Slashdot Mirror
Equifax Breach Provokes Calls For Serious Data Protection Reforms (wired.com)
Equifax's data breach was colossal -- but what should happen next? The Guardian writes:
The problem is that companies like Equifax are able to accumulate -- essentially, without limit -- as much sensitive, personal data as they can get their hands on. There is an urgent need for strict regulations on what types of data companies can collect and how much data a company can possess, both in aggregate and about individuals. At the very least, this will lessen the severity and size of (inevitable) data breaches... Without putting hard limits on the data capitalists who extract and exploit our personal information, they will continue to reap the benefit while we bear the risks.
Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, adds, "we need to penalize companies that collect SSNs but can't protect [them]." Wired reports: Experts across numerous privacy and security fields agree that the solution to the over-collection and over-use of SSNs isn't one particular replacement, but a diverse array of authentications like individual codes (similar to passwords), biometrics, and even physical tokens to create more variation in the ID process. Some also argue that the government likely won't be the driving force behind the shift. "We have a government that works at a glacial pace in the best of times," says Brenda Sharton, who chairs the Privacy & Cybersecurity practice at the Goodwin law firm, which has worked on data privacy breach investigations since the early 2000s. "There will reach a point where SSN [exposure] becomes untenable. And it may push us in the direction of having companies require multi-factor authentication."
Meanwhile TechCrunch argues, "This crass, callow, and lazy treatment of our digital data cannot stand...": We must create new, secure methods for cryptographically securing our data... These old organizations -- Equifax was founded in 1899 and hasn't changed much since inception -- must die, to be replaced by solutions that (and I shudder to say this) are blockchain-based.
Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, adds, "we need to penalize companies that collect SSNs but can't protect [them]." Wired reports: Experts across numerous privacy and security fields agree that the solution to the over-collection and over-use of SSNs isn't one particular replacement, but a diverse array of authentications like individual codes (similar to passwords), biometrics, and even physical tokens to create more variation in the ID process. Some also argue that the government likely won't be the driving force behind the shift. "We have a government that works at a glacial pace in the best of times," says Brenda Sharton, who chairs the Privacy & Cybersecurity practice at the Goodwin law firm, which has worked on data privacy breach investigations since the early 2000s. "There will reach a point where SSN [exposure] becomes untenable. And it may push us in the direction of having companies require multi-factor authentication."
Meanwhile TechCrunch argues, "This crass, callow, and lazy treatment of our digital data cannot stand...": We must create new, secure methods for cryptographically securing our data... These old organizations -- Equifax was founded in 1899 and hasn't changed much since inception -- must die, to be replaced by solutions that (and I shudder to say this) are blockchain-based.
An SSN is a good primary key in a database because each SSN should correspond to a unique person. It's a terrible way, however, for proof of identity. We essentially use it as a username, but also as a password, and a password that you're unable to change. Furthermore, by law, you have to provide it to banks and some other institutions to use their services. You need to share your SSN with your employer in order to get paid for your job. And you have to trust that none of these entities will mishandle your SSN.
How about using the SSN for the primary key it is and doing away with it altogether for proof of identity. Mandate that financial institutions use other proof of identity such as one time use passwords and public key encryption. Devalue the SSN and, at the same time, replace it with a secure means to prove identity. The government does have a role, because they can and do regulate entities like financial institutions.
These old organizations -- Equifax was founded in 1899 and hasn't changed much since inception -- must die, to be replaced by solutions that (and I shudder to say this) are blockchain-based.
About as insightful as the apper guy. Blockchain magic fixes everything. Also since when did the age of a company was a good predictor of an internal cowboy culture?
I have a very simple solution for policymakers to implement:
- Name + phone hacked = $2 penalty
- Name + address hacked = $3 penalty
- Name + SSN hacked = $5 penalty
- etc., and combinations of the above, just multiply.
Things would get fixed right quick.
... horse escapes from wide-open barn! Farmer encouraged to shut the f-ing door!
Bright godz, what a mess...
I'll believe that corporations are people when I see one executed. As the saying goes.
Regulatory filings show the three Equifax executives — Chief Financial Officer John Gamble, U.S. Information Solutions President Joseph Loughran and Workforce Solutions President Rodolfo Ploder — completed stock sales on Aug. 1 and 2.
Wait, that guy is named John Gamble? and he is the damned CEO?
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Right now, it's in the best interests of the corporation to allow the details to be stolen.
Assuming the customer even catches the theft, they're still responsible for the first $50 dollars. And if the company chooses to dispute the customer's claim, they might get more than that.
The seller and processor all file claims with their insurance company, and get their money back.
In short, everyone but the victim wins.
Until that changes, this will continue to happen.
[End Of Line]
Penalties are aiming in the wrong direction because leaks will continue to happen. Better to change finance law so that the victim is presumed innocent until proven guilty. A victim should not be penalized. Rather, the lender who fails to perform due diligence and verify identity before extending credit should lose. That would be a powerful motivation for the finance industry to adopt new techniques that minimize their risk of losing.
In no place this should be considered "credentials". But the US financial institutions pretend these are secret passwords.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
(1) We should have control over our personal information, and no one should be allowed to collect it, sell it, and most importantly, use it against us or to manipulate us without our knowledge. I think that must start with the right to control WHERE that personal knowledge is stored (because possession is still 9 points of the law).
(2) Those parts of our personal information that have become public should be visible to ALL of the public. As it might apply in an improved Slashdot, I would thus be able use that public information to save time by ignoring people with low reputations. No insult intended [to the authors of rather mindless comments on today's Slashdot?], but I'd prefer to spend as much time as possible consorting with people who are nicer and smarter than I am and zero time (or less) being distracted by trolls.
(3) I'd be willing to help pay for such systems, both in terms of development and ongoing costs.
Feeling like a broken record stuck on an old joke, but lots of detailed suggestions available upon polite request. Even nicer if you have some better ideas, but if you have nothing to say, then why don't you say nothing?
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
A) Equifax gets sued out of existence
B) The Equifax Security Cxx is held personally liable, and faces serious prison time
C) The other Cxx's are held personally liable, and get to eat based on how many cans they can dig out of trash dumpsters.
Until something like this happens you and I are fucked, while the 1% glide along with no problem.
It is weird to see proposal to introduce high tech solutions to fix the reliance on SSN: cryptography, biometry... All that solutions will have flaws
Another option could be to look at the numerous other countries in the world, where knowing your SSN has never been enough to get a credit on your behalf, or to sell your house.
SSNs, birthdates and associated names should all be considered public knowledge, since none of them are revokable (or realistically revokable, in the case of SSNs and names). Relying on an SSN and/or birthdate as a password is madness.
Regulation can be dangerous, but it seems this is a situation where it is called for: when a citizen's liberty is being trampled; and the Equifax breach will trample on people's liberty for decades to come – yet they are offering a pittance of one year's credit monitoring as if this will help for a lifetime of damage. Perhaps the EU's GDPR takes things a bit too far for the USA, but it can be used as a reference point, and we need something in our citizen's rights to their own identity in this modern world.
There are many technical solutions available, but out the gate, it seems like we should be seeking some greater level of culpability on behalf of those holding this data, perhaps even considering the GDPR in context. We can at least ask that of our government. A petition has been started to at least raise visibility of this to congress. Start the dialog at the right levels, and hope it will not get steamrolled by lobbyists.
tora
Nothing will happen at the federal level right away because of this.
The banks are too powerful. These are the same guys who pushed binding arbitration in consumer contracts of adhesion.
States will need to take the initiative first. Let's hope that the banks don't have the power to pass a federal law to preempt the flurry of state laws which will come out of this.
Death by a thousand cuts at the state level might prompt a 'watered down' federal update to the Federal Credit Reporting Act, but it will end up pre-empting any state laws with a decent set of teeth.
Sometimes I worry about the rule of law and equal protection under the law in the US. It the banking cartel can rip off everyone by sidestepping the rule of law with binding arbitration, why can't a sniper take out a banker or two?
When anyone accuses you of something you accuse them of it 10x.
It's easier when your adversary is a corrupt, thieving, lying piece of garbage. At this point I'm starting to wonder about the real involvment of the Russians in the election; if they are indeed smart as chess players, maybe what they did was make sure that the Democrats picked the worst possible candidate instead of the guy that clearly embodies the real liberal values.
But when it comes to Equifax, this comparison hardly applies because Equifax are not evil, they're merely incompetent, and have been for a long time. They're just like Diebold (the makers of those hilarious MS-Access based voting machines); once you start scratching the surface you just can't help but freak out when you realize how fucking retarded they are.
lucm, indeed.
It's not a matter of increased security, it's simply a matter of following known best practices and being diligent in applying patches and hotfixes.
Equifax are complete morons. Last year they settled a lawsuit because of another security "breach": someone figured out that customers could login using a PIN made of the last 4 digits of their SSN and the 4 digits of their birth year. We're not talking about military-grade security being defeated by criminal mastermind. Those guys are complete and absolute incompetents.
They could fix their entire set of weaknesses and prevent further exploits by reading the bullet points of a CISSP tutorial and following them. That's all there is to it.
lucm, indeed.
Hahahahahahahaha!
So you wanna keep a couple hundred million dollars in a Somali bank? Oh my brother, have I got a great deal for you on a slightly used bridge...
But when it comes to Equifax, this comparison hardly applies because Equifax are not evil, they're merely incompetent
Are you joking? They were the datamining scum-of-the-earth bastards before Silicon Valley even invented the term for it. Their entire business is founded upon the notion of putting people into indentured servitude via debt.