Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple To Build $1.3 Billion Iowa Data Center, Get $208 Million In Incentives (cnbc.com)

Posted by BeauHD on from the future-investments dept.

CEO Tim Cook said on Thursday that Apple will invest at least $1.3 billion in the first phase of an Iowa data center project. The data center will be built near Waukee, Iowa, creating 50 permanent jobs with more than 550 jobs supported by construction, Apple said in a statement. CNBC reports: "Apple is going to continue to invest in that future, for Waukee, for Iowa and for America," Cook said. It will get $208 million in state and local tax benefits, according to The Associated Press. "Apple has been searching for the perfect location and I am so proud to say that they found it right here in Iowa," Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said, noting the state's educated workforce, stable climate and low-cost, renewable energy. "Iowa workers give companies a leg up at the start.... it is just a blessing to be in the heartland of America." The 400,000-square-foot data center will "strengthen the relationships" in Iowa, where 30 Apple suppliers, including 3M and Qorvo, already operate, Cook said.

13 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Dear Iowa... by MetricT · · Score: 2

    I'll be happy to create one job if you give me $26 million. I will be sitting at home awaiting the check arrival so I can start. Thanks.

    1. Re:Dear Iowa... by galabar · · Score: 2

      If you are willing to build a billion dollar data center, they might be interested.

    2. Re:Dear Iowa... by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      What is in it for IA, campaign donations for the next election as a percentage of the tax cheating. Now I understand under law, all are meant to be treated equal, so why do some fuckers get taxed less upon an individual discriminatory basis whilst all the rest of the citizens pay taxes, gees I seem to remember something in the US constitution, how individualised laws were illegal and all must be treated equally but obviously campaign donations over rule that pesky little law when it comes to cheating on taxes.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Eventually...just two jobs... by bschorr · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. A guy
    2. A dog

    The guy is there to feed the dog. The dog is there to make sure the guy doesn't touch the servers.

    --
    -B-
  3. More jobs would make this a good deal by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's good for those 50 people, who I assume are going to be reduced to 10 or 15 over time as data center tasks get even more routine. You basically need security guards, 1 or 2 admins and a bunch of hardware guys to run around and replace disks, rack equipment, etc. And with vendors producing Open Compute-style pods-in-a-box that just have cables, water lines and ductwork coming out, this job gets even easier and more automated. Disks are so cheap now that they could probably just let them die and do a once-a-year purge of all the dead drives, meaning you wouldn't even have to have the full time guys for that job.

    Data centers are not a good investment for EDAs...the tax forgiveness and free electricity they're getting will never be offset by 50 jobs over the long term. Government officials think "cyber" when they hear about these projects and think they're master negotiators for bringing this big Silicon Valley titan into their jurisdiction. The details come out later...and Apple may not even decide to stick around.

    I think it's growing more and more obvious that full-time, lifelong employment is going away, but the need to keep the consumption cycle running isn't. You're not just going to replace the whole "money is the only store of value" thing overnight. Since no one will ever agree to a basic income until people are killing each other over food scraps, I propose blatant make-work projects. Seriously, if employers won't hire the vast majority of people, how can you run a society where most people can't participate in the economy, _and_ not make those who can feel that those who can't are "lazy drug using welfare queens" or similar?

  4. capitali$m doesn't add up by bigtreeman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Companies shouldn't get handouts from governments.
    It goes against all the rules of capitalism and the free market.
    If they can't make a go of it without corporate welfare they should shut shop.

    --
    Go well
    1. Re:capitali$m doesn't add up by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      A major corporation like Apple can build a data center almost anywhere. It's not a question of whether Apple can make a go of it without corporate welfare. The fact is, they can demand it and get it, so why wouldn't they?

      Apple is building one data center. Multiple states would love to have the resulting tax revenue. Limited demand and more customers leads to the customers bidding on the product. Sometimes the bidding gets carried away and the customer spends far more on the product than it's worth (which does seem to be the case here).

      That's not against your imaginary Rules of Capitalism (feel free to post a link to those official rules, btw... would love to see them). That is the reality of capitalism. When you argue for the free market, this sort of thing is exactly what you're arguing for.

  5. UBI case by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    208 million to get 50 jobs is quite expensive. At that price we can give 50 huge universal basic income for more than a lifespan.

    I agree technological leadership is more than 50 jobs, but please stop telling us such tax breaks are for employment.

    1. Re:UBI case by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      These tax breaks are an admission that the State has a bad tax policy. Instead of fixing it, they do this.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  6. Breakdown by dbarclay10 · · Score: 2

    For anybody too lazy to do the math, that works out to $4.16 million per permanent job, or $208k per year per permanent job for 20 years.

    --

    Barclay family motto:
    Aut agere aut mori.
    (Either action or death.)
  7. Re:Tim Cook vs. Mark Zuckerberg 2020 by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    It's so awful it just might work. I mean if you listen to anyone, whatever candidates are running are somehow the worst the party has every fielded. I can't wait another decade or so when whoever we have is so bad that people are looking back favorably on Trump.

  8. Let's set a few things straight by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. They are being paid 4M per job
    No, this assumes that some other company would have built on that land and paid the full tax rate. This is vacant land which is taxed at a far lower level. It seems more likely that Iowa is simply applying the tax rate of what vacant land would cost instead of developed commercial property.

    2. Apple can pick up and leave after 10 years
    True, they can have another state build a new data center for them but why would they? The labor cost savings would be insignificant and if you have a perfectly good data center what is the point of mothballing it?

    I don't like the fact that rich companies like Apple get tax breaks but everybody wants to have high tech jobs. Tech companies are not going to move to sparsely populated states like Iowa without major incentives. Even if they leave later on they will leave behind a built up infrastructure that could be used to lure other companies to the region.

  9. Re: Tim Cook vs. Mark Zuckerberg 2020 by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2

    What is an 'alt-right snowflake'? If you are going to try to appropriate political namecalls, at least have an idea going into it what you might mean.