Slashdot Mirror
Verizon To Start Throttling All Smartphone Videos To 480p or 720p (arstechnica.com)
Verizon Wireless will start throttling video streams to resolutions as low as 480p on smartphones this week. Most data plans will get 720p video on smartphones, but customers won't have any option to completely un-throttle video. From a report: 1080p will be the highest resolution provided on tablets, effectively ruling out 4K video on Verizon's mobile network. Anything identified as a video will not be given more than 10Mbps worth of bandwidth. This limit will affect mobile hotspot usage as well. Verizon started selling unlimited smartphone data plans in February of this year, and the carrier said at the time that it would deliver video to customers at the same resolution used by streaming video companies. "We deliver whatever the content provider gives us. We don't manipulate the data," Verizon told Ars in February. That changes beginning on Wednesday, both for existing customers and new ones. The changes were detailed today in an announcement of new unlimited data plans. Starting August 23, Verizon's cheapest single-line unlimited smartphone data plan will cost $75 a month, which is $5 less than it cost before. The plan will include only "DVD-quality streaming" of 480p on phones and 720p on tablets.The new Verizon cell phone plans can be compare side by side here, along with all of Verizon's existing plans.
On the contrary - it is against net neutrality since it is treating some internet traffic (videos) differently to all other internet traffic (not videos). It is applying some kind of filter in the middle if and only if the ISP deems the data to look a certain way. That means that it becomes impossible for me to download certain types of data over this connection.
This is almost the exact case that net neutrality hopes to prevent.
If all lessees of suitable FCC-owned spectrum do this, it's not a free market.
No, this is network management. Network Neutrality is normally, and usefully, described as discrimination against the source (or destination) of data.
What Verizon is doing is not discriminating against source, it's managing data under a particular protocol. The battle for all protocols to be treated equally was lost a long time ago when most ISPs stopped allowing customers to receive data on port 25.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
Net Neutrality is not only about throttling one particular company. It's about applying any filter that causes some data to be treated differently to another.
The "Net" refers to networks. As in, I'm neutral as to how I treat packets from network A and network B.
You may want ISPs to be neutral about how they treat packets on criteria other than their source and destination, but that isn't Net Neutrality. That's something else entirely.
ISPs can throttle and apply QoS polices to traffic and maintain network neutrality as long as the selection criteria isn't based on src or dst.
Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
That definition of Network Neutrality is the one that's pushed by ISPs, not by NN advocates. Typical NN definitions allow differentiating based on traffic type, but with some tight constraints (e.g. you can put things into latency-sensitive, jitter-sensitive, and bandwidth-sensitive buckets, but you can't treat one latency-sensitive protocol differently from another). QoS explicitly is allowed by all except for the straw-man NN definition used by ISPs.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News