Slashdot Mirror


New Kind of Gravitational Wave Source Detected? (nature.com)

"Scientists possibly detected an entirely different type of gravitational wave [source]," writes schwit1. "Gossip over potential detection of colliding neutron stars has astronomers in a tizzy," reports Nature: Astrophysicists may have detected gravitational waves last week from the collision of two neutron stars in a distant galaxy -- and telescopes trained on the same region might also have spotted the event. Rumours to that effect are spreading fast online, much to researchers' excitement. Such a detection could mark a new era of astronomy: one in which phenomena are both seen by conventional telescopes and 'heard' as vibrations in the fabric of space-time. "It would be an incredible advance in our understanding," says Stuart Shapiro, an astrophysicist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign...

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) in Louisiana and Washington state has three times detected gravitational waves -- ripples in the fabric of space-time -- emerging from colliding black holes. But scientists have been hoping to detect ripples from another cosmic cataclysm, such as the merger of neutron stars, remnants of large stars that exploded but were not massive enough to collapse into a black hole.

One astronomer tweeted last week that "merging neutron-neutron star is the initial call," while Nature adds that the same rumor had already been circulating privately, according to "some astronomers who do not want to be identified."

Friday Ligo announced cautiously that "We are working hard to assure that the candidates are valid gravitational-wave events, and it will require time to establish the level of confidence needed to bring any results to the scientific community and the greater public. We will let you know as soon we have information ready to share."

5 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Not a new kind by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But a new reason for them being formed.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  2. New kind of gravitational wave detected by Goondra · · Score: 5, Informative

    NO, NO, NO! A gravitational wave is a gravitational wave. The correct title of the article should have be "New source of gravitational waves detected". The new source is binary neutron star merging as compared to binary black hold merging.

    --
    DGDanforth
  3. Re:Gravitational waves are pseudoscience by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider that a wave implies that something is oscillating, otherwise you don't have a wave at all. Scientists can't even explain what is oscillating when these supposed gravitational waves occur, which is a huge problem

    Um, they can and have. The curvature of spacetime is what's rippling, and the observable effect is changes in distance and/or timeflow. It's a consequence of the general theory of relativity.

  4. Re:The Scam Continues by stevelinton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not a gravitational wave astronomer (or any other kind) but I know some physics and I am interested in the details of highly precise astronomical instruments. LIGO can, and does, measure variations in the length of the arms of the interferometer of the order of 10^-18 meters. There are many techniques needed to achieve this accuracy -- extremely stable laser sources where neither the power level nor the phase varies by much more than the inevitable statistical variation due to the beam being made up of photons; very powerful lasers so that that statistical noise is as small as possible in comparison with the total signal; the path is between very solid quartz mirrors VERY carefully suspended in a vacuum, with active damping of some vibration frequencies and active control of the mirror temperature; the beam bounces up and down the tunnels many times, so that the effective path length is longer; etc. etc.. In normal operation the paths are adjusted until the signals from the two arms precisely cancel one another out (destructive interference) and then any change in path lengths, even if only a very tiny fraction of a wavelength, shows up as a small fraction of the very powerful beams not interfering destructively, but instead being detected by a very sensitive detector, etc. etc,

    It's a triumph of laser engineering and should be celebrated.

  5. Re:Speed of propagation by stevelinton · · Score: 3, Informative

    The supernova signal is due to the time it takes the photons to get out through the remains of the exploding star. They are reabsorbed and reemitted multiple times in this jouney. The neutrinos come straight from the core and mostly escape directly.