Slashdot Mirror


Chrome Will Soon Let You Permanently Mute Websites (androidpolice.com)

Google Chrome will soon allow users to permanently mute websites, a feature that will cheer millions who suffer through autoplaying videos on (annoying) websites every day. From a report: According to Google's Francois Beaufort, the Chrome team is still experimenting with this feature. In the early version, the sound toggle is in the page info popup, which you can access by clicking on the far left of the address bar. That's either an info icon or a "Secure" label for sites that have HTTPS enabled. There are already various toggles in there now for things like Flash, JavaScript, notifications, and so on. Soon, a sound toggle will be added that works in the same way. Sites on which you disable sound will remain that way until you turn them back on.

82 comments

  1. Finally by sexconker · · Score: 2

    There are a few websites I use that only work in Chrome (because fuck testing in anything else, right modern web developers?), and I'm fuckign sick of having to mute them every time.

    1. Re:Finally by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But why should I have to mute each site individually? Why can't "no autoplay sound" be turned off globally? I never want any site to autoplay (either audio or video). There used to be plugins that disable autoplay, but apparently none of them work anymore because Google changed Chrome to intentionally break them, which seems ... evil.

    2. Re:Finally by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      That'd be an interesting list. I don't even have Chrome installed, except in a seldom used VM explicitly to test for something that Chrome can't handle. It's been dormant since Chrome 28 or something like that.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes fuck anything else. It's the only thing close to standards compliant.

    4. Re:Finally by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But why should I have to mute each site individually? Why can't "no autoplay sound" be turned off globally? I never want any site to autoplay (either audio or video). There used to be plugins that disable autoplay, but apparently none of them work anymore because Google changed Chrome to intentionally break them, which seems ... evil.

      Mute Chrome in your OS?

    5. Re:Finally by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Our version of Kronos time keeping + whatever, for one. It recently stopped working on FF completely. Only Chrome is supported, and only Chrome seems to work now (perhaps Opera would work). Firefox used to work once you got the site to believe you had the proper versions of flash/java installed.

    6. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they are usually too busy learning the new hot meme language / framework / library to be doing Actual Work.

      There is zero excuses for making websites that only work in Chrome unless you are deliberately being a cunt.
      More than 90% of web tech works in every browser, even way back to fucking IE6. It's trivial to make sites degrade gracefully for older browsers.
      I was doing it when I was in my early teens for crying out loud! I had to deal with MYSPACE. You don't know true suffering unless you touched that shitheap.

      The fact that the websites exclusively work in Chrome tells me the developers are pricks or is using features not supposed to be used on live websites. (experimental)
      Most likely prick because most experimental code was put behind hard process flags and not little in-browser toggles or prefixes like it used to be. (thank the GODs for that!)
      The differences between Chrome, Opera, Safari, Firefox and hell, even Edge, are pretty damn small now. There's very rarely major rendering differences, it's mostly tiny pixel issues now.
      The only other issue is if you are using an older version of a browser. A lot of new stuff was introduced to most browsers recently because a spec was finalized finally.

    7. Re:Finally by taustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't care who is at fault, there is fault. If a web site doesn't work for shit, it doesn't work for shit.

    8. Re:Finally by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm sure there will be an extension that makes it the default, if they don't support it in the preferences.

      Google didn't intentionally break the autoplay extensions, they broke because they worked by blocking Flash and HTML video tags in the page. Web sites instead generate HTML5 tags via Javascript, which needs something a bit more advanced (like uBlock) to deal with.

      The one upside of Flash was that it was easy to block.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so now you can manually play sounds in the browser?

    10. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly autoplay of sound and video is evil.

      I don;t want a a cute girl asking for a sex survey when people think i am working....

      But why should I have to mute each site individually? Why can't "no autoplay sound" be turned off globally? I never want any site to autoplay (either audio or video). There used to be plugins that disable autoplay, but apparently none of them work anymore because Google changed Chrome to intentionally break them, which seems ... evil.

    11. Re:Finally by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      There is. Mute tab does this https://chrome.google.com/webs...

      Set the default to muted and go into
      chrome://flags/ and enable "Tab audio muting UI control".

      Then just click the little muted speaker to unmute the tab.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    12. Re:Finally by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Well, there's part of the problem... flash. So my guess is you need the specific Chrome/flash version that still supports that pile....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re:Finally by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Previously, FF worked once you got it to report the versions Kronos expected, but that's no longer the case, even if you do have the proper versions.

    14. Re:Finally by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Mute Chrome in your OS?

      Then you have to un-mute it when you do want the sound. Plus, that doesn't disable autoplay - the video will still run. Whenever you do want to watch something, you have to pause it, "rewind" it, open the OS control, turn off the OS mute, play, when finished open the OS control again if it closed, and turn on the OS mute again. Instead of just clicking play whenever you want to watch something, like YouTube used to be in the old days before Google bought it.

    15. Re:Finally by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Why Firefox remains my preferred browser, since Chrome and Edge don't allow you to disable user hostile media from autoplaying.

  2. change the default...opt in to sound, not opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd love to have the default be "no sound", and only enable it for sites I want sound out of (netflix, youtube, etc).

  3. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now can we set everything to mute by default?

  4. I dub this feature, "Porn Tab muting". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, science.

  5. Permanent audio blacklist? by Hadlock · · Score: 3

    This is amazing if it's true. I hate visiting a news site to read a particular article, and some live news feed, or the video version of the article starts playing. I think that within a month I'll have blacklisted 99% of the offending sites and won't have to browse with my computer's audio muted anymore. What a time to be alive!

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Permanent audio blacklist? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a whitelist, but this seems like exactly the sort of thing that should just be treated like any other sort of permission (e.g. location data, notifications, etc.). Just give it the standard Always Allow/Ask/Always Deny toggle in Chrome's settings and call it a day. I'll get my whitelist, you'll get your blacklist, and everyone (that matters) will be happier.

  6. Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla is busy killing addons. Moving on.

  7. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by dgatwood · · Score: 2

    My thoughts, exactly. Assuming the flag is accessible from Chrome extensions, it should be possible to trivially write an extension that would set the mute flag as soon as you go to a new page and provides a whitelisting feature to disable that behavior for a given page.

    If the flag isn't exposed to extensions, file a bug. :-)

    That said, just being able to mute CNN.com would be a big win. I'd like to kill their autoplay videos entirely for bandwidth reasons, but at least I'll be able to look at their website now while listening to other things in the background without their stupid autoplay video crap forcing itself upon my ears.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  8. Not good enough by DeHackEd · · Score: 3

    Muting's not good enough. As someone with a slow(-ish) internet connection with a meter on it, why am I being forced to download and play a video I clearly don't want?

    1. Re:Not good enough by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My favorite is when the site throws an autoplaying video at you, you stop it, then you scroll down to read whatever you wanted to read, and the video resizes and moves to the bottom right corner, following you as you scroll down the page. And of course it'll start playing again when it feels like it.

    2. Re:Not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it may be clear to you that you do not want the video, because you are, well, YOU, but it's not clear to the site's owners and creators. They are assuming that you DO want it and are operating under that assumption unless specifically told otherwise.

    3. Re:Not good enough by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Yep. Next up will be a video ad version of the old whack-a-mole game. As soon as your mouse gets close to pause/close/X button, it will vanish and pop up somewhere else on the page.

      Hmm, I wonder if we could fight evil with evil here. Someone could write and patent that, create a web site no one ever visits and put it on there (so that no one can claim you're not actually using the patent), and then patent-troll any web advertisers that try to do that.

    4. Re:Not good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox and Safari have options to turn off videos autoplaying. I believe you have to turn on the debug menu in Safari.

    5. Re:Not good enough by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As someone with a slow(-ish) internet connection with a meter on it, why am I being forced to download and play a video I clearly don't want?

      Probably because you're not using Pale Moon with Adblock Plus and Noscript Origin... That stuff annoys the piss out of me any time I'm not using my desktop PC. When I am using my desktop PC, I just don't see it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Meanwhile Edge will have extra volume options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With maximum volume as default.

  10. So weird by PingSpike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This topic of auto play video nightmares comes up all the time. Very annoying stuff I agree. But apparently everyone has just been suffering with it by the comments I always see.

    I installed Flash Control https://addons.mozilla.org/en-... forever ago and never see them. Despite its name, it blocks HTML5 videos as well. Everything is click to play, as it should be. I whitelist youtube and moved on with my life. Are others not aware of these kinds of extensions?

    This chrome addition is nice and everything...but auto-muted videos are presumably still loading, using cpu time and bandwidth.

    1. Re:So weird by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      This topic of auto play video nightmares comes up all the time. Very annoying stuff I agree. But apparently everyone has just been suffering with it by the comments I always see.

      I installed Flash Control https://addons.mozilla.org/en-... forever ago and never see them. Despite its name, it blocks HTML5 videos as well. Everything is click to play, as it should be. I whitelist youtube and moved on with my life. Are others not aware of these kinds of extensions?

      This chrome addition is nice and everything...but auto-muted videos are presumably still loading, using cpu time and bandwidth.

      Thank you so much for this add on! I hope it really stops the auto play video on pretty much every news web page nowadays!

  11. Didn't know this feature. What else am I missing? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    In the early version, the sound toggle is in the page info popup, which you can access by clicking on the far left of the address bar.

    Can someone list Chrome's other [hidden] treasures?

  12. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Funny

    That said, just being able to mute CNN.com would be a big win. I'd like to kill their autoplay videos entirely for bandwidth reasons, but at least I'll be able to look at their website now while listening to other things in the background without their stupid autoplay video crap forcing itself upon my ears.

    But you will be missing out on CNN - The Most Trusted Name In News...

  13. how about permanently blacklisting web sites by doctorvo · · Score: 2

    There are some web sites I just don't want to see, not in search results, not in links, not in stories. I'd like a way of permanently banning them from my browser. How about supporting that in a way that's easier than the hodgepodge of extensions I need to make that happen right now?

    1. Re:how about permanently blacklisting web sites by green1 · · Score: 2

      Google used to have a way of blacklisting websites from their search results, I found it incredibly handy and used it all the time. but of course like so many Google features before, it's always the most useful ones that they decide to discontinue.

    2. Re:how about permanently blacklisting web sites by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Of course they discontinued that useful feature. They make more money the more searches you make on their site. Therefore, they only want to be slightly better than Bing (and more famous than DDG),

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  14. Thank you! by ngc5194 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    THANK YOU! The current crop of ads is taking us in a direction which is in danger of making the web unusable. I realize that ads are necessary to pay for content, and I'm not opposed to that, but autoplay and scripting in these ads is evil. The memory and processing power web browsers consume, largely in powering these ads, is truly insane. If I see an autoplay ad for a product I buy, I stop buying it. If a web site insists on showing me ads that consume a boat load of my system memory, I stop visiting that site. This war of escalation for our attention has gotten out of hand. The only way to put the brakes on this is to make the most egregious offenders realize that their participation in this war is unprofitable.

    1. Re:Thank you! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      What? What about the last crop of ads that made the web unusable? And the one before that? And the Chevy Silverado ad in 1999 which autoplayed in a quiet lab on full volume which scared the shit out of me? That was the first one, and the last one for me. I've blocked them all since.
       
      I don't know about this crop, because I haven't seen any of them. You must be new here if you think this is pretty recent.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  15. Feature Already Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "Delete Bookmark".

  16. Fixing the wrong problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I want is a way to DISABLE AUTOPLAY in the first place. Not have the video start playing, but with the sound muted. I don't want the video sucking up my bandwidth in the first place.

    Why can I not get a "just don't autoplay videos" toggle? Or, better, a "only autoplay videos from these specific sites" whitelist? Why should I need an extension to get what seems like obvious functionality that should be in the core app? Any why, when the core app developers decide to address the issue, do they address the wrong thing?

    1. Re:Fixing the wrong problem. by taustin · · Score: 2

      What I was is a complete, comprehensive list of all features the browser supports, with check boxes to turn them off. I want a browser that will let me turn of text if I want. I want a browser where I can click once on "uncheck all," and render all web pages as completely blank. Then I can turn on what is actually useful.

    2. Re:Fixing the wrong problem. by gman003 · · Score: 1

      On Firefox: navigate to about:config, search for "media.autoplay.enabled", set it to false.

      I believe some sites use trickery, running some Javascript after page load to trigger the video playback, but this will get most of them. And if you disable Javascript too, it'll block literally all of them.

  17. Re: change the default...opt in to sound, not opt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather be able to opt out of autoplay videos all together. They really get annoying, especially when I'm close to my data cap.

  18. Who in the right mind by taustin · · Score: 1

    leaves the sound on be default? Not just in browser, but at the OS level. Too many programs make annoying, and utterly useless, sounds.

    1. Re:Who in the right mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I was wondering. Mute every computer, put every phone on vibrate. There, problem solved. Except for the mobile browser ads that autoplay with sound even with the phone's audio muted while on vibrate. So yeah, let's focus on getting rid of autoplay instead.

    2. Re:Who in the right mind by green1 · · Score: 1

      Simple solution. Leave the speakers off until there's something you want to hear.

      My speakers are rarely on, unless I decide to specifically watch a video or something. Webpages can try to make all the noise they want, I won't even notice.

    3. Re:Who in the right mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons my phone is a flip phone. If I want to surf the web, I'll use a computer. If I want to surf the web while elsewhere, I'll use my laptop. In both cases, I control its ability to make sound.

    4. Re:Who in the right mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      That's been my method since 30 seconds after the first web page made sound at me, many years ago.

  19. Do it the other way around by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sites on which you disable sound will remain that way until you turn them back on.

    No, do it the other way. Let me disable sound on all sites unless I opt to enable it for a specific site. That way I'm not playing whack-a-mole with a million random websites I might one day click. Instead I only get sound on the few dozen websites I frequent which need sound, and the occasional random site I visit where I want sound I can temporarily turn it on.

    1. Re:Do it the other way around by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I would be hard pressed to think of more than a couple sites where I want to hear audio and none where I want it to start on it's own.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  20. Wow... might move me back to chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate the evil empire. Google does a lot of evil in the name of not doing evil.

    Ask the dead people, right?

    Something like this is going to make things like CNN, and ABC things where I can read the news at work again. I have just taken to never going to those sites, because they can't honor my request not to blare loud crap over my background music while I am studying.

  21. I mute the whole system to browse the web by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I don't care which site it is who wakes up the whole house when I browse the web when I can't sleep at night.

  22. WooHoo!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally,

    No more accidental audio from xhamster and pornhub!!!

  23. can we mute google, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as in opt-out of every piece of data collection they do on chrome users?

  24. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Do they actually say that? Wow, I visit cnn.com often and I never knew that. I mean, I know I try to keep my PC muted unless I'm specifically watching something specific on YouTube/NetFlix/etc., but I didn't realize I was that (successfully) anal about it.

  25. Arms race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I like being able to stop those stupid ads attached to game wikis that play audio without prompting, this doesn't solve the underlying problem - the entire cycle is an arms race between browsers and unscrupulous advertisers. I can think of a few examples through the years:

    Advertisers pop up a separate window or tab for their ad - browsers add a "this site is trying to launch a popup" confirmation that won't open the popup unless you opt in.

    Advertisers open popups that open popups that open popups ad infinitum - browsers add a confirmation dialog that asks if you want the page that was opened by another page to really open another page.

    Advertisers track cookies to serve up ads that users do not want following them around - browsers add incognito mode.

    Now advertisers autoplay ads with audio - browsers add the ability to mute websites so the audio won't intrude on browsing.

    I wish there were a better solution than just reacting to annoying advertisers.

  26. Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched back to FF because Chrome likes to auto-play video and gives no native way to disable it. This is a step in the right direction but they need to add the ability to disable video as well.

  27. Stop auto-playing videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Muting audio is a mere work-around to the larger problem of auto-play videos that browser developers have been ignoring for years. Seriously, how are these developers so fucking oblivious? It took them years to fix the pop-up problem, now it's taking them years to address the auto-play video problem.

    ALL videos should be manual start unless the user specifically white-lists the page or site. Stopping the auto-play problem would not only cut the need for audio muting, but also greatly reduce unnecessary data transfer.

  28. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    You can actually do all of this now with mute tab https://chrome.google.com/webs...

    Set the default to muted and go into
    chrome://flags/ and enable Tab audio muting UI control.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  29. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the pointer, but why the heck would an extension that just sets a flag on each tab require permission to read and modify content on all websites I visit? This extension is asking for way more broad permissions than it should reasonably need. No, I will not trust an extension to have complete access to the password fields for my bank account just to mute annoying, badly designed websites.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  30. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    That said, just being able to mute CNN.com would be a big win. I'd like to kill their autoplay videos entirely for bandwidth reasons, but at least I'll be able to look at their website now while listening to other things in the background without their stupid autoplay video crap forcing itself upon my ears.

    But you will be missing out on CNN - The Most Trusted Name In News...

    Other way around. With this, I won't be missing out. As it is, I don't bother to go to the website very often because the experience is too disruptive.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  31. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    The ended up on my permanent blacklist because of that shit. If I can't make it not autoplay, then it gets banned. That simple. I can't fathom how that decision gets made, given how awkward and stupidly annoying it is. Do the people around the board table deciding that they should have autoplay videos actually like that shit?

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  32. What do they mean by 'mute'? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Troll

    I never hear sounds from web pages. Then again:

    1) I don't use Chrome
    2) I don't have my speakers turned on unless I explicitly want to listen to something
    3) Don't have Flash installed
    4) Run uMatrix to stop ads from running

    This isn't rocket science. It's disconcerting that people on here even have this issue.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  33. Maybe half a "solution" by markdavis · · Score: 3

    >"Google Chrome will soon allow users to permanently mute websites, a feature that will cheer millions who suffer through autoplaying videos on (annoying) websites every day"

    Sorry, but audio is not the only problem. Let us know when AUTOPLAY OF THE VIDEOS (and even stupid animations) can also be "permanently" disabled. Having a video play is almost as annoying as the audio that goes with it. Many of us can't read or tolerate looking at sites that constantly move and spin and fade... it is beyond severely distracting. And now sites take their F'ing autoplaying videos and MOVE THEM DOWN THE SCREEN TO FOLLOW YOU, just to maximize the annoyance, waste screen space, and cover things you want to see.

    At least Firefox + FlashStopper is a HUGE help (despite the name, it has nothing to do with Flash), although it does nothing for non-video animation.

  34. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    IDK I figure it has something to do with it's blacklisting and whitelisting functions.

    Https everywhere also requires it and it only works with URLs and it was made by the EFF.

    Otherwise "Clever mute" is the only similar one requiring less. I'm aware of.
    https://chrome.google.com/webs...

    It requires access to browsing history and permission to display notifications.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  35. Dear Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you REALLY cared, you'd let us order carpet-firebombing of those assholes homes and offices.

    Sincerely: We really were that sick of it.

  36. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    The people who sell ads love it, because the autoplay videos can start with an annoying ad that they get paid for whether the user is actually watching it or not. These days, it's all about monetization at all costs, no matter how many users leave as a result. This is towards the end of the death spiral for the industry.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  37. No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My system has external speakers. One of them has a volume control. Therefore I have total control (as well as tonal control ;)

  38. Only "permanent" until it's not with nonfree SW. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Chrome is nonfree software (aka user-subjugating, proprietary software). Users are not free to run, share, modify, or inspect the complete corresponding source code and build instructions. Only Google, Chrome's copyright holder and proprietor, can do this.

    Therefore the alleged "permanency" of any feature in Chrome is up to the proprietor, just as all other features are with any nonfree program. If Google decides to later take this feature away (possibly reframing the decision in a press release with some euphemism as a cover to distract users away from the user's lack of control over the program and thus their computers), so be it. What is pitched as permanent suddenly becomes revealed to be impermanent and up to the whim of the proprietor.

    This and all the other problems (when viewed from a user's perspective) with nonfree software apply. You can't trust it will do what you want it to do and even if you find it useful, reliable, and robust against errors (as some nonfree software is) you can't take steps to maintain that or vet it in any serious way. Software freedom (a user's freedom to run, inspect, share, and modify all published computer software for any purpose at any time) is a value unto itself. It's wise not to get lost in the shuffle of new features; even less technically featureful free software is a better choice than robust and featureful nonfree software because features can be added but freedom is usually not added.

  39. other options by swell · · Score: 1

    My computer must be unique. I never have a problem with autoplay because I have a built in volume control that goes all the way to zero. It works in every browser and every program that makes noise. The control for this is just a short reach from my Delete key. In an emergency I can always press Cmd-W to immediately close the web page.

    Is it possible that other computers offer such options?

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:other options by joemck · · Score: 1

      Yes, but many of us want to continue to listen to music, either from another app or another browser tab, and not hear the random site we're reading start screaming at us. Or we leave the sound turned on when nothing's playing in order to hear notification chimes and chirps.

  40. er by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    haha that was so wrong. I meant noscript and uBlock Origin. I'm not even using ABP any more, in fact, although they do have an Android browser I guess I will start using... which is based on firefox

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. Here's a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop visiting websites that abuse you by blasting you with ads and auto-playing audio/video.

  42. Lynx..just text only please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please for my father's wallet sake, for my third world country's sake, just give me an option "text browsing mode". Dont even load any media. If i want , i will right-click on the media-object on the page and choose load.

  43. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy to mute websites. I've been doing so for a a long time.le For example:
    facebook-hosts.txt

  44. Re:change the default...opt in to sound, not opt o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, you know, make the whole problem go away by disabling autoplay for all audio/video content, just like it was in the early days of the web. Oh, wait, Google owns YouTube... that'll never happen.

  45. Put a mute button on your mouse by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    I assigned one of the buttons on my mouse to mute/unmute. Simce the last thing I probably did was click a link, my hand is already there and it's mutted in a fraction of a second. Works great for Youtube ads where by the time you muted using "normal" controls, you'd have already watched enough of the ad to skip it. Most of your modern mouses come with software to reassign a button to "mute" or one of many other functions.