Slashdot Mirror


Uber Investors Slam Travis Kalanick In Open Letter To Employees (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: Benchmark Capital, one of Uber's largest investors, is trying to explain its legal feud with former CEO Travis Kalanick to the ride-sharing company's employees. Benchmark sued Kalanick for fraud last week, adding another controversy to the company's already disastrous summer. In an open letter to Uber employees, Benchmark slammed Kalanick's leadership of the company and said that he was purposely hindering the board's search for a replacement CEO. The firm also criticized Uber's slow response to the report compiled by Eric Holder and Tammy Albarran on harassment within Uber, and the stagnant search for a chief financial officer that has dragged on for more than two years.

"It has appeared at times as if the search was being manipulated to deter candidates and create a power vacuum in which Travis could return," the unsigned letter reads. "It's easy to reduce this situation to a battle of personalities. But this isn't about Benchmark versus Travis. It's about ensuring that Uber can reach its full potential as a company. And that will only happen if we get rid of the roadblocks and distractions that have plagued Uber, and its board, for far too long," Benchmark wrote in its letter. "Failing to act would have meant endorsing behavior that was utterly unacceptable in any company, let alone a company of Uber's size and importance."
Kalanick has responded to Benchmark through a spokesperson via The New York Times: "Like many shareholders, I am disappointed and baffled by Benchmark's hostile actions, which clearly are not in the best interests of Uber and its employees on whose behalf they claim to be acting. Since 2009, building Uber into a great company has been my passion and obsession. I continue to work tirelessly with the board to identify and hire the best CEO to guide Uber into its next phase of growth and ensure its continued success."

20 comments

  1. This latest tech bubble can't pop soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really can't wait for this latest tech bubble to pop, and clear away all of the stupidity and drama that has taken over the tech fields since the .com bust. Silicon Valley and Seattle need to return to their roots as places where tech, and not politics and drama, were what mattered most.

    1. Re:This latest tech bubble can't pop soon enough! by Misagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can Uber be classified as a "tech" company, now again?
      Other than calling itself "Uber Technologies" and relying a smartphone app, the only thing that I can see as being the core business inside their complex structure is the cars driving around.

      Yes, it is using smartphone apps in a different way from the norm. But so is the company that is delivering groceries to my door - and they are in the food business, not in the technology sector.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:This latest tech bubble can't pop soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, their entire self driving r&d division maybe??

    3. Re:This latest tech bubble can't pop soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually believe that their "R&D" division exists? P.T. Barnum was right.

    4. Re:This latest tech bubble can't pop soon enough! by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the company delivering groceries to your door owns cars and groceries. Uber doesn't own cars. They don't just rely on an app, the app is their entire product. They are an orchestration layer only. Which makes them very much a tech company.

  2. But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like looking at a slow motion train wreck. Pass the popcorn!

  3. Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough already. He made that company what it was. Yes, he struggled to manage it once it hit the big time, but he's one of the great success stories of the tech industry. Reminds me a little of Steve Jobs when it comes to business instincts. Jobian should be a term.

    1. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's Uber's way to try to overcome all the criticism they've been getting lately. Kalanick was the scapegoat. The fact that he did some things poorly means he will now get blamed for everything that was done poorly. It's the way of the world.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He has made a fortune from a company that does nothing but bleed money, flout laws and treats everyone like shit. Doesn't seem unreasonable to land most of the blame squarely at his feet.

    3. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jobs was absolute shit during his first tenure with Apple. It was only after he got canned and gained some perspective and spent time maturing that he became an okay CEO, and I think a lot of his success during his second tenure was realizing that while he was good (and not perfect) at product vision and marketing, there were a lot of other parts of the company that were better left to more qualified people and that he should probably leave it to them rather than always trying to do things his way.

      Maybe this guy is the same and needs to get tossed out. When you're on top, its easy to get this false sense of everything being a direct result of your own actions and dismissing all of the other factors that contributed to that success. Finding out you're not as special as you think is one of those experiences that can humble you a bit and let you grow as a person.

    4. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding out you're not as special as you think is one of those experiences that can humble you a bit and let you grow as a person.

      Well, apparently he has a bunch of runway for growth...

    5. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are indeed correct. Jobs got better and his mind got sharper each year. He was really hitting his stride there at the end. We'll never know what else he would have come up with for us. One of the true tragedies of this young century. From a tinkerer in a garage...to a visionary who shaped our world.

    6. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      = = = Reminds me a little of Steve Jobs when it comes to business instincts. = = =

      Steve Jobs may have stretched a few laws and regulations over the years (the 'agreement' on not cross-recruiting comes to mind), but none of Jobs' businesses were founded fundamentally on wholesale breaking and flouting of the law. So not such a great comparison there.

    7. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scapegoat? Funny. I thought he was the Central Executive Officer. You know, the one responsible for running the organization.

    8. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > his mind got sharper each year.

      Not in all things. He DID try to cure cancer with holistic shit, after all.

    9. Re:Time to pile on Kalanick by mjwx · · Score: 1

      = = = Reminds me a little of Steve Jobs when it comes to business instincts. = = =

      Steve Jobs may have stretched a few laws and regulations over the years (the 'agreement' on not cross-recruiting comes to mind), but none of Jobs' businesses were founded fundamentally on wholesale breaking and flouting of the law. So not such a great comparison there.

      Yep, Steve Jobs completely lacked humility and were pretty light with other scruples, but even he didn't wantonly break laws. I'm pretty critical of Jobs, but I'll happily say that of all things, he wasn't a criminal.

      Uber was a pyramid scheme from the very beginning. The only difference is he was conning Silicon Valley VC's instead of old grandmas. The death of Uber is now inevitable and the investors that were conned now want their money back. I have no doubt Kalanick has squirrelled away a small fortune of it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  4. Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kalanick is an asshole. That is how he built that company, by being an asshole and doing things people said not to do.

    Benchmark was happy with that when they thought the unicorn would produce golden sprinkles on them. He was always an asshole, but he was their asshole.

    But surprise, assholes do things that cause problems for you too, even if they are your asshole.

    Meh. Chickens -> Roost.

  5. This open letter makes it worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Investors publishing something like this while in the midst of a lawsuit only makes the whole thing look like an even bigger clusterfuck. I stopped using Uber in favor of Lyft over a year ago, and my experience has been so much better.

  6. I do hope this corporate vampire is killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a stake driven through Uber's heart.