looking. Probably could do three rounds of that each half hour.

  20. Better than... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Interactive things tend to be more addictive than dead things. I mean... think about it... How addicted are you to your dead friends, dead pets, dead rocks? Aren't the interactive ones more fun?

    1. Re:Better than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interactive rocks FTW.

    2. Re:Better than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found a dead badger once. Roadkill. The soft fur and its twisted look made it a keeper. We had many nice moments together. It was dead but was still good company, no arguing and such. It lasted some weeks until my neghbors started complain about a stench. However it kept me away from the internets for a while.

  21. No more than other things by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Any activity that causes the body to releases dopamine or happy-fun chemicals like norepinephrine can be addictive. Video games, exercise, sex, drugs. I would think that some things, like playing with your phone or getting swole, are more innocuous.

  22. Computer addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At 91 my eyes are not what they used to be and my energies also have dropped somewhat. To have a desktop which puts me in immediate touch with any news event, any comment, any reference for arcane information at the touch of a keyboard plus that the type can be easily enlarged to meed my visual decline. If anything, my contacts with the world and people of similar interest is far more intense than ever before. To characterize this as an addiction is, to say the least, a total misinterpretation of reality. Are people these days addicted to automobiles rather than horses, to airplanes rather than dreaming at isolated spots of seeing the world? This judgement strikes me as most peculiar.I think far better these days now being far better informed of the dynamics of the planet. I do not feel deprived of sitting beneath a tree and studying the bugs.

  23. Dumb Question - Apps are meant to be additictive by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    I thought the whole idea of games, social media and other apps like these that they were designed to be addictive - otherwise how are users going to tell other people about them ("Man, I just can't stop playing this" or "This is the same game Alec Baldwin refused to stop playing when the plane was supposed to take off").

    There's really two issues here. The first is that various apps are addictive and the answer to that is yes because they are designed to be.

    The second, which I think is much more important, are the various apps not developing and harming long term thinking and reasoning skills? Are they turning us into purely reactive entities that don't think through their responses?

    Is Donald Trump president?

  24. Somewhat similar to newspapers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in that a subway/street scene from the '90s or earlier would be full of them. Phones and other devices have replaced them.

    The big difference is that they have constant content updates. I think any addiction comes from that. You can always stop reading a newspaper and get back to it later. Same with movies, TV shows, or single-player games. It's the always-online, multiplayer-type of games/content that get people hooked. The feeling that they are missing something by not being online/in a game.

    Word verification: sporty

  25. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Unless you have no other skills, interest or talents.

  26. Re: On Child Molestation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of off topic, but this is what hollywood/scientlology/whatever gets you. An episode of DS with nothing but YouTube comments at the bottom. Gross and disheartening.

  27. Attentive? by SeriousTube · · Score: 1

    Slashdot readers are attentive? TIL. Flutters away to read something else.

  28. Uniquely qualified to address this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot readers seem uniquely qualified to address this"
    Are you fucking serious? You know who's uniquely qualified to address this? Researchers with a thorough background in addiction doing a controlled, double-blind study on a representative sample of people and then submitting their findings and conclusions for peer-review to find methodological errors before giving you whatever answer they found.

    1. Re:Uniquely qualified to address this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Slashdot readers seem uniquely qualified to address this"
      Are you fucking serious? You know who's uniquely qualified to address this? Researchers with a thorough background in addiction doing a controlled, double-blind study on a representative sample of people and then submitting their findings and conclusions for peer-review to find methodological errors before giving you whatever answer they found.

      Good luck finding significant numbers of people within certain demographics that do not have or use smart phones or computers to fill the 'control' side of the research. Otherwise, faux outrage included, spot on!

  29. tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

  30. Kind of... by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    I come to slashdot and other tech forums because it makes me feel better, as opposed to CNN. After reading that i want to off myself. ya these tech sites really seem to be a type of meditation almost... I think you all know what i mean... You have to be fully focused on what your doing (coding), or reading in regards to tech.... it takes your mind off the bad things quite well... especially if you got the BUG for it... you know what i mean about the BUG... that drive that makes you want to code... that feeling... its a beautiful thing.

    --
    [($)]
  31. Exactly by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a great video on addiction by Youtube user Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell, that offers up the following: "The opposite of addiction is not sobriety. The opposite of addiction is connection." It's almost too simple to be correct, but it makes sense.

    1. Re:Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you are addicted to connection??

  32. Interactive as opposed to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this technology and civilization has been a terrible mistake and makes us unhappy.
    Lets just go back to the trees and communicate by throwing feces at each others as nature intended.

  33. Only if you don't have something better to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you don't have something better to do.

    Human focus can be changed easily. If you put down the device and do something else, you'll never miss it.

    If you like building Lego structures, work on that a few hours instead.
    If you like hiking, do that for a few hours instead.
    If you find a great book to read, do that for a few hours a day until it is finished.
    Play a sport, go fishing, learn to fly, go to the beach, lake, boat ride - pretty much any activity that doesn't need a computing device can take your mind off it.

    The only trick I can think of is to disable notification, so your change in focus isn't interrupted.

    This really isn't hard.

  34. Controllability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The human mind wants to control its environment. Computers offer unparalleled control.

    For anyone wanting to increase that control, learn programming. To bring that into the real world, combine that with robotics.

  35. Actually, I'd like to ask a related question: by hey! · · Score: 1

    Does mental "down time" perform any useful function?

    Because that's what we're eliminating: time you spend neither doing something explicitly purposeful nor being entertained.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  36. slashdot reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Summary TL;DR, I'm a slashdot reader, and a millenial. We will rule your world soon.

  37. Other activities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... doing an activity over and over again each day that you place great importance in ...

    Ever notice that no-one worries whether going to work or washing the dishes are addictive. For most people, work is repetitive and dull with a reward only once every 2 weeks.

    I remember an Australian documentary on poker machines. Even when one has lost money, they 'reward' the player for not losing more.

  38. Re:Dumb Question - Apps are meant to be additictiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, he is and he is a Slashdot dumb editor...

  39. Re:Dumb Question - Apps are meant to be additictiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't understand this:
    by mykepredko ( 40154 ) on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:09AM (#54949191) Homepage
    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:38AM (#54950431)

    How is it possible that the reply was at 11:38 and the post at 12:09...time travel?

  40. Devices? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    For most of those people staring at a screen, it's not the device that interests them, but rather the content. They have found a way to interact with more interesting people who are not in physical proximity. Here's a nice article on neurochemicals the brain uses to reward behavior. It's possible to design computer games that stimulate the release of these chemicals, particularly dopamine. In some cases, this can lead to behavior that qualifies as addiction. Most of the time, you're seeing people replacing behavior that's valued by someone in their physical proximity with behavior that's valued by people who are more distant. Whether the support systems in our society are sufficiently good that we can so frequently disregard physical proximity as an organizing factor in the web of value exchange that we use to construct our place in society is a discussion worth having, and probably worth having in secondary school. However, it's not a discussion about addiction.

  41. Dopamine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your dopamine levels increase, there is possibility of addiction.

    Yes, we are that simple...

  42. Yes by The123king · · Score: 1

    Yes

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  43. To a certain degree by theupdown · · Score: 1

    These devices and apps revolve around instant gratification which I think is the root of all addiction. If you have an addictive personality then using technology can become your vice. Or maybe it's not so much we're addicted to technology but we've been socialized to need it.

  44. We're scanners because life is short by kwijibo · · Score: 1

    There comes a time when after youve done the school and the books, you need the cliff-notes, the reference data, the meat-and-potatoes, on a particular subject at a particular time. Computers help get you that one fact, so that you can get to the next thing. You could even give up books entirely if you have a career, because, meh, you'll read an interesting few later. Git er done, because your body is on its way to degrading permanently or youre gonna be kilt tomorrow. Do as thou will.

  45. Re:Dumb Question - Apps are meant to be additictiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a sec! YOU also posted at 11:42AM while the OP posted at 12:09! Quick, grab on to my time lasso man—you've been sucked into a time vortex!