Slashdot Mirror
Are We Being Watched? Tens of Other Worlds Could Spot the Earth (eurekalert.org)
A group of scientists from Queen's University Belfast and the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Germany have turned exoplanet-hunting on its head, in a study that instead looks at how an alien observer might be able to detect Earth using our own methods. From a report: They find that at least nine exoplanets are ideally placed to observe transits of Earth, in a new work published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Thanks to facilities and missions such as SuperWASP and Kepler, we have now discovered thousands of planets orbiting stars other than our Sun, worlds known as 'exoplanets.' The vast majority of these are found when the planets cross in front of their host stars in what are known as 'transits,' which allow astronomers to see light from the host star dim slightly at regular intervals every time the planet passes between us and the distant star. In the new study, the authors reverse this concept and ask, "How would an alien observer see the Solar System?" They identified parts of the distant sky from where various planets in our Solar System could be seen to pass in front of the Sun - so-called 'transit zones' -- concluding that the terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars) are actually much more likely to be spotted than the more distant 'Jovian' planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune), despite their much larger size. To look for worlds where civilisations would have the best chance of spotting our Solar System, the astronomers looked for parts of the sky from which more than one planet could be seen crossing the face of the Sun. They found that three planets at most could be observed from anywhere outside of the Solar System, and that not all combinations of three planets are possible.
No, but our ancestors might be.
Is it because they do not support life?
That their live is not advanced enough?
That they are trying to contact us, but we cannot detect their message.
That it is a quality of advanced civilisations that they ignore each other (or defer contact until some defined "level" of civilisation has been reached).
or are they on their way, right now.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
The majority of life has two suns not one.
Probably but it's not impossible that, for whatever reason, life might have a better chance of arising in a single-star system.
Don't phrase assumptions as facts.
The majority of life has two suns not one.
The majority of stars are in binary systems, but this does not necessarily mean that the majority of life will be found in such systems.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
They are looking for worlds that could see us using our current technology. Its an interesting study, but 100 years ago we would have tried (and failed) with a very different technique (direct telescopic examination). 100 years from now we may be using a completely different technology (solar system sized interferometers?, Some new trick to drastically reduce stray light in an image? X-ray telescopes? I have no idea) )
We know nothing about alien technology (if it even exists). It may have followed similar paths to ours, but it might be wildly different.
Considering that we detect planets that transit the parent star, and that we've detected thousands of them, AND that such an occultation is visible ONLY when the Earth is precisely on the plane of that system's ecliptic ... the only viable conclusion must be that planets around other star systems are LITERALLY as "common as dirt". It's likely that there are planets around MOST stars.
John Mulaney has an outstanding story about "What's New Pussycat" and the best dinner he's ever had.
No, but that's the way you'd bet.
. . .we're reality Three-V.
". . . as J'mm tests the native female with the Anal Probe, consider how Mutual of Andromeda protects your homeworld from pesky alien intrusions. . . "
- Mrrl'nn Prk'nz, host of "Mutual of Andromeda's 'Wild Planet'"
Probably but it's not impossible that, for whatever reason, life might have a better chance of arising in a single-star system.
Life is highly unlikely to arise on a planet around a double star unless the two stars were very close together. The temperature variations as the planet orbited them would be tremendous, that is if the orbit were stable at all.