Slashdot Mirror


Police Allegedly Arrest UK News Photographer For Standing In A Field (wordpress.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader Andy Smith, a Scotland-based news photographer, writes: I'm a press photographer. Slashdot has previously covered how the police used underhanded tactics to seize some of my work photos. But that was far from the end of the story. Several months of harassment culminated in me being arrested for standing in a field, something protected by law here in Scotland. I was given a police caution, which is a formal alternative to prosecution, but the police then cancelled the caution and prosecuted me anyway. Ironically, I was meant to be joining the police this month as a volunteer, but that has now been delayed by at least six months.
Earlier Andy had filmed the same police sergeant warning him not to photograph a minor traffic accident -- which had "seemed to anger him."

7 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds typical by burtosis · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's only a matter of time before a journalist is arrested for being outstanding in the field.

  2. Re:Good. by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Let's not forget how utterly corrupt and liberal the press has become. I don't know about the UK but here in the USA the mainstream press is 100% bullshit all day every day. "

    While in the UK Foxnews got cancelled because nobody watches it.

  3. Re:Just desserts by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    filming XXX doing their jobs in the hope that he will catch one of them slipping up

    Hilariously, that seems to be the point of the notorious British CCTV surveillance nightmare. ;-p

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  4. Re:Journalist forgets he doesn't live in the USA.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well done for the USA! USA! USA! post. No journalist has ever been threatened arrested or beaten for photographing the police in the US, despite it being legal.

    It's legal here too.

    generally you'll have no trouble finding a lawyer if you ran into that sort of issue here.

    His union has been support.

    So just stop photographing the police, and be glad it's the least of your worries.

    If the police are afraid of what might happen if the public see them in action, it'll rapidly become the greatest of your worries.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  5. Re:Short on details by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Informative

    This didn't happen in England - it happened in Scotland, where it's explicitly written into law that it's completely legal to walk on someone else's land as long as you don't cause damage.

  6. Re:Short on details by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... or cause danger, or intrude on privacy. I.e. you won't have access to someone's back yard where they might reasonably expect privacy, or to a pasture with dangerous animals, but a field is fair game. If planted, footpaths must be provided to cross or skirt them, so you don't impede on the public right of way.

    It's also a crime to prevent people from access without a good reason (and ownership is explicitly not a good reason). I.e. the policeman here is the one who should be prosecuted.

  7. Re: Just desserts by alexo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rule of thumb: If it's an AC post, assume trolling (or just douchebaggery).
    https://www.penny-arcade.com/c...