Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Finds a New Service To Copy: Tinder (vice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report from Motherboard, written by Jacob Dube: Facebook is trying out a new feature that connects users on its Messenger chat platform, but only if they both accept. It looks a lot like Tinder, except it only appears to be connecting people who are already friends with each other. While using Facebook on my phone Wednesday night, I was greeted by a notification that said "[Name redacted] and 15 others may want to meet up with you this week." When I opened the link, I was taken to a page with photos of my Facebook friends and a question: "Want to meet up with [name redacted] this week?" It indicated that my response would be private unless we both said yes. Tap "No Thanks," and that's the end of it. The feature seems to be in beta, and, though it is currently available to me and a few of my friends in Canada, the rest of Motherboard was unable to access it. It's unclear what the feature might be called. It's not hard to see the similarity between the feature and dating apps like Tinder or Bumble, but the Facebook feature seems to connect you only to people you already know, and could have already reached on the Messenger app. The feature didn't just show me potential love interests, however. It also displayed some of my friends, indicating that it might be used to encourage people who are already friends on Facebook to hang out IRL. "People often use Facebook to make plans with their friends," a Facebook spokesperson told Motherboard in an email. "So, we're running a very small test in the Facebook app to make that easier. We look forward to hearing people's feedback." The test is reportedly limited to a small number of users in parts of Toronto and New Zealand, on iOS and Android.

46 comments

  1. Not the First time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel like that this is not the FIRST time they've done this...

    1. Re: Not the First time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm about 75% of the way towards deleting Facebook off my phone.

      For some reason it thinks it's appropriate to ask if I know every single person on the planet, even if there's no link between us.

      At first I got a kick out of seeing random pretty girls, but it

    2. Re: Not the First time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Random pretty girls are probably spies anyways.

    3. Re: Not the First time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /s/meet/hook/g

    4. Re: Not the First time... by gnick · · Score: 2

      At first I got a kick out of seeing random pretty girls, but it

      The cake is a lie.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. seems to be in beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just how Zuck rolls, permabeta.

  3. Social media depression by amanaplanacanalpanam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So now I can feel guilty when declining requests by people I don't want to hang out with...and feel rejected when people I do want to hang out with decline mine.

    1. Re:Social media depression by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Sort of like when people you're not that into send a friend request, and when you send a friend request to people not that into you...

      clearly, that's a new experience for the Facebook faithful.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Social media depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who (in their sane / correct / right mind) is still using or joining ArseBook? It is well past the time to abandon the Social Media ship.

      And yet the marketeers still find ready victims for their Siri / Alexa... are modern humans THAT stupid?

    3. Re:Social media depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ArseBook.com, eh? Sounds like a perfect site for those who are into anal.

  4. Re:Creimer's a homo by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    the only grinder he's into is the sandwich variety, and he's what you'd call an enthusiast.

  5. Let me get this straight by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So the website which lets you pretend to be "friends" with a bunch of people you haven't seen in years is trying to develop a specific service where you use the website to see if they want to meet up in real life? Like you wouldn't have thought of that yourself, already?

    What is this actually adding to the equation, other than maybe some level of plausible deniability?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Let me get this straight by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Funny

      What is this actually adding to the equation, other than maybe some level of plausible deniability?

      Most people are too shy to just text "DTF?" to their local friends.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Let me get this straight by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      surprised it's not including the people who've you searched for (or have searched for you)

      that would make way, way more sense (other than the obvious creepy factor)

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Facebook start as a way to see if students at your university were single?

      This fits right in with that...

    4. Re: Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict a bunch of STDs as sex becomes more accessible.

    5. Re:Let me get this straight by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Ooh good call, they'll totally do that even if they don't admit to it...

    6. Re: Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you haven't been to a red light district.

    7. Re:Let me get this straight by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What is this actually adding to the equation, other than maybe some level of plausible deniability?

      And only in one direction. If it asks you, you can't assume that the other person has said yes. But if you say yes and it doesn't "connect" you, or whatever, you can assume that the other person said no. So the person who got dissed knows it, but the person who isn't interested can't tell that the other person is.

      It might be better if there were a degree of randomness, where you couldn't be certain whether the other person was even asked, or where maybe the person is a friend of a friend instead of someone you actually know....

      That said, this is arguably worse than having no plausible deniability; in fact, it's exactly backwards from an ideal outcome. An ideal design would be to minimize the chances of someone getting hurt, such that the person who get rejected wouldn't know that he/she got rejected, but so that the person would know for sure if he/she got asked because the other person was interested or just randomly. An algorithm for achieving such an outcome is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re: Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring a condom.

    9. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically what Tinder does.

    10. Re:Let me get this straight by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Informative

      Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
      Zuck: Just ask.
      Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
      [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
      Zuck: People just submitted it.
      Zuck: I don't know why.
      Zuck: They "trust me"
      Zuck: Dumb fucks.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:Let me get this straight by coofercat · · Score: 1

      It's almost like they've invented a way to contact people you know - sort of like a paper letter, but electronic, but at the same time sort of like a phone call, but one you type out rather than using your voice.

      I tell you, those FB engineers have really excelled this time ;-)

    12. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *phone dings*
      *guy checks F@#%book app* "You're drunk, and your crush is spending another night alone. Swipe left to send a booty-call text."

  6. Creimer is fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because he's a fat lardo! Hahahaha!

  7. Re:Creimer's a homo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is more true than creimer's claim that he eats a low calorie, low carb diet. There's no way he'd still be the morbidly obese lardo that he is.

  8. Fuckface and Goofle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is their main strategy anymore.

  9. Gotta say it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've got to say that if I had a Facecrook account, I'd be annoyed but since I don't, I find the whole thing amusing!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope the onions didn't fall off your belt as you typed that up.

    2. Re:Gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! It was the style at the time!

    3. Re:Gotta say it by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      You said "Facecrook" oh how clever.. Do you use "M$" too? well done.

    4. Re:Gotta say it by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Those with a facebook icon next to their username have no business posting anything about facebook.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to say that if I had a Facecrook account...

      NOBODY cares that you're not on FB. There's no reason to announce it. Do you also not own a television? We're dying to know.

      Facecrook... How clever... Do you also say Shillary?

    6. Re:Gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Facecrook employee.

    7. Re:Gotta say it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You said "Facecrook" oh how clever.. Do you use "M$" too? well done.

      ....says the schmuck with a Facebook tag to the right of his name! LOL, too funny!

      Do you work for them or do you just suck Zuckerberg's cock for free?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    8. Re:Gotta say it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Facecrook... How clever... Do you also say Shillary?

      No, I say "The candidate who was so bad that even a lying, cheating scumbag like Donald Trump could beat her".

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  10. They are calling the new app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Friends with Benefits

  11. Facebook is always experimenting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story behind Facebook can be found in "The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook: A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal" by Ben Mezrich, which "The Social Network" movie was based on. "The Boy Kings: A Journey into the Heart of the Social Network" by Katherine Losse takes place after the movie and from a woman's perspective that I'm currently reading. The most recent Facebook-related book is "Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley" by Antonio Garcia Martinez, who sold his startup and engineers to Twitter while getting a job at Facebook in a three-way deal, and developed the ad system at Facebook that tracks both logged in and anonymous users with third-party demographic data.

  12. Do you know X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    According to our big data analysis, you two should fuck.

  13. It's Social Manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything Facebook does is part of some kind of social manipulation or another. I would be interested to know how Facebook puts these gatherings together. My prediction is that Facebook will choose groups of people to try to get together, where a majority of the attendees have more liberal thought patterns than the others, in an attempt to make moderates and right-leaners feel like they should think more like liberals.

    That's just my prediction, though, based on Mark Zuckerberg's clear devotion to far-left socialist authoritarian views.

  14. So turning it into another dating site then? by ShamblerBishop · · Score: 1

    Generally when people get together with someone after meeting online, they'll close off their online dating accounts - since people won't want their partner to still be using an online dating site, while with them - something Facebook should consider if they're going to try and go down this route...

  15. OPT OUT OPTION PLEASE by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Facebook, please give us a way to opt out of these additional services. I'm not interested in a marketplace or these add-on services you keep adding. If you're going to add it, at least allow me to customize my experience to suit my preferences, k thx bai. I have actually started using Facebook a lot less. There is a game I really like that I found on Facebook but now because they keep making Facebook into this hulking albatross, I found a way to access it outside of Facebook. If it weren't for me wanting to keep somewhat in touch with old friends and family, I probably wouldn't use Facebook at all.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  16. Relationship status by crtreece · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the relationship status (single, married, complicated) the people this is going out to have set. Knowing that would give a clue as to whether this was supposed to be a dating tool, or just some push to get you meeting up with people IRL.

    --
    file: .signature not found
  17. Dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook should call it "Finder" (rhyming with Tinder), so when you meet someone it's a Finder Binder (fender bender) -- because it's a stupid app and even dumber idea.

  18. Bang With Friends redux by JimDot · · Score: 1

    The Bang With Friends app lets you tag friends you want to bang. If they happen to also use the app and also tag you then it connects you. It made news 4-5 years ago but it appears to still be around: https://www.facebook.com/searc...